Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The conformation of the N—H bond in the title compound, C8H7Cl2NO, is syn to the ortho-chloro group and anti to the meta-chloro group, in contrast to the syn conformation observed with respect to both ortho- and meta-chloro substituents in N-(2,3-dichloro­phen­yl)acetamide and the anti conformation with respect to the meta-chloro substituent in N-(3,4-dichloro­phen­yl)acetamide. The dihedral angle between the dichloro­phenyl and acetamide groups is 44.6 (2)°. Short Cl...Cl type II contacts (Cl...Cl = 3.5 Å) and inter­molecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds link the mol­ecules into chains.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807037178/gw2016sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807037178/gw2016Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 613377

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 299 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.006 Å
  • R factor = 0.055
  • wR factor = 0.108
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.0

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level A RINTA01_ALERT_3_A The value of Rint is greater than 0.20 Rint given 0.213
Author Response: The structure is an organic compound, which scatters with minor intensity at high theta value and this has resulted in a higher than normal for R~int~(0.213).
PLAT020_ALERT_3_A The value of Rint is greater than 0.10 .........       0.21
Author Response: The structure is of an organic compound, which scatters with minor intensity at high theta value and this has resulted in a higher than normal.

Alert level C PLAT340_ALERT_3_C Low Bond Precision on C-C Bonds (x 1000) Ang ... 6
Alert level G PLAT860_ALERT_3_G Note: Number of Least-Squares Restraints ....... 1
2 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 4 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

The amide moiety is an important constituent of many biologically significant compounds. The structural studies of amides are therefore of interest (Gowda et al., 2007a,b; Gowda, Kozisek et al., 2007, and references therein; Jones et al., 1990; Wan et al., 2006). As part of a study of the effect of ring and side chain substitutions on the solid state structures of this class of compounds (Gowda et al., 2007a,b; Gowda, Kozisek et al., 2007, and references therein), the crystal structure of N-(2,5-dichlorophenyl)-acetamide (25DCPA) has been determined. The conformation of the N—H bond in 25DCPA is syn to the ortho chloro group and anti to the meta chloro group (Fig. 1), in contrast to the syn conformation observed with respect to both ortho and meta chloro substituents in N-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007b) and anti conformation observed with respect to the meta chloro substituent in N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-acetamide (Jones et al., 1990). The bond lengths and angles in 25DCPA show normal values (Allen et al., 1987). The molecular skeleton is essentially planar. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the dichlorophenyl and the acetamide moiety is 44.6 (2) °. The intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) link the molecules into chains (Fig. 2). Further, a short ClA···Cl Type II contact (distance = 3.5 Å) controls the packing in the structure.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Allen et al. (1987); Gowda et al. (2007a,b); Gowda, Kozisek et al. (2007, and references therein); Jones et al. (1990); Pies et al. (1971); Shilpa & Gowda (2007); Wan et al. (2006).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared according to the literature method of Shilpa and Gowda (Shilpa & Gowda, 2007). The purity of the compound was checked by determining its melting point. It was characterized by recording its infrared, NMR (Shilpa & Gowda, 2007) and NQR spectra (Pies et al., 1971). Single crystals of the title compound were obtained from a slow evaporation of its ethanolic solution (2 g in about 30 ml e thanol) and used for X-ray diffraction studies at room temperature.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C atoms were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C–H = 0.93 Å (CH aromatic) or 0.96 Å (CH3) and Uiso(H) = 1.5 Ueq(CH3). N—H distance was restrained to 0.86 (1) Å.

Structure description top

The amide moiety is an important constituent of many biologically significant compounds. The structural studies of amides are therefore of interest (Gowda et al., 2007a,b; Gowda, Kozisek et al., 2007, and references therein; Jones et al., 1990; Wan et al., 2006). As part of a study of the effect of ring and side chain substitutions on the solid state structures of this class of compounds (Gowda et al., 2007a,b; Gowda, Kozisek et al., 2007, and references therein), the crystal structure of N-(2,5-dichlorophenyl)-acetamide (25DCPA) has been determined. The conformation of the N—H bond in 25DCPA is syn to the ortho chloro group and anti to the meta chloro group (Fig. 1), in contrast to the syn conformation observed with respect to both ortho and meta chloro substituents in N-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-acetamide (Gowda et al., 2007b) and anti conformation observed with respect to the meta chloro substituent in N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-acetamide (Jones et al., 1990). The bond lengths and angles in 25DCPA show normal values (Allen et al., 1987). The molecular skeleton is essentially planar. The dihedral angle between the mean planes of the dichlorophenyl and the acetamide moiety is 44.6 (2) °. The intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) link the molecules into chains (Fig. 2). Further, a short ClA···Cl Type II contact (distance = 3.5 Å) controls the packing in the structure.

For related literature, see: Allen et al. (1987); Gowda et al. (2007a,b); Gowda, Kozisek et al. (2007, and references therein); Jones et al. (1990); Pies et al. (1971); Shilpa & Gowda (2007); Wan et al. (2006).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996); cell refinement: CAD-4-PC; data reduction: REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Crystal packing of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
N-(2,5-Dichlorophenyl)acetamide top
Crystal data top
C8H7Cl2NOF(000) = 416
Mr = 204.05Dx = 1.517 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54180 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 5.8557 (4) Åθ = 5.6–25.3°
b = 4.7942 (4) ŵ = 6.13 mm1
c = 31.822 (2) ÅT = 299 K
β = 90.531 (6)°Prism, white
V = 893.31 (11) Å30.15 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1017 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.213
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 66.9°, θmin = 2.8°
ω/2θ scansh = 66
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
k = 51
Tmin = 0.478, Tmax = 0.832l = 3737
3583 measured reflections3 standard reflections every 120 min
1569 independent reflections intensity decay: 1.0%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.108H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2)]
1569 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
112 parametersΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = 0.48 e Å3
Crystal data top
C8H7Cl2NOV = 893.31 (11) Å3
Mr = 204.05Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nCu Kα radiation
a = 5.8557 (4) ŵ = 6.13 mm1
b = 4.7942 (4) ÅT = 299 K
c = 31.822 (2) Å0.15 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm
β = 90.531 (6)°
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1017 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Rint = 0.213
Tmin = 0.478, Tmax = 0.8323 standard reflections every 120 min
3583 measured reflections intensity decay: 1.0%
1569 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0551 restraint
wR(F2) = 0.108H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
1569 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.48 e Å3
112 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2319 (10)0.7304 (5)0.01550 (14)0.058 (2)
H1A0.11710.59790.02340.069*
H1B0.35020.63680.00030.069*
H1C0.16430.87180.00200.069*
C20.3318 (8)0.8623 (5)0.05414 (13)0.0379 (12)
C50.5242 (9)0.7740 (5)0.12195 (12)0.0357 (12)
C60.7266 (8)0.6682 (5)0.13610 (12)0.0395 (12)
C70.8178 (9)0.7474 (6)0.17467 (15)0.0468 (14)
H70.95560.67190.18400.056*
C80.7039 (9)0.9384 (6)0.19928 (14)0.0459 (14)
H80.76380.99380.22510.055*
C90.5013 (9)1.0442 (5)0.18487 (13)0.0396 (12)
C100.4075 (9)0.9656 (5)0.14680 (13)0.0386 (12)
H100.26851.03920.13780.046*
N40.4305 (7)0.6906 (4)0.08251 (10)0.0371 (10)
H4N0.424 (7)0.522 (3)0.0752 (12)0.045*
O30.3239 (7)1.1152 (3)0.05928 (9)0.0610 (13)
Cl110.8771 (2)0.43003 (17)0.10588 (4)0.0553 (4)
Cl120.3522 (2)1.28471 (15)0.21550 (3)0.0535 (4)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.090 (5)0.0300 (13)0.053 (3)0.0036 (19)0.022 (3)0.0087 (15)
C20.043 (4)0.0297 (12)0.041 (3)0.0012 (17)0.001 (2)0.0017 (15)
C50.038 (3)0.0292 (12)0.040 (3)0.0044 (15)0.007 (2)0.0057 (14)
C60.036 (3)0.0314 (13)0.052 (3)0.0000 (17)0.001 (2)0.0075 (15)
C70.041 (4)0.0488 (16)0.051 (3)0.002 (2)0.007 (3)0.0082 (18)
C80.045 (4)0.0496 (17)0.043 (3)0.004 (2)0.011 (2)0.0026 (18)
C90.048 (4)0.0286 (13)0.043 (3)0.0049 (17)0.000 (2)0.0020 (14)
C100.042 (3)0.0298 (12)0.044 (3)0.0028 (17)0.001 (2)0.0013 (15)
N40.043 (3)0.0235 (10)0.045 (2)0.0026 (14)0.0064 (18)0.0024 (11)
O30.108 (4)0.0222 (8)0.052 (2)0.0035 (14)0.015 (2)0.0009 (11)
Cl110.0448 (10)0.0533 (5)0.0679 (9)0.0153 (5)0.0043 (6)0.0026 (5)
Cl120.0659 (12)0.0473 (4)0.0474 (8)0.0051 (5)0.0033 (6)0.0066 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.497 (4)C6—Cl111.738 (5)
C1—H1A0.9600C7—C81.381 (7)
C1—H1B0.9600C7—H70.9300
C1—H1C0.9600C8—C91.366 (6)
C2—O31.225 (3)C8—H80.9300
C2—N41.348 (4)C9—C101.378 (5)
C5—C61.362 (5)C9—Cl121.748 (5)
C5—C101.395 (6)C10—H100.9300
C5—N41.423 (4)N4—H4N0.841 (10)
C6—C71.387 (5)
C2—C1—H1A109.5C8—C7—C6120.0 (4)
C2—C1—H1B109.5C8—C7—H7120.0
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C6—C7—H7120.0
C2—C1—H1C109.5C9—C8—C7118.6 (3)
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C9—C8—H8120.7
H1B—C1—H1C109.5C7—C8—H8120.7
O3—C2—N4122.1 (3)C8—C9—C10122.1 (4)
O3—C2—C1120.9 (3)C8—C9—Cl12119.6 (3)
N4—C2—C1117.0 (2)C10—C9—Cl12118.3 (4)
C6—C5—C10119.1 (3)C9—C10—C5119.0 (4)
C6—C5—N4121.0 (4)C9—C10—H10120.5
C10—C5—N4119.9 (4)C5—C10—H10120.5
C5—C6—C7121.2 (4)C2—N4—C5125.3 (2)
C5—C6—Cl11120.4 (3)C2—N4—H4N113 (2)
C7—C6—Cl11118.4 (3)C5—N4—H4N122 (2)
C10—C5—C6—C70.1 (6)C8—C9—C10—C50.7 (7)
N4—C5—C6—C7179.5 (4)Cl12—C9—C10—C5180.0 (3)
C10—C5—C6—Cl11179.8 (3)C6—C5—C10—C90.5 (6)
N4—C5—C6—Cl110.6 (6)N4—C5—C10—C9179.9 (4)
C5—C6—C7—C80.5 (7)O3—C2—N4—C53.6 (8)
Cl11—C6—C7—C8179.3 (3)C1—C2—N4—C5176.7 (5)
C6—C7—C8—C90.4 (7)C6—C5—N4—C2137.7 (5)
C7—C8—C9—C100.2 (7)C10—C5—N4—C242.7 (7)
C7—C8—C9—Cl12179.6 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4N···O3i0.84 (1)2.10 (1)2.921 (3)166 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H7Cl2NO
Mr204.05
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)299
a, b, c (Å)5.8557 (4), 4.7942 (4), 31.822 (2)
β (°) 90.531 (6)
V3)893.31 (11)
Z4
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)6.13
Crystal size (mm)0.15 × 0.10 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerEnraf–Nonius CAD-4
Absorption correctionψ scan
(North et al., 1968)
Tmin, Tmax0.478, 0.832
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
3583, 1569, 1017
Rint0.213
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.597
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.055, 0.108, 1.05
No. of reflections1569
No. of parameters112
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.29, 0.48

Computer programs: CAD-4-PC (Enraf–Nonius, 1996), CAD-4-PC, REDU4 (Stoe & Cie, 1987), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 2003), SHELXL97.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4N···O3i0.841 (10)2.099 (14)2.921 (3)166 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y1, z.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds