supplementary materials


Acta Cryst. (2009). E65, o2601    [ doi:10.1107/S1600536809039166 ]

1,3-Phenylenediammonium dinitrate

B. Portis, K. R. Dey, M. A. Saeed, D. R. Powell and M. A. Hossain

Abstract top

In the title compound, C6H10N22+·2NO3-, the dication lies on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis. The nitrate ions are linked to the dications though N-H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network.

Comment top

Simple polyammonium ions are known as excellent hydrogen bond donors for a variety of anions in particular for oxoanions, forming supramolecular aggregates with hydrogen bonding networks (Ilioudis et al., 2002). Indeed, a difunctional or trifunctional polyamine is widely used as an essential building block for a macrocyclic based host, and acts as major binding components for a negatively charged anion (Bianchi et al., 1997; Hossain, 2008). In this study, we used a simple 1,3-phenylenediamine to prepare an adduct with nitric acid. We report, herein, the crystal structure of the title compound in which the nitrate anions are connected to the cationic units through hydrogen bonding interactions.

X-ray analysis of the nitrate salt reveals that both amino groups are protonated to form a dication and crystallized with two nitrate anions. In the crystal lattice, each diaction is surrounded by two symmetry related nitrate anions (Fig. 1). Each amino group is engaged in coordinating nitrate anions through N—H ···O bonds ranging from 2.7955 (15) to 2.8626 (16) Å (see Table 1). The crystal structure viewed along the b axis shows that the cations are arranged antiparallel to one another along the c axis in which two adjacent aromatic units are separated at 7.024 Å (Fig. 2). Therefore, there is no π-π stacking involved. The nitrates serve as linkers of the two adjacent aromatic units by hydrogen bonding networks along the b axis.

Related literature top

For general background to polyamines, see: Bianchi et al. (1997); Ilioudis et al. (2002); Hossain (2008). For related structures, see: Anderson et al. (2006; Gawlicka-Chruszcz & Stadnicka (2002); Soumhi & Jouini (1995); Wang et al. (2007).

Experimental top

To a solution of 1,3-phenylenediamine (0.1 g) in CH3OH (2 ml) was added a few drop of nitric acid. The white precipitate formed immediately was filtered and washed with diethyl ether. Yield: 80%. M.P. 150.5°C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O, TSP): δ 7.15 (m, J = 4 Hz,1H, ArH), 6.68 (d, J = 8 Hz, J = 2 Hz, 2H, ArH), 6.62 (t, J= 2 Hz, 1H, ArH). Crystals suitable for X-ray crystallography were obtained by recystallization from a methanolic solution of the salt and isolated after seven days keeping the solution under Et2O diffusion in a desiccator.

Refinement top

H atoms bonded to carbons were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C-H = 0.99 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C). H atoms bonded to N atoms were located in a difference map and their positional parameters were refined, with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(N).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The formula unit of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonding interactions. Symmetry code: (i) -x, y, 1/2 -z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Crystal packing of the title compound, viewed along the b axis.
1,3-Phenylenediammonium dinitrate top
Crystal data top
C6H10N22+·2NO3F(000) = 488
Mr = 234.18Dx = 1.551 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54178 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 3468 reflections
a = 16.2548 (12) Åθ = 5.5–69.5°
b = 9.6212 (8) ŵ = 1.22 mm1
c = 7.1070 (6) ÅT = 100 K
β = 115.506 (6)°Block, colorless
V = 1003.14 (14) Å30.53 × 0.50 × 0.24 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
942 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube882 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.036
φ and ω scansθmax = 69.5°, θmin = 5.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007)
h = 1918
Tmin = 0.562, Tmax = 0.761k = 1111
5278 measured reflectionsl = 88
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.054P)2 + 1.07P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
942 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
84 parametersΔρmin = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0046 (5)
Crystal data top
C6H10N22+·2NO3V = 1003.14 (14) Å3
Mr = 234.18Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cCu Kα radiation
a = 16.2548 (12) ŵ = 1.22 mm1
b = 9.6212 (8) ÅT = 100 K
c = 7.1070 (6) Å0.53 × 0.50 × 0.24 mm
β = 115.506 (6)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD area-detector
diffractometer
942 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 2007)
882 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.562, Tmax = 0.761Rint = 0.036
5278 measured reflectionsθmax = 69.5°
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092Δρmax = 0.26 e Å3
S = 1.00Δρmin = 0.20 e Å3
942 reflectionsAbsolute structure: ?
84 parametersFlack parameter: ?
0 restraintsRogers parameter: ?
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N1A0.16571 (7)0.19642 (12)1.08086 (17)0.0129 (3)
O1A0.11343 (7)0.11334 (11)0.94063 (14)0.0171 (3)
O2A0.17425 (7)0.31761 (10)1.03487 (16)0.0205 (3)
O3A0.20794 (7)0.15171 (11)1.26369 (14)0.0170 (3)
C10.00000.16909 (19)0.25000.0119 (4)
H10.00000.07030.25000.014*
C20.06684 (9)0.24329 (14)0.40956 (19)0.0125 (3)
C30.06855 (9)0.38745 (15)0.4119 (2)0.0148 (3)
H30.11560.43640.52180.018*
C40.00000.4588 (2)0.25000.0167 (4)
H40.00000.55750.25000.020*
N50.13746 (8)0.16679 (12)0.58086 (17)0.0136 (3)
H5A0.1261 (12)0.1620 (17)0.700 (3)0.016*
H5B0.1409 (11)0.079 (2)0.535 (3)0.016*
H5C0.1918 (13)0.2147 (19)0.624 (3)0.016*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N1A0.0125 (6)0.0140 (6)0.0121 (6)0.0001 (4)0.0053 (4)0.0013 (4)
O1A0.0187 (5)0.0179 (5)0.0115 (5)0.0058 (4)0.0034 (4)0.0038 (4)
O2A0.0234 (6)0.0108 (5)0.0243 (6)0.0001 (4)0.0075 (4)0.0016 (4)
O3A0.0154 (5)0.0232 (6)0.0100 (5)0.0005 (4)0.0032 (4)0.0017 (4)
C10.0139 (9)0.0107 (9)0.0117 (9)0.0000.0062 (7)0.000
C20.0122 (7)0.0161 (7)0.0097 (6)0.0005 (5)0.0053 (5)0.0011 (5)
C30.0157 (7)0.0151 (7)0.0138 (7)0.0031 (5)0.0065 (6)0.0034 (5)
C40.0215 (10)0.0119 (9)0.0191 (9)0.0000.0112 (8)0.000
N50.0133 (6)0.0149 (6)0.0098 (6)0.0005 (4)0.0022 (5)0.0005 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, °) top
N1A—O2A1.2348 (16)C3—C41.3901 (16)
N1A—O3A1.2556 (15)C3—H30.95
N1A—O1A1.2747 (15)C4—H40.95
C1—C21.3838 (16)N5—H5A0.943 (19)
C1—H10.95N5—H5B0.92 (2)
C2—C31.387 (2)N5—H5C0.924 (19)
C2—N51.4621 (16)
O2A—N1A—O3A121.59 (11)C4—C3—H3120.7
O2A—N1A—O1A119.88 (11)C3i—C4—C3120.83 (18)
O3A—N1A—O1A118.53 (11)C3—C4—H4119.6
C2i—C1—C2117.89 (17)C2—N5—H5A112.7 (10)
C2—C1—H1121.1C2—N5—H5B108.4 (11)
C1—C2—C3122.02 (12)H5A—N5—H5B109.8 (14)
C1—C2—N5118.72 (13)C2—N5—H5C108.7 (11)
C3—C2—N5119.26 (11)H5A—N5—H5C104.8 (15)
C2—C3—C4118.62 (12)H5B—N5—H5C112.5 (15)
C2—C3—H3120.7
C2i—C1—C2—C30.49 (9)N5—C2—C3—C4178.80 (10)
C2i—C1—C2—N5179.28 (13)C2—C3—C4—C3i0.47 (8)
C1—C2—C3—C40.97 (17)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, y, −z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5A···O1A0.94 (2)1.87 (2)2.7955 (15)168 (2)
N5—H5B···O1Aii0.92 (2)1.95 (2)2.8416 (16)163 (2)
N5—H5C···O3Aiii0.92 (2)1.96 (2)2.8626 (16)167 (2)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, −y, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+2.
Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)
top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5A···O1A0.94 (2)1.87 (2)2.7955 (15)168 (2)
N5—H5B···O1Ai0.92 (2)1.95 (2)2.8416 (16)163 (2)
N5—H5C···O3Aii0.92 (2)1.96 (2)2.8626 (16)167 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+2.
Acknowledgements top

This work was supported by the National Center for Research Resources (grant No. G12RR013459) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA) Program `Recovery Act Administrative Supplements Providing Summer Research Research Experiences for Students and Science Educators' under contract 5R25RR020405–04S1. Funds to purchase the diffractometer used in this study were provided in part by the National Science Foundation (grant No. CHE-0130835).

references
References top

Anderson, K. M., Goeta, K. M., Hancock, K. S. B. & Steed, J. W. (2006). Chem. Commun. pp. 2138–2140.

Bianchi, A., García-España, E. & Bowman-James, K. (1997). Supramolecular Chemistry of Anions. New York: Wiley-VCH.

Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Gawlicka-Chruszcz, A. & Stadnicka, K. (2002). Acta Cryst. C58, o416–o420.

Hossain, M. A. (2008). Curr. Org. Chem. 12, 1231–1256.

Ilioudis, C. A., Georganopoulou, D. G. & Steed, J. W. (2002). CrystEngComm, 4, 26–36.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2007). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.

Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.

Soumhi, E. H. & Jouini, T. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 1457–1459.

Wang, K.-W., Zhang, H. & Shen, L.-Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o126–o128.