Supporting information
Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039074/ez2093sup1.cif | |
Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807039074/ez2093Isup2.hkl |
CCDC reference: 660263
Key indicators
- Single-crystal X-ray study
- T = 290 K
- Mean (C-C) = 0.005 Å
- R factor = 0.054
- wR factor = 0.127
- Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.7
checkCIF/PLATON results
No syntax errors found
Alert level B PLAT026_ALERT_3_B Ratio Observed / Unique Reflections too Low .... 39 Perc.
Alert level C PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 5
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
2,6-dichlorobenzaldehyde (100 mmol) in absolute ethanol (30 ml) was added to ethylenediamine (50 mmol) and stirred for 24 h. The colorless crystalline solid was filtered and washed with ether and hexane. Very small crystals were obtained by recrystallization from dichloromethane. It was not possible to obtain larger crystals.
All H atoms were geometrically positioned and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The very small crystals led to weak data and a low ratio of observed to unique reflections.
In the present study the structure of the title compound, which can be used as tetradentate ligand coordinating to metals and/or for the preparation of crystalline polymers, is investigated. Previously, novel coordination polymers containing silver ions bridged by the monochloro-substituted equivalent of the title compound has been studied (Richmond et al., 1988). In addition, various macrocyclic compounds can be synthesized by template condensation of ethane-1,2-diimine or related blocks (Helldörfer et al., 2003).
The molecular structure of (I) and the atom-numbering scheme are shown in Fig. 1. Relatively weak intermolecular van der Waals interactions are present between neighboring molecules, stabilizing the crystal structure. Two benzyl rings, which are connected through the diimine group, lie in two parallel planes with a dihedral angle of zero. The two carbon and two nitrogen atoms in the ethane-1,2-diimine chain are co-planar, with an N1—C8—C8—N1 torsion angle of 180.0 (0)°, as there is a centre of symmetry between the two central carbon atoms.
For related literature, see: Helldörfer et al. (2003); Richmond et al. (1988).
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2003).
Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) showing the atom labelling scheme, with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. |
C16H12Cl4N2 | F(000) = 380 |
Mr = 374.08 | Dx = 1.507 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 5106 reflections |
a = 3.9704 (5) Å | θ = 4.0–32.2° |
b = 14.3246 (13) Å | µ = 0.71 mm−1 |
c = 14.4926 (14) Å | T = 290 K |
β = 90.201 (9)° | Block, colourless |
V = 824.25 (15) Å3 | 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm |
Z = 2 |
Oxford Diffraction XcaliburII with SapphireIII CCD diffractometer | 1585 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 621 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.098 |
Detector resolution: 12 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 4.0° |
ω scans at different φ | h = −4→4 |
Absorption correction: numerical X-RED and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1997) | k = −15→17 |
Tmin = 0.749, Tmax = 0.853 | l = −15→17 |
5106 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.127 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.054P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 0.80 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
1585 reflections | Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 |
101 parameters | Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL97, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.016 (3) |
C16H12Cl4N2 | V = 824.25 (15) Å3 |
Mr = 374.08 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 3.9704 (5) Å | µ = 0.71 mm−1 |
b = 14.3246 (13) Å | T = 290 K |
c = 14.4926 (14) Å | 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm |
β = 90.201 (9)° |
Oxford Diffraction XcaliburII with SapphireIII CCD diffractometer | 1585 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: numerical X-RED and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1997) | 621 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.749, Tmax = 0.853 | Rint = 0.098 |
5106 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.127 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.80 | Δρmax = 0.30 e Å−3 |
1585 reflections | Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3 |
101 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cl1 | 0.8556 (3) | 0.96684 (8) | 0.13206 (7) | 0.0833 (5) | |
Cl2 | 0.7366 (3) | 1.24856 (7) | 0.37687 (7) | 0.0899 (5) | |
N1 | 0.7752 (7) | 1.0293 (2) | 0.3933 (2) | 0.0582 (9) | |
C1 | 0.7773 (8) | 1.1105 (2) | 0.2499 (2) | 0.0482 (9) | |
C2 | 0.7342 (9) | 1.0791 (3) | 0.1596 (2) | 0.0552 (10) | |
C3 | 0.5925 (11) | 1.1355 (3) | 0.0922 (3) | 0.0721 (12) | |
H3 | 0.5629 | 1.1129 | 0.0325 | 0.086* | |
C4 | 0.4978 (12) | 1.2233 (4) | 0.1134 (3) | 0.0813 (14) | |
H4 | 0.4055 | 1.2611 | 0.0676 | 0.098* | |
C5 | 0.5349 (11) | 1.2583 (3) | 0.2017 (3) | 0.0746 (12) | |
H5 | 0.4673 | 1.3187 | 0.2160 | 0.089* | |
C6 | 0.6755 (9) | 1.2008 (3) | 0.2678 (2) | 0.0577 (10) | |
C7 | 0.9218 (9) | 1.0470 (2) | 0.3199 (3) | 0.0547 (10) | |
H7 | 1.1297 | 1.0194 | 0.3086 | 0.066* | |
C8 | 0.9438 (9) | 0.9702 (2) | 0.4596 (2) | 0.0604 (11) | |
H8A | 1.1373 | 0.9405 | 0.4313 | 0.072* | |
H8B | 0.7917 | 0.9218 | 0.4807 | 0.072* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cl1 | 0.1191 (11) | 0.0660 (8) | 0.0647 (7) | 0.0050 (7) | −0.0062 (7) | −0.0082 (6) |
Cl2 | 0.1344 (11) | 0.0710 (8) | 0.0645 (8) | 0.0043 (7) | −0.0006 (7) | −0.0138 (6) |
N1 | 0.055 (2) | 0.072 (2) | 0.0469 (18) | 0.0036 (18) | −0.0077 (16) | 0.0153 (17) |
C1 | 0.050 (2) | 0.052 (2) | 0.042 (2) | −0.0046 (19) | 0.0016 (18) | 0.0082 (18) |
C2 | 0.059 (3) | 0.054 (2) | 0.052 (2) | −0.0002 (19) | 0.004 (2) | 0.009 (2) |
C3 | 0.093 (3) | 0.076 (3) | 0.047 (2) | −0.006 (3) | −0.010 (2) | 0.013 (2) |
C4 | 0.095 (4) | 0.084 (4) | 0.064 (3) | 0.007 (3) | −0.009 (3) | 0.025 (3) |
C5 | 0.091 (3) | 0.058 (3) | 0.075 (3) | 0.009 (2) | 0.009 (3) | 0.013 (2) |
C6 | 0.066 (3) | 0.061 (3) | 0.046 (2) | −0.002 (2) | 0.0076 (19) | 0.000 (2) |
C7 | 0.055 (2) | 0.057 (3) | 0.052 (2) | 0.000 (2) | −0.009 (2) | 0.005 (2) |
C8 | 0.065 (3) | 0.067 (3) | 0.049 (2) | 0.001 (2) | −0.011 (2) | 0.0113 (19) |
Cl1—C2 | 1.727 (4) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
Cl2—C6 | 1.738 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.382 (5) |
N1—C7 | 1.241 (4) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
N1—C8 | 1.443 (4) | C5—C6 | 1.381 (5) |
C1—C6 | 1.381 (5) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C1—C2 | 1.393 (4) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C1—C7 | 1.477 (4) | C8—C8i | 1.515 (6) |
C2—C3 | 1.386 (5) | C8—H8A | 0.9700 |
C3—C4 | 1.348 (5) | C8—H8B | 0.9700 |
C7—N1—C8 | 118.2 (3) | C6—C5—H5 | 121.0 |
C6—C1—C2 | 116.3 (3) | C4—C5—H5 | 121.0 |
C6—C1—C7 | 124.1 (3) | C5—C6—C1 | 123.1 (3) |
C2—C1—C7 | 119.6 (3) | C5—C6—Cl2 | 116.9 (3) |
C3—C2—C1 | 121.5 (4) | C1—C6—Cl2 | 120.0 (3) |
C3—C2—Cl1 | 119.5 (3) | N1—C7—C1 | 122.2 (4) |
C1—C2—Cl1 | 118.9 (3) | N1—C7—H7 | 118.9 |
C4—C3—C2 | 119.7 (4) | C1—C7—H7 | 118.9 |
C4—C3—H3 | 120.1 | N1—C8—C8i | 108.6 (4) |
C2—C3—H3 | 120.1 | N1—C8—H8A | 110.0 |
C3—C4—C5 | 121.4 (4) | C8i—C8—H8A | 110.0 |
C3—C4—H4 | 119.3 | N1—C8—H8B | 110.0 |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.3 | C8i—C8—H8B | 110.0 |
C6—C5—C4 | 117.9 (4) | H8A—C8—H8B | 108.4 |
C6—C1—C2—C3 | −0.9 (5) | C2—C1—C6—C5 | 0.6 (6) |
C7—C1—C2—C3 | 178.5 (3) | C7—C1—C6—C5 | −178.7 (4) |
C6—C1—C2—Cl1 | −180.0 (3) | C2—C1—C6—Cl2 | −176.9 (3) |
C7—C1—C2—Cl1 | −0.6 (5) | C7—C1—C6—Cl2 | 3.7 (5) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 1.0 (6) | C8—N1—C7—C1 | −176.9 (3) |
Cl1—C2—C3—C4 | −179.9 (4) | C6—C1—C7—N1 | 54.5 (5) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | −0.8 (7) | C2—C1—C7—N1 | −124.8 (4) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0.6 (7) | C7—N1—C8—C8i | 108.0 (5) |
C4—C5—C6—C1 | −0.5 (6) | N1—C8—C8i—N1i | 180.000 (4) |
C4—C5—C6—Cl2 | 177.1 (3) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | C16H12Cl4N2 |
Mr | 374.08 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 290 |
a, b, c (Å) | 3.9704 (5), 14.3246 (13), 14.4926 (14) |
β (°) | 90.201 (9) |
V (Å3) | 824.25 (15) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 0.71 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.1 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Oxford Diffraction XcaliburII with SapphireIII CCD |
Absorption correction | Numerical X-RED and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1997) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.749, 0.853 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 5106, 1585, 621 |
Rint | 0.098 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.617 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.054, 0.127, 0.80 |
No. of reflections | 1585 |
No. of parameters | 101 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.30, −0.24 |
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2003), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2003), CrysAlis RED, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2001), PLATON (Spek, 2003).
In the present study the structure of the title compound, which can be used as tetradentate ligand coordinating to metals and/or for the preparation of crystalline polymers, is investigated. Previously, novel coordination polymers containing silver ions bridged by the monochloro-substituted equivalent of the title compound has been studied (Richmond et al., 1988). In addition, various macrocyclic compounds can be synthesized by template condensation of ethane-1,2-diimine or related blocks (Helldörfer et al., 2003).
The molecular structure of (I) and the atom-numbering scheme are shown in Fig. 1. Relatively weak intermolecular van der Waals interactions are present between neighboring molecules, stabilizing the crystal structure. Two benzyl rings, which are connected through the diimine group, lie in two parallel planes with a dihedral angle of zero. The two carbon and two nitrogen atoms in the ethane-1,2-diimine chain are co-planar, with an N1—C8—C8—N1 torsion angle of 180.0 (0)°, as there is a centre of symmetry between the two central carbon atoms.