supplementary materials


si2033 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, o4032    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807043747 ]

1-Hydroxycyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid

R. Betz and P. Klüfers

Abstract top

The title compound, C5H8O3, was prepared as a potentially chelating molecule bearing the conformationally rigid cyclobutane group. The cyclobutane ring is arranged perpendicular to the carboxyl group. In the polar crystal structure, each molecule exhibits four hydrogen-bonded contacts to neighbouring molecules. Instead of the formation of typical carboxylic acid dimers, an infinite hydrogen-bonded chain with alternating O-H and O=C-O-H units is observed.

Comment top

The title compound, C5H8O3, was prepared as a potential chelating molecule bearing the conformational rigid cyclobutane group.

The cyclobutane ring adopts a perpendicular orientation to the carboxyl group (Fig. 1). One carbon atom of the cyclobutane ring shows a comparatively high anisotropic displacement parameter – a finding, which is in agreement with the results obtained for a palladium complex including cyclobutane moieties (Muranishi & Okabe, 2004). The observed bond lengths are in agreement with valence considerations. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds determine the crystal structure. Due to the trigonal 3-axes symmetry, trimer ring systems with graph set notation R33(5) and infinite chains C(5) (Bernstein et al., 1995) form the three-dimensional network. The formation of dimeric units upon hydrogen-bond formation – as is apparent in the structures of 1-hydroxycyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (Betz & Klüfers, 2007a) and the cyclopentane analogue (Betz & Klüfers, 2007b) – is not observed. Instead, infinite bonding sequences of the type (···O=C—O–H···O–H···)n with alternating carboxy and hydroxy functions are formed.

Related literature top

The title compound was prepared according to standard procedures (Becker et al., 2001). The pattern of hydrogen bonding differs from that observed for the homologues, 1-hydroxycyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (Betz & Klüfers, 2007a) and 1-hydroxycyclopentane-1-carboxylic acid (Betz & Klüfers, 2007b). The comparatively high anisotropic displacement parameter observed for one of the C atoms of the cyclobutane moiety is comparable wit the results reported in the literature for a palladium complex including the same cyclic fragment (Muranishi & Okabe, 2004).

For related literature, see: Bernstein et al. (1995).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared according to standard procedures (Becker et al., 2001) upon acidic hydrolysis of the cyanohydrin of cyclobutanone. Crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were directly obtained from the crystallized reaction product.

Refinement top

All H atoms were located in a difference map and refined as riding on their parent atoms. One common isotropic displacement parameter for all H atoms was refined to Uiso(H) = 0.062 (3).

Due to the absence of significant anomalous scattering the absolute structure factor, which is −1.2 with an estimated standard deviation of 1.1 for the unmerged data set, is meaningless. Thus, Friedel opposites (327 pairs) have been merged.

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 2004); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), with atom labels and anisotropic displacement ellipsoids (drawn at 50% probability level) for non-H atoms.
1-Hydroxycyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid top
Crystal data top
C5H8O3Z = 18
Mr = 116.12F000 = 1116
Trigonal, R3cDx = 1.351 Mg m3
Hall symbol: R 3 -2"cMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.158 (5) ÅCell parameters from 8387 reflections
b = 10.158 (5) Åθ = 3.1–27.5º
c = 28.747 (5) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
α = 90ºT = 293 (2) K
β = 90ºBlock, colourless
γ = 120º0.25 × 0.20 × 0.16 mm
V = 2568.9 (18) Å3
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
629 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: rotating anodeRint = 0.013
Monochromator: MONTEL, graded multilayered X-ray opticsθmax = 27.5º
T = 293(2) Kθmin = 3.7º
φ/ω–scanh = 13→13
Absorption correction: nonek = 10→10
2401 measured reflectionsl = 37→37
657 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained refinement
Least-squares matrix: full  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0483P)2 + 0.8981P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
wR(F2) = 0.079Δρmax = 0.15 e Å3
S = 1.07Δρmin = 0.11 e Å3
657 reflectionsExtinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
82 parametersExtinction coefficient: 0.0040 (11)
1 restraint
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Crystal data top
C5H8O3γ = 120º
Mr = 116.12V = 2568.9 (18) Å3
Trigonal, R3cZ = 18
a = 10.158 (5) ÅMo Kα
b = 10.158 (5) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 28.747 (5) ÅT = 293 (2) K
α = 90º0.25 × 0.20 × 0.16 mm
β = 90º
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
657 independent reflections
Absorption correction: none629 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
2401 measured reflectionsRint = 0.013
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.079Δρmax = 0.15 e Å3
S = 1.07Δρmin = 0.11 e Å3
657 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
82 parametersFlack parameter:
1 restraintRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.18848 (17)0.15037 (16)0.00859 (5)0.0401 (4)
H20.160 (4)0.079 (4)0.0286 (12)0.070 (9)*
O110.2872 (2)0.4282 (2)0.09671 (6)0.0553 (5)
H110.240 (4)0.439 (4)0.1225 (13)0.075 (10)*
O120.06620 (18)0.22283 (19)0.07944 (6)0.0501 (4)
C10.1989 (2)0.3086 (2)0.07142 (6)0.0351 (4)
C20.2812 (2)0.2928 (2)0.02965 (6)0.0324 (4)
C30.3344 (3)0.4280 (2)0.00422 (7)0.0412 (5)
H310.32200.39880.03680.049*
H320.29110.49220.00230.049*
C40.4967 (3)0.4924 (3)0.01362 (11)0.0609 (6)
H410.52870.57730.03480.073*
H420.57110.51690.01090.073*
C50.4496 (3)0.3412 (3)0.03797 (9)0.0459 (5)
H510.47780.35190.07060.055*
H520.48210.27840.02180.055*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0480 (8)0.0331 (7)0.0344 (7)0.0166 (6)0.0051 (6)0.0051 (6)
O110.0485 (9)0.0572 (10)0.0458 (9)0.0155 (8)0.0085 (7)0.0200 (7)
O120.0431 (8)0.0510 (9)0.0465 (8)0.0163 (7)0.0117 (6)0.0083 (7)
C10.0388 (10)0.0363 (9)0.0316 (9)0.0199 (8)0.0040 (7)0.0000 (7)
C20.0372 (9)0.0332 (9)0.0291 (8)0.0193 (7)0.0024 (7)0.0013 (7)
C30.0492 (11)0.0400 (10)0.0381 (9)0.0250 (10)0.0093 (8)0.0063 (8)
C40.0431 (13)0.0529 (15)0.0701 (15)0.0115 (10)0.0060 (12)0.0073 (12)
C50.0402 (11)0.0539 (12)0.0503 (11)0.0284 (10)0.0026 (9)0.0069 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
O2—C21.409 (2)C3—C41.527 (4)
O2—H20.85 (4)C3—H310.9700
O11—C11.311 (2)C3—H320.9700
O11—H110.92 (4)C4—C51.531 (4)
O12—C11.207 (2)C4—H410.9700
C1—C21.517 (2)C4—H420.9700
C2—C31.544 (3)C5—H510.9700
C2—C51.544 (3)C5—H520.9700
C2—O2—H2110 (2)C2—C3—H32113.7
C1—O11—H11114 (2)H31—C3—H32111.0
O12—C1—O11124.26 (18)C3—C4—C589.70 (18)
O12—C1—C2123.42 (17)C3—C4—H41113.7
O11—C1—C2112.28 (17)C5—C4—H41113.7
O2—C2—C1109.16 (15)C3—C4—H42113.7
O2—C2—C3113.53 (15)C5—C4—H42113.7
C1—C2—C3111.77 (15)H41—C4—H42110.9
O2—C2—C5117.34 (17)C4—C5—C289.39 (17)
C1—C2—C5115.15 (16)C4—C5—H51113.7
C3—C2—C588.59 (15)C2—C5—H51113.7
C4—C3—C289.54 (17)C4—C5—H52113.7
C4—C3—H31113.7C2—C5—H52113.7
C2—C3—H31113.7H51—C5—H52111.0
C4—C3—H32113.7
O12—C1—C2—O211.5 (3)C1—C2—C3—C4104.08 (19)
O11—C1—C2—O2170.40 (18)C5—C2—C3—C412.53 (19)
O12—C1—C2—C3114.9 (2)C2—C3—C4—C512.64 (18)
O11—C1—C2—C363.2 (2)C3—C4—C5—C212.64 (18)
O12—C1—C2—C5146.0 (2)O2—C2—C5—C4128.41 (19)
O11—C1—C2—C535.9 (2)C1—C2—C5—C4101.0 (2)
O2—C2—C3—C4131.90 (19)C3—C2—C5—C412.50 (18)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O12i0.85 (4)2.07 (4)2.895 (2)163 (3)
O2—H2···O2i0.85 (4)2.51 (3)3.037 (3)121 (3)
O11—H11···O2ii0.92 (4)1.74 (4)2.6488 (19)170 (4)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y, −x, z; (ii) −y+1/3, −x+2/3, z+1/6.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O12i0.85 (4)2.07 (4)2.895 (2)163 (3)
O2—H2···O2i0.85 (4)2.51 (3)3.037 (3)121 (3)
O11—H11···O2ii0.92 (4)1.74 (4)2.6488 (19)170 (4)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y, −x, z; (ii) −y+1/3, −x+2/3, z+1/6.
Acknowledgements top

The authors thank Dr Peter Mayer for professional support. The coeditor (H. Schmalle) is acknowledged for his support regarding graph theory.

references
References top

Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.

Becker, H. G. O., Beckert, R., Domschke, G., Fanghänel, E., Habicher, W. D., Metz, P., Pavel, D. & Schwetlick, K. (2001). Organikum – Organisch-chemisches Grundpraktikum. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.

Bernstein, J., Davies, R. E. & Chang, N. L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.

Betz, R. & Klüfers, P. (2007a). Acta Cryst. E63, o3891–?.

Betz, R. & Klüfers, P. (2007b). Acta Cryst. E63, o3932–?.

Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Muranishi, Y. & Okabe, N. (2004). Acta Cryst. C60, m47–m50.

Nonius (2004). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.

Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.