Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The 1:2 molar ratio reaction of Ag2O with N-acetyl-L-histidine (H2achis) possessing the partial structure O=C—N—C—COOH, as well as imidazole units, afforded the light-stable and water-insoluble silver(I) title complex, [Ag(C8H10N3O3)]n. This complex showed modest anti­microbial activity against selected bacteria and yeasts in a water-suspension system. X-ray crystallography revealed that the complex in the solid state forms a helical polymeric structure with an AgNO3 core based on chelating Hachis (one carboxyl­ate O atom and one imidazole N atom) and two O atoms of the other two Hachis ligands that can be described as ∞{[Ag(Hachis)]}; this differs from the structure of the related silver(I) complex ∞{[Ag(Hhis)]} (L-histidine = H2his) based on an AgN2 core. Polymer chains of the title complex form three-dimensional inter­molecular hydrogen-bonding networks in the crystal structure.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807041724/hg2285sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807041724/hg2285Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 660179

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 173 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.006 Å
  • R factor = 0.028
  • wR factor = 0.064
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 12.8

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 25.35 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1765 Count of symmetry unique reflns 1063 Completeness (_total/calc) 166.04% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 702 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.660 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT791_ALERT_1_G Confirm the Absolute Configuration of C6 = . S
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 0 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Although Ag—N and Ag—O bonding complexes are potential bioinorganic materials such as antimicrobial activities (Gimeno et al., 2004.), light-sensitivity and poor solubility made them harder to be handled. Their crystallization was not easy. Silver imidazolate {[Ag(im)]} (Him=imidazole), which showed strongly effective and a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activities but insoluble in most solvents (Nomiya et al., 1997.), was structurally characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (Masciocchi et al., 1995.) and its single crystals were prepared by hydrothermal method only in 2006 (Huang et al., 2006.). Recently, we noticed that reactions of Ag2O with ligands having an OOC-C—X (X=N or O)—C=O moiety (such as 2-pyrrolidone-5-carboxylic acid, 5-oxo-2-tetrahydrofurancarboxylic acid, camphanic acid, and N-acetylglycine) afforded water-soluble and relatively light-stable (i.e. stable for a few hours to days at ambient temperature) Ag—O bonding complexes (Kasuga et al., 2006, and references therein). Herein, we report crystal structure of the (N-acetyl-L-histidinato)silver(I) (complex 1), whose ligand containing both the OOC-C—N—C=O moiety and imidazole ring (Fig. 1).

Reaction of N-acetyl-L-histidine (H2achis) and Ag2O at ambient temperature in water followed by the vapor-diffusion crystallization gave water-insoluble complex 1, which showed modest antimicrobial activities against E. coli, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans and S. cerevisiae in water-suspension system.

The closely related complex, water-insoluble {[Ag(Hhis)]} (H2his=L-histidine), was a helical polymer consisting of a bent 2-coordinate silver(I) atom linking with the Namino atom in one Hhis- ligand and the Nπ atom of imidazole in a different Hhis- ligand (Nomiya et al., 2000). In complex 1, Nπ atom also coordinated to Ag1, but Namido atom did not. Instead, an oxygen atom (O2) of the carboxylate group and two oxygen atoms (O1i and O2ii) in different Hachis- ligands coordinated to Ag1 (symmetry codes: (i) x + 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 2; (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 2). Therefore, the geometry around Ag1 was disordered 4-coordinate with AgN1O3 core (Fig. 2). The O2 in complex 1 was bridged by two silver(I) atoms (Ag1 and Ag1i). The six-membered ring formed by Ag1, O2ii, Ag1ii, O1, C1 and O2 was connected through silver(I) and O2 atoms to form ladder polymer chain of {[Ag(Hachis)]} across the a axis. The distance and angle of N2—H2N···O1iii indicated that hydrogen bond was formed between carboxylate and imidazole ring (symmetry code: (iii) -x + 1/2, -y, z - 1/2). For one pitch of the chain, four hydrogen bonds were observed as shown in dashed lines in Fig. 3.

In summary, {[Ag(Hachis)]} is a ladder polymer, which forms three-dimensional network of hydrogen bonds between the ladders chains.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Gimeno & Laguna (2004); Huang et al. (2006); Kasuga et al. (2006); Masciocchi et al. (1995); Nomiya et al. (1997, 2000).

Experimental top

To a suspension of 116 mg (0.5 mmol) of Ag2O in 20 ml of water was added 198 mg of H2achis (0.5 mmol), followed by stirring for 1 h at room temperature. The black suspension changed to a clear, colorless solution and the solution was filtered through a folded filter paper (Whatman #5). Vapor diffusion was performed at room temperature by using the colorless filtrate as the inner solution and acetone as the external solvent. The colorless platelet crystals that were formed were collected on a membrane filter (JG 0.2 mm) and they were washed with acetone and ether (50 ml each) (0.1375 g of {[Ag(Hachis)]} (complex 1), 90.4% yield).

Complex 1 is insoluble in H2O and other organic solvents (MeOH, DMSO, acetone, EtOH, CH3CN, CH2Cl2, CHCl3, ether, and EtOAc). The color of the crystals did not change for at least two weeks. Complex 1 was characterized by EA, IR, and TG/DTA.

Prominent IR bands at 1800–400 cm-1 (KBr) 1629vs, 1590vs, 1438w, 1399m, 1297w, 1105w, 1087w, 939w, 692 s, 663 s, 622 s, 552 s. No weight loss before decomposition (ca 226 °C). Anal. Calcd. for C8H10N3O3Ag. C 31.60, H 3.32, N 13.82. Found (Perkin Elmer PE2400 series II CHNS/O Analyzer) C 31.59, H 2.79, N 13.77.

Complex 1 showed modest activity against Gram-negative bacteria (minimum inhibitory concentration (=MIC) for E. coli and P. aeruginosa was both 250 µ g mL-1), Gram-positive bacterium (MIC for B. subtilis was 500 µ g mL-1) and yeasts (MIC for C. albicans and S. cerevisiae was both 125 µ g mL-1).

Refinement top

The H atoms were placed at geometrically calculated positions and refined using riding and rotating models.

Structure description top

Although Ag—N and Ag—O bonding complexes are potential bioinorganic materials such as antimicrobial activities (Gimeno et al., 2004.), light-sensitivity and poor solubility made them harder to be handled. Their crystallization was not easy. Silver imidazolate {[Ag(im)]} (Him=imidazole), which showed strongly effective and a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activities but insoluble in most solvents (Nomiya et al., 1997.), was structurally characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (Masciocchi et al., 1995.) and its single crystals were prepared by hydrothermal method only in 2006 (Huang et al., 2006.). Recently, we noticed that reactions of Ag2O with ligands having an OOC-C—X (X=N or O)—C=O moiety (such as 2-pyrrolidone-5-carboxylic acid, 5-oxo-2-tetrahydrofurancarboxylic acid, camphanic acid, and N-acetylglycine) afforded water-soluble and relatively light-stable (i.e. stable for a few hours to days at ambient temperature) Ag—O bonding complexes (Kasuga et al., 2006, and references therein). Herein, we report crystal structure of the (N-acetyl-L-histidinato)silver(I) (complex 1), whose ligand containing both the OOC-C—N—C=O moiety and imidazole ring (Fig. 1).

Reaction of N-acetyl-L-histidine (H2achis) and Ag2O at ambient temperature in water followed by the vapor-diffusion crystallization gave water-insoluble complex 1, which showed modest antimicrobial activities against E. coli, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans and S. cerevisiae in water-suspension system.

The closely related complex, water-insoluble {[Ag(Hhis)]} (H2his=L-histidine), was a helical polymer consisting of a bent 2-coordinate silver(I) atom linking with the Namino atom in one Hhis- ligand and the Nπ atom of imidazole in a different Hhis- ligand (Nomiya et al., 2000). In complex 1, Nπ atom also coordinated to Ag1, but Namido atom did not. Instead, an oxygen atom (O2) of the carboxylate group and two oxygen atoms (O1i and O2ii) in different Hachis- ligands coordinated to Ag1 (symmetry codes: (i) x + 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 2; (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 2). Therefore, the geometry around Ag1 was disordered 4-coordinate with AgN1O3 core (Fig. 2). The O2 in complex 1 was bridged by two silver(I) atoms (Ag1 and Ag1i). The six-membered ring formed by Ag1, O2ii, Ag1ii, O1, C1 and O2 was connected through silver(I) and O2 atoms to form ladder polymer chain of {[Ag(Hachis)]} across the a axis. The distance and angle of N2—H2N···O1iii indicated that hydrogen bond was formed between carboxylate and imidazole ring (symmetry code: (iii) -x + 1/2, -y, z - 1/2). For one pitch of the chain, four hydrogen bonds were observed as shown in dashed lines in Fig. 3.

In summary, {[Ag(Hachis)]} is a ladder polymer, which forms three-dimensional network of hydrogen bonds between the ladders chains.

