supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o2396    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809034941 ]

3-Cyanoanilinium bromide

B. Wang

Abstract top

In the cation of the title compound, C7H7N2+·Br-, all non-H atoms are essentially coplanar [r.m.s. deviation = 0.010 (5) Å]. The compound is isomorphous with the chloride analogue. In the crystal, the cations and anions are connected by N-H...Br hydrogen bonds.

Comment top

The construction of metal-organic coordination compounds has attracted much attention owing to potential functions, such as permittivity, fluorescence, magnetism and optical properties (Fu et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2001; Fu & Xiong (2008); Xie et al., 2003; Zhao et al.,2004; Xiong et al., 1999). Nitrile derivatives are a class of excellent ligands for the construction of novel metal-organic frameworks. (Wang et al. 2002; Fu et al., 2008). We report here the crystal structure of the title compound, which is isomorphous with the chloride analogue (Wen, 2008). In the cation all non-H atoms are essentially coplanar [r.m.s. deviation 0.010 (5) Å]. In the crystal structure, the organic cations and bromide ions are connected by N—H···Br hydrogen bonds along b axis, (Table 1), (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For applications of metal-organic coordination compounds, see: Fu et al. (2007); Chen et al. (2001); Fu & Xiong (2008); Xiong et al. (1999); Xie et al. (2003); Zhao et al. (2004). For nitrile derivatives, see: Fu et al. (2008); Wang et al. 2002. For the chloride analogue, see: Wen (2008).

Experimental top

The commercial 3-aminobenzonitrile (3 mmol, 0.55 g) and HBr (0.5 ml) were dissolved in ethanol (20 ml). Colourless block-shaped crystals of the title compound suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained by slow evaporation at room temperature.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C and N atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding, with C-H = 0.93 Å, N-H = 0.89 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(N). A rotating-group model was used for the -NH3 group.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); cell refinement: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); data reduction: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A view of the title compound with the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The crystal packing of the title compound, viewed along the a axis showing the N—H···Br interactions (dotted line) in the title compound. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding (dashed lines) have been omitted for clarity.
3-Cyanoanilinium bromide top
Crystal data top
C7H7N2+·BrZ = 2
Mr = 199.06F(000) = 196
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.732 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.6396 (9) ÅCell parameters from 1378 reflections
b = 6.1757 (12) Åθ = 3.0–27.5°
c = 13.542 (3) ŵ = 5.31 mm1
α = 93.07 (3)°T = 298 K
β = 96.22 (3)°Block, colourless
γ = 97.33 (3)°0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
V = 381.68 (13) Å3
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
1716 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1378 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.063
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.0°
CCD profile fitting scansh = 65
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
k = 88
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 1.00l = 1717
3777 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.134H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.10 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.053P)2 + 0.0394P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1716 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.71 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.75 e Å3
Crystal data top
C7H7N2+·Brγ = 97.33 (3)°
Mr = 199.06V = 381.68 (13) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 4.6396 (9) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 6.1757 (12) ŵ = 5.31 mm1
c = 13.542 (3) ÅT = 298 K
α = 93.07 (3)°0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
β = 96.22 (3)°
Data collection top
Rigaku Mercury2
diffractometer
1716 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)
1378 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.90, Tmax = 1.00Rint = 0.063
3777 measured reflectionsθmax = 27.5°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.052H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.134Δρmax = 0.71 e Å3
S = 1.10Δρmin = 0.75 e Å3
1716 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
92 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N20.6256 (9)0.2461 (6)0.6051 (3)0.0419 (10)
H2A0.74370.14460.59900.063*
H2B0.71750.37550.59270.063*
H2C0.46530.21180.56190.063*
N10.0113 (11)0.7158 (8)0.8871 (4)0.0575 (13)
C40.5438 (10)0.2565 (7)0.7064 (4)0.0339 (10)
C30.3783 (10)0.4177 (7)0.7330 (3)0.0349 (10)
H30.32150.51660.68770.042*
C20.3001 (10)0.4273 (7)0.8286 (4)0.0350 (10)
C50.6331 (11)0.1113 (7)0.7719 (4)0.0389 (11)
H50.74460.00480.75270.047*
C70.3878 (12)0.2814 (8)0.8962 (4)0.0429 (12)
H70.33450.28890.96040.051*
C60.5540 (12)0.1259 (8)0.8677 (4)0.0473 (13)
H60.61460.02870.91320.057*
C10.1216 (11)0.5910 (8)0.8593 (4)0.0422 (12)
Br10.09268 (11)0.23870 (7)0.42210 (4)0.0448 (2)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N20.053 (3)0.044 (2)0.032 (2)0.0176 (19)0.0038 (19)0.0003 (18)
N10.058 (3)0.052 (3)0.067 (3)0.020 (2)0.016 (3)0.004 (2)
C40.040 (3)0.028 (2)0.033 (3)0.0073 (18)0.004 (2)0.0017 (18)
C30.039 (3)0.033 (2)0.032 (3)0.010 (2)0.000 (2)0.0010 (19)
C20.030 (2)0.034 (2)0.041 (3)0.0057 (18)0.005 (2)0.002 (2)
C50.049 (3)0.034 (2)0.037 (3)0.018 (2)0.007 (2)0.001 (2)
C70.056 (3)0.039 (3)0.035 (3)0.011 (2)0.010 (2)0.000 (2)
C60.062 (4)0.040 (3)0.045 (3)0.015 (2)0.010 (3)0.014 (2)
C10.045 (3)0.040 (3)0.044 (3)0.012 (2)0.011 (2)0.000 (2)
Br10.0573 (4)0.0399 (3)0.0423 (4)0.0214 (2)0.0112 (3)0.0037 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
N2—C41.463 (6)C3—H30.9300
N2—H2A0.8900C2—C71.384 (7)
N2—H2B0.8900C2—C11.457 (6)
N2—H2C0.8900C5—C61.388 (7)
N1—C11.121 (6)C5—H50.9300
C4—C51.365 (6)C7—C61.371 (7)
C4—C31.388 (6)C7—H70.9300
C3—C21.383 (7)C6—H60.9300
C4—N2—H2A109.5C3—C2—C1120.2 (4)
C4—N2—H2B109.5C7—C2—C1119.1 (5)
H2A—N2—H2B109.5C4—C5—C6118.6 (4)
C4—N2—H2C109.5C4—C5—H5120.7
H2A—N2—H2C109.5C6—C5—H5120.7
H2B—N2—H2C109.5C6—C7—C2119.4 (5)
C5—C4—C3122.0 (4)C6—C7—H7120.3
C5—C4—N2119.8 (4)C2—C7—H7120.3
C3—C4—N2118.2 (4)C7—C6—C5121.0 (5)
C2—C3—C4118.2 (4)C7—C6—H6119.5
C2—C3—H3120.9C5—C6—H6119.5
C4—C3—H3120.9N1—C1—C2177.0 (6)
C3—C2—C7120.7 (4)
C5—C4—C3—C20.9 (7)N2—C4—C5—C6179.6 (5)
N2—C4—C3—C2179.8 (4)C3—C2—C7—C60.0 (7)
C4—C3—C2—C70.7 (7)C1—C2—C7—C6179.5 (5)
C4—C3—C2—C1178.8 (4)C2—C7—C6—C50.6 (8)
C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (7)C4—C5—C6—C70.5 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···Br1i0.892.593.434 (4)159
N2—H2B···Br1ii0.892.463.337 (4)169
N2—H2C···Br10.892.453.299 (4)160
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N2—H2A···Br1i0.892.593.434 (4)159
N2—H2B···Br1ii0.892.463.337 (4)169
N2—H2C···Br10.892.453.299 (4)160
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.
Acknowledgements top

This work was supported by a start-up grant from Southeast University to Professor Ren-Gen Xiong.

references
References top

Chen, Z.-F., Li, B.-Q., Xie, Y.-R., Xiong, R.-G., You, X.-Z. & Feng, X.-L. (2001). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 4, 346–349.

Fu, D.-W., Song, Y.-M., Wang, G.-X., Ye, Q., Xiong, R.-G., Akutagawa, T., Nakamura, T., Chan, P. W. H., Huang, S.-P. & -, D. (2007). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 5346–5347.

Fu, D.-W. & Xiong, R.-G. (2008). Dalton Trans. pp. 3946–3948.

Fu, D.-W., Zhang, W. & Xiong, R.-G. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 3461–3464.

Rigaku (2005). CrystalClear. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Wang, L.-Z., Wang, X.-S., Li, Y.-H., Bai, Z.-P., Xiong, R.-G., Xiong, M. & Li, G.-W. (2002). Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 18, 1191–1194.

Wen, X.-C. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o1462.

Xie, Y.-R., Zhao, H., Wang, X.-S., Qu, Z.-R., Xiong, R.-G., Xue, X.-A., Xue, Z.-L. & You, X.-Z. (2003). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 20, 3712–3715.

Xiong, R.-G., Zuo, J.-L., You, X.-Z., Fun, H.-K. & Raj, S. S. S. (1999). New J. Chem. 23, 1051–1052.

Zhao, H., Ye, Q., Wu, Q., Song, Y.-M., Liu, Y.-J. & Xiong, R.-G. (2004). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 630, 1367–1370.