supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o115    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536808041706 ]

2-Aminobenzimidazolium hydrogen sulfate

W. You, Y. Fan, H.-F. Qian, C. Yao and W. Huang

Abstract top

In the title salt, C7H8N3+·HSO4-, the benzimdazole ring system is planar [mean deviation 0.0086 (1) Å]. In the crystal, N-H...O and O-H...O hydrogen-bond interactions give rise to a layer motif.

Comment top

Several ion-pair adducts of 2-aminobenzimidazole with different organic acids such as picric acid (El-Medania et al., 2003) and squaric acid (YeŞilel et al., 2008) have been reported. Herein, we present a hydrogen sulfate of 2-aminobenzimidazole.

The atom-numbering scheme of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1, while selected bond distances and bond angles are given in Table 1. The benzimidazole skeleton of the title compound is planar and the proton is delocalized within the imidazole ring although it is added to one of the nitrogen atoms. With regard to the hydrogen sulfate anion, the hydrogen atom is added to the O1 atom of SO4 group due to the obviously longer O1–S1 bond length. In the crystal packing, typical π-π stacking can be found between neighbouring aromatic rings with the centroid-to-centroid separation of 3.452 (2) Å. Furthermore, N—H···O and O—H···O hydrogen bonding interactions are found between adjacent molecules to form a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For related compounds, see: El-Medania et al. (2003); YeŞilel et al. (2008).

Experimental top

The treatment of 2-aminobenzimidazole dissolved in methanol with an excess of hydrochloric acid yields the title compound. Single crystal suitable for X-ray diffraction measurement was obtained after 3 days' slow evaporation of the mother liquid at room temperature in air. Anal. Calcd. For C~7~H~9Ñ~3Õ~4~S: C, 36.36; H, 3.92; O, 27.68%. Found: C, 36.17; H, 4.03; N, 27.74%. Main FT—IR absorptions (KBr pellets, cm-1): 3385 (s), 3194 (m), 1687 (s), 1476 (m), 1286 (m), 1206(s), 1175 (vs), 1070 (m), 1026 (m), 888 (s), and 577 (w).

Refinement top

The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, whereas the H atoms bonded with carbon, nitrogen and oxygen atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions (C—H = 0.93 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å) and refined as riding atoms, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and 1.2U~eq~(N) and Uĩso~(H) = 1.5U~eq~(O).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2000); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. An ORTEP drawing of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A perspective view of the packing structure of the title compound. Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 1, y - 1/2, -z + 1/2; (ii) x, -y + 3/2, z + 1/2.
2-Aminobenzimidazolium hydrogen sulfate top
Crystal data top
C7H8N3+·HSO4F(000) = 480
Mr = 231.23Dx = 1.550 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1841 reflections
a = 10.855 (6) Åθ = 1.0–1.0°
b = 13.049 (7) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
c = 7.082 (4) ÅT = 291 K
β = 99.025 (7)°Block, colourless
V = 990.7 (9) Å30.16 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART
diffractometer
1841 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1408 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.057
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.5°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
h = 1313
Tmin = 0.950, Tmax = 0.968k = 1115
5083 measured reflectionsl = 88
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.103 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0593P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.96(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1841 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
136 parametersΔρmin = 0.35 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0
Crystal data top
C7H8N3+·HSO4V = 990.7 (9) Å3
Mr = 231.23Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 10.855 (6) ŵ = 0.33 mm1
b = 13.049 (7) ÅT = 291 K
c = 7.082 (4) Å0.16 × 0.12 × 0.10 mm
β = 99.025 (7)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART
diffractometer
1841 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2000)
1408 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.950, Tmax = 0.968Rint = 0.057
5083 measured reflectionsθmax = 25.5°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.103Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
S = 0.96Δρmin = 0.35 e Å3
1841 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
136 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Experimental. The structure was solved by direct methods (Bruker, 2000) and successive difference Fourier syntheses.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.61393 (19)0.67017 (16)0.3926 (3)0.0400 (5)
C20.80252 (18)0.71967 (16)0.5357 (3)0.0387 (5)
C30.9247 (2)0.72581 (18)0.6229 (3)0.0483 (6)
H30.97250.66740.65570.058*
C40.9730 (2)0.82273 (19)0.6594 (3)0.0533 (6)
H41.05550.82960.71780.064*
C50.9026 (2)0.91056 (19)0.6120 (3)0.0563 (6)
H50.93820.97460.64070.068*
C60.7787 (2)0.90386 (17)0.5216 (3)0.0497 (6)
H60.73100.96200.48660.060*
C70.73133 (18)0.80702 (16)0.4872 (3)0.0385 (5)
N10.72523 (15)0.63593 (13)0.4769 (2)0.0410 (4)
H1A0.74600.57250.49250.049*
N20.61415 (15)0.77282 (13)0.3989 (2)0.0429 (5)
H2A0.55210.81160.35550.051*
N30.51968 (16)0.61327 (14)0.3154 (3)0.0534 (5)
H3A0.52650.54760.31630.064*
H3B0.45110.64160.26390.064*
O10.21109 (12)0.84704 (11)0.3128 (2)0.0508 (4)
H1B0.24500.81550.40690.076*
O20.32882 (14)0.75437 (11)0.1058 (2)0.0533 (5)
O30.41587 (12)0.90419 (10)0.2672 (2)0.0494 (4)
O40.23730 (14)0.91989 (11)0.0168 (2)0.0539 (4)
S10.30277 (5)0.85757 (4)0.16657 (8)0.0404 (2)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0399 (11)0.0385 (12)0.0414 (12)0.0044 (9)0.0057 (10)0.0029 (9)
C20.0419 (12)0.0400 (12)0.0344 (11)0.0037 (9)0.0069 (9)0.0013 (9)
C30.0444 (12)0.0581 (15)0.0420 (13)0.0089 (11)0.0057 (10)0.0033 (11)
C40.0416 (13)0.0658 (17)0.0518 (15)0.0066 (11)0.0051 (11)0.0039 (12)
C50.0584 (15)0.0548 (16)0.0577 (15)0.0130 (12)0.0151 (12)0.0092 (12)
C60.0537 (14)0.0407 (13)0.0552 (15)0.0009 (10)0.0103 (12)0.0020 (11)
C70.0401 (11)0.0386 (12)0.0371 (12)0.0045 (9)0.0073 (9)0.0016 (9)
N10.0438 (10)0.0322 (10)0.0453 (11)0.0091 (7)0.0017 (8)0.0001 (7)
N20.0404 (10)0.0343 (10)0.0520 (12)0.0109 (7)0.0013 (8)0.0010 (8)
N30.0447 (10)0.0400 (11)0.0719 (14)0.0050 (8)0.0019 (10)0.0067 (10)
O10.0408 (8)0.0495 (10)0.0611 (10)0.0055 (7)0.0047 (8)0.0063 (7)
O20.0640 (10)0.0331 (9)0.0582 (10)0.0091 (7)0.0047 (8)0.0073 (7)
O30.0387 (8)0.0372 (9)0.0669 (10)0.0035 (6)0.0086 (7)0.0032 (7)
O40.0609 (9)0.0381 (9)0.0548 (10)0.0046 (7)0.0153 (8)0.0072 (7)
S10.0402 (3)0.0288 (3)0.0484 (4)0.0019 (2)0.0045 (2)0.0007 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
C1—N31.312 (3)C6—C71.372 (3)
C1—N11.338 (2)C6—H60.9300
C1—N21.340 (3)C7—N21.400 (2)
C2—C31.375 (3)N1—H1A0.8600
C2—C71.390 (3)N2—H2A0.8600
C2—N11.401 (3)N3—H3A0.8600
C3—C41.378 (3)N3—H3B0.8600
C3—H30.9300O1—S11.5510 (18)
C4—C51.389 (3)O1—H1B0.8200
C4—H40.9300O2—S11.4549 (16)
C5—C61.398 (3)O3—S11.4528 (14)
C5—H50.9300O4—S11.4336 (15)
N3—C1—N1126.0 (2)C6—C7—N2131.49 (19)
N3—C1—N2125.21 (19)C2—C7—N2106.26 (18)
N1—C1—N2108.79 (18)C1—N1—C2109.21 (17)
C3—C2—C7121.5 (2)C1—N1—H1A125.4
C3—C2—N1132.04 (19)C2—N1—H1A125.4
C7—C2—N1106.42 (17)C1—N2—C7109.28 (16)
C2—C3—C4116.7 (2)C1—N2—H2A125.4
C2—C3—H3121.7C7—N2—H2A125.4
C4—C3—H3121.7C1—N3—H3A120.0
C3—C4—C5122.2 (2)C1—N3—H3B120.0
C3—C4—H4118.9H3A—N3—H3B120.0
C5—C4—H4118.9S1—O1—H1B109.5
C4—C5—C6120.8 (2)O4—S1—O3114.09 (9)
C4—C5—H5119.6O4—S1—O2113.76 (10)
C6—C5—H5119.6O3—S1—O2110.13 (9)
C7—C6—C5116.5 (2)O4—S1—O1104.41 (10)
C7—C6—H6121.8O3—S1—O1106.91 (10)
C5—C6—H6121.8O2—S1—O1106.88 (10)
C6—C7—C2122.2 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O4i0.862.002.848 (3)167
O1—H1B···O2ii0.821.802.619 (2)176
N2—H2A···O30.861.942.795 (2)177
N3—H3A···O3i0.862.092.899 (3)157
N3—H3B···O20.862.172.987 (2)158
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) x, −y+3/2, z+1/2.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O4i0.862.002.848 (3)167
O1—H1B···O2ii0.821.802.619 (2)176
N2—H2A···O30.861.942.795 (2)177
N3—H3A···O3i0.862.092.899 (3)157
N3—H3B···O20.862.172.987 (2)158
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) x, −y+3/2, z+1/2.
Acknowledgements top

WH acknowledges the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20871065) and the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry, for financial aid.

references
References top

Bruker (2000). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

El-Medania, S. M., Youssef, T. A. & Ramadan, R. M. (2003). J. Mol. Struct. 644, 77–87.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

YeŞilel, O. Z., OdabaŞoğlu, M. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2008). J. Mol. Struct. 874, 151–158.