supplementary materials


bv2091 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2008). E64, o733    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536808007149 ]

(E)-2-(2-Fluorobenzylidene)butanoic acid

M. Niaz, M. N. Tahir, Zia-ur-Rehman, S. Ali and I. U. Khan

Abstract top

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C11H11FO2, the methine CH forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with the carboxyl O atom. The molecules form dimers through hydrogen bonding between carboxyl groups. These dimers are linked to each other by C-H...O contacts between the benzene and carbonyl groups of adjoining molecules. In addition, there are weak intermolecular C-H...F contacts.

Comment top

Cinnamic acid derivatives are well known for their antibacterial, antifungal antiparasitic (Burt, 2004), and antitumor activity (Hertog et al., 1995). They are also used in the shikmic acid metabolic pathways of higher plants (Forgó et al., 2005).

In the structure of the title compound (I), there are two C-atoms between the carboxylate and 2-fluorophenyl C-atoms. A search of CCDC (Allen, 2002) shows that a structure of 2-amino-2-(2-fluorophenyl)acetic acid (Burns et al., 1993) has been published in which there is only a single C-atom between carboxylate and phenyl ring. Moreover, there is no structure of this kind with a different position for the F-atom.

The C1=O2 bond distance [1.2301 (18) Å], is significantly shorter than the C1—O1 distance [1.3006 (18) Å]. The C1—O1 bond lengthened due to the formation of intramolecular and intermolecular H-bonds. The value of C2=C3 is 1.334 (2) Å. The phenyl ring bond distances are in the normal range but the C4—C5—C6 bond angle is 124.27 (18)°, due to the influence of the F substituent attached to C5. The dihedral angle between the planes formed by (O1, C1, and O2) and (C2, C10, and C11) is 80.97 (18)°, and the dihedral angles between these planes and the phenyl ring are 52.88 (10)° and 67.17 (15)° respectively. The molecules are stabilized by intramolecular and intermolecular H-bonds. The title compound forms dimers through H-bonding, O1—H1···O2i [symmetry code i = -x + 2, -y, -z] as shown in Fig 2. These dimers are linked to each other through a C6—H6···O2ii interaction [symmetry code ii = -x + 1, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2]. Details of the H-bonding are given in Table 1. In addition there is a weak C8—H8···F1iii intermolecular interaction [symmetry code iii = x, 1/2 - y, 1/2 + z] with a distance 3.2658 (25) Å between C8 and F1iii.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Burns & Hagaman (1993); Burt (2004); Forgó et al. (2005); Hertog et al. (1995); Muhammad et al. (2007). For details of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002).

Experimental top

Compound (I) was synthesized as reported earlier (Niaz, et al., 2007). A mixture of 2-fluorobenzaldehyde (1.05 ml, 10 mmol), ethylmalonic acid (2.64 g, 20 mmol) and piperidine (1.98 ml, 20 mmol) in a pyridine (12.5 ml) solution was heated on a steam-bath for 24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled and added to a mixture of 25 ml of concentrated HCl and 50 g of ice. The precipitate formed in the acidified mixture was filtered off and washed with ice-cold water. The product was recrystallized from ethanol. The yield was 65%, m.p. 94 °C.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and PLATON (Spek, 2003).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP drawing of the title compound, C11H11F1O2 with the atom numbering scheme. The thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H-atoms are shown by small circles of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The packing figure (PLATON: Spek, 2003) which shows the dimeric nature of the compound owing to inter molecular hydrogen bonding and also showing a link between dimers.
(E)-2-(2-Fluorobenzylidene)butanoic acid top
Crystal data top
C11H11F1O2F000 = 408
Mr = 194.20Dx = 1.287 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2981 reflections
a = 4.1895 (4) Åθ = 2.3–30.6º
b = 17.4362 (19) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
c = 13.8134 (15) ÅT = 296 (2) K
β = 96.719 (3)ºPrismatic, colourless
V = 1002.12 (18) Å30.25 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker KappaAPEXII CCD
diffractometer
2981 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1704 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.026
Detector resolution: 7.2 pixels mm-1θmax = 30.6º
T = 296(2) Kθmin = 2.3º
ω scansh = 5→6
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
k = 24→23
Tmin = 0.935, Tmax = 0.958l = 19→19
8632 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.164  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0731P)2 + 0.1527P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2981 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.41 e Å3
131 parametersΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction correction: none
Crystal data top
C11H11F1O2V = 1002.12 (18) Å3
Mr = 194.20Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 4.1895 (4) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 17.4362 (19) ÅT = 296 (2) K
c = 13.8134 (15) Å0.25 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm
β = 96.719 (3)º
Data collection top
Bruker KappaAPEXII CCD
diffractometer
2981 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
1704 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.935, Tmax = 0.958Rint = 0.026
8632 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050131 parameters
wR(F2) = 0.164H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.41 e Å3
2981 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.5705 (5)0.28288 (7)0.22076 (10)0.1113 (6)
O11.0669 (3)0.08331 (7)0.07503 (9)0.0575 (4)
H11.104 (5)0.0617 (11)0.0126 (15)0.069*
O20.8191 (3)0.02692 (7)0.09434 (9)0.0609 (4)
C10.8986 (4)0.03770 (8)0.12367 (11)0.0406 (4)
C20.8045 (3)0.06721 (8)0.21699 (11)0.0394 (4)
C30.8530 (4)0.14131 (9)0.23791 (12)0.0443 (4)
H30.95550.16990.19380.053*
C40.7616 (4)0.18258 (9)0.32326 (11)0.0449 (4)
C50.6226 (5)0.25413 (10)0.31195 (13)0.0593 (5)
C60.5260 (6)0.29671 (11)0.38672 (16)0.0705 (6)
H60.42860.34430.37490.085*
C70.5763 (6)0.26755 (11)0.47922 (15)0.0659 (6)
H70.51200.29530.53110.079*
C80.7214 (5)0.19750 (12)0.49543 (14)0.0691 (6)
H80.75860.17810.55850.083*
C90.8126 (5)0.15554 (11)0.41831 (13)0.0601 (5)
H90.91050.10810.43040.072*
C100.6348 (4)0.01081 (9)0.27580 (12)0.0458 (4)
H10A0.47790.01700.23190.055*
H10B0.51850.03920.32090.055*
C110.8524 (5)0.04706 (11)0.33354 (14)0.0614 (5)
H11A0.72480.08080.36820.092*
H11B1.00410.02050.37910.092*
H11C0.96570.07640.28970.092*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.2170 (19)0.0646 (8)0.0569 (8)0.0505 (10)0.0350 (9)0.0161 (6)
O10.0854 (9)0.0450 (7)0.0468 (7)0.0124 (6)0.0275 (6)0.0072 (5)
O20.0912 (10)0.0434 (7)0.0528 (7)0.0149 (6)0.0288 (7)0.0118 (5)
C10.0485 (8)0.0360 (8)0.0382 (8)0.0015 (6)0.0091 (7)0.0007 (6)
C20.0426 (8)0.0401 (8)0.0357 (7)0.0046 (6)0.0061 (6)0.0003 (6)
C30.0549 (9)0.0404 (8)0.0382 (8)0.0029 (6)0.0085 (7)0.0005 (6)
C40.0575 (10)0.0386 (8)0.0393 (8)0.0012 (7)0.0088 (7)0.0041 (6)
C50.0947 (14)0.0413 (9)0.0438 (10)0.0086 (9)0.0156 (9)0.0029 (7)
C60.1047 (17)0.0438 (10)0.0653 (13)0.0165 (10)0.0194 (12)0.0084 (9)
C70.0898 (15)0.0588 (12)0.0521 (11)0.0015 (10)0.0203 (10)0.0183 (9)
C80.0999 (16)0.0685 (13)0.0391 (9)0.0122 (11)0.0095 (10)0.0042 (9)
C90.0866 (14)0.0525 (10)0.0406 (9)0.0170 (9)0.0047 (9)0.0027 (8)
C100.0478 (9)0.0460 (9)0.0456 (9)0.0026 (7)0.0136 (7)0.0018 (7)
C110.0694 (12)0.0513 (10)0.0654 (12)0.0014 (8)0.0163 (10)0.0179 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
F1—C51.350 (2)C6—H60.9300
O1—C11.3006 (18)C7—C81.371 (3)
O1—H10.97 (2)C7—H70.9300
O2—C11.2301 (18)C8—C91.383 (2)
C1—C21.483 (2)C8—H80.9300
C2—C31.334 (2)C9—H90.9300
C2—C101.506 (2)C10—C111.521 (2)
C3—C41.470 (2)C10—H10A0.9700
C3—H30.9300C10—H10B0.9700
C4—C51.378 (2)C11—H11A0.9600
C4—C91.388 (2)C11—H11B0.9600
C5—C61.371 (3)C11—H11C0.9600
C6—C71.368 (3)
C1—O1—H1112.0 (12)C6—C7—H7120.0
O2—C1—O1122.15 (14)C8—C7—H7120.0
O2—C1—C2120.97 (14)C7—C8—C9120.19 (18)
O1—C1—C2116.88 (13)C7—C8—H8119.9
C3—C2—C1118.35 (14)C9—C8—H8119.9
C3—C2—C10125.80 (14)C8—C9—C4121.56 (17)
C1—C2—C10115.63 (13)C8—C9—H9119.2
C2—C3—C4126.91 (15)C4—C9—H9119.2
C2—C3—H3116.5C2—C10—C11115.09 (14)
C4—C3—H3116.5C2—C10—H10A108.5
C5—C4—C9115.53 (15)C11—C10—H10A108.5
C5—C4—C3119.92 (15)C2—C10—H10B108.5
C9—C4—C3124.53 (14)C11—C10—H10B108.5
F1—C5—C6118.18 (17)H10A—C10—H10B107.5
F1—C5—C4117.52 (16)C10—C11—H11A109.5
C6—C5—C4124.27 (18)C10—C11—H11B109.5
C7—C6—C5118.38 (18)H11A—C11—H11B109.5
C7—C6—H6120.8C10—C11—H11C109.5
C5—C6—H6120.8H11A—C11—H11C109.5
C6—C7—C8120.03 (18)H11B—C11—H11C109.5
O2—C1—C2—C3169.70 (16)C3—C4—C5—C6179.3 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C310.1 (2)F1—C5—C6—C7179.6 (2)
O2—C1—C2—C105.2 (2)C4—C5—C6—C71.5 (4)
O1—C1—C2—C10174.93 (14)C5—C6—C7—C80.3 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4176.46 (15)C6—C7—C8—C91.0 (4)
C10—C2—C3—C42.1 (3)C7—C8—C9—C40.1 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5136.30 (19)C5—C4—C9—C81.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C945.5 (3)C3—C4—C9—C8179.80 (19)
C9—C4—C5—F1179.57 (19)C3—C2—C10—C11106.93 (19)
C3—C4—C5—F11.2 (3)C1—C2—C10—C1178.57 (19)
C9—C4—C5—C62.4 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2i0.97 (2)1.66 (2)2.6325 (18)177.7 (12)
C3—H3···O10.932.322.713 (2)105
C6—H6···O2ii0.932.533.421 (2)160
C8—H8···F1iii0.932.553.266 (2)134 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y, −z; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O2i0.97 (2)1.66 (2)2.6325 (18)177.7 (12)
C3—H3···O10.932.322.713 (2)105
C6—H6···O2ii0.932.533.421 (2)160
C8—H8···F1iii0.932.553.266 (2)134 (1)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y, −z; (ii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2.
Acknowledgements top

The authors acknowledge the Higher Education Commision, Islamabad, Pakistan, for funding the purchase of the diffractometer and Bana International, Karachi, Pakistan, for technical support.

references
References top

Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388.

Bruker (2005). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc. Madison, Wisconsion, USA.

Bruker (2007). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc. Madison, Wisconsion, USA.

Burns, J. H. & Hagaman, E. W. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 1393–1396.

Burt, S. (2004). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 94, 223–253.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.

Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.

Forgó, P., Felföldi, K. & Pálinkó, I. (2005). J. Mol. Struct. 744–747, 273–276.

Hertog, M. G., Kromhout, D., Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H., Buzina, R., Fidanza, F., Giampaoli, S., Jansen, A., Menotti, A. & Nedeljkovic, S. (1995). Arch. Intern. Med. 155, 381–386.

Muhammad, N., Zia-ur-Rehman., Ali, S. & Meetsma, A. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o2174–o2175.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Spek, A. L. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 7–13.