Download citation
Download citation
link to html
In the title mol­ecule, C16H11BrCl2O2, the angle between the mean planes of the 2,4-dichloro­phenyl and 2-bromo­phenyl groups is 45.3 (5)°. The 5-meth­oxy group, with a torsion angle of 175.4 (4)°, is twisted slightly away from the plane of the 2-bromo­phenyl ring in an anti­periplanar conformation. The ketone oxygen of the prop-2-en-1-one group is twisted in a synclinal arrangement with respect to the 2,4-dichloro­phenyl group, with a torsion angle of 54.1 (5)°. Mol­ecules pack in a chain-like fashion, in an alternate inverted pattern parallel to the bc face of the unit cell, along the c axis.

Supporting information

cif

Crystallographic Information File (CIF) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807048271/ww2098sup1.cif
Contains datablocks global, I

hkl

Structure factor file (CIF format) https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536807048271/ww2098Isup2.hkl
Contains datablock I

CCDC reference: 667305

Key indicators

  • Single-crystal X-ray study
  • T = 296 K
  • Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.004 Å
  • R factor = 0.053
  • wR factor = 0.126
  • Data-to-parameter ratio = 24.0

checkCIF/PLATON results

No syntax errors found



Alert level B ABSTM02_ALERT_3_B The ratio of expected to reported Tmax/Tmin(RR') is < 0.75 Tmin and Tmax reported: 0.305 1.000 Tmin(prime) and Tmax expected: 0.251 0.603 RR(prime) = 0.733 Please check that your absorption correction is appropriate. PLAT061_ALERT_3_B Tmax/Tmin Range Test RR' too Large ............. 0.67
Alert level C PLAT029_ALERT_3_C _diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full Low ....... 0.97 PLAT062_ALERT_4_C Rescale T(min) & T(max) by ..................... 0.60
Alert level G ABSTM02_ALERT_3_G When printed, the submitted absorption T values will be replaced by the scaled T values. Since the ratio of scaled T's is identical to the ratio of reported T values, the scaling does not imply a change to the absorption corrections used in the study. Ratio of Tmax expected/reported 0.603 Tmax scaled 0.603 Tmin scaled 0.184
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 2 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 2 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 0 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 4 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 1 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check

Comment top

Chalcones are one of the major classes of natural products with widespread distribution in fruits, vegetables, spices, tea and soy based foodstuff have been recently subjects of great interest for their interesting pharmacological activities (Di Carlo et al., 1999). A vast number of naturally occurring chalcones are polyhydroxylated in the aryl rings. The radical quenching properties of the phenolic groups present in many chalcones have raised interest in using the compounds or chalcone rich plant extracts as drugs or food preservatives (Dhar, 1981). Chalcones can be easily obtained from the aldol condensation of aromatic aldehydes and aromatic ketones. This class of compounds presents interesting biological properties such as cytotoxicity (Pandey et al., 2005; Bhat et al., 2005) and antiherpes activity and antitumour activity and may be useful for the chemotherapy of leishmaniasis among others (Lawrence et al., 2001). A review on the bioactivities of chalcones is described (Dimmock et al., 1999). Chalcones and their heterocyclic analogs as potential antifungal chemotherapeutic agents is published (Opletalova & Sedivy, 1999). Chalcones and flavonoids as anti-tuberculosis agents is reported (Lin et al., 2002). Among several organic compounds reported for NLO property, chalcone derivatives are noticeable materials for their excellent blue light transmittance and good crystallizability. They provide a necessary configuration to show NLO property with two planar rings connected through a conjugated double bond (Goto et al., 1991; Uchida et al., 1998; Tam et al., 1989; Indira et al., 2002, Sarojini et al., 2006). Substitution on either of the phenyl rings greatly influence non-centrosymmetric crystal packing. It is speculated that in order to improve the activity, more bulky substituents should be introduced to increase the spontaneous polarization of acentric crystal (Fichou et al., 1988). The molecular hyperpolarizability β are strongly influenced not only by the electronic effect but also by the steric effect of the substituent (Cho et al., 1996). Bromo groups can obviously improve the molecular first order hyperpolarizabilities and can effectively reduce the dipole-dipole interactions between the molecules (Zhao et al., 2002). The crystal structures of chalcones containing structures of a few dichloro and bromo substituted chalcones viz., (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(quinolin-8-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Sarojini et al., 2007), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(4,5-dimethoxy-2-nitrophenyl) prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007a), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl) prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007b), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007c), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007 d), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(2-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007 e), (2E)-1-(3-bromo-2-thienyl)-3-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl] prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007a), (2E)-1-(3-bromo-2-thienyl)-3-(4-butoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007b), (2E)-1-(3-bromo-2-thienyl)-3-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007c) and (2E)-1-(3-bromothien-2-yl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007 d) have been reported. In continuation of our work on chalcones, a new chalcone, (I), C16H11BrCl2O2 is synthesized and its crystal structure is reported.

