supplementary materials
Dichlorido{N-[1-(2-pyridyl)ethylidene]ethane-1,2-diamine}copper(II)
2-acetylpyridine (10 mmol, 1205 mg) was added dropwise to a absolute ethanol (20 ml) of diamine (10 mmol, 611 mg). The mixture was heated under reflux with
stirring for 3 h. An absolute ethanol solution (10 ml) of cupric chloride
dihydrate (10 mmol, 1700 mg) was then added dropwise, and the mixture was
stirred at room temperature for another 13 h. The solution was filtered off,
the filterate was kept at room temperature for about three weeks, after which
large green block-shaped crystals of the title complex suitable for X-ray
diffraction analysis were obtained.
All H-atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with
C—H = 0.90–0.97 Å, and N—H (amino) 0.90 Å, with Uiso(H)
=1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: SMART (Siemens, 1996); cell refinement: SAINT (Siemens, 1996); data reduction: SAINT (Siemens, 1996); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).
Dichlorido{
N-[1-(2-pyridyl)ethylidene]ethane-1,2-diamine}copper(II)
top
Crystal data top
| [CuCl2(C9H13N3)] | Z = 2 |
| Mr = 297.66 | F(000) = 302 |
| Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 1.675 Mg m−3 |
| Hall symbol: -P 1 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| a = 7.2701 (10) Å | Cell parameters from 1739 reflections |
| b = 8.8008 (12) Å | θ = 2.3–27.9° |
| c = 9.5773 (15) Å | µ = 2.27 mm−1 |
| α = 82.940 (2)° | T = 298 K |
| β = 76.289 (1)° | Block, green |
| γ = 85.751 (2)° | 0.50 × 0.42 × 0.17 mm |
| V = 590.16 (15) Å3 | |
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2021 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1549 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| graphite | Rint = 0.034 |
| φ and ω scans | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.2° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −5→8 |
| Tmin = 0.396, Tmax = 0.699 | k = −10→10 |
| 2903 measured reflections | l = −9→11 |
Refinement top
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.160 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| S = 1.04 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0888P)2 + 0.8983P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 2021 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| 136 parameters | Δρmax = 0.91 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.81 e Å−3 |
Crystal data top
| [CuCl2(C9H13N3)] | γ = 85.751 (2)° |
| Mr = 297.66 | V = 590.16 (15) Å3 |
| Triclinic, P1 | Z = 2 |
| a = 7.2701 (10) Å | Mo Kα radiation |
| b = 8.8008 (12) Å | µ = 2.27 mm−1 |
| c = 9.5773 (15) Å | T = 298 K |
| α = 82.940 (2)° | 0.50 × 0.42 × 0.17 mm |
| β = 76.289 (1)° | |
Data collection top
Siemens SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2021 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1549 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Tmin = 0.396, Tmax = 0.699 | Rint = 0.034 |
| 2903 measured reflections | θmax = 25.0° |
Refinement top
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.053 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| wR(F2) = 0.160 | Δρmax = 0.91 e Å−3 |
| S = 1.04 | Δρmin = −0.81 e Å−3 |
| 2021 reflections | Absolute structure: ? |
| 136 parameters | Flack parameter: ? |
| 0 restraints | Rogers parameter: ? |
Special details top
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top| | x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | |
| Cu1 | 0.53050 (9) | 0.78810 (8) | 0.77470 (7) | 0.0327 (3) | |
| Cl1 | 0.7011 (2) | 0.53529 (17) | 0.80166 (16) | 0.0397 (4) | |
| Cl2 | 0.7438 (2) | 0.9433 (2) | 0.81435 (18) | 0.0476 (4) | |
| N1 | 0.6029 (6) | 0.8157 (6) | 0.5531 (5) | 0.0341 (11) | |
| N2 | 0.3090 (6) | 0.7056 (6) | 0.7282 (5) | 0.0347 (11) | |
| N3 | 0.3644 (7) | 0.7751 (6) | 0.9746 (5) | 0.0357 (11) | |
| H3A | 0.4022 | 0.6933 | 1.0288 | 0.043* | |
| H3B | 0.3743 | 0.8597 | 1.0159 | 0.043* | |
| C1 | 0.1667 (9) | 0.6172 (9) | 0.5489 (7) | 0.0527 (18) | |
| H1A | 0.0658 | 0.5872 | 0.6302 | 0.079* | |
| H1B | 0.2225 | 0.5283 | 0.5032 | 0.079* | |
| H1C | 0.1171 | 0.6883 | 0.4809 | 0.079* | |
| C2 | 0.3123 (8) | 0.6909 (7) | 0.5987 (6) | 0.0343 (13) | |
| C3 | 0.4844 (8) | 0.7519 (7) | 0.4929 (6) | 0.0326 (13) | |
| C4 | 0.5180 (9) | 0.7429 (8) | 0.3465 (6) | 0.0427 (15) | |
| H4 | 0.4342 | 0.6966 | 0.3070 | 0.051* | |
| C5 | 0.6828 (10) | 0.8058 (9) | 0.2596 (7) | 0.0561 (19) | |
| H5 | 0.7108 | 0.8023 | 0.1601 | 0.067* | |
| C6 | 0.8026 (10) | 0.8725 (9) | 0.3213 (7) | 0.0531 (18) | |
| H6 | 0.9125 | 0.9155 | 0.2646 | 0.064* | |
| C7 | 0.7586 (9) | 0.8752 (7) | 0.4685 (7) | 0.0416 (15) | |
| H7 | 0.8408 | 0.9203 | 0.5105 | 0.050* | |
| C8 | 0.1613 (8) | 0.6561 (8) | 0.8557 (6) | 0.0412 (15) | |
| H8A | 0.1867 | 0.5504 | 0.8911 | 0.049* | |
| H8B | 0.0381 | 0.6645 | 0.8321 | 0.049* | |
| C9 | 0.1656 (8) | 0.7610 (8) | 0.9685 (7) | 0.0406 (14) | |
| H9A | 0.1095 | 0.8611 | 0.9436 | 0.049* | |
| H9B | 0.0931 | 0.7192 | 1.0622 | 0.049* | |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top| | U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 |
| Cu1 | 0.0302 (4) | 0.0363 (5) | 0.0324 (4) | −0.0047 (3) | −0.0096 (3) | 0.0001 (3) |
| Cl1 | 0.0404 (8) | 0.0339 (8) | 0.0412 (8) | 0.0017 (6) | −0.0079 (6) | 0.0048 (6) |
| Cl2 | 0.0403 (9) | 0.0487 (10) | 0.0580 (10) | −0.0096 (7) | −0.0133 (7) | −0.0145 (8) |
| N1 | 0.031 (2) | 0.035 (3) | 0.033 (3) | −0.004 (2) | −0.007 (2) | 0.007 (2) |
| N2 | 0.027 (2) | 0.053 (3) | 0.025 (2) | −0.009 (2) | −0.0086 (19) | 0.002 (2) |
| N3 | 0.040 (3) | 0.033 (3) | 0.035 (3) | −0.001 (2) | −0.011 (2) | −0.001 (2) |
| C1 | 0.038 (3) | 0.081 (5) | 0.043 (4) | −0.016 (4) | −0.008 (3) | −0.015 (4) |
| C2 | 0.029 (3) | 0.037 (3) | 0.037 (3) | 0.001 (2) | −0.012 (2) | 0.001 (3) |
| C3 | 0.034 (3) | 0.033 (3) | 0.031 (3) | −0.002 (2) | −0.010 (2) | 0.003 (2) |
| C4 | 0.042 (3) | 0.051 (4) | 0.036 (3) | −0.007 (3) | −0.013 (3) | 0.001 (3) |
| C5 | 0.057 (4) | 0.077 (5) | 0.031 (3) | −0.009 (4) | −0.008 (3) | 0.008 (3) |
| C6 | 0.044 (4) | 0.060 (5) | 0.047 (4) | −0.015 (3) | −0.003 (3) | 0.015 (3) |
| C7 | 0.039 (3) | 0.038 (3) | 0.046 (4) | −0.009 (3) | −0.008 (3) | 0.004 (3) |
| C8 | 0.033 (3) | 0.053 (4) | 0.037 (3) | −0.011 (3) | −0.007 (3) | 0.001 (3) |
| C9 | 0.034 (3) | 0.045 (4) | 0.040 (3) | 0.001 (3) | −0.006 (3) | −0.001 (3) |
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
| Cu1—N2 | 1.977 (5) | C1—H1C | 0.9600 |
| Cu1—N3 | 2.002 (5) | C2—C3 | 1.498 (8) |
| Cu1—N1 | 2.050 (5) | C3—C4 | 1.376 (8) |
| Cu1—Cl2 | 2.2659 (17) | C4—C5 | 1.396 (9) |
| Cu1—Cl1 | 2.4812 (16) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
| N1—C7 | 1.327 (7) | C5—C6 | 1.363 (10) |
| N1—C3 | 1.333 (7) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
| N2—C2 | 1.257 (7) | C6—C7 | 1.372 (9) |
| N2—C8 | 1.467 (7) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
| N3—C9 | 1.475 (7) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
| N3—H3A | 0.9000 | C8—C9 | 1.512 (9) |
| N3—H3B | 0.9000 | C8—H8A | 0.9700 |
| C1—C2 | 1.479 (8) | C8—H8B | 0.9700 |
| C1—H1A | 0.9600 | C9—H9A | 0.9700 |
| C1—H1B | 0.9600 | C9—H9B | 0.9700 |
| | | |
| N2—Cu1—N3 | 82.95 (19) | N2—C2—C3 | 114.1 (5) |
| N2—Cu1—N1 | 78.71 (18) | C1—C2—C3 | 120.6 (5) |
| N3—Cu1—N1 | 158.54 (19) | N1—C3—C4 | 122.8 (5) |
| N2—Cu1—Cl2 | 164.66 (16) | N1—C3—C2 | 114.0 (5) |
| N3—Cu1—Cl2 | 96.66 (15) | C4—C3—C2 | 123.2 (5) |
| N1—Cu1—Cl2 | 98.10 (14) | C3—C4—C5 | 117.5 (6) |
| N2—Cu1—Cl1 | 95.01 (16) | C3—C4—H4 | 121.3 |
| N3—Cu1—Cl1 | 96.91 (15) | C5—C4—H4 | 121.3 |
| N1—Cu1—Cl1 | 95.69 (14) | C6—C5—C4 | 119.6 (6) |
| Cl2—Cu1—Cl1 | 100.26 (6) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.2 |
| C7—N1—C3 | 118.8 (5) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.2 |
| C7—N1—Cu1 | 127.4 (4) | C5—C6—C7 | 119.0 (6) |
| C3—N1—Cu1 | 113.5 (4) | C5—C6—H6 | 120.5 |
| C2—N2—C8 | 126.8 (5) | C7—C6—H6 | 120.5 |
| C2—N2—Cu1 | 119.1 (4) | N1—C7—C6 | 122.4 (6) |
| C8—N2—Cu1 | 113.9 (4) | N1—C7—H7 | 118.8 |
| C9—N3—Cu1 | 109.9 (4) | C6—C7—H7 | 118.8 |
| C9—N3—H3A | 109.7 | N2—C8—C9 | 106.3 (5) |
| Cu1—N3—H3A | 109.7 | N2—C8—H8A | 110.5 |
| C9—N3—H3B | 109.7 | C9—C8—H8A | 110.5 |
| Cu1—N3—H3B | 109.7 | N2—C8—H8B | 110.5 |
| H3A—N3—H3B | 108.2 | C9—C8—H8B | 110.5 |
| C2—C1—H1A | 109.5 | H8A—C8—H8B | 108.7 |
| C2—C1—H1B | 109.5 | N3—C9—C8 | 108.7 (5) |
| H1A—C1—H1B | 109.5 | N3—C9—H9A | 109.9 |
| C2—C1—H1C | 109.5 | C8—C9—H9A | 109.9 |
| H1A—C1—H1C | 109.5 | N3—C9—H9B | 109.9 |
| H1B—C1—H1C | 109.5 | C8—C9—H9B | 109.9 |
| N2—C2—C1 | 125.3 (5) | H9A—C9—H9B | 108.3 |
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N3—H3A···Cl1i | 0.90 | 2.47 | 3.248 (5) | 145 |
| N3—H3B···Cl2ii | 0.90 | 2.49 | 3.322 (5) | 154 |
| C6—H6···Cl2iii | 0.93 | 2.77 | 3.666 (7) | 161 |
| C4—H4···Cl1iv | 0.93 | 2.74 | 3.612 (7) | 156 |
| C1—H1A···Cl1v | 0.96 | 2.80 | 3.726 (6) | 161 |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (iii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (v) x−1, y, z. |
Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) top| Cu1—N2 | 1.977 (5) | Cu1—Cl2 | 2.2659 (17) |
| Cu1—N3 | 2.002 (5) | Cu1—Cl1 | 2.4812 (16) |
| Cu1—N1 | 2.050 (5) | | |
| | | |
| N3—Cu1—N1 | 158.54 (19) | N2—Cu1—Cl2 | 164.66 (16) |
Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N3—H3A···Cl1i | 0.90 | 2.47 | 3.248 (5) | 145 |
| N3—H3B···Cl2ii | 0.90 | 2.49 | 3.322 (5) | 154 |
| C6—H6···Cl2iii | 0.93 | 2.77 | 3.666 (7) | 161 |
| C4—H4···Cl1iv | 0.93 | 2.74 | 3.612 (7) | 156 |
| C1—H1A···Cl1v | 0.96 | 2.80 | 3.726 (6) | 161 |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2; (iii) −x+2, −y+2, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (v) x−1, y, z. |
The authors acknowledge financial support by the Shandong Provincial Science
Foundation and the State Key Laboratory of Crystalline Materials, Shandong
University, People's Republic of China.
Addison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349–1356.
Coles, S. J., Hursthouse, M. B., Kelly, D. G., Toner, A. J. & Walker, N. M. (1998). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3489–3593.
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.
Siemens (1996). SMART and SAINT. Siemens Analytical X-ray Instruments Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Schiff-base ligands have played an integral role in the development of coordination chemistry since the late 19t h century. The finding that metal complexes of these ligands are ubiquitous is a reflection of their facile synthesis, wide application and the accessibility of diverse structural modifications (Coles et al., 1998). We report here the synthesis and crystal structure of the title complex, a new copper(II) complex, with a tridentate Schiff base ligand derived from the condensation of 2-acetylpyridine and diamine.
The molecular structure of the title complex is shown in Fig.1. The CuII atom is five-coordinated. The basal plane for a tetragonal-pyramidal geometry is defined by the atoms N1, N2, N3 and Cl2, their mean deviation from this plane is 0.025 Å, and the Cu atom juts out of this plane by 0.2599 (2) Å. The axial position of the pyramid is occupied by atom Cl1. For this point of view, a geometry parameter τ, which is defined τ = (β - α)/60, applicable to five-coordinate structures within the structural continuum between trigonal bipyramidal and tetragonal or rectangular pyramidal. For a perfect tetragonal symmetry τ is zero, and for a perfect trigonal-bipyramidal geometry τ becomes 1.0 (Addison et al. 1984). In the title compound, the largest angles within the four atoms N1, N2, N3, Cl2 are β = 164.66 (16)° for N2–Cu1–Cl2, and α = 158.54 (19)° for N1–Cu1–N3. Thus, τ is (164.66–158.54)/60 = 0.102, indicating a 90% rectangular pyramidal geometry. Selected geometric parameters are presented in Table 1. As seen in Fig. 2, the molecules are linked into chains by intermolecular N—H···Cl and C—H···Cl hydrogen bonds (Table 2).