supplementary materials


dn2442 scheme

Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o1278    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809016626 ]

1,3-Dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)propan-2-aminium 2,2-dichloroacetate

Y.-H. Yu and K. Qian

Abstract top

The title compound, C4H12NO3+·C2HCl2O2-, was obtained from dichloroacetic acid and 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol. In the crystal structure, the cations and anions are connected by intermolecular N-H...O and O-H...O hydrogen bonding, forming a two-dimensional array parallel to (001). The crystal used for analysis was a merohedral twin, as indicated by the Flack parameter of 0.67 (6).

Comment top

During the past 15 years, organic crystals for quadratic nonlinear optics have been intensely engineered (Etter & Frankenbach, 1989; Yaghi et al., 1997). Arising from the complexation of organic and inorganic molecules based on acid–base interactions, highly polarisable cations, responsible for NLO properties, are linked to inorganic anions through hydrogen bond networks which generate a noncentrosymmetric structural organization (Etter, 1990). In this paper, a novel nonlinear hybrid molecular crystal, NH2C(CH2OH)3, has been prepared by complexation between dichloroacetic and tris(hydroxymethyl)amino methane.

The structure is built up from cations and anions (Fig. 1) connected through strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds (Table 1, Fig. 2) to form a two-dimensional layer developing parallel to the (001) plane. As suggested by the value of the Flack parameter (Flack, 1983), 0.67 (6), based on 920 Friedel's pairs, the particular crystal is twinned by inversion.

Related literature top

For the engineering of organic crystals for quadratic non-linear optics, see: Etter & Frankenbach (1989); Yaghi et al. (1997). For hydrogen-bond networks, see: Etter (1990).

Experimental top

The crystals were grown by slow evaporation at ambient temperature of the solution prepared by adding dichloroacetic acid to the aqueous solution of tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane in a stoichiometric ratio. For the X-ray diffraction analysis, suitable single crystals of compound (I) were obtained after one night by slow evaporation from an filtration water solution.

Refinement top

All H atoms were found from a difference Fourier map but they were treated as riding on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.97 Å (methylene) or 0.98 Å (methine), N—H = 0.89 Å and O—H = 0.82 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(N,O).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with the atom labeling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are represented as small spheres of arbitrary radii. H bond is drawn as dashed line.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Partial packing view showing the intricated hydrogen bond framework. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bondings were omitted. [Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1, y + 1/2, -z + 1.]
1,3-Dihydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)propan-2-aminium 2,2-dichloroacetate top
Crystal data top
C4H12NO3+·C2HCl2O2F000 = 260
Mr = 250.07Dx = 1.597 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation
λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: P 2ybCell parameters from 735 reflections
a = 8.6231 (17) Åθ = 2.8–27.5º
b = 6.1376 (12) ŵ = 0.62 mm1
c = 9.898 (2) ÅT = 293 K
β = 97.03 (3)ºPrism, colourless
V = 519.92 (18) Å30.22 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Rigaku SCXmini
diffractometer
2044 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1951 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Monochromator: graphiteRint = 0.025
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0º
T = 293 Kθmin = 3.3º
ω scansh = 10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 7→7
Tmin = 0.875, Tmax = 0.929l = 12→12
4914 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031  w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0218P)2 + 0.166P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.069(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.10Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
2044 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
130 parametersExtinction correction: none
3 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 920 Friedel pairs
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsFlack parameter: 0.67 (6)
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Crystal data top
C4H12NO3+·C2HCl2O2V = 519.92 (18) Å3
Mr = 250.07Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα
a = 8.6231 (17) ŵ = 0.62 mm1
b = 6.1376 (12) ÅT = 293 K
c = 9.898 (2) Å0.22 × 0.18 × 0.12 mm
β = 97.03 (3)º
Data collection top
Rigaku SCXmini
diffractometer
2044 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
1951 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.875, Tmax = 0.929Rint = 0.025
4914 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.069Δρmax = 0.23 e Å3
S = 1.10Δρmin = 0.25 e Å3
2044 reflectionsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 920 Friedel pairs
130 parametersFlack parameter: 0.67 (6)
3 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl10.86491 (9)0.39154 (15)0.00483 (7)0.0630 (2)
Cl20.70850 (10)0.03942 (11)0.13016 (8)0.0598 (2)
C10.6938 (3)0.3135 (4)0.0737 (2)0.0342 (5)
H10.60460.32630.00260.041*
C20.6675 (2)0.4656 (4)0.1919 (2)0.0282 (5)
C30.2265 (2)0.2569 (3)0.3756 (2)0.0215 (4)
C40.3748 (2)0.1471 (3)0.3394 (2)0.0248 (4)
H4A0.35400.08270.24960.030*
H4B0.45580.25620.33650.030*
C50.0883 (2)0.0986 (3)0.3577 (2)0.0249 (4)
H5A0.05430.08010.26130.030*
H5B0.12260.04230.39440.030*
C60.1911 (2)0.4607 (3)0.2892 (2)0.0270 (4)
H6A0.18410.42150.19370.032*
H6B0.09050.51880.30580.032*
N10.25465 (19)0.3243 (3)0.52217 (16)0.0221 (3)
H1A0.34700.39030.53820.033*
H1B0.25400.20700.57500.033*
H1C0.17970.41560.54030.033*
O10.54454 (19)0.5709 (3)0.17435 (18)0.0444 (4)
O20.76863 (19)0.4708 (3)0.29336 (16)0.0403 (4)
O30.42905 (16)0.0160 (2)0.43407 (15)0.0306 (4)
H30.38570.12810.40710.046*
O40.30642 (17)0.6233 (2)0.31776 (17)0.0336 (4)
H40.38050.59590.27590.050*
O50.04042 (15)0.1704 (3)0.42311 (15)0.0274 (3)
H50.09310.25640.37350.041*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl10.0535 (4)0.0984 (7)0.0405 (4)0.0075 (4)0.0196 (3)0.0042 (4)
Cl20.0872 (5)0.0321 (3)0.0549 (4)0.0001 (4)0.0123 (4)0.0081 (3)
C10.0339 (12)0.0377 (13)0.0292 (11)0.0008 (10)0.0040 (9)0.0007 (10)
C20.0274 (11)0.0271 (10)0.0304 (11)0.0002 (10)0.0048 (9)0.0064 (9)
C30.0185 (9)0.0225 (10)0.0233 (10)0.0014 (8)0.0018 (8)0.0011 (8)
C40.0213 (10)0.0248 (11)0.0288 (11)0.0005 (9)0.0052 (9)0.0000 (9)
C50.0191 (9)0.0233 (11)0.0324 (11)0.0007 (8)0.0029 (8)0.0030 (9)
C60.0247 (10)0.0227 (10)0.0332 (11)0.0007 (9)0.0017 (9)0.0044 (9)
N10.0180 (7)0.0224 (8)0.0259 (9)0.0000 (7)0.0031 (7)0.0006 (7)
O10.0347 (9)0.0503 (11)0.0494 (10)0.0142 (8)0.0097 (8)0.0129 (9)
O20.0424 (9)0.0425 (10)0.0337 (9)0.0120 (8)0.0048 (7)0.0105 (7)
O30.0238 (7)0.0236 (8)0.0433 (9)0.0036 (6)0.0002 (7)0.0001 (7)
O40.0293 (8)0.0219 (7)0.0510 (10)0.0038 (6)0.0105 (7)0.0024 (7)
O50.0179 (7)0.0308 (8)0.0337 (8)0.0002 (6)0.0043 (6)0.0027 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
Cl1—C11.765 (2)C5—O51.421 (2)
Cl2—C11.773 (3)C5—H5A0.9700
C1—C21.536 (3)C5—H5B0.9700
C1—H10.9800C6—O41.413 (3)
C2—O11.236 (3)C6—H6A0.9700
C2—O21.247 (3)C6—H6B0.9700
C3—N11.499 (3)N1—H1A0.8900
C3—C61.525 (3)N1—H1B0.8900
C3—C41.527 (3)N1—H1C0.8900
C3—C51.531 (3)O3—H30.8119
C4—O31.411 (2)O4—H40.8205
C4—H4A0.9700O5—H50.8200
C4—H4B0.9700
C2—C1—Cl1109.75 (16)O5—C5—C3112.99 (16)
C2—C1—Cl2110.36 (16)O5—C5—H5A109.0
Cl1—C1—Cl2110.39 (14)C3—C5—H5A109.0
C2—C1—H1108.8O5—C5—H5B109.0
Cl1—C1—H1108.8C3—C5—H5B109.0
Cl2—C1—H1108.8H5A—C5—H5B107.8
O1—C2—O2127.1 (2)O4—C6—C3112.27 (17)
O1—C2—C1114.5 (2)O4—C6—H6A109.2
O2—C2—C1118.38 (19)C3—C6—H6A109.2
N1—C3—C6108.33 (17)O4—C6—H6B109.2
N1—C3—C4107.93 (16)C3—C6—H6B109.2
C6—C3—C4110.28 (16)H6A—C6—H6B107.9
N1—C3—C5108.57 (16)C3—N1—H1A109.5
C6—C3—C5110.83 (16)C3—N1—H1B109.5
C4—C3—C5110.81 (17)H1A—N1—H1B109.5
O3—C4—C3112.12 (16)C3—N1—H1C109.5
O3—C4—H4A109.2H1A—N1—H1C109.5
C3—C4—H4A109.2H1B—N1—H1C109.5
O3—C4—H4B109.2C4—O3—H3106.3
C3—C4—H4B109.2C6—O4—H4109.1
H4A—C4—H4B107.9C5—O5—H5109.5
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.892.002.881 (2)169
N1—H1B···O2ii0.891.972.858 (2)172
N1—H1C···O5iii0.892.032.909 (2)169
O3—H3···O4iv0.811.852.654 (2)169
O4—H4···O10.821.842.655 (2)173
O5—H5···O2v0.821.882.691 (2)168
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1; (iv) x, y−1, z; (v) x−1, y, z.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O3i0.892.002.881 (2)169
N1—H1B···O2ii0.891.972.858 (2)172
N1—H1C···O5iii0.892.032.909 (2)169
O3—H3···O4iv0.811.852.654 (2)169
O4—H4···O10.821.842.655 (2)173
O5—H5···O2v0.821.882.691 (2)168
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1; (iv) x, y−1, z; (v) x−1, y, z.
references
References top

Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1996). ORTEPIII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA.

Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126.

Etter, M. C. & Frankenbach, G. M. (1989). Chem. Mater. 1, 10–12.

Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.

Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881.

Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.

Yaghi, O. M., Davis, C. E., Li, G.-M. & Li, H.-L. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 2861–2868.