Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The formula unit of the title compound, 2C3H5N2+·C8H4O42−, consists of two imidazole cations which are N—H...O hydrogen-bonded to a terephthalate anion which lies on a crystallographic inversion center. In the crystal structure, two N—H...O and two C—H...O hydrogen bonds link the components into a three-dimensional network.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044236/lh2499sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807044236/lh2499Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 663772

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 298 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.002 Å
  • R factor = 0.046
  • wR factor = 0.137
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.7

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT153_ALERT_1_C The su's on the Cell Axes are Equal (x 100000) 60 Ang. PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.46 PLAT353_ALERT_3_C Long N-H Bond (0.87A) N1 - H1 ... 1.05 Ang. PLAT353_ALERT_3_C Long N-H Bond (0.87A) N2 - H2A ... 1.01 Ang.
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 0 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 1 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 0 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

With the aim of researching hydrogen-bonded actions in new classes of organic adducts, we have investigated the reactions of terephthalic acid with imidazole. The 1:2 organic salt is formed as a consequence of protons being transferred from the carboxyl oxygen atoms to the imine N atoms. We report here the molecular and supramolecular structure of the title compound.

The asymmetric unit consists of half of a terephthalate anion and one imidazolium cation, the formula unit being generated by a crystallogrphic inversion center (Fig.1). The supramolecular structure can be readily analysed in terms of simple substructures listed below. Firstly, a combination of the N1–H1···O1iii [N–O = 2.6336 (14) Å, N–H···O = 167.1 (17)°, symmetry code: (iii) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2] and N2–H2···O2 hydrogen bonds (Table 1) links the terephthalate anion and imidazolium cations into a (30–1) sheet (Fig.2) in the form of a (6,6) net (Batten & Robson, 1998) which is built from R88(22) rings (Bernstein et al., 1995). Three networks of this type pass through the unit cell by translation. Secondly, the imidazolium C5 and C6 atoms at (x,y,z) act as soft hydrogen-bond donor, via. H5A and H6A, to the carboxyl O2 and O1 atoms at (1 - x, -y, 1 - z) and (-x, -y, 1 - z), respectively, linking the adjacent networks into a simple three-dimensional network (Fig.3). Although aryl and imidazole rings exist, no ππ stacking and C–H···π interactions are observed in the supramolecular structure.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Bernstein et al. (1995); Batten & Robson (1998)

Experimental top

All reagents and solvents were used as obtained without further purification. 1:2 molar amount of imidazole (0.4 mmol, 27 mg) and terephthalic acid (0.2 mmol, 33 mg) were dissolved in 95% methanol (10 ml). The mixture was stirred for ten minutes at ambient temperature. The resulting colorless solution was kept in air for several days. Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis were grown by slow evaporation of the solution at the bottom of the vessel.

Refinement top

H atoms bonded to carbon atoms were located at the geometrical positions with C—H=0.93 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). H1 and H2A were located from the difference maps with the N–H distances refined freely and their Uiso values being set 1.2 times of their carrier atoms.

Structure description top

With the aim of researching hydrogen-bonded actions in new classes of organic adducts, we have investigated the reactions of terephthalic acid with imidazole. The 1:2 organic salt is formed as a consequence of protons being transferred from the carboxyl oxygen atoms to the imine N atoms. We report here the molecular and supramolecular structure of the title compound.

The asymmetric unit consists of half of a terephthalate anion and one imidazolium cation, the formula unit being generated by a crystallogrphic inversion center (Fig.1). The supramolecular structure can be readily analysed in terms of simple substructures listed below. Firstly, a combination of the N1–H1···O1iii [N–O = 2.6336 (14) Å, N–H···O = 167.1 (17)°, symmetry code: (iii) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2] and N2–H2···O2 hydrogen bonds (Table 1) links the terephthalate anion and imidazolium cations into a (30–1) sheet (Fig.2) in the form of a (6,6) net (Batten & Robson, 1998) which is built from R88(22) rings (Bernstein et al., 1995). Three networks of this type pass through the unit cell by translation. Secondly, the imidazolium C5 and C6 atoms at (x,y,z) act as soft hydrogen-bond donor, via. H5A and H6A, to the carboxyl O2 and O1 atoms at (1 - x, -y, 1 - z) and (-x, -y, 1 - z), respectively, linking the adjacent networks into a simple three-dimensional network (Fig.3). Although aryl and imidazole rings exist, no ππ stacking and C–H···π interactions are observed in the supramolecular structure.

For related literature, see: Bernstein et al. (1995); Batten & Robson (1998)

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2001); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure, showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. Atoms marked with 'a' are symmetry position (-x, -y, -z).
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure, showing the formation of the two-dimensional (301¯) network fromed by N–H···O hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. Atom marked with (iii) is at symmetry position (-x + 1/2, y + 1/2, -z + 3/2).
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Part of the crystal structure, showing the formation of the three-dimensional network formed by C–H···O and N–H···O hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
Bisimidazolium terephthalate top
Crystal data top
2C3H5N2+·C8H4O42F(000) = 316
Mr = 302.29Dx = 1.392 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 3264 reflections
a = 9.6288 (6) Åθ = 2.3–28.1°
b = 8.3351 (6) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 9.8244 (6) ÅT = 298 K
β = 113.854 (1)°Block, colorless
V = 721.12 (8) Å30.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1696 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine focus sealed Siemens Mo tube1368 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.041
0.3° wide ω exposures scansθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)
h = 1212
Tmin = 0.966, Tmax = 0.979k = 1010
7596 measured reflectionsl = 1112
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.137H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.12 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0835P)2 + 0.0143P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1696 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
108 parametersΔρmax = 0.30 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
Crystal data top
2C3H5N2+·C8H4O42V = 721.12 (8) Å3
Mr = 302.29Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 9.6288 (6) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 8.3351 (6) ÅT = 298 K
c = 9.8244 (6) Å0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20 mm
β = 113.854 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1696 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)
1368 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.966, Tmax = 0.979Rint = 0.041
7596 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0460 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.137H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.12Δρmax = 0.30 e Å3
1696 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
108 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.05078 (13)0.03576 (14)0.15160 (12)0.0333 (3)
C20.05484 (15)0.13358 (15)0.04568 (13)0.0382 (3)
H20.09200.22370.07570.046*
C30.10550 (14)0.09803 (15)0.10470 (13)0.0372 (3)
H30.17660.16430.17460.045*
C40.10569 (15)0.07248 (15)0.31591 (13)0.0370 (3)
O10.02858 (11)0.17027 (15)0.35300 (10)0.0590 (4)
O20.22390 (11)0.00486 (13)0.40159 (9)0.0511 (3)
C50.52371 (16)0.05999 (17)0.75057 (15)0.0464 (4)
H5A0.58590.00910.71200.056*
C60.32334 (17)0.15446 (19)0.77332 (15)0.0505 (4)
H6A0.22310.18060.75350.061*
C70.56890 (16)0.13368 (18)0.88368 (15)0.0484 (4)
H7A0.66820.14320.95420.058*
N10.44244 (13)0.19155 (15)0.89584 (12)0.0483 (3)
H10.438 (2)0.251 (2)0.988 (2)0.084 (6)*
N20.36978 (14)0.07411 (14)0.68328 (12)0.0452 (3)
H2A0.3003 (19)0.027 (2)0.584 (2)0.068 (5)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0375 (6)0.0407 (6)0.0203 (6)0.0038 (5)0.0103 (5)0.0013 (4)
C20.0470 (7)0.0409 (6)0.0259 (6)0.0047 (5)0.0140 (6)0.0027 (5)
C30.0432 (7)0.0422 (7)0.0220 (6)0.0057 (5)0.0089 (5)0.0036 (5)
C40.0412 (7)0.0474 (7)0.0218 (6)0.0086 (5)0.0120 (5)0.0031 (5)
O10.0588 (7)0.0867 (8)0.0293 (6)0.0078 (5)0.0154 (5)0.0186 (5)
O20.0526 (6)0.0717 (7)0.0207 (5)0.0033 (5)0.0062 (4)0.0042 (4)
C50.0489 (8)0.0550 (8)0.0367 (8)0.0012 (6)0.0189 (6)0.0082 (6)
C60.0468 (8)0.0713 (10)0.0318 (7)0.0022 (7)0.0141 (6)0.0073 (6)
C70.0454 (8)0.0611 (8)0.0340 (8)0.0049 (6)0.0112 (6)0.0068 (6)
N10.0541 (7)0.0623 (7)0.0271 (6)0.0010 (6)0.0149 (5)0.0097 (5)
N20.0517 (7)0.0557 (7)0.0258 (6)0.0048 (5)0.0132 (5)0.0074 (5)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.3878 (17)C5—N21.3621 (19)
C1—C3i1.3892 (17)C5—H5A0.9300
C1—C41.5128 (16)C6—N11.3203 (17)
C2—C31.3877 (16)C6—N21.3232 (17)
C2—H20.9300C6—H6A0.9300
C3—C1i1.3892 (17)C7—N11.3592 (17)
C3—H30.9300C7—H7A0.9300
C4—O21.2437 (16)N1—H11.04 (2)
C4—O11.2518 (16)N2—H2A1.010 (18)
C5—C71.3478 (19)
C2—C1—C3i118.96 (11)C7—C5—H5A126.5
C2—C1—C4121.01 (11)N2—C5—H5A126.5
C3i—C1—C4120.03 (11)N1—C6—N2108.92 (13)
C3—C2—C1120.56 (12)N1—C6—H6A125.5
C3—C2—H2119.7N2—C6—H6A125.5
C1—C2—H2119.7C5—C7—N1107.33 (12)
C2—C3—C1i120.49 (11)C5—C7—H7A126.3
C2—C3—H3119.8N1—C7—H7A126.3
C1i—C3—H3119.8C6—N1—C7108.39 (12)
O2—C4—O1125.89 (12)C6—N1—H1125.2 (11)
O2—C4—C1117.37 (12)C7—N1—H1126.3 (11)
O1—C4—C1116.73 (11)C6—N2—C5108.35 (12)
C4—O2—H2A133.4 (6)C6—N2—H2A124.6 (9)
C7—C5—N2107.01 (12)C5—N2—H2A126.9 (9)
C3i—C1—C2—C30.2 (2)O1—C4—O2—H2A18.7 (8)
C4—C1—C2—C3179.41 (10)C1—C4—O2—H2A162.3 (8)
C1—C2—C3—C1i0.3 (2)N2—C5—C7—N10.01 (16)
C2—C1—C4—O2163.41 (12)N2—C6—N1—C70.20 (18)
C3i—C1—C4—O216.93 (18)C5—C7—N1—C60.13 (18)
C2—C1—C4—O115.68 (18)N1—C6—N2—C50.19 (17)
C3i—C1—C4—O1163.98 (12)C7—C5—N2—C60.11 (16)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···O21.010 (18)1.665 (19)2.6307 (14)158.6 (15)
C6—H6A···O1ii0.932.223.1046 (18)159
C5—H5A···O2iii0.932.503.3601 (17)154
N1—H1···O1iv1.04 (2)1.61 (2)2.6336 (14)167.1 (17)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y, z+1; (iii) x+1, y, z+1; (iv) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula2C3H5N2+·C8H4O42
Mr302.29
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)9.6288 (6), 8.3351 (6), 9.8244 (6)
β (°) 113.854 (1)
V3)721.12 (8)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.20 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1997)
Tmin, Tmax0.966, 0.979
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7596, 1696, 1368
Rint0.041
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.660
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.046, 0.137, 1.12
No. of reflections1696
No. of parameters108
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.30, 0.23

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2001), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2001), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···O21.010 (18)1.665 (19)2.6307 (14)158.6 (15)
C6—H6A···O1i0.932.223.1046 (18)159
C5—H5A···O2ii0.932.503.3601 (17)154
N1—H1···O1iii1.04 (2)1.61 (2)2.6336 (14)167.1 (17)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z+1; (iii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+3/2.
 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds