![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Supplementary Material]](/e/graphics/supplementarymaterialsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, i177 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807039797 ]
Online 15 August 2007
No syntax errors found
Alert level A REFLT03_ALERT_3_A Reflection count > 15% excess reflns - sys abs data present? From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 24.85 From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_full 24.85 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 165 TEST2: Reflns within _diffrn_reflns_theta_max Count of symmetry unique reflns 96 Completeness (_total/calc) 171.88%
| Author Response: ... The data are from two twin components, hence the apparent excess of reflections. Further details of the twinning and how it was dealt with are given in the experimental details. ( _exptl_special_details ) |
PLAT027_ALERT_3_A _diffrn_reflns_theta_full (too) Low ............ 24.85 Deg.
| Author Response: ... A 2-theta cut-off of 50 degrees was applied so the limit should be 25 degrees. |
PLAT029_ALERT_3_A _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.85
| Author Response: ... Output from platon is given below. The calculated value is perhaps due to confusion due to the data coming from two twin components? |
=============================================================================== Summary of Reflection Data in FCF =============================================================================== Total (in FCF) .............. 338 (Hmax = 4, Kmax = 5, Lmax = 29) Obs Actual Theta(Max) (Deg.) ..... 27.35 (Hmax = 5, Kmax = 5, Lmax = 29) Exp Actual Theta(Min) (Deg.) ..... 5.31 Unique (Expected) ............ 121 (HKL 121, -H-K-L 0) Unique (in FCF) .............. 118 (HKL 118, -H-K-L 0) Observed [I .gt. 2 Sig(I)] ... 117 (HKL 117, -H-K-L 0) Less-Thans ................... 1 (HKL 1, -H-K-L 0) Missing (Total) .............. 3 (HKL 3, -H-K-L 0) Missing Below Th(Min) ........ 1 Missing Th(Min) to STh/L=0.600 2 Missing STh/L=0.600 to Th(Max) 0 Missing Very Strong Refl. .... 0 Space Group Extinctions ...... 0
Alert level B PLAT021_ALERT_1_B Ratio Unique / Expected Reflections too High ... 1.72
Alert level C PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ?
3 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 1 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 1 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster