supplementary materials


bt2937 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o1201    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809015372 ]

Deacetyl tenuazonic acid

D. Siegel, M. Koch, F. Emmerling and I. Nehls

Abstract top

The heterocycle in the title compound {systematic name: (5S)-5-[(1S)-1-methylpropyl]pyrrolidine-2,4-dione}, C8H13NO2, is planar (r.m.s. deviation for all non-H atoms = 0.008 Å). The crystal structure is stabilized by N-H...O hydrogen bonding.

Comment top

Tenuazonic acid (TA) is an Alternaria mycotoxin commonly encountered in food (Siegel, Rasenko et al., 2009; Weidenbörner, 2001). The title compound is known to be formed upon boiling of TA in 0.1 M HCl (Stickings, 1959). It is therefore a possible degradation product which might also be encountered in food matrices.

Whereas TA itself could so far only be crystallized as its copper (II) salt (Dippenaar et al., 1977) or 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone (Siegel, Merkel et al., 2009), the title compound is conveniently crystallized from hexane/ethyl acetate.

Each molecule (Fig. 1) is connected to two adjacent molecules via N—H···O hydrogen bonds. Along the b axis chains of symmetry equivalent molecules are formed (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

Tenuazonic acid (TA) is an Alternaria mycotoxin commonly encountered in food (Siegel, Rasenko et al., 2009; Weidenbörner, 2001). The title compound is known to be formed upon boiling of the Alternaria mycotoxin tenuazonic acid in 0.1 M HCl (Stickings, 1959). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Lebrun et al. (1988). For the crystal structure of the tenuazonic acid copper (II) salt, see: Dippenaar et al. (1977) and for the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone, see: Siegel, Merkel et al. (2009). For the structures of other pyrrolidine-2,4-diones, see, for example: Yu et al. (2007); Zhu et al. (2004); Ellis & Spek (2001).

Experimental top

The title compound was supplied by the workgroup of Professor R. Faust (University of Kassel, Germany) by synthesis according to a literature procedure (Lebrun et al., 1988). For x-ray analysis, it was recrystallized several times from hexane:ethyl acetate 50:50 (v:v).

Refinement top

The hydrogen atoms were located in difference maps but positioned with idealized geometry and refined using the riding model, with C—H = 0.98–1.00 Å or N—H = 0.90 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N) or 1.5Ueq(Cmethyl).

Computing details top

Data collection: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989); cell refinement: CAD-4 Software (Enraf–Nonius, 1989); data reduction: CORINC (Dräger & Gattow, 1971); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP representation of the title compound with atomic labeling of, shown with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of the unit cell of the title compound along [100], showing the hydrogen-bonded chains running along the twofold screw axis.
(5S)-5-[(1S)-1-methylpropyl]pyrrolidine-2,4-dione top
Crystal data top
C8H13NO2F000 = 168
Mr = 155.19Dx = 1.206 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Cu Kα radiation
λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 25 reflections
a = 5.0114 (4) Åθ = 67–69º
b = 7.7961 (4) ŵ = 0.71 mm1
c = 10.9919 (10) ÅT = 193 K
β = 95.778 (4)ºBlock, yellow
V = 427.26 (6) Å30.44 × 0.16 × 0.16 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
Rint = 0.040
Monochromator: graphiteθmax = 69.9º
T = 193 Kθmin = 4.0º
ω/2θ scansh = 6→5
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(CORINC; Dräger & Gattow, 1971)
k = 8→9
Tmin = 0.744, Tmax = 0.993l = 13→13
1866 measured reflections3 standard reflections
1571 independent reflections every 60 min
1558 reflections with I > 2σ(I) intensity decay: 2%
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0616P)2 + 0.0771P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.098(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
1571 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
103 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.017 (4)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 697 Friedel pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapFlack parameter: 0.1 (2)
Crystal data top
C8H13NO2V = 427.26 (6) Å3
Mr = 155.19Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21Cu Kα
a = 5.0114 (4) ŵ = 0.71 mm1
b = 7.7961 (4) ÅT = 193 K
c = 10.9919 (10) Å0.44 × 0.16 × 0.16 mm
β = 95.778 (4)º
Data collection top
Enraf–Nonius CAD-4
diffractometer
1558 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Absorption correction: ψ scan
(CORINC; Dräger & Gattow, 1971)
Rint = 0.040
Tmin = 0.744, Tmax = 0.9933 standard reflections
1866 measured reflections every 60 min
1571 independent reflections intensity decay: 2%
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.098Δρmax = 0.22 e Å3
S = 1.06Δρmin = 0.16 e Å3
1571 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 697 Friedel pairs
103 parametersFlack parameter: 0.1 (2)
1 restraint
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.0559 (2)0.66044 (16)0.50335 (11)0.0386 (3)
O20.5911 (3)0.74694 (19)0.22570 (14)0.0494 (4)
N10.2318 (3)0.48864 (18)0.41048 (11)0.0303 (3)
H10.18660.39460.45190.036*
C10.1196 (3)0.6392 (2)0.43372 (14)0.0305 (3)
C20.2400 (3)0.7779 (2)0.36022 (15)0.0360 (4)
H2A0.10120.83200.30210.043*
H2B0.32650.86750.41450.043*
C30.4437 (3)0.6853 (2)0.29328 (15)0.0335 (4)
C40.4354 (3)0.4941 (2)0.32393 (13)0.0296 (3)
H40.61220.45940.36720.036*
C50.3757 (3)0.3822 (2)0.20975 (14)0.0317 (4)
H50.50400.41610.15000.038*
C60.0924 (4)0.4130 (3)0.14885 (16)0.0425 (4)
H6A0.03730.35940.19950.051*
H6B0.05710.53800.14670.051*
C70.0441 (6)0.3429 (4)0.0202 (2)0.0761 (8)
H7A0.17210.39460.03070.114*
H7B0.13910.37060.01380.114*
H7C0.06790.21810.02190.114*
C80.4266 (4)0.1937 (2)0.2416 (2)0.0474 (5)
H8A0.60880.18040.28210.071*
H8B0.40710.12500.16660.071*
H8C0.29670.15490.29660.071*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0498 (7)0.0316 (6)0.0377 (6)0.0010 (5)0.0201 (5)0.0054 (5)
O20.0530 (8)0.0418 (8)0.0576 (8)0.0067 (6)0.0262 (6)0.0115 (6)
N10.0349 (7)0.0268 (7)0.0303 (6)0.0028 (5)0.0094 (5)0.0017 (5)
C10.0374 (8)0.0264 (8)0.0279 (7)0.0056 (6)0.0046 (6)0.0030 (6)
C20.0462 (9)0.0253 (8)0.0378 (8)0.0062 (7)0.0104 (7)0.0022 (7)
C30.0348 (8)0.0312 (8)0.0347 (8)0.0065 (6)0.0043 (6)0.0024 (7)
C40.0268 (7)0.0308 (8)0.0321 (7)0.0025 (6)0.0063 (5)0.0042 (7)
C50.0310 (8)0.0312 (8)0.0346 (8)0.0006 (6)0.0120 (6)0.0011 (6)
C60.0373 (9)0.0512 (11)0.0391 (9)0.0028 (7)0.0037 (7)0.0102 (8)
C70.0824 (18)0.087 (2)0.0547 (14)0.0218 (14)0.0144 (12)0.0302 (13)
C80.0558 (11)0.0317 (9)0.0573 (12)0.0060 (8)0.0182 (8)0.0003 (8)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
O1—C11.2338 (19)C5—C81.526 (2)
O2—C31.199 (2)C5—C61.526 (2)
N1—C11.337 (2)C5—H51.0000
N1—C41.4640 (18)C6—C71.512 (3)
N1—H10.9038C6—H6A0.9900
C1—C21.511 (2)C6—H6B0.9900
C2—C31.501 (2)C7—H7A0.9800
C2—H2A0.9900C7—H7B0.9800
C2—H2B0.9900C7—H7C0.9800
C3—C41.530 (2)C8—H8A0.9800
C4—C51.533 (2)C8—H8B0.9800
C4—H41.0000C8—H8C0.9800
C1—N1—C4115.63 (14)C6—C5—C4111.45 (13)
C1—N1—H1119.0C8—C5—H5107.6
C4—N1—H1125.2C6—C5—H5107.6
O1—C1—N1125.18 (14)C4—C5—H5107.6
O1—C1—C2125.70 (14)C7—C6—C5114.04 (16)
N1—C1—C2109.12 (14)C7—C6—H6A108.7
C3—C2—C1104.25 (14)C5—C6—H6A108.7
C3—C2—H2A110.9C7—C6—H6B108.7
C1—C2—H2A110.9C5—C6—H6B108.7
C3—C2—H2B110.9H6A—C6—H6B107.6
C1—C2—H2B110.9C6—C7—H7A109.5
H2A—C2—H2B108.9C6—C7—H7B109.5
O2—C3—C2127.06 (17)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
O2—C3—C4123.96 (16)C6—C7—H7C109.5
C2—C3—C4108.98 (13)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—C3101.98 (13)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—C5115.10 (13)C5—C8—H8A109.5
C3—C4—C5112.44 (13)C5—C8—H8B109.5
N1—C4—H4109.0H8A—C8—H8B109.5
C3—C4—H4109.0C5—C8—H8C109.5
C5—C4—H4109.0H8A—C8—H8C109.5
C8—C5—C6112.26 (15)H8B—C8—H8C109.5
C8—C5—C4110.21 (14)
C4—N1—C1—O1179.64 (15)C2—C3—C4—N11.75 (16)
C4—N1—C1—C20.22 (18)O2—C3—C4—C557.6 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3179.26 (14)C2—C3—C4—C5122.08 (14)
N1—C1—C2—C31.33 (18)N1—C4—C5—C875.53 (17)
C1—C2—C3—O2178.44 (17)C3—C4—C5—C8168.27 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C41.90 (17)N1—C4—C5—C649.81 (19)
C1—N1—C4—C30.95 (16)C3—C4—C5—C666.39 (17)
C1—N1—C4—C5121.07 (15)C8—C5—C6—C770.6 (3)
O2—C3—C4—N1178.57 (16)C4—C5—C6—C7165.2 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.902.022.8963 (18)164
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y−1/2, −z+1.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1···O1i0.902.022.8963 (18)164
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y−1/2, −z+1.
references
References top

Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.

Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Dippenaar, A., Holzapfel, C. W. & Boeyens, J. C. A. (1977). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 7, 189–197.

Dräger, M. & Gattow, G. (1971). Acta Chem. Scand. 25, 761–762.

Ellis, D. D. & Spek, A. L. (2001). Acta Cryst. C57, 433–434.

Enraf–Nonius (1989). CAD-4 Software. Enraf–Nonius, Delft, The Netherlands.

Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.

Lebrun, M. H., Nicolas, L., Boutar, M., Gaudemer, F., Ranomenjanahary, S. & Gaudemer, A. (1988). Phytochemistry, 27, 77–84.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Siegel, D., Merkel, S., Koch, M., Emmerling, F. & Nehls, I. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o988–o989.

Siegel, D., Rasenko, T., Koch, M. & Nehls, I. (2009). J. Chromatogr. A. 1216, 4582-4588.

Stickings, C. E. (1959). Biochem. J. 72, 332–340.

Weidenbörner, M. (2001). In Encyclopedia of Food Mycotoxins. Berlin: Springer.

Yu, G.-S., Xu, H.-Z. & Zhu, Y.-Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o3384.

Zhu, Y.-Q., Song, H.-B., Li, J.-R., Yao, C.-S., Hu, F.-Z., Zou, X.-M. & Yang, H.-Z. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o196–o198.