For related literature, see: Gimeno & Laguna (2004); Huang et al. (2006); Kasuga et al. (2006); Masciocchi et al. (1995); Nomiya et al. (1997, 2000).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2000); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Chemical structures of H2achis and the related ligands.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. ORTEP-3 drawing (Farrugia, 1997) of complex 1 with 50% probability thermal ellipsoids.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Hydrogen bonding network of complex 1 viewed along the a axis. Symmetry codes: (i) x + 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 2, (ii) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 2 and (iii) -x + 1/2, -y, z - 1/2.
Poly[(µ3-N-acetyl-L-histidinato-κ4N,O:O:O')silver(I)] top
Crystal data top
[Ag(C8H10N3O3)]F(000) = 600
Mr = 304.06Dx = 2.090 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 86 reflections
a = 5.039 (3) Åθ = 3.3–25.4°
b = 13.656 (8) ŵ = 2.08 mm1
c = 14.043 (9) ÅT = 173 K
V = 966.4 (10) Å3Prism, colorless
Z = 40.32 × 0.29 × 0.01 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury
diffractometer
1765 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1715 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 14.892 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.4°, θmin = 3.3°
dtcell.ref scansh = 66
Absorption correction: numerical
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1999)
k = 1615
Tmin = 0.556, Tmax = 0.980l = 1615
9224 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028H-atom parameters not refined
wR(F2) = 0.064 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0275P)2 + 0.9828P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.11(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1765 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.80 e Å3
138 parametersΔρmin = 0.65 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 0000 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.03 (5)
Crystal data top
[Ag(C8H10N3O3)]V = 966.4 (10) Å3
Mr = 304.06Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 5.039 (3) ŵ = 2.08 mm1
b = 13.656 (8) ÅT = 173 K
c = 14.043 (9) Å0.32 × 0.29 × 0.01 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury
diffractometer
1765 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1999)
1715 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.556, Tmax = 0.980Rint = 0.039
9224 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028H-atom parameters not refined
wR(F2) = 0.064Δρmax = 0.80 e Å3
S = 1.11Δρmin = 0.65 e Å3
1765 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), with 0000 Friedel pairs
138 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.03 (5)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.5974 (8)0.1081 (3)1.0856 (3)0.0156 (9)
C20.3599 (10)0.0856 (3)0.7963 (3)0.0246 (10)
H20.24500.13080.76560.030*
C30.6681 (9)0.0232 (3)0.8858 (3)0.0186 (8)
C40.5516 (9)0.0520 (3)0.8383 (3)0.0230 (10)
H40.59550.11940.84330.028*
C50.8765 (8)0.0227 (3)0.9608 (3)0.0194 (9)
H5A0.98660.08230.95380.023*
H5B0.99330.03470.95060.023*
C60.7665 (8)0.0188 (3)1.0637 (3)0.0171 (9)
H60.92280.02111.10760.021*
C70.7649 (8)0.1554 (3)1.1000 (3)0.0237 (9)
C80.6020 (9)0.2448 (3)1.1236 (3)0.0294 (10)
H8A0.41490.23181.10940.044*
H8B0.62150.26031.19140.044*
H8C0.66380.30031.08530.044*
Ag10.66858 (6)0.25670 (2)0.89688 (2)0.02431 (11)
N10.6274 (7)0.0723 (2)1.0830 (2)0.0186 (7)
H1N0.45280.07341.08350.022*
N20.3583 (8)0.0117 (3)0.7818 (3)0.0264 (8)
H2N0.25220.04380.74300.032*
N30.5423 (8)0.1095 (3)0.8590 (3)0.0217 (8)
O10.3590 (6)0.09409 (18)1.1138 (2)0.0205 (6)
O20.6944 (6)0.1908 (2)1.0741 (2)0.0239 (7)
O31.0065 (6)0.1576 (2)1.0979 (2)0.0282 (7)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.018 (2)0.0183 (19)0.011 (2)0.0011 (16)0.0047 (16)0.0001 (15)
C20.026 (2)0.027 (2)0.021 (2)0.006 (2)0.006 (2)0.0099 (18)
C30.021 (2)0.0176 (18)0.017 (2)0.0004 (17)0.001 (2)0.0021 (16)
C40.027 (3)0.020 (2)0.022 (2)0.0045 (19)0.0021 (18)0.0050 (17)
C50.015 (2)0.019 (2)0.024 (2)0.0019 (17)0.0018 (18)0.0012 (17)
C60.019 (2)0.016 (2)0.017 (2)0.0004 (16)0.0004 (16)0.0004 (16)
C70.026 (2)0.020 (2)0.025 (2)0.0069 (16)0.001 (2)0.002 (2)
C80.031 (2)0.016 (2)0.041 (3)0.0042 (19)0.0045 (18)0.002 (2)
Ag10.02532 (17)0.01610 (16)0.03151 (18)0.00361 (14)0.00139 (14)0.00172 (14)
N10.0122 (17)0.0166 (16)0.027 (2)0.0041 (14)0.0002 (15)0.0010 (14)
N20.026 (2)0.0271 (19)0.026 (2)0.0082 (19)0.0051 (18)0.0035 (15)
N30.024 (2)0.0180 (18)0.0229 (18)0.0042 (16)0.0052 (16)0.0009 (15)
O10.0163 (15)0.0152 (13)0.0301 (17)0.0006 (11)0.0041 (15)0.0047 (12)
O20.0212 (15)0.0167 (14)0.0337 (17)0.0049 (13)0.0023 (14)0.0009 (12)
O30.0208 (16)0.0263 (16)0.0376 (18)0.0061 (13)0.0010 (17)0.0043 (16)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O21.241 (5)C6—N11.454 (5)
C1—O11.279 (5)C6—H61.0000
C1—C61.519 (6)C7—O31.218 (5)
C2—N31.313 (6)C7—N11.350 (5)
C2—N21.345 (5)C7—C81.508 (6)
C2—H20.9500C8—H8A0.9800
C3—C41.358 (6)C8—H8B0.9800
C3—N31.390 (5)C8—H8C0.9800
C3—C51.488 (6)Ag1—N32.174 (4)
C4—N21.371 (6)Ag1—O1i2.257 (3)
C4—H40.9500Ag1—O2ii2.528 (3)
C5—C61.548 (6)Ag1—O22.649 (3)
C5—H5A0.9900N1—H1N0.8800
C5—H5B0.9900N2—H2N0.8800
O2—C1—O1123.1 (4)N1—C7—C8116.1 (4)
O2—C1—C6118.9 (4)C7—C8—H8A109.5
O1—C1—C6118.0 (3)C7—C8—H8B109.5
N3—C2—N2110.6 (4)H8A—C8—H8B109.5
N3—C2—H2124.7C7—C8—H8C109.5
N2—C2—H2124.7H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C3—N3108.1 (4)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C4—C3—C5130.5 (4)N3—Ag1—O1i160.48 (13)
N3—C3—C5121.2 (3)N3—Ag1—O2ii91.43 (13)
C3—C4—N2106.8 (4)O1i—Ag1—O2ii99.02 (10)
C3—C4—H4126.6N3—Ag1—O286.01 (12)
N2—C4—H4126.6O1i—Ag1—O2110.37 (10)
C3—C5—C6114.1 (3)O2ii—Ag1—O289.49 (9)
C3—C5—H5A108.7C7—N1—C6120.3 (4)
C6—C5—H5A108.7C7—N1—H1N119.9
C3—C5—H5B108.7C6—N1—H1N119.9
C6—C5—H5B108.7C2—N2—C4107.7 (4)
H5A—C5—H5B107.6C2—N2—H2N126.2
N1—C6—C1112.3 (3)C4—N2—H2N126.2
N1—C6—C5112.0 (3)C2—N3—C3106.8 (3)
C1—C6—C5111.2 (3)C2—N3—Ag1126.8 (3)
N1—C6—H6107.0C3—N3—Ag1125.7 (3)
C1—C6—H6107.0C1—O1—Ag1ii104.1 (2)
C5—C6—H6107.0C1—O2—Ag1i127.5 (3)
O3—C7—N1122.0 (4)C1—O2—Ag1114.4 (2)
O3—C7—C8121.9 (4)Ag1i—O2—Ag195.84 (10)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+2; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z+2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2N···O1iii0.882.022.834 (5)153
Symmetry code: (iii) x+1/2, y, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Ag(C8H10N3O3)]
Mr304.06
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)5.039 (3), 13.656 (8), 14.043 (9)
V3)966.4 (10)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.08
Crystal size (mm)0.32 × 0.29 × 0.01
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Mercury
Absorption correctionNumerical
(ABSCOR; Higashi, 1999)
Tmin, Tmax0.556, 0.980
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9224, 1765, 1715
Rint0.039
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.602
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.064, 1.11
No. of reflections1765
No. of parameters138
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters not refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.80, 0.65
Absolute structureFlack (1983), with 0000 Friedel pairs
Absolute structure parameter0.03 (5)

Computer programs: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2000), CrystalClear, SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2N···O1i0.882.022.834 (5)153.4
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y, z1/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds