supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2007). E63, i193    [ doi:10.1107/S160053680705283X ]

Lutetium(III) oxide iodide

S. Zimmermann and G. Meyer

Abstract top

Single crystals of lutetium oxide iodide, LuOI, were obtained as a by-product of the reaction of lutetium metal, rhenium powder and lutetium triiodide, LuI3, in a sealed tantalum container. LuOI crystallizes in the tetragonal PbFCl-type of structure (matlockite), where Lu, O and I are situated on positions with 4mm, \overline{4}m2 and 4mm symmetry, respectively.

Comment top

In conproportionation reactions of rare-earth halides with their respective metals (frequently with the addition of a transition metal), the oxide halides REOX (RE = rare earth metal, X = halogen) often appear as a few single crystals as by-products. Except for impurities from the reaction containers, e.g. tantalum, this may be due to impure anhydrous rare-earth trihalides MX3.

LuOI was obtained in a reaction of lutetium metal, rhenium powder and nominally pure lutetium triiodide, LuI3, in a tantalum container at 1223 K. It crystallizes with the tetragonal PbFCl type of structure, in which Lu3+ is surrounded by four oxygen and four iodine atoms in a distorted square antiprismatic coordination with Lu—O distances of 2.2048 (5) Å and Lu—I distances of 3.3138 (10) Å. An additional iodide ion is capping one of the square faces at a distance of 4.0152 (18) Å (Figs. 1, 2). The cell parameters obtained from the present single-crystal study show no significant differences to those of a previous powder study (a = 3.850, c = 9.179 Å; Batsanov et al., 1983; Meyer, 1993).

Related literature top

For a previous powder study of LuOI, see: Batsanov et al. (1983); Meyer (1993). Syntheses of lanthanide compounds have been compiled by Meyer (1991).

Experimental top

Light orange, transparent plates of LuOI were obtained as a by-product (ca 30%) from the reaction of lutetium powder (0.066 g, 0.37 mmol, Smart Elements, 99.99%), rhenium powder (0.030 g, 0.16 mmol, Merck, 99.9%) and LuI3 (0.150 g, 0.4 mmol). Most of LuI3 and apparently all rhenium powder remained unreacted. LuI3 was prepared by the direct reaction of Lu chips (Chempur, 99.9%) with I2 (Acros, 95%) in a sealed silica tube at 503 K and subsequent purification of the product by high-vacuum sublimation. The reaction was carried out in a He-arc welded tantalum container within a silica jacket at 1223 K for 17 d. Due to their moisture and air sensitivity, reagents and products were handled in an argon-filled glove box (M. Braun, Garching, Germany).

Refinement top

For the present refinement, origin choice 2 for space group P4/nmm was chosen. The highest peak in the final difference Fourier map is 0.90 Å from atom Lu and the deepest hole is 0.81 Å from the same atom.

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); data reduction: X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 1997); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2005); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 1997).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. : The surrounding of Lu3+ in LuOI with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 75% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) x, y + 1, z; (iii) −x − 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (iv) x − 1, y − 1, z; (v) x − 1, y, z; (vi) x, y − 1, z; (vii) −x, −y + 2, −z + 1.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. : Part of the crystal structure of LuOI, viewed approximately along the a axis. Lu atoms are represented as black, O as blue and I as pink spheres.
Lutetium(III) oxide iodide top
Crystal data top
LuOIZ = 2
Mr = 317.87F000 = 264
Tetragonal, P4/nmmDx = 7.717 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 4a 2aMo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 3.8585 (7) ÅCell parameters from 1205 reflections
b = 3.8585 (7) Åθ = 1.9–28.2º
c = 9.189 (2) ŵ = 47.02 mm1
α = 90ºT = 293 (2) K
β = 90ºPlate, orange
γ = 90º0.20 × 0.10 × 0.05 mm
V = 136.81 (5) Å3
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-I
diffractometer
126 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube121 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.093
T = 293(2) Kθmax = 27.8º
φ scansθmin = 4.4º
Absorption correction: numerical
[X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001) and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1999)]
h = 4→5
Tmin = 0.008, Tmax = 0.092k = 5→5
1249 measured reflectionsl = 12→12
Refinement top
Refinement on F2  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0633P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
Least-squares matrix: full(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Δρmax = 2.82 e Å3
wR(F2) = 0.094Δρmin = 3.05 e Å3
S = 1.20Extinction correction: none
126 reflections
9 parameters
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Crystal data top
LuOIγ = 90º
Mr = 317.87V = 136.81 (5) Å3
Tetragonal, P4/nmmZ = 2
a = 3.8585 (7) ÅMo Kα
b = 3.8585 (7) ŵ = 47.02 mm1
c = 9.189 (2) ÅT = 293 (2) K
α = 90º0.20 × 0.10 × 0.05 mm
β = 90º
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-I
diffractometer
126 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
[X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2001) and X-SHAPE (Stoe & Cie, 1999)]
121 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.008, Tmax = 0.092Rint = 0.093
1249 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034Δρmax = 2.82 e Å3
wR(F2) = 0.094Δρmin = 3.05 e Å3
S = 1.20Absolute structure: ?
126 reflectionsFlack parameter: ?
9 parametersRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R– factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Lu0.25000.75000.38386 (8)0.0147 (5)
I0.25001.25000.17918 (15)0.0235 (5)
O0.25000.25000.50000.015 (3)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Lu0.0104 (5)0.0104 (5)0.0232 (6)0.0000.0000.000
I0.0222 (6)0.0222 (6)0.0260 (8)0.0000.0000.000
O0.010 (4)0.010 (4)0.024 (5)0.0000.0000.000
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Lu—Oi2.2048 (5)Lu—Lui3.4641 (10)
Lu—Oii2.2048 (5)Lu—Luviii3.4641 (10)
Lu—Oiii2.2048 (5)Lu—Luiii3.4641 (10)
Lu—O2.2048 (5)I—Luix3.3138 (10)
Lu—Iiv3.3138 (10)I—Luii3.3138 (10)
Lu—I3.3138 (10)I—Lux3.3138 (10)
Lu—Iv3.3138 (10)O—Lui2.2048 (5)
Lu—Ivi3.3138 (10)O—Luvi2.2048 (5)
Lu—Luvii3.4641 (10)O—Luiii2.2048 (5)
Oi—Lu—Oii76.449 (15)O—Lu—Lui38.225 (8)
Oi—Lu—Oiii122.10 (3)Iiv—Lu—Lui110.470 (13)
Oii—Lu—Oiii76.449 (15)I—Lu—Lui110.470 (13)
Oi—Lu—O76.449 (15)Iv—Lu—Lui176.54 (4)
Oii—Lu—O122.10 (3)Ivi—Lu—Lui72.62 (3)
Oiii—Lu—O76.449 (15)Luvii—Lu—Lui67.69 (2)
Oi—Lu—Iiv141.643 (6)Oi—Lu—Luviii100.90 (3)
Oii—Lu—Iiv141.643 (6)Oii—Lu—Luviii38.225 (8)
Oiii—Lu—Iiv76.426 (19)Oiii—Lu—Luviii38.225 (8)
O—Lu—Iiv76.426 (19)O—Lu—Luviii100.90 (3)
Oi—Lu—I76.426 (19)Iiv—Lu—Luviii110.470 (13)
Oii—Lu—I76.426 (19)I—Lu—Luviii110.470 (13)
Oiii—Lu—I141.643 (6)Iv—Lu—Luviii72.62 (3)
O—Lu—I141.643 (6)Ivi—Lu—Luviii176.54 (4)
Iiv—Lu—I110.84 (5)Luvii—Lu—Luviii67.69 (2)
Oi—Lu—Iv141.643 (6)Lui—Lu—Luviii103.93 (4)
Oii—Lu—Iv76.426 (19)Oi—Lu—Luiii100.90 (3)
Oiii—Lu—Iv76.426 (19)Oii—Lu—Luiii100.90 (3)
O—Lu—Iv141.643 (6)Oiii—Lu—Luiii38.225 (8)
Iiv—Lu—Iv71.21 (2)O—Lu—Luiii38.225 (8)
I—Lu—Iv71.21 (2)Iiv—Lu—Luiii72.62 (3)
Oi—Lu—Ivi76.426 (19)I—Lu—Luiii176.54 (4)
Oii—Lu—Ivi141.643 (6)Iv—Lu—Luiii110.470 (13)
Oiii—Lu—Ivi141.643 (6)Ivi—Lu—Luiii110.470 (13)
O—Lu—Ivi76.426 (19)Luvii—Lu—Luiii103.93 (4)
Iiv—Lu—Ivi71.21 (2)Lui—Lu—Luiii67.69 (2)
I—Lu—Ivi71.21 (2)Luviii—Lu—Luiii67.69 (2)
Iv—Lu—Ivi110.84 (5)Luix—I—Luii71.21 (2)
Oi—Lu—Luvii38.225 (8)Luix—I—Lux71.21 (2)
Oii—Lu—Luvii38.225 (7)Luii—I—Lux110.84 (5)
Oiii—Lu—Luvii100.90 (3)Luix—I—Lu110.84 (5)
O—Lu—Luvii100.90 (3)Luii—I—Lu71.21 (2)
Iiv—Lu—Luvii176.54 (4)Lux—I—Lu71.21 (2)
I—Lu—Luvii72.62 (3)Lui—O—Luvi103.551 (15)
Iv—Lu—Luvii110.470 (13)Lui—O—Luiii122.10 (3)
Ivi—Lu—Luvii110.470 (13)Luvi—O—Luiii103.551 (15)
Oi—Lu—Lui38.225 (8)Lui—O—Lu103.551 (15)
Oii—Lu—Lui100.90 (3)Luvi—O—Lu122.10 (3)
Oiii—Lu—Lui100.90 (3)Luiii—O—Lu103.551 (15)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) −x−1, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) x−1, y−1, z; (v) x−1, y, z; (vi) x, y−1, z; (vii) −x, −y+2, −z+1; (viii) −x−1, −y+2, −z+1; (ix) x+1, y+1, z; (x) x+1, y, z.
Selected geometric parameters (Å) top
Lu—O2.2048 (5)Lu—Lui3.4641 (10)
Lu—I3.3138 (10)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, −z+1.
Acknowledgements top

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), SFB 608 (Complex transition metal compounds with spin and charge degrees of freedom and disorder).

references
References top

Batsanov, S. S., Kopaneva, L. I. & Dorogova, G. V. (1983). Zh. Neorg. Khim. 28, 2150–2152.

Brandenburg, K. (2005). DIAMOND. Version 3.0d. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.

Meyer, G. (1991). Synthesis of Lanthanide and Actinide Compounds, edited by G. Meyer & L. R. Morss, pp. 135–144. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Meyer, G. (1993). ICDD entry [42-981]. International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newton Square, PA, USA.

Sheldrick, G. M. (1997). SHELXS97 and SHELXL97. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Stoe & Cie (1999). X-SHAPE. Version 1.06. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.

Stoe & Cie (2001). X-AREA (Version 1.15) and X-RED (Version 1.22). Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.