supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, m2605    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536807046314 ]

Poly[bis([mu]2-4-pyridinecarboxylato-[kappa]3N:O,O')cobalt(II)]: a triply interpenetrated structure with diamonoid topology

H.-Q. Hao, M.-X. Peng and Z.-Y. Chen

Abstract top

The binary title complex, [Co(C6H4NO2)2]n, is a three-dimensional coordination polymer that is triply interpenetrated with diamonoid topology. The asymmetric unit comprises half a Co atom, which lies on a twofold axis, and a 4-pyridinecarboxylate anion, in a general position. The Co atom is in a distorted cis-N2O4 octahedral geometry defined by two chelating carboxylate groups and two pyridyl N atoms.

Comment top

Pyridinecarboxylates and their derivatives are good bridging ligands in the construction of 2- and 3-D functional metal-organic frameworks (Evans et al., 1999; Lu, 2003; Tong, Chen & Batten, 2003; Tong, Li et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2003). The title complex, (I), was obtained unexpectedly in an attempt to prepare a bimetallic coordination network (see Experimental) with 4-pyridinecarboxylate (4-pya).

The structure of (I) is a three-dimensional coordination network. The Co(II) atom, which is located on a 2-fold axis (Fig. 1), is coordinated by four O atoms derived from two chelating carboxylate ligands and two pyridine-N atoms that define a distorted octahedral geometry within a cis-N2O4 donor set. The major distortion from the ideal octahedral geometry is caused by the acute chelate angle of 60.43 (7)° for O1—Co—O2.

The Co—N bond length [2.0723 (16) Å] is slightly shorter than those of 2.133 (3) Å, found in [Co(4-pya)2]·0.5EtOH (Wei et al., 2004), and 2.166 (4) Å, found in [Co(4,4-bipyridine)(4-pya)(H2O)]NO3.4,4'-bipyridine·1.5H2O (MacGillivray et al., 1998). By contrast, the Co—O bond distances of 2.1104 (16) and 2.2279 (16) Å are longer than those of 2.082 (4)–2.098 (4) Å formed by the 4-pya ligands in poly[tetrakis(µ3-4-pya)dicobalt(II)] (Wei et al., 2004).

In the crystal structure, the polymeric chains are triply interpenetrated with a diamonoid topology (Fig. 2). This resembles the situation in [Zn(4-pya)2]n (Evans et al., 1999) but, the structures are not isomorphous.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Evans et al. (1999); Lu (2003); MacGillivray et al. (1998); Tong, Chen & Batten (2003); Tong, Li et al. (2003); Wang et al. (2003); Wei et al. (2004).

Experimental top

To a ethanol-water solution (2:1 v:v, 10 ml) of Co(NO3)2·6H2O (0.146 g, 0.5 mmol) and Gd(NO3)3·6H2O (0.226 g, 0.5 mmol), a solution of 4-pyridinecarboxylic acid (0.123 g, 1.0 mmol) in EtOH (5 ml) was added slowly with stirring over 30 min at 333 K. This solution was transferred into a sealed 23-ml Teflon-lined stainless container and heated to 160 °C for 3 days. After slow cooling to room temperature over 8 h, red crystals of (I) separated from the solution (yield 75%).

Refinement top

All the H atoms were included in the riding-model approximation, with C–H = 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1999); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 1998).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) extended to show the octahedral coordination geometry for the Co atom and the atom-labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (a) x − 1/2, −y + 1/2, −z − 3/4; (b) −y + 1/2, x − 1/2, z + 3/4; (c) y, x, −z; (d) y + 1/2, −x + 1/2, z − 3/4.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Plot of a single diamonoid network in (I) viewed along the a axis.
Poly[bis(µ2-4-pyridinecarboxylato-κ3N:O,O')cobalt(II)] top
Crystal data top
[Co(C6H4NO2)2]Z = 4
Mr = 303.13F000 = 612
Tetragonal, P43212Dx = 1.698 Mg m3
Hall symbol: P 4nw 2abwMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 11.6304 (7) ÅCell parameters from 1288 reflections
b = 11.6304 (7) Åθ = 2.5–27.5º
c = 8.7665 (10) ŵ = 1.46 mm1
α = 90ºT = 293 (2) K
β = 90ºBlock, red
γ = 90º0.21 × 0.15 × 0.07 mm
V = 1185.81 (17) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1288 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1219 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.027
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 27.5º
φ and ω scansθmin = 2.5º
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
h = 10→14
Tmin = 0.749, Tmax = 0.905k = 14→14
4769 measured reflectionsl = 11→4
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.033P)2 + 0.0513P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.063(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
1288 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
87 parametersExtinction correction: none
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: (Flack, 1983)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapFlack parameter: 0.03 (2)
Crystal data top
[Co(C6H4NO2)2]γ = 90º
Mr = 303.13V = 1185.81 (17) Å3
Tetragonal, P43212Z = 4
a = 11.6304 (7) ÅMo Kα
b = 11.6304 (7) ŵ = 1.46 mm1
c = 8.7665 (10) ÅT = 293 (2) K
α = 90º0.21 × 0.15 × 0.07 mm
β = 90º
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1288 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2002)
1219 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.749, Tmax = 0.905Rint = 0.027
4769 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.063Δρmax = 0.39 e Å3
S = 1.11Δρmin = 0.24 e Å3
1288 reflectionsAbsolute structure: (Flack, 1983)
87 parametersFlack parameter: 0.03 (2)
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Co10.27729 (2)0.27729 (2)0.00000.02511 (13)
O10.39522 (15)0.18731 (17)0.13866 (18)0.0475 (5)
O20.37226 (15)0.37088 (16)0.18249 (19)0.0457 (4)
N10.64350 (14)0.24467 (16)0.59662 (19)0.0299 (4)
C10.5913 (2)0.15229 (19)0.5376 (2)0.0369 (5)
H10.60660.08060.57990.044*
C20.5157 (2)0.1592 (2)0.4165 (3)0.0370 (5)
H20.48120.09320.37790.044*
C30.49211 (18)0.2652 (2)0.3537 (2)0.0315 (5)
C40.5420 (2)0.36043 (19)0.4179 (3)0.0354 (5)
H40.52570.43340.38020.042*
C50.61669 (19)0.34707 (18)0.5389 (2)0.0331 (5)
H50.64970.41230.58190.040*
C60.41504 (18)0.2756 (2)0.2161 (2)0.0352 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Co10.02932 (16)0.02932 (16)0.01668 (18)0.00108 (16)0.00053 (11)0.00053 (11)
O10.0495 (10)0.0624 (12)0.0305 (8)0.0157 (9)0.0138 (8)0.0114 (9)
O20.0435 (11)0.0472 (11)0.0464 (9)0.0054 (7)0.0189 (8)0.0158 (9)
N10.0315 (9)0.0357 (10)0.0225 (8)0.0011 (7)0.0037 (7)0.0011 (7)
C10.0467 (14)0.0288 (12)0.0352 (12)0.0008 (10)0.0074 (11)0.0039 (10)
C20.0431 (13)0.0349 (13)0.0330 (11)0.0033 (11)0.0104 (11)0.0013 (10)
C30.0298 (11)0.0408 (13)0.0238 (9)0.0012 (10)0.0026 (9)0.0011 (10)
C40.0412 (13)0.0354 (13)0.0294 (11)0.0055 (10)0.0035 (10)0.0063 (10)
C50.0414 (13)0.0292 (11)0.0288 (11)0.0013 (9)0.0057 (9)0.0034 (9)
C60.0291 (11)0.0529 (14)0.0235 (10)0.0028 (11)0.0005 (8)0.0043 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Co1—N1i2.0723 (16)N1—Co1iv2.0723 (16)
Co1—N1ii2.0723 (16)C1—C21.381 (3)
Co1—O1iii2.1104 (16)C1—H10.9300
Co1—O12.1104 (16)C2—C31.377 (3)
Co1—O2iii2.2279 (16)C2—H20.9300
Co1—O22.2279 (16)C3—C41.372 (3)
O1—C61.253 (3)C3—C61.508 (3)
O2—C61.250 (3)C4—C51.379 (3)
N1—C51.331 (3)C4—H40.9300
N1—C11.338 (3)C5—H50.9300
N1i—Co1—N1ii103.65 (10)C1—N1—Co1iv119.51 (15)
N1i—Co1—O1iii94.67 (7)N1—C1—C2122.6 (2)
N1ii—Co1—O1iii93.05 (7)N1—C1—H1118.7
N1i—Co1—O193.05 (7)C2—C1—H1118.7
N1ii—Co1—O194.67 (7)C3—C2—C1119.1 (2)
O1iii—Co1—O1167.50 (11)C3—C2—H2120.5
N1i—Co1—O2iii153.36 (7)C1—C2—H2120.5
N1ii—Co1—O2iii88.08 (6)C4—C3—C2118.33 (19)
O1iii—Co1—O2iii60.43 (7)C4—C3—C6121.0 (2)
O1—Co1—O2iii109.99 (7)C2—C3—C6120.7 (2)
N1i—Co1—O288.08 (6)C3—C4—C5119.4 (2)
N1ii—Co1—O2153.36 (7)C3—C4—H4120.3
O1iii—Co1—O2109.99 (7)C5—C4—H4120.3
O1—Co1—O260.43 (7)N1—C5—C4122.7 (2)
O2iii—Co1—O291.79 (8)N1—C5—H5118.6
C6—O1—Co191.44 (14)C4—C5—H5118.6
C6—O2—Co186.20 (13)O2—C6—O1121.71 (19)
C5—N1—C1117.73 (18)O2—C6—C3119.8 (2)
C5—N1—Co1iv122.20 (14)O1—C6—C3118.5 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z−3/4; (ii) −y+1/2, x−1/2, z+3/4; (iii) y, x, −z; (iv) y+1/2, −x+1/2, z−3/4.
Acknowledgements top

The authors thank Jiaying University for generously supporting this work.

references
References top

Bruker (1998). SMART (Version 5.0) and SHELXTL (Version 5.1). Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Bruker (1999). SAINT. Version 6.0. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Evans, O. R., Xiong, R.-G., Wang, Z., Wong, G. K. & Lin, W. (1999). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 38, 536–538.

Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.

Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII. Report ORNL-5138. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Lu, J. Y. (2003). Coord. Chem. Rev. 246, 327–347.

MacGillivray, L. R., Groeneman, R. H. & Atwood, J. L. (1998). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 2676–2677.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXL97 and SHELXS97. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2002). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Tong, M.-L., Chen, X.-M. & Batten, S. R. (2003). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 16170–16171.

Tong, M.-L., Li, L.-J., Mochizuki, K., Chang, H.-C., Chen, X.-M., Li, Y. & Kitagawa, S. (2003). Chem. Commun. pp. 428–429.

Wang, R., Hong, M., Luo, J., Cao, R. & Weng, J. (2003). Chem. Commun. pp. 1018–1019.

Wei, Q., Nieuwenhuyzen, M., Meunier, F., Hardacre, C. & James, S. L. (2004). Dalton Trans. pp. 1807–1811.