supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o107    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536808041792 ]

4-Cyanobenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone

D.-H. Wu, Y.-H. Zhang, Z.-F. Li and Y.-H. Li

Abstract top

The molecule of the title compound, C9H8N4S, adopts an E configuration about both the C=N and C-NH bonds. In the crystal structure, adjacent molecules are linked by intermolecular N-H...S hydrogen-bonding interactions, forming chains running parallel to the b axis.

Comment top

Thiosemicarbazones constitute an important class of N,S donors due to their propensity to react with a wide range of metals (Casas et al., 2000). Schiff bases show potential as antimicrobial and anticancer agents (Tarafder et al., 2000; Deschamps et al., 2003) and so have biochemical and pharmacological applications. It has been postulated that extensive electron delocalization in the thiosemicarbazone moiety helps the free thiosemicarbazone ligands and their metal complexes to exhibit SHG (second harmonic generation) efficiency (Liu et al., 1999; Wu et al., 2000). As part of a research on non-linear optical materials, specifically thiosemicarbazones and their metal complexes, we report here the crystal structure of a new Schiff base compound derived from thiosemicarbazide and 4-cyanobenzaldehyde.

In the title compound (Fig. 1), the thiosemicarbazone moiety is nearly planar (maximum deviation 0.113 (2) Å for atom N2) and shows an E configuration about both the C1N2 and C2N3 bonds. The molecule is not strictly planar, the dihedral angle between the thiosemicarbazone moiety and the phenyl ring being 15.8 (6)°. The C—S bond distance of 1.689 (2) Å agrees well with similar bonds in related compounds, being intermediate between the value of 1.82Å for a C—S single bond and 1.56 Å for a CS double bond (Sutton, 1965). The C1—N2 bond distance (1.344 (3)Å) is indicative of some double-bond character, suggesting extensive electron delocalization in the whole molecule. The C1—N1 bond distance of 1.316 (3)Å is also indicative of some double-bond character. All the bond distances except for the C6—C9 bond length (1.447 (3) Å) fall within the normal range. In the crystal packing, adjacent molecules are linked by N—H···S hydrogen bonds (Table 1) to form chains running parallel to the b axis.

Related literature top

For a general background to thiosemicarbazone compounds, see: Casas et al. (2000); Tarafder et al. (2000); Deschamps et al. (2003); Liu et al. (1999); Wu et al. (2000). For reference structural data, see: Sutton (1965).

Experimental top

The title compound was synthesized by refluxing 4-cyanobenzaldehyde (1.05 g, 8 mmol) and thiosemicarbazide (0.73 g, 8 mmol) in absolute ethanol (40 ml) for 6 h. After cooling to room temperature, the white solid formed was isolated and dried under vacuum (1.47 g, yield 90%). Single crystals suitable for X-ray structure analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of a methanol solution.

Refinement top

H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined using a riding model, with N—H = 0.86 Å, C—H = 0.93 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C, N).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
4-Cyanobenzaldehyde thiosemicarbazone top
Crystal data top
C9H8N4SF(000) = 424
Mr = 204.26Dx = 1.339 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1740 reflections
a = 12.284 (6) Åθ = 2.5–27.5°
b = 8.209 (4) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
c = 10.058 (3) ÅT = 291 K
β = 92.20 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 1013.5 (8) Å30.25 × 0.17 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
2309 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1596 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.055
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
CCD_Profile_fitting scansh = 1515
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 1010
Tmin = 0.94, Tmax = 0.96l = 1213
10019 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.109H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.01 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0258P)2 + 0.6908P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2309 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
127 parametersΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H8N4SV = 1013.5 (8) Å3
Mr = 204.26Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 12.284 (6) ŵ = 0.28 mm1
b = 8.209 (4) ÅT = 291 K
c = 10.058 (3) Å0.25 × 0.17 × 0.15 mm
β = 92.20 (3)°
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
2309 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
1596 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.94, Tmax = 0.96Rint = 0.055
10019 measured reflectionsθmax = 27.5°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.109Δρmax = 0.17 e Å3
S = 1.01Δρmin = 0.19 e Å3
2309 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
127 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.07786 (19)0.5792 (3)0.6753 (2)0.0446 (6)
C20.18757 (19)0.2982 (3)0.4587 (2)0.0454 (6)
H20.15750.20480.49460.054*
C30.26310 (18)0.2841 (3)0.3506 (2)0.0426 (6)
C40.30116 (19)0.1304 (3)0.3163 (2)0.0482 (6)
H40.27480.03840.35830.058*
C50.3781 (2)0.1135 (3)0.2198 (2)0.0532 (7)
H50.40290.01080.19640.064*
C60.4175 (2)0.2517 (3)0.1588 (2)0.0509 (6)
C70.3777 (2)0.4058 (3)0.1891 (2)0.0541 (7)
H70.40280.49730.14520.065*
C80.3008 (2)0.4214 (3)0.2846 (2)0.0500 (6)
H80.27400.52390.30520.060*
C90.5021 (2)0.2377 (4)0.0632 (3)0.0616 (7)
N10.1138 (2)0.7144 (3)0.6221 (2)0.0717 (8)
H1A0.14850.71060.54960.086*
H1B0.10260.80650.66000.086*
N20.09749 (15)0.4384 (2)0.61235 (17)0.0436 (5)
H2A0.06940.34900.63960.052*
N30.16254 (15)0.4379 (2)0.50426 (18)0.0441 (5)
N40.5709 (2)0.2293 (3)0.0102 (3)0.0853 (9)
S10.01195 (6)0.57476 (8)0.81966 (6)0.0544 (2)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0526 (14)0.0390 (12)0.0423 (12)0.0019 (12)0.0033 (11)0.0001 (11)
C20.0475 (14)0.0477 (14)0.0414 (13)0.0021 (12)0.0063 (11)0.0010 (11)
C30.0399 (13)0.0479 (14)0.0402 (12)0.0015 (11)0.0030 (10)0.0042 (10)
C40.0505 (14)0.0477 (14)0.0467 (13)0.0025 (12)0.0053 (12)0.0032 (11)
C50.0533 (15)0.0568 (17)0.0498 (14)0.0051 (13)0.0050 (12)0.0093 (12)
C60.0463 (14)0.0659 (17)0.0406 (13)0.0036 (14)0.0050 (11)0.0039 (13)
C70.0540 (15)0.0593 (17)0.0496 (14)0.0012 (14)0.0094 (12)0.0056 (13)
C80.0533 (15)0.0469 (14)0.0500 (14)0.0026 (13)0.0072 (11)0.0046 (12)
C90.0626 (17)0.0696 (19)0.0535 (15)0.0057 (15)0.0115 (14)0.0018 (14)
N10.112 (2)0.0411 (13)0.0645 (15)0.0058 (13)0.0407 (14)0.0043 (11)
N20.0546 (12)0.0375 (11)0.0396 (10)0.0007 (10)0.0111 (9)0.0008 (9)
N30.0492 (11)0.0464 (12)0.0372 (10)0.0016 (10)0.0068 (8)0.0027 (9)
N40.088 (2)0.091 (2)0.0797 (18)0.0167 (17)0.0398 (16)0.0100 (16)
S10.0765 (5)0.0431 (3)0.0448 (3)0.0083 (4)0.0184 (3)0.0010 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
C1—N11.316 (3)C5—H50.9300
C1—N21.344 (3)C6—C71.394 (4)
C1—S11.689 (2)C6—C91.447 (3)
C2—N31.277 (3)C7—C81.378 (3)
C2—C31.461 (3)C7—H70.9300
C2—H20.9300C8—H80.9300
C3—C41.394 (3)C9—N41.146 (3)
C3—C81.396 (3)N1—H1A0.8600
C4—C51.387 (3)N1—H1B0.8600
C4—H40.9300N2—N31.374 (2)
C5—C61.385 (4)N2—H2A0.8600
N1—C1—N2117.7 (2)C5—C6—C9120.1 (3)
N1—C1—S1123.15 (19)C7—C6—C9118.9 (2)
N2—C1—S1119.15 (18)C8—C7—C6119.4 (2)
N3—C2—C3120.5 (2)C8—C7—H7120.3
N3—C2—H2119.8C6—C7—H7120.3
C3—C2—H2119.8C7—C8—C3120.4 (2)
C4—C3—C8119.5 (2)C7—C8—H8119.8
C4—C3—C2119.0 (2)C3—C8—H8119.8
C8—C3—C2121.4 (2)N4—C9—C6178.1 (3)
C5—C4—C3120.5 (2)C1—N1—H1A120.0
C5—C4—H4119.7C1—N1—H1B120.0
C3—C4—H4119.7H1A—N1—H1B120.0
C6—C5—C4119.1 (2)C1—N2—N3119.73 (19)
C6—C5—H5120.4C1—N2—H2A120.1
C4—C5—H5120.4N3—N2—H2A120.1
C5—C6—C7121.0 (2)C2—N3—N2116.2 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···S1i0.862.503.355 (2)171
N1—H1B···S1ii0.862.633.399 (3)150
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) −x, y+1/2, −z+3/2.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···S1i0.862.503.355 (2)171
N1—H1B···S1ii0.862.633.399 (3)150
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) −x, y+1/2, −z+3/2.
Acknowledgements top

The authors thank the Start-up Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds of Southeast University (grant No. 1112000048).

references
References top

Casas, J. S., Garcia-Tasende, M. S. & Sordo, J. (2000). Coord. Chem. Rev. 209, 197–261.

Deschamps, P., Kulkarni, P. P. & Sarkar, B. (2003). Inorg. Chem. 42, 7366–7368.

Liu, Z.-H., Duan, C.-Y., Hu, J. & You, X.-Z. (1999). Inorg. Chem. 38, 1719–1724.

Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Sutton, L. E. (1965). Tables of Interatomic Distances and Configurations in Molecules and Ions, Suppl. London: The Chemical Society.

Tarafder, M. T. H., Ali, M. A., Wee, D. J., Azahari, K., Silong, S. & Crouse, K. A. (2000). Transition Met. Chem. 25, 456–460.

Wu, D.-H., He, C., Duan, C.-Y. & You, X.-Z. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 1336–1337.