The angle between the mean planes of the 2,4-dichlorophenyl and 2-bromophenyl groups is 45.3 (5)° (Fig. 1). The 5-methoxy group, with a torsion angle [C16–O2–C14–C13] of 175.4 (4)°, is twisted slightly away from the plane of the 2-bromophenyl ring in an anti-periplanar formation. The ketone oxygen of the prop-2-en-1-one group, with a 54.1 (5)° torsion angle [C2–C1–C7–O1], is twisted in a syn-clinal arrangement with the 2,4-dichlorophenyl group. Molecules in the asymmetric unit pack themselves in a chain-like fashion in an alternate inverted pattern parallel to the bc face of the unit cell along the c axis (Fig. 2). Crystal packing is stabilized by van der Waals forces as well as by interactions between π ring orbitals from a nearby 2-bromo-5-methoxyphenyl ring [C10i–C15i (Cg1i); where Cg = ring center of gravity] and H6A from the 2,4-dichlorophenyl ring [C6–H6A···Cg1i: 2.78 (0) Å (symmetry code i: 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z)].

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Sarojini et al. 2007; Yathirajan et al. (2007a,b,c,d,e); Butcher et al., (2007a,b,c,d). For related literature, see: Dhar, (1981); Fichou et al. (1988); Tam et al. (1989); Goto et al. (1991); Cho et al. (1996); Uchida et al. (1998); Di Carlo et al. (1999); Dimmock et al. (1999); Opletalova & Sedivy, (1999); Lawrence et al. (2001); Indira et al. (2002); Lin et al. (2002); Zhao et al. (2002); Bhat et al. (2005); Pandey et al. (2005); Sarojini et al. (2006).

Experimental top

2-Bromo-5-methoxybenzaldehyde (2.15 g, 0.01 mol) in ethanol (30 ml) was mixed with 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)ethanone (1.89 g, 0.01 mol) in ethanol (20 ml) and the mixture was treated with 7 ml of 10% KOH solution (Fig. 3). The reaction mixture was then kept for constant stirring for 10 h. The solid precipitate obtained was filtered, washed with ethanol and dried. The crystal growth was carried out from a 1:1 mixture of acetone and toluene by the slow evaporation technique (m.p.: 367–369 K). Analysis found: C 49.71, H 2.83%; C16H11BrCl2O2 requires: C 49.78, H 2.87%.

Refinement top

All H atoms were placed in their calculated places and all H atoms were refined using a riding model with C—H = 0.93 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.18–1.50Ueq(C).

Structure description top

Chalcones are one of the major classes of natural products with widespread distribution in fruits, vegetables, spices, tea and soy based foodstuff have been recently subjects of great interest for their interesting pharmacological activities (Di Carlo et al., 1999). A vast number of naturally occurring chalcones are polyhydroxylated in the aryl rings. The radical quenching properties of the phenolic groups present in many chalcones have raised interest in using the compounds or chalcone rich plant extracts as drugs or food preservatives (Dhar, 1981). Chalcones can be easily obtained from the aldol condensation of aromatic aldehydes and aromatic ketones. This class of compounds presents interesting biological properties such as cytotoxicity (Pandey et al., 2005; Bhat et al., 2005) and antiherpes activity and antitumour activity and may be useful for the chemotherapy of leishmaniasis among others (Lawrence et al., 2001). A review on the bioactivities of chalcones is described (Dimmock et al., 1999). Chalcones and their heterocyclic analogs as potential antifungal chemotherapeutic agents is published (Opletalova & Sedivy, 1999). Chalcones and flavonoids as anti-tuberculosis agents is reported (Lin et al., 2002). Among several organic compounds reported for NLO property, chalcone derivatives are noticeable materials for their excellent blue light transmittance and good crystallizability. They provide a necessary configuration to show NLO property with two planar rings connected through a conjugated double bond (Goto et al., 1991; Uchida et al., 1998; Tam et al., 1989; Indira et al., 2002, Sarojini et al., 2006). Substitution on either of the phenyl rings greatly influence non-centrosymmetric crystal packing. It is speculated that in order to improve the activity, more bulky substituents should be introduced to increase the spontaneous polarization of acentric crystal (Fichou et al., 1988). The molecular hyperpolarizability β are strongly influenced not only by the electronic effect but also by the steric effect of the substituent (Cho et al., 1996). Bromo groups can obviously improve the molecular first order hyperpolarizabilities and can effectively reduce the dipole-dipole interactions between the molecules (Zhao et al., 2002). The crystal structures of chalcones containing structures of a few dichloro and bromo substituted chalcones viz., (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(quinolin-8-yl)prop-2-en-1-one (Sarojini et al., 2007), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(4,5-dimethoxy-2-nitrophenyl) prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007a), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl) prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007b), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007c), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007 d), (2E)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-3-(2-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Yathirajan et al., 2007 e), (2E)-1-(3-bromo-2-thienyl)-3-[4-(dimethylamino)phenyl] prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007a), (2E)-1-(3-bromo-2-thienyl)-3-(4-butoxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007b), (2E)-1-(3-bromo-2-thienyl)-3-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)prop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007c) and (2E)-1-(3-bromothien-2-yl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one (Butcher et al., 2007 d) have been reported. In continuation of our work on chalcones, a new chalcone, (I), C16H11BrCl2O2 is synthesized and its crystal structure is reported.

The angle between the mean planes of the 2,4-dichlorophenyl and 2-bromophenyl groups is 45.3 (5)° (Fig. 1). The 5-methoxy group, with a torsion angle [C16–O2–C14–C13] of 175.4 (4)°, is twisted slightly away from the plane of the 2-bromophenyl ring in an anti-periplanar formation. The ketone oxygen of the prop-2-en-1-one group, with a 54.1 (5)° torsion angle [C2–C1–C7–O1], is twisted in a syn-clinal arrangement with the 2,4-dichlorophenyl group. Molecules in the asymmetric unit pack themselves in a chain-like fashion in an alternate inverted pattern parallel to the bc face of the unit cell along the c axis (Fig. 2). Crystal packing is stabilized by van der Waals forces as well as by interactions between π ring orbitals from a nearby 2-bromo-5-methoxyphenyl ring [C10i–C15i (Cg1i); where Cg = ring center of gravity] and H6A from the 2,4-dichlorophenyl ring [C6–H6A···Cg1i: 2.78 (0) Å (symmetry code i: 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z)].

For related structures, see: Sarojini et al. 2007; Yathirajan et al. (2007a,b,c,d,e); Butcher et al., (2007a,b,c,d). For related literature, see: Dhar, (1981); Fichou et al. (1988); Tam et al. (1989); Goto et al. (1991); Cho et al. (1996); Uchida et al. (1998); Di Carlo et al. (1999); Dimmock et al. (1999); Opletalova & Sedivy, (1999); Lawrence et al. (2001); Indira et al. (2002); Lin et al. (2002); Zhao et al. (2002); Bhat et al. (2005); Pandey et al. (2005); Sarojini et al. (2006).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound, showing atom labeling and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound, viewed down the a axis and showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Synthetic scheme for C16H11BrCl2O2.
(2E)-3-(2-Bromo-5-methoxyphenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)prop-2-en-1-one top
Crystal data top
C16H11BrCl2O2Z = 2
Mr = 386.06F(000) = 384
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.640 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.7836 (13) ÅCell parameters from 4266 reflections
b = 7.8829 (8) Åθ = 4.7–32.4°
c = 13.0927 (19) ŵ = 2.97 mm1
α = 83.05 (1)°T = 296 K
β = 88.899 (13)°Plate, pale yellow
γ = 78.596 (11)°0.45 × 0.37 × 0.17 mm
V = 781.68 (19) Å3
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R CCD
diffractometer
4577 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2880 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
Detector resolution: 10.5081 pixels mm-1θmax = 32.4°, θmin = 4.7°
φ and ω scansh = 1110
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
k = 1111
Tmin = 0.305, Tmax = 1.000l = 1819
8869 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.126H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0456P)2 + 0.6258P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4577 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
191 parametersΔρmax = 0.74 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H11BrCl2O2γ = 78.596 (11)°
Mr = 386.06V = 781.68 (19) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 7.7836 (13) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 7.8829 (8) ŵ = 2.97 mm1
c = 13.0927 (19) ÅT = 296 K
α = 83.05 (1)°0.45 × 0.37 × 0.17 mm
β = 88.899 (13)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R CCD
diffractometer
4577 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
2880 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.305, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.030
8869 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0530 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.126H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.74 e Å3
4577 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
191 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br0.19344 (6)0.81176 (4)0.43646 (3)0.06201 (16)
Cl10.24366 (16)0.09035 (12)0.15596 (9)0.0728 (3)
Cl20.25624 (19)0.73128 (14)0.02982 (8)0.0837 (4)
O10.5150 (4)0.0495 (3)0.3339 (2)0.0678 (8)
O20.1303 (4)0.3275 (3)0.82251 (18)0.0643 (7)
C10.3892 (4)0.3245 (4)0.2449 (2)0.0378 (6)
C20.3062 (5)0.2898 (4)0.1586 (2)0.0441 (7)
C30.2649 (5)0.4133 (4)0.0736 (2)0.0537 (9)
H3A0.20660.38930.01730.064*
C40.3121 (5)0.5721 (4)0.0743 (2)0.0513 (8)
C50.3987 (5)0.6101 (4)0.1559 (3)0.0504 (8)
H5A0.43220.71720.15430.060*
C60.4354 (4)0.4865 (4)0.2408 (2)0.0437 (7)
H6A0.49280.51250.29680.052*
C70.4314 (4)0.1950 (4)0.3399 (2)0.0432 (7)
C80.3722 (4)0.2515 (4)0.4402 (2)0.0417 (7)
H8A0.41110.17660.49920.050*
C90.2675 (4)0.4020 (4)0.4518 (2)0.0388 (6)
H9A0.22450.47170.39170.047*
C100.2116 (4)0.4711 (4)0.5489 (2)0.0374 (6)
C110.1705 (4)0.6497 (4)0.5541 (2)0.0425 (7)
C120.1197 (5)0.7168 (4)0.6455 (3)0.0496 (8)
H12A0.09460.83670.64760.060*
C130.1066 (5)0.6045 (5)0.7330 (3)0.0518 (8)
H13A0.07080.64900.79430.062*
C140.1467 (5)0.4245 (4)0.7307 (2)0.0455 (7)
C150.1996 (4)0.3585 (4)0.6394 (2)0.0395 (6)
H15A0.22740.23850.63790.047*
C160.1558 (8)0.1460 (6)0.8250 (3)0.0852 (15)
H16A0.13420.09510.89320.128*
H16B0.27430.10110.80590.128*
H16C0.07650.11750.77750.128*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br0.0796 (3)0.03977 (19)0.0635 (2)0.01194 (17)0.00880 (19)0.00831 (14)
Cl10.0965 (8)0.0418 (4)0.0858 (7)0.0191 (5)0.0089 (6)0.0200 (4)
Cl20.1286 (11)0.0601 (6)0.0499 (5)0.0004 (6)0.0125 (6)0.0143 (4)
O10.090 (2)0.0433 (13)0.0573 (15)0.0139 (13)0.0105 (14)0.0001 (11)
O20.090 (2)0.0597 (15)0.0413 (13)0.0130 (14)0.0090 (13)0.0039 (11)
C10.0424 (18)0.0345 (14)0.0339 (14)0.0026 (12)0.0044 (12)0.0023 (11)
C20.056 (2)0.0323 (14)0.0449 (17)0.0071 (13)0.0032 (14)0.0098 (12)
C30.069 (3)0.0518 (19)0.0388 (17)0.0036 (17)0.0066 (16)0.0114 (14)
C40.070 (2)0.0410 (16)0.0366 (16)0.0006 (16)0.0016 (15)0.0014 (12)
C50.066 (2)0.0354 (15)0.0494 (18)0.0140 (15)0.0068 (16)0.0003 (13)
C60.050 (2)0.0421 (15)0.0399 (16)0.0110 (14)0.0002 (13)0.0046 (12)
C70.0457 (19)0.0350 (14)0.0456 (17)0.0033 (13)0.0016 (13)0.0003 (12)
C80.0462 (19)0.0387 (15)0.0366 (15)0.0026 (13)0.0030 (13)0.0016 (11)
C90.0443 (18)0.0368 (14)0.0341 (14)0.0080 (13)0.0045 (12)0.0017 (11)
C100.0361 (16)0.0377 (14)0.0378 (15)0.0049 (12)0.0044 (12)0.0047 (11)
C110.0414 (18)0.0369 (14)0.0487 (17)0.0083 (13)0.0080 (14)0.0011 (12)
C120.049 (2)0.0382 (15)0.061 (2)0.0019 (14)0.0048 (16)0.0122 (14)
C130.051 (2)0.056 (2)0.0474 (18)0.0043 (16)0.0009 (15)0.0164 (15)
C140.049 (2)0.0483 (17)0.0397 (16)0.0110 (14)0.0007 (14)0.0051 (13)
C150.0413 (18)0.0366 (14)0.0414 (15)0.0091 (12)0.0028 (13)0.0050 (11)
C160.141 (5)0.059 (2)0.053 (2)0.021 (3)0.018 (3)0.0067 (18)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br—C111.908 (3)C8—C91.323 (4)
Cl1—C21.739 (3)C8—H8A0.9300
Cl2—C41.737 (3)C9—C101.468 (4)
O1—C71.213 (4)C9—H9A0.9300
O2—C141.363 (4)C10—C111.390 (4)
O2—C161.401 (5)C10—C151.405 (4)
C1—C61.388 (4)C11—C121.386 (5)
C1—C21.394 (4)C12—C131.376 (5)
C1—C71.507 (4)C12—H12A0.9300
C2—C31.385 (4)C13—C141.395 (5)
C3—C41.374 (5)C13—H13A0.9300
C3—H3A0.9300C14—C151.384 (4)
C4—C51.368 (5)C15—H15A0.9300
C5—C61.380 (4)C16—H16A0.9600
C5—H5A0.9300C16—H16B0.9600
C6—H6A0.9300C16—H16C0.9600
C7—C81.474 (4)
C14—O2—C16118.4 (3)C8—C9—H9A116.4
C6—C1—C2117.2 (3)C10—C9—H9A116.4
C6—C1—C7119.7 (3)C11—C10—C15118.2 (3)
C2—C1—C7123.2 (3)C11—C10—C9121.0 (3)
C3—C2—C1121.8 (3)C15—C10—C9120.9 (3)
C3—C2—Cl1117.5 (3)C12—C11—C10121.6 (3)
C1—C2—Cl1120.7 (2)C12—C11—Br117.4 (2)
C4—C3—C2118.4 (3)C10—C11—Br120.9 (2)
C4—C3—H3A120.8C13—C12—C11119.4 (3)
C2—C3—H3A120.8C13—C12—H12A120.3
C5—C4—C3121.8 (3)C11—C12—H12A120.3
C5—C4—Cl2118.9 (3)C12—C13—C14120.6 (3)
C3—C4—Cl2119.3 (3)C12—C13—H13A119.7
C4—C5—C6118.8 (3)C14—C13—H13A119.7
C4—C5—H5A120.6O2—C14—C15125.4 (3)
C6—C5—H5A120.6O2—C14—C13114.9 (3)
C5—C6—C1121.9 (3)C15—C14—C13119.6 (3)
C5—C6—H6A119.0C14—C15—C10120.6 (3)
C1—C6—H6A119.0C14—C15—H15A119.7
O1—C7—C8121.0 (3)C10—C15—H15A119.7
O1—C7—C1120.7 (3)O2—C16—H16A109.5
C8—C7—C1118.3 (3)O2—C16—H16B109.5
C9—C8—C7124.2 (3)H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C9—C8—H8A117.9O2—C16—H16C109.5
C7—C8—H8A117.9H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C8—C9—C10127.2 (3)H16B—C16—H16C109.5
C6—C1—C2—C32.5 (5)C7—C8—C9—C10176.2 (3)
C7—C1—C2—C3178.2 (3)C8—C9—C10—C11151.1 (3)
C6—C1—C2—Cl1179.8 (2)C8—C9—C10—C1528.3 (5)
C7—C1—C2—Cl10.4 (4)C15—C10—C11—C120.3 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C41.8 (5)C9—C10—C11—C12179.2 (3)
Cl1—C2—C3—C4179.6 (3)C15—C10—C11—Br177.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C50.4 (6)C9—C10—C11—Br2.3 (4)
C2—C3—C4—Cl2178.2 (3)C10—C11—C12—C131.1 (5)
C3—C4—C5—C61.7 (5)Br—C11—C12—C13178.0 (3)
Cl2—C4—C5—C6176.9 (3)C11—C12—C13—C141.0 (5)
C4—C5—C6—C10.9 (5)C16—O2—C14—C155.0 (6)
C2—C1—C6—C51.1 (5)C16—O2—C14—C13175.4 (4)
C7—C1—C6—C5179.5 (3)C12—C13—C14—O2179.4 (3)
C6—C1—C7—O1125.2 (4)C12—C13—C14—C150.2 (5)
C2—C1—C7—O154.1 (5)O2—C14—C15—C10179.8 (3)
C6—C1—C7—C853.3 (4)C13—C14—C15—C100.6 (5)
C2—C1—C7—C8127.4 (3)C11—C10—C15—C140.6 (5)
O1—C7—C8—C9173.6 (3)C9—C10—C15—C14180.0 (3)
C1—C7—C8—C98.0 (5)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H11BrCl2O2
Mr386.06
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)7.7836 (13), 7.8829 (8), 13.0927 (19)
α, β, γ (°)83.05 (1), 88.899 (13), 78.596 (11)
V3)781.68 (19)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)2.97
Crystal size (mm)0.45 × 0.37 × 0.17
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Gemini R CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.305, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
8869, 4577, 2880
Rint0.030
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.754
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.053, 0.126, 1.08
No. of reflections4577
No. of parameters191
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.74, 0.43

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997), SHELXTL (Bruker, 2000).

 

Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds