![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Supplementary Material]](/e/graphics/supplementarymaterialsborder.gif)
![[Buy article online]](/logos/buy.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](hy2081contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m2501-m2502 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807043255 ]
3N,N',N''}cadmium(II) acetonitrile solvateNo syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Rep. MoietyFormula Strings Differ .... ? PLAT153_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Axes are Equal (x 100000) 300 Ang. PLAT220_ALERT_2_C Large Non-Solvent C Ueq(max)/Ueq(min) ... 2.92 Ratio PLAT244_ALERT_4_C Low 'Solvent' Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for C28 PLAT380_ALERT_4_C Check Incorrectly? Oriented X(sp2)-Methyl Moiety C27 PLAT480_ALERT_4_C Long H...A H-Bond Reported H16A .. CL2 .. 2.84 Ang.
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_1_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: C29 H34 Cd1 Cl2 N4 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:C2 H3 N1 PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Cd1 (2) 2.11
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 6 ALERT level C = Check and explain 2 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 3 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 0 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster