organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

4-Methyl-N-(4-methyl­phen­yl)benzamide

aDepartment of Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri 574 199, Mangalore, India, bFaculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Slovak Technical University, Radlinského 9, SK-812 37 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, and cInstitute of Materials Science, Darmstadt University of Technology, Petersenstrasse 23, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: gowdabt@yahoo.com

(Received 21 February 2009; accepted 23 February 2009; online 28 February 2009)

In the title compound, C15H15NO, the amide fragment has an anti conformation. The central amide group is tilted with respect to the benzoyl ring, forming a dihedral angle of 32.3 (5)°. The benzoyl and aniline rings make a dihedral angle of 59.6 (5)°. Mol­ecules are linked into infinite supra­molecular chains via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The mol­ecule is disordered so that the aromatic rings are disposed across a twofold axis with equal occupancies.

Related literature

For background to our study of the substituent effects on the structures of benzanilides, see: Gowda et al. (2003[Gowda, B. T., Jyothi, K., Paulus, H. & Fuess, H. (2003). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 58, 225-230.]). For related structures, see Gowda et al. (2008a[Gowda, B. T., Tokarčík, M., Kožíšek, J. & Sowmya, B. P. (2008a). Acta Cryst. E64, o83.],b[Gowda, B. T., Tokarčík, M., Kožíšek, J., Sowmya, B. P. & Fuess, H. (2008b). Acta Cryst. E64, o1494.], 2009[Gowda, B. T., Foro, S., Sowmya, B. P. & Fuess, H. (2009). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A. In preparation. CCDC deposition No. 691312, CCDC, Cambridge, England.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C15H15NO

  • Mr = 225.28

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 13.3236 (5) Å

  • b = 5.3591 (2) Å

  • c = 17.3525 (6) Å

  • β = 92.248 (3)°

  • V = 1238.06 (8) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.08 mm−1

  • T = 295 K

  • 0.26 × 0.25 × 0.07 mm

Data collection
  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur System diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.]) Tmin = 0.984, Tmax = 0.995

  • 8166 measured reflections

  • 1235 independent reflections

  • 775 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.029

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037

  • wR(F2) = 0.103

  • S = 0.99

  • 1235 reflections

  • 154 parameters

  • 59 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.12 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.12 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1N⋯O1i 0.883 (15) 2.416 (19) 3.202 (3) 148.3 (6)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z.

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007[Oxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.]); data reduction: CrysAlis RED; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2002[Brandenburg, K. (2002). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97, PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837-838.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

In the present work, as part of a study of the substituent effects on the structures of benzanilides (Gowda et al., 2003; Gowda et al., 2008a,b), the structure of 4-methyl-N- (4-methylphenyl)benzamide (I) has been determined. The amide adopts an anti-conformation (Fig. 1), similar to that observed in N-(4-methylphenyl)benzamide (N4MPBA) (Gowda et al., 2008a), 4-methyl-N-(phenyl)benzamide (NP4MBA) (Gowda et al., 2009), 2-methyl-N-(4-methylphenyl)benzamide (N4MP2MBA) (Gowda et al., 2008b) and other benzanilides (Gowda et al., 2003). The central amide group is tilted to the benzoyl ring at an angle of 32.3 (5)°, compared to the values of 20.7 (2)°, 33.9 (14)°, 60.0 (1)°, observed for N4MPBA, NP4MBA and N4MP2MBA, respectively. The two aromatic rings form a dihedral angle of 59.6 (5)°, in comparison with the values in the structures cited above of 63.4 (1)°, 61.0 (1)°, and 81.4 (1)°, respectively. The molecules are linked by N—H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) into supramolecular chains running along the b axis (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For background to our study of the substituent effects on the structures of benzanilides, see: Gowda et al. (2003). For related structures, see Gowda et al. (2008a,b, 2009).

Experimental top

Compound (I) was prepared according to the method described by Gowda et al. (2003). Plate-like colourless single crystals were obtained by slow evaporation from an ethanol solution (ca. 30 ml) of (I) (0.5 g) held at room temperature.

Refinement top

H atoms attached to C atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined in the riding model approximation with C–H distances of 0.93 or 0.96 Å. The position of amide-H was refined; N-H = 0.883 (15) Å. The Uiso(H) values were set at 1.2 Ueq(C-aromatic, N) and 1.5 Ueq(C-methyl). The structure was found to be disordered in space group C2/c. The amide-O and -H atoms lie on a 2-fold axis with the aromatic rings disordered about this axis with equal occupancies. The geometries of the rings were restrained using the SADI and FLAT commands and the anisotropic displacement parameters were restrained with the DELU command in SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 2008). The atoms of the aniline moiety exhibit large thermal motion which accounts for the low value of the average ring bond distance of 1.359 (6) Å.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2002); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of (I) showing the atom labelling scheme and one orientation of the disordered molecule. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure of (I) showing supramolecular chains running along the b axis connected by N—H···Oi hydrogen bonds, shown by dashed lines. H atoms not involved in intermolecular bonding have been omitted for reasons of clarity. Symmetry operation (i): x, y +1, z.
4-Methyl-N-(4-methylphenyl)benzamide top
Crystal data top
C15H15NOF(000) = 480
Mr = 225.28Dx = 1.209 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 2932 reflections
a = 13.3236 (5) Åθ = 3.2–29.2°
b = 5.3591 (2) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 17.3525 (6) ÅT = 295 K
β = 92.248 (3)°Plate, colorless
V = 1238.06 (8) Å30.26 × 0.25 × 0.07 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur System
diffractometer
1235 independent reflections
Graphite monochromator775 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.434 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.029
ω scans with κ offsetsθmax = 26.2°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
h = 1616
Tmin = 0.984, Tmax = 0.995k = 66
8166 measured reflectionsl = 2121
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.103H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.99 w = [exp(0.90(sinθ/λ)2)]/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.068P)2]
where P = 0.33333Fo2 + 0.66667Fc2
1235 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
154 parametersΔρmax = 0.12 e Å3
59 restraintsΔρmin = 0.12 e Å3
Crystal data top
C15H15NOV = 1238.06 (8) Å3
Mr = 225.28Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 13.3236 (5) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
b = 5.3591 (2) ÅT = 295 K
c = 17.3525 (6) Å0.26 × 0.25 × 0.07 mm
β = 92.248 (3)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur System
diffractometer
1235 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
775 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.984, Tmax = 0.995Rint = 0.029
8166 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.03759 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.103H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.99Δρmax = 0.12 e Å3
1235 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.12 e Å3
154 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.50.0539 (2)0.250.0805 (4)
C80.52889 (16)0.1648 (5)0.26154 (14)0.0581 (6)0.5
C90.6171 (5)0.2387 (10)0.3106 (4)0.0555 (13)0.5
C100.6994 (7)0.0833 (15)0.3106 (7)0.0633 (14)0.5
H100.69720.06160.28110.076*0.5
C110.7862 (10)0.142 (3)0.3548 (6)0.0640 (17)0.5
H110.84130.03540.35490.077*0.5
C120.7905 (9)0.361 (3)0.3989 (11)0.061 (2)0.5
C130.7076 (9)0.522 (3)0.3987 (9)0.085 (3)0.5
H130.70870.66860.42720.102*0.5
C140.6229 (6)0.4507 (13)0.3538 (6)0.0705 (18)0.5
H140.56710.5550.35330.085*0.5
C150.8883 (6)0.3929 (11)0.4511 (4)0.0850 (19)0.5
H15A0.87770.51890.48930.127*0.5
H15B0.94280.44190.41980.127*0.5
H15C0.90440.23750.47620.127*0.5
N10.47296 (14)0.3550 (4)0.23226 (11)0.0625 (6)0.5
H1N0.50.495 (4)0.250.075*
C10.3832 (5)0.3400 (10)0.1864 (4)0.0567 (15)0.5
C20.3155 (8)0.1540 (16)0.1904 (7)0.0730 (18)0.5
H20.32870.02050.22350.088*0.5
C30.2279 (10)0.157 (3)0.1466 (8)0.083 (3)0.5
H30.18380.02450.15170.099*0.5
C40.2007 (11)0.343 (3)0.0962 (12)0.076 (3)0.5
C50.2728 (8)0.520 (3)0.0939 (8)0.081 (2)0.5
H50.26130.64820.05860.097*0.5
C60.3605 (6)0.5322 (14)0.1370 (6)0.0728 (17)0.5
H60.40350.66770.13290.087*0.5
C70.1050 (8)0.3838 (19)0.0558 (5)0.146 (4)0.5
H7A0.05780.26030.07140.219*0.5
H7B0.11340.37160.00120.219*0.5
H7C0.08050.5470.0680.219*0.5
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0817 (8)0.0553 (7)0.1022 (9)00.0262 (7)0
C80.0577 (18)0.0537 (13)0.0624 (16)0.0023 (10)0.0047 (12)0.0014 (11)
C90.0529 (18)0.053 (3)0.0602 (18)0.001 (2)0.0042 (13)0.004 (2)
C100.052 (2)0.063 (4)0.074 (2)0.004 (2)0.0032 (17)0.016 (3)
C110.046 (3)0.078 (4)0.067 (3)0.003 (3)0.0077 (19)0.001 (2)
C120.045 (3)0.077 (4)0.058 (4)0.005 (2)0.016 (2)0.000 (3)
C130.087 (5)0.082 (4)0.084 (4)0.024 (4)0.023 (3)0.008 (3)
C140.056 (2)0.070 (5)0.084 (4)0.011 (3)0.019 (2)0.004 (4)
C150.052 (2)0.104 (3)0.097 (5)0.017 (2)0.021 (2)0.001 (3)
N10.0602 (15)0.0521 (11)0.0736 (15)0.0012 (9)0.0166 (9)0.0010 (9)
C10.0564 (17)0.057 (4)0.056 (2)0.004 (3)0.0120 (15)0.004 (3)
C20.075 (5)0.064 (4)0.080 (3)0.000 (3)0.003 (3)0.024 (3)
C30.058 (5)0.085 (4)0.104 (5)0.017 (3)0.004 (3)0.002 (3)
C40.069 (5)0.096 (5)0.063 (4)0.003 (3)0.007 (4)0.015 (3)
C50.073 (4)0.104 (5)0.063 (3)0.003 (3)0.017 (3)0.016 (3)
C60.074 (4)0.068 (4)0.076 (3)0.007 (3)0.007 (3)0.013 (3)
C70.100 (5)0.274 (11)0.061 (3)0.040 (5)0.025 (3)0.001 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C81.247 (3)N1—N1i0.929 (3)
O1—C8i1.247 (3)N1—C11.413 (6)
C8—C8i0.854 (4)N1—H1N0.883 (15)
C8—C91.478 (7)C1—C21.348 (5)
C9—C141.362 (6)C1—C61.366 (5)
C9—C101.377 (5)C2—C31.368 (7)
C10—C111.398 (7)C2—H20.93
C10—H100.93C3—C41.363 (7)
C11—C121.402 (7)C3—H30.93
C11—H110.93C4—C51.352 (7)
C12—C131.400 (6)C4—C71.447 (14)
C12—C151.567 (11)C5—C61.363 (8)
C13—C141.398 (10)C5—H50.93
C13—H130.93C6—H60.93
C14—H140.93C7—H7A0.96
C15—H15A0.96C7—H7B0.96
C15—H15B0.96C7—H7C0.96
C15—H15C0.96
C8i—C8—C9162.2 (4)C2—C1—N1124.5 (6)
O1—C8—C9125.3 (3)C6—C1—N1118.2 (6)
C14—C9—C10118.4 (6)C1—C2—C3121.3 (9)
C14—C9—C8124.6 (6)C1—C2—H2119.3
C10—C9—C8117.0 (6)C3—C2—H2119.3
C9—C10—C11120.4 (9)C4—C3—C2124.5 (12)
C9—C10—H10119.8C4—C3—H3117.8
C11—C10—H10119.8C2—C3—H3117.8
C10—C11—C12120.2 (11)C5—C4—C3111.0 (12)
C10—C11—H11119.9C5—C4—C7119.5 (11)
C12—C11—H11119.9C3—C4—C7129.0 (10)
C13—C12—C11119.9 (10)C4—C5—C6127.8 (13)
C13—C12—C15124.9 (9)C4—C5—H5116.1
C11—C12—C15114.9 (8)C6—C5—H5116.1
C14—C13—C12116.9 (10)C5—C6—C1118.1 (10)
C14—C13—H13121.5C5—C6—H6121
C12—C13—H13121.5C1—C6—H6121
C9—C14—C13124.1 (8)C4—C7—H7A109.5
C9—C14—H14117.9C4—C7—H7B109.5
C13—C14—H14117.9H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N1i—N1—C1172.2 (4)C4—C7—H7C109.5
N1i—N1—H1N58.3 (7)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C1—N1—H1N124.7 (6)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C1—C6117.2 (6)
C8i—O1—C8—C9169.7 (6)C8—C9—C14—C13178.6 (11)
C8i—C8—C9—C141.0 (19)C12—C13—C14—C90 (2)
O1—C8—C9—C14145.7 (6)C6—C1—C2—C30.1 (17)
C8i—C8—C9—C10177.5 (15)N1—C1—C2—C3176.9 (10)
O1—C8—C9—C1035.8 (9)C1—C2—C3—C40 (3)
C14—C9—C10—C110.6 (15)C2—C3—C4—C51 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C11179.2 (9)C2—C3—C4—C7170.1 (17)
C9—C10—C11—C121 (2)C3—C4—C5—C63 (3)
C10—C11—C12—C130 (3)C7—C4—C5—C6169.1 (16)
C10—C11—C12—C15175.0 (12)C4—C5—C6—C14 (3)
C11—C12—C13—C140 (3)C2—C1—C6—C51.7 (15)
C15—C12—C13—C14174.0 (15)N1—C1—C6—C5178.8 (10)
C10—C9—C14—C130.2 (16)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1ii0.88 (2)2.42 (2)3.202 (3)148 (1)
Symmetry code: (ii) x, y+1, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H15NO
Mr225.28
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)295
a, b, c (Å)13.3236 (5), 5.3591 (2), 17.3525 (6)
β (°) 92.248 (3)
V3)1238.06 (8)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.08
Crystal size (mm)0.26 × 0.25 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur System
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.984, 0.995
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
8166, 1235, 775
Rint0.029
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.621
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.037, 0.103, 0.99
No. of reflections1235
No. of parameters154
No. of restraints59
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.12, 0.12

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2007), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2002), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1N···O1i0.883 (15)2.416 (19)3.202 (3)148.3 (6)
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+1, z.
 

Acknowledgements

MT and JK thank the Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic (grant No. VEGA 1/0817/08) and the Structural Funds, Interreg IIIA, for financial support in purchasing the diffractometer.

References

First citationBrandenburg, K. (2002). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Foro, S., Sowmya, B. P. & Fuess, H. (2009). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A. In preparation. CCDC deposition No. 691312, CCDC, Cambridge, England.  Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Jyothi, K., Paulus, H. & Fuess, H. (2003). Z. Naturforsch. Teil A, 58, 225–230.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Tokarčík, M., Kožíšek, J. & Sowmya, B. P. (2008a). Acta Cryst. E64, o83.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Tokarčík, M., Kožíšek, J., Sowmya, B. P. & Fuess, H. (2008b). Acta Cryst. E64, o1494.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOxford Diffraction (2007). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, England.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds