Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the structure of the title compound, C12H10Cl2N2, the cyclo­hexene ring adopts a half-chair conformation.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807032874/rt2001sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807032874/rt2001Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 660311

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 200 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.032
  • wR factor = 0.089
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 10.1

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.97 PLAT154_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Angles are Equal (x 10000) 200 Deg.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

One of the primary interests of our lab is the synthesis and characterization of novel substituted quinoxalines and the closely related phenazines. Quinoxalines and their derivatives have received considerable attention in the past several years due to their electronic properties (Page et al., 1998; Simpson & Gordon, 1995), H-bonding ability (Pascal & Ho, 1993; Wozniak et al., 1993), and their capacity to coordinate to metals (Wu et al., 2002; Willett et al., 2001). During our investigations, we have prepared a number of substituted quinoxalines and phenazines, which readily coordinate to copper iodide forming novel structures. Our current work involves the synthesis of new nitrogen heterocycles (Gibson, et al., 2006) which may lead to novel three-dimensional structures upon coordination to cuprous salts. Here, we report the crystal structure of 7,8-dichloro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenazine (I), (Figure 1).

The structure of (I) exhibits bond distances and angles that are normal, for all fall within ranges established in the literature for similar nitrogen heterocycles (Brown et al., 2004). There are two molecules per unit cell, related to each other by an inversion center. The chloride substituents are almost eclipsed with respect to each other, with a torsion angle Cl1—C10—C9—Cl2 of 0.36 (16)°. Both aromatic rings are essentially planar and almost co-planar with a dihedral angle of 1.20 (18)°, based on least-squares plane calculations on C12—C11—C10—C9—C8—C7 and C7—C12—N1—C1—C6—N2. The H-saturated fragment of the ring system adopts a twisted, cyclohexyl-like conformation as evidenced by the angles depicted by atoms C5 C4 C3 110.68 (12)°, C2 C3 C4 109.92 (12)°, and the C2—C3—C4—C5 torsion angle of 63.62 (17)°, which suggest the presence of some angle and torsional strain.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Brown et al. (2004); Farrugia (1997); Gibson et al. (2006); Page et al. (1998); Pascal & Ho (1993); Simpson & Gordon (1995); Willett et al. (2001); Wozniak et al. (1993); Wu et al. (2002).

Experimental top

A 20 ml test tube was charged with 4,5-Dichloro-o-phenylenediamine (177 mg, 1 mmol) and 1,2-Cyclohexanedione (112 mg, 1 mmol). This was heated in a boiling water bath for 1 h, until the reaction mixture was homogeneous. The residue was then dissolved in boiling ethanol (100% EtOH, 15 ml). Upon cooling to 0° C, light yellow crystals of (1) were obtained (215 mg, 85% yield) mp 215–216° C.

Refinement top

H atoms were treated as riding, with C—H = 1.00 with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C) for all H atoms.

Structure description top

One of the primary interests of our lab is the synthesis and characterization of novel substituted quinoxalines and the closely related phenazines. Quinoxalines and their derivatives have received considerable attention in the past several years due to their electronic properties (Page et al., 1998; Simpson & Gordon, 1995), H-bonding ability (Pascal & Ho, 1993; Wozniak et al., 1993), and their capacity to coordinate to metals (Wu et al., 2002; Willett et al., 2001). During our investigations, we have prepared a number of substituted quinoxalines and phenazines, which readily coordinate to copper iodide forming novel structures. Our current work involves the synthesis of new nitrogen heterocycles (Gibson, et al., 2006) which may lead to novel three-dimensional structures upon coordination to cuprous salts. Here, we report the crystal structure of 7,8-dichloro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenazine (I), (Figure 1).

The structure of (I) exhibits bond distances and angles that are normal, for all fall within ranges established in the literature for similar nitrogen heterocycles (Brown et al., 2004). There are two molecules per unit cell, related to each other by an inversion center. The chloride substituents are almost eclipsed with respect to each other, with a torsion angle Cl1—C10—C9—Cl2 of 0.36 (16)°. Both aromatic rings are essentially planar and almost co-planar with a dihedral angle of 1.20 (18)°, based on least-squares plane calculations on C12—C11—C10—C9—C8—C7 and C7—C12—N1—C1—C6—N2. The H-saturated fragment of the ring system adopts a twisted, cyclohexyl-like conformation as evidenced by the angles depicted by atoms C5 C4 C3 110.68 (12)°, C2 C3 C4 109.92 (12)°, and the C2—C3—C4—C5 torsion angle of 63.62 (17)°, which suggest the presence of some angle and torsional strain.

For related literature, see: Brown et al. (2004); Farrugia (1997); Gibson et al. (2006); Page et al. (1998); Pascal & Ho (1993); Simpson & Gordon (1995); Willett et al. (2001); Wozniak et al. (1993); Wu et al. (2002).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: XSHELL (Bruker, 2004); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP drawing of (I) (Farrugia, 1997). Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres.
7,8-dichloro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrophenazine top
Crystal data top
C12H10Cl2N2Z = 2
Mr = 253.12F(000) = 260
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.549 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
a = 6.3442 (3) ÅCell parameters from 71 reflections
b = 7.3885 (3) Åθ = 9.5–41.0°
c = 11.7831 (5) ŵ = 5.13 mm1
α = 85.720 (2)°T = 200 K
β = 82.122 (2)°Block, yellow
γ = 83.572 (2)°0.35 × 0.21 × 0.08 mm
V = 542.68 (4) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX II CCD
diffractometer
1868 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1810 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.034
ω and ψ scansθmax = 67.0°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
h = 77
Tmin = 0.267, Tmax = 0.685k = 88
9473 measured reflectionsl = 1414
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.089All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.067P)2 + 0.0594P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1868 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
185 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
Crystal data top
C12H10Cl2N2γ = 83.572 (2)°
Mr = 253.12V = 542.68 (4) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 6.3442 (3) ÅCu Kα radiation
b = 7.3885 (3) ŵ = 5.13 mm1
c = 11.7831 (5) ÅT = 200 K
α = 85.720 (2)°0.35 × 0.21 × 0.08 mm
β = 82.122 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX II CCD
diffractometer
1868 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
1810 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.267, Tmax = 0.685Rint = 0.034
9473 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0320 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.089All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
1868 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.29 e Å3
185 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.93385 (5)0.65523 (4)0.28885 (3)0.04023 (16)
Cl20.50704 (6)0.83977 (5)0.20124 (3)0.04102 (16)
N10.54783 (19)0.67203 (16)0.69452 (11)0.0335 (3)
N20.16607 (18)0.84040 (15)0.61792 (10)0.0314 (3)
C10.3736 (2)0.71175 (17)0.76619 (11)0.0313 (3)
C20.3837 (3)0.6595 (2)0.89145 (13)0.0402 (3)
C30.2006 (2)0.7516 (2)0.97160 (12)0.0395 (3)
C40.0116 (2)0.7388 (2)0.92727 (12)0.0390 (3)
C50.0180 (2)0.8423 (2)0.81112 (13)0.0382 (3)
C60.1794 (2)0.79711 (17)0.72703 (11)0.0307 (3)
C70.3461 (2)0.79900 (16)0.54201 (11)0.0294 (3)
C80.3393 (2)0.83969 (17)0.42346 (12)0.0322 (3)
C90.5173 (2)0.79438 (17)0.34757 (11)0.0322 (3)
C100.7083 (2)0.71125 (16)0.38628 (11)0.0316 (3)
C110.7188 (2)0.67350 (18)0.50048 (12)0.0340 (3)
C120.5361 (2)0.71473 (17)0.58085 (11)0.0298 (3)
H80.202 (3)0.896 (2)0.3985 (14)0.039 (4)*
H110.855 (3)0.616 (2)0.5315 (13)0.037 (4)*
H2A0.376 (3)0.524 (3)0.9028 (15)0.047 (4)*
H3A0.205 (3)0.698 (2)1.0494 (15)0.037 (4)*
H4A0.025 (3)0.613 (2)0.9204 (13)0.036 (4)*
H5A0.142 (3)0.818 (3)0.7777 (16)0.050 (5)*
H2B0.523 (3)0.682 (3)0.9123 (17)0.057 (5)*
H3B0.218 (3)0.880 (2)0.9745 (14)0.043 (4)*
H4B0.127 (3)0.781 (2)0.9851 (15)0.043 (4)*
H5B0.032 (3)0.976 (2)0.8240 (15)0.046 (4)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0375 (2)0.0407 (2)0.0404 (2)0.00292 (16)0.00363 (15)0.00642 (15)
Cl20.0478 (2)0.0431 (2)0.0313 (2)0.00231 (17)0.00522 (15)0.00027 (15)
N10.0326 (6)0.0321 (6)0.0357 (6)0.0007 (5)0.0071 (5)0.0007 (5)
N20.0302 (6)0.0283 (6)0.0354 (6)0.0037 (5)0.0041 (5)0.0023 (4)
C10.0332 (7)0.0272 (6)0.0337 (7)0.0040 (5)0.0056 (5)0.0001 (5)
C20.0387 (8)0.0460 (8)0.0348 (7)0.0002 (7)0.0069 (6)0.0016 (6)
C30.0451 (8)0.0406 (8)0.0329 (7)0.0077 (6)0.0032 (6)0.0014 (6)
C40.0387 (7)0.0392 (8)0.0373 (7)0.0057 (6)0.0011 (6)0.0008 (6)
C50.0336 (7)0.0381 (8)0.0402 (8)0.0006 (6)0.0004 (6)0.0025 (6)
C60.0325 (6)0.0242 (6)0.0354 (7)0.0051 (5)0.0048 (5)0.0013 (5)
C70.0297 (6)0.0231 (6)0.0358 (7)0.0046 (5)0.0051 (5)0.0001 (5)
C80.0337 (7)0.0274 (6)0.0363 (7)0.0043 (6)0.0077 (5)0.0009 (5)
C90.0398 (7)0.0261 (6)0.0318 (6)0.0078 (5)0.0059 (5)0.0003 (5)
C100.0328 (6)0.0246 (6)0.0372 (7)0.0044 (5)0.0013 (5)0.0041 (5)
C110.0318 (7)0.0301 (6)0.0399 (7)0.0012 (6)0.0059 (6)0.0024 (5)
C120.0320 (6)0.0249 (6)0.0331 (6)0.0039 (5)0.0066 (5)0.0002 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl1—C101.7394 (13)C4—C51.520 (2)
Cl2—C91.7405 (13)C4—H4A0.955 (17)
N1—C11.3151 (19)C4—H4B0.970 (18)
N1—C121.3632 (19)C5—C61.5090 (19)
N2—C61.3132 (18)C5—H5A0.97 (2)
N2—C71.3716 (18)C5—H5B1.001 (18)
C1—C61.4378 (19)C7—C121.4104 (19)
C1—C21.506 (2)C7—C81.412 (2)
C2—C31.524 (2)C8—C91.368 (2)
C2—H2A1.006 (19)C8—H80.995 (18)
C2—H2B0.99 (2)C9—C101.413 (2)
C3—C41.524 (2)C10—C111.363 (2)
C3—H3A0.974 (18)C11—C121.4133 (19)
C3—H3B0.969 (18)C11—H111.019 (17)
C1—N1—C12116.95 (11)C4—C5—H5A110.3 (11)
C6—N2—C7116.96 (12)C6—C5—H5B108.7 (10)
N1—C1—C6121.78 (13)C4—C5—H5B107.7 (10)
N1—C1—C2117.16 (12)H5A—C5—H5B108.0 (16)
C6—C1—C2121.04 (13)N2—C6—C1121.97 (13)
C1—C2—C3113.99 (13)N2—C6—C5117.29 (12)
C1—C2—H2A107.4 (10)C1—C6—C5120.73 (13)
C3—C2—H2A107.6 (10)N2—C7—C12120.84 (12)
C1—C2—H2B110.1 (12)N2—C7—C8119.23 (12)
C3—C2—H2B111.0 (12)C12—C7—C8119.92 (12)
H2A—C2—H2B106.4 (16)C9—C8—C7119.21 (12)
C4—C3—C2109.92 (12)C9—C8—H8122.7 (9)
C4—C3—H3A112.9 (10)C7—C8—H8118.0 (9)
C2—C3—H3A109.4 (10)C8—C9—C10120.99 (12)
C4—C3—H3B107.7 (10)C8—C9—Cl2119.22 (10)
C2—C3—H3B110.3 (10)C10—C9—Cl2119.79 (10)
H3A—C3—H3B106.5 (14)C11—C10—C9120.61 (12)
C5—C4—C3110.68 (12)C11—C10—Cl1118.89 (11)
C5—C4—H4A109.9 (9)C9—C10—Cl1120.50 (10)
C3—C4—H4A107.9 (10)C10—C11—C12119.75 (13)
C5—C4—H4B113.5 (11)C10—C11—H11122.7 (9)
C3—C4—H4B108.5 (10)C12—C11—H11117.6 (9)
H4A—C4—H4B106.2 (14)N1—C12—C7121.50 (12)
C6—C5—C4113.28 (12)N1—C12—C11119.01 (12)
C6—C5—H5A108.7 (11)C7—C12—C11119.49 (12)
C12—N1—C1—C60.29 (19)C12—C7—C8—C90.80 (19)
C12—N1—C1—C2178.13 (12)C7—C8—C9—C101.3 (2)
N1—C1—C2—C3164.89 (13)C7—C8—C9—Cl2178.55 (9)
C6—C1—C2—C316.7 (2)C8—C9—C10—C110.3 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C446.64 (17)Cl2—C9—C10—C11179.53 (10)
C2—C3—C4—C563.51 (17)C8—C9—C10—Cl1179.73 (9)
C3—C4—C5—C648.59 (17)Cl2—C9—C10—Cl10.43 (15)
C7—N2—C6—C10.57 (19)C9—C10—C11—C121.2 (2)
C7—N2—C6—C5179.97 (11)Cl1—C10—C11—C12178.78 (9)
N1—C1—C6—N20.3 (2)C1—N1—C12—C70.49 (19)
C2—C1—C6—N2178.61 (11)C1—N1—C12—C11179.57 (12)
N1—C1—C6—C5179.63 (11)N2—C7—C12—N10.18 (19)
C2—C1—C6—C52.0 (2)C8—C7—C12—N1179.40 (11)
C4—C5—C6—N2162.46 (13)N2—C7—C12—C11179.88 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C118.14 (19)C8—C7—C12—C110.66 (19)
C6—N2—C7—C120.36 (18)C10—C11—C12—N1178.41 (12)
C6—N2—C7—C8178.87 (11)C10—C11—C12—C71.6 (2)
N2—C7—C8—C9178.43 (11)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H10Cl2N2
Mr253.12
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)200
a, b, c (Å)6.3442 (3), 7.3885 (3), 11.7831 (5)
α, β, γ (°)85.720 (2), 82.122 (2), 83.572 (2)
V3)542.68 (4)
Z2
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)5.13
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.21 × 0.08
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX II CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2004)
Tmin, Tmax0.267, 0.685
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
9473, 1868, 1810
Rint0.034
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.597
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.032, 0.089, 1.05
No. of reflections1868
No. of parameters185
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.23, 0.29

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2004), SAINT-Plus, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), XSHELL (Bruker, 2004), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds