Download citation
Download citation
link to html
The binary title complex, [Co(C6H4NO2)2]n, is a three-dimensional coordination polymer that is triply inter­penetrated with diamonoid topology. The asymmetric unit comprises half a Co atom, which lies on a twofold axis, and a 4-pyridine­carboxyl­ate anion, in a general position. The Co atom is in a distorted cis-N2O4 octa­hedral geometry defined by two chelating carboxyl­ate groups and two pyridyl N atoms.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807046314/tk2191sup1.cif
Contains datablocks I, global

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807046314/tk2191Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 663653

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 293 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.003 Å
  • R factor = 0.027
  • wR factor = 0.063
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 14.8

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level C PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.97 PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for O1 PLAT241_ALERT_2_C Check High Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for O2 PLAT242_ALERT_2_C Check Low Ueq as Compared to Neighbors for Co1
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 27.50 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 1288 Count of symmetry unique reflns 836 Completeness (_total/calc) 154.07% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 452 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.541 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT199_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _cell_measurement_temperature 293 K PLAT200_ALERT_1_G Check the Reported _diffrn_ambient_temperature . 293 K PLAT794_ALERT_5_G Check Predicted Bond Valency for Co1 (3) 1.80
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 4 ALERT level C = Check and explain 4 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 3 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 1 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Pyridinecarboxylates and their derivatives are good bridging ligands in the construction of 2- and 3-D functional metal-organic frameworks (Evans et al., 1999; Lu, 2003; Tong, Chen & Batten, 2003; Tong, Li et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003). The title complex, (I), was obtained unexpectedly in an attempt to prepare a bimetallic coordination network (see Experimental) with 4-pyridinecarboxylate (4-pya).

The structure of (I) is a three-dimensional coordination network. The Co(II) atom, which is located on a 2-fold axis (Fig. 1), is coordinated by four O atoms derived from two chelating carboxylate ligands and two pyridine-N atoms that define a distorted octahedral geometry within a cis-N2O4 donor set. The major distortion from the ideal octahedral geometry is caused by the acute chelate angle of 60.43 (7)° for O1—Co—O2.

The Co—N bond length [2.0723 (16) Å] is slightly shorter than those of 2.133 (3) Å, found in [Co(4-pya)2].0.5EtOH (Wei et al., 2004), and 2.166 (4) Å, found in [Co(4,4-bipyridine)(4-pya)(H2O)]NO3.4,4'-bipyridine.1.5H2O (MacGillivray et al., 1998). By contrast, the Co—O bond distances of 2.1104 (16) and 2.2279 (16) Å are longer than those of 2.082 (4)–2.098 (4) Å formed by the 4-pya ligands in poly[tetrakis(µ3-4-pya)dicobalt(II)] (Wei et al., 2004).

In the crystal structure, the polymeric chains are triply interpenetrated with a diamonoid topology (Fig. 2). This resembles the situation in [Zn(4-pya)2]n (Evans et al., 1999) but, the structures are not isomorphous.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Evans et al. (1999); Lu (2003); MacGillivray et al. (1998); Tong, Chen & Batten (2003); Tong, Li et al. (2003); Wang et al. (2003); Wei et al. (2004).

Experimental top

To a ethanol-water solution (2:1 v:v, 10 ml) of Co(NO3)2.6H2O (0.146 g, 0.5 mmol) and Gd(NO3)3.6H2O (0.226 g, 0.5 mmol), a solution of 4-pyridinecarboxylic acid (0.123 g, 1.0 mmol) in EtOH (5 ml) was added slowly with stirring over 30 min at 333 K. This solution was transferred into a sealed 23-ml Teflon-lined stainless container and heated to 160 °C for 3 days. After slow cooling to room temperature over 8 h, red crystals of (I) separated from the solution (yield 75%).

Refinement top

All the H atoms were included in the riding-model approximation, with C–H = 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

Pyridinecarboxylates and their derivatives are good bridging ligands in the construction of 2- and 3-D functional metal-organic frameworks (Evans et al., 1999; Lu, 2003; Tong, Chen & Batten, 2003; Tong, Li et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003). The title complex, (I), was obtained unexpectedly in an attempt to prepare a bimetallic coordination network (see Experimental) with 4-pyridinecarboxylate (4-pya).

The structure of (I) is a three-dimensional coordination network. The Co(II) atom, which is located on a 2-fold axis (Fig. 1), is coordinated by four O atoms derived from two chelating carboxylate ligands and two pyridine-N atoms that define a distorted octahedral geometry within a cis-N2O4 donor set. The major distortion from the ideal octahedral geometry is caused by the acute chelate angle of 60.43 (7)° for O1—Co—O2.

The Co—N bond length [2.0723 (16) Å] is slightly shorter than those of 2.133 (3) Å, found in [Co(4-pya)2].0.5EtOH (Wei et al., 2004), and 2.166 (4) Å, found in [Co(4,4-bipyridine)(4-pya)(H2O)]NO3.4,4'-bipyridine.1.5H2O (MacGillivray et al., 1998). By contrast, the Co—O bond distances of 2.1104 (16) and 2.2279 (16) Å are longer than those of 2.082 (4)–2.098 (4) Å formed by the 4-pya ligands in poly[tetrakis(µ3-4-pya)dicobalt(II)] (Wei et al., 2004).

In the crystal structure, the polymeric chains are triply interpenetrated with a diamonoid topology (Fig. 2). This resembles the situation in [Zn(4-pya)2]n (Evans et al., 1999) but, the structures are not isomorphous.

For related literature, see: Evans et al. (1999); Lu (2003); MacGillivray et al. (1998); Tong, Chen & Batten (2003); Tong, Li et al. (2003); Wang et al. (2003); Wei et al. (2004).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) extended to show the octahedral coordination geometry for the Co atom and the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (a) x - 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z - 3/4; (b) -y + 1/2, x - 1/2, z + 3/4; (c) y, x, -z; (d) y + 1/2, -x + 1/2, z - 3/4.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Plot of a single diamonoid network in (I) viewed along the a axis.
Poly[bis(µ2-4-pyridinecarboxylato-κ3N:O,O')cobalt(II)] top
Crystal data top
[Co(C6H4NO2)2]Dx = 1.698 Mg m3
Mr = 303.13Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Tetragonal, P43212Cell parameters from 1288 reflections
Hall symbol: P 4nw 2abwθ = 2.5–27.5°
a = 11.6304 (7) ŵ = 1.46 mm1
c = 8.7665 (10) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1185.81 (17) Å3Block, red
Z = 40.21 × 0.15 × 0.07 mm
F(000) = 612
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1288 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1219 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.027
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 1014
Tmin = 0.749, Tmax = 0.905k = 1414
4769 measured reflectionsl = 114
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.063 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.033P)2 + 0.0513P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.11(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1288 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
87 parametersΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
0 restraintsAbsolute structure: (Flack, 1983)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.03 (2)
Crystal data top
[Co(C6H4NO2)2]Z = 4
Mr = 303.13Mo Kα radiation
Tetragonal, P43212µ = 1.46 mm1
a = 11.6304 (7) ÅT = 293 K
c = 8.7665 (10) Å0.21 × 0.15 × 0.07 mm
V = 1185.81 (17) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1288 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
1219 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.749, Tmax = 0.905Rint = 0.027
4769 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.063Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
S = 1.11Δρmin = 0.24 e Å3
1288 reflectionsAbsolute structure: (Flack, 1983)
87 parametersAbsolute structure parameter: 0.03 (2)
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Co10.27729 (2)0.27729 (2)0.00000.02511 (13)
O10.39522 (15)0.18731 (17)0.13866 (18)0.0475 (5)
O20.37226 (15)0.37088 (16)0.18249 (19)0.0457 (4)
N10.64350 (14)0.24467 (16)0.59662 (19)0.0299 (4)
C10.5913 (2)0.15229 (19)0.5376 (2)0.0369 (5)
H10.60660.08060.57990.044*
C20.5157 (2)0.1592 (2)0.4165 (3)0.0370 (5)
H20.48120.09320.37790.044*
C30.49211 (18)0.2652 (2)0.3537 (2)0.0315 (5)
C40.5420 (2)0.36043 (19)0.4179 (3)0.0354 (5)
H40.52570.43340.38020.042*
C50.61669 (19)0.34707 (18)0.5389 (2)0.0331 (5)
H50.64970.41230.58190.040*
C60.41504 (18)0.2756 (2)0.2161 (2)0.0352 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Co10.02932 (16)0.02932 (16)0.01668 (18)0.00108 (16)0.00053 (11)0.00053 (11)
O10.0495 (10)0.0624 (12)0.0305 (8)0.0157 (9)0.0138 (8)0.0114 (9)
O20.0435 (11)0.0472 (11)0.0464 (9)0.0054 (7)0.0189 (8)0.0158 (9)
N10.0315 (9)0.0357 (10)0.0225 (8)0.0011 (7)0.0037 (7)0.0011 (7)
C10.0467 (14)0.0288 (12)0.0352 (12)0.0008 (10)0.0074 (11)0.0039 (10)
C20.0431 (13)0.0349 (13)0.0330 (11)0.0033 (11)0.0104 (11)0.0013 (10)
C30.0298 (11)0.0408 (13)0.0238 (9)0.0012 (10)0.0026 (9)0.0011 (10)
C40.0412 (13)0.0354 (13)0.0294 (11)0.0055 (10)0.0035 (10)0.0063 (10)
C50.0414 (13)0.0292 (11)0.0288 (11)0.0013 (9)0.0057 (9)0.0034 (9)
C60.0291 (11)0.0529 (14)0.0235 (10)0.0028 (11)0.0005 (8)0.0043 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Co1—N1i2.0723 (16)N1—Co1iv2.0723 (16)
Co1—N1ii2.0723 (16)C1—C21.381 (3)
Co1—O1iii2.1104 (16)C1—H10.9300
Co1—O12.1104 (16)C2—C31.377 (3)
Co1—O2iii2.2279 (16)C2—H20.9300
Co1—O22.2279 (16)C3—C41.372 (3)
O1—C61.253 (3)C3—C61.508 (3)
O2—C61.250 (3)C4—C51.379 (3)
N1—C51.331 (3)C4—H40.9300
N1—C11.338 (3)C5—H50.9300
N1i—Co1—N1ii103.65 (10)C1—N1—Co1iv119.51 (15)
N1i—Co1—O1iii94.67 (7)N1—C1—C2122.6 (2)
N1ii—Co1—O1iii93.05 (7)N1—C1—H1118.7
N1i—Co1—O193.05 (7)C2—C1—H1118.7
N1ii—Co1—O194.67 (7)C3—C2—C1119.1 (2)
O1iii—Co1—O1167.50 (11)C3—C2—H2120.5
N1i—Co1—O2iii153.36 (7)C1—C2—H2120.5
N1ii—Co1—O2iii88.08 (6)C4—C3—C2118.33 (19)
O1iii—Co1—O2iii60.43 (7)C4—C3—C6121.0 (2)
O1—Co1—O2iii109.99 (7)C2—C3—C6120.7 (2)
N1i—Co1—O288.08 (6)C3—C4—C5119.4 (2)
N1ii—Co1—O2153.36 (7)C3—C4—H4120.3
O1iii—Co1—O2109.99 (7)C5—C4—H4120.3
O1—Co1—O260.43 (7)N1—C5—C4122.7 (2)
O2iii—Co1—O291.79 (8)N1—C5—H5118.6
C6—O1—Co191.44 (14)C4—C5—H5118.6
C6—O2—Co186.20 (13)O2—C6—O1121.71 (19)
C5—N1—C1117.73 (18)O2—C6—C3119.8 (2)
C5—N1—Co1iv122.20 (14)O1—C6—C3118.5 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+1/2, z3/4; (ii) y+1/2, x1/2, z+3/4; (iii) y, x, z; (iv) y+1/2, x+1/2, z3/4.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[Co(C6H4NO2)2]
Mr303.13
Crystal system, space groupTetragonal, P43212
Temperature (K)293
a, c (Å)11.6304 (7), 8.7665 (10)
V3)1185.81 (17)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.46
Crystal size (mm)0.21 × 0.15 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
Tmin, Tmax0.749, 0.905
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
4769, 1288, 1219
Rint0.027
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.650
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.027, 0.063, 1.11
No. of reflections1288
No. of parameters87
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.39, 0.24
Absolute structure(Flack, 1983)
Absolute structure parameter0.03 (2)

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1999), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976), SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds