organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

1,4-Bis(4,5-di­hydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)benzene–terephthalic acid–water (1/1/4)

aSchool of Chemical and Material Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 200 Xiaolingwei Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province 210094, People's Republic of China, bDepartment of Public Education, Jiangxi Vocational & Technical College of Electricity, 8 Mailu Road, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province 330032, People's Republic of China, and cSchool of Chemical and Material Engineering, Jiangnan University, 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province 214122, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: liweijun947@163.com

(Received 21 September 2009; accepted 6 October 2009; online 10 October 2009)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C12H14N4·C8H6O4·4H2O, consists of one half of the 1,4-bis­(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)benzene (bib) mol­ecule, one half of the terephthalic acid (TA) mol­ecule and two water mol­ecules. Both the bib and the TA mol­ecules reside on crystallographic inversion centers, which coincide with the centroids of the respective benzene rings. The bib and the TA, together with the water mol­ecules, are linked through inter­molecular O—H⋯O, O—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming a three-dimensional network of stacked layers. Weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O contacts support the stability of the crystal structure.

Related literature

For general background, see: Jeffrey (1997[Jeffrey, G. A. (1997). An introduction to Hydrogen Bonding. New York: Oxford University Press.]). For hydrogen bonding in mol­ecular complexes of disubstituted biphenyls, see: Thaimattam et al. (1998[Thaimattam, R., Reddy, D. S., Xue, F., Mak, T. C. W., Nangia, A. & Desiraju, G. R. (1998). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1783-1789.]). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Ren et al. (2007[Ren, C.-X., Cheng, L., Ye, B.-H. & Chen, X.-M. (2007). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 3741-3747.]). For related structures, see: Ren et al. (2007[Ren, C.-X., Cheng, L., Ye, B.-H. & Chen, X.-M. (2007). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 3741-3747.], 2009[Ren, C.-X., Li, S.-Y., Yin, Z.-Z., Lu, X. & Ding, Y.-Q. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m572-m573.] and literature cited therein); Shang et al. (2009[Shang, S.-M., Ren, C.-X., Wang, X., Lu, L.-D. & Yang, X.-J. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2221-o2222.]). For experimental refinement details, see: Nardelli, (1999[Nardelli, M. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 563-571.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C12H14N4·C8H6O4·4H2O

  • Mr = 452.46

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 7.9929 (13) Å

  • b = 16.847 (3) Å

  • c = 7.9615 (12) Å

  • β = 94.899 (3)°

  • V = 1068.2 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.11 mm−1

  • T = 273 K

  • 0.50 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 1998[Bruker (1998). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.968

  • 5588 measured reflections

  • 2300 independent reflections

  • 832 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.075

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.090

  • wR(F2) = 0.257

  • S = 0.79

  • 2300 reflections

  • 158 parameters

  • 6 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.71 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.43 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2W—H2WB⋯O1i 0.85 (4) 2.37 (6) 2.904 (5) 121 (7)
O2W—H2WA⋯O1ii 0.85 1.96 2.815 (5) 180
O1W—H1WB⋯O2Wiii 0.85 (4) 2.08 (4) 2.926 (5) 172 (5)
O1W—H1WA⋯O2iv 0.86 (3) 1.851 (15) 2.707 (5) 172 (3)
O2—H2D⋯N1 0.82 2.13 2.934 (4) 165
N2—H2C⋯O1Wv 0.86 1.98 2.828 (4) 167
C5—H5⋯O1 0.93 2.50 3.407 (4) 165
C6—H6⋯O1Wv 0.93 2.47 3.380 (6) 166
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) [x, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (iii) [x, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]; (iv) x+1, y, z; (v) [-x+1, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998[Bruker (1998). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1998[Bruker (1998). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]) and PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Attention has recently focused on the use of supramolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding and ππ interactions, in addition to coordinate bonds, in the controlled assembly of supramolecular architectures (Jeffrey, 1997). Hydrogen bonds often play a dominant role in crystal engineering because of their combine strength with directionality (Thaimattam, et al., 1998). On the other hand, supramolecular systems sustained by soft connections, such as hydrogen bonds, are comparatively more flexible and sensitive to the chemical environment. We described previously a number of such complexes, including the imidazole ligand, and have concluded that hydrogen bonding involving this group influences the geometry around the metal atom and the crystallization mechanism [Ren, et al. (2007, 2009 and literature cited therein); Shang et al. (2009)]. We describe herewith the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (Fig. 1), namely bib.TA.4H2O (I) (bib = 1,4-bis(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)benzene, TA = terephthalate), which exhibits a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded molecular architecture.

The crystal lattice contains two bib, two TA and eight lattice water molecules in the solid. The bib and TA in a trans, trans configuration are in a face-to-face orientation and the dihedral angle between acid TA and base bib components is 9.5°. And the bib and TA ligands are joined together by two water molecules through hydrogen bonds between the carboxy oxygen atom in TA and the nitrogen atom of –C=N– in bib to give a macrocycle O1W–H1WB···O2W, O2W—H2WB···O1, O1W—H1WA···O2, N2—H2C···O1W and O2–H2D···N1 with the hydrogen bond geometry given in Table 1, and a face-to-face intracyclic \<i>p-\<i>p interaction at 3.69 Å (Fig. 1). Each bib group also features another macrocycles, resulting in 1-D chains running along the a axis. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the adjacent TA ligands are furthermore linked in the antiparallel alignment with offset along the ab plane by hydrogen bonds between the water molecules and the oxygen of TA groups (O2W—H2WA···O1, O1W—H1WA···O2, O2W—H2WB···O1, and O1W—H1WB···O2W (see Table 1). These ab planes are packed and stabilized by the hydrogen bonds between the lattice water and oxygen atom of TA ligands (O2w—H2wa···O1 = 2.82 Å) into a 3-D structure. Weak intermolecular C—H···O contacts contribute to the stability of the layered structure (Table 1).

Related literature top

For general background, see: Jeffrey (1997). For hydrogen bonding in molecular complexes of disubstituted biphenyls, see: Thaimattam et al. (1998). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Ren et al. (2007). For related structures, see: Ren et al. (2007, 2009 and literature cited therein); Shang et al. (2009). For experimental refinement details, see: Nardelli, (1999).

Experimental top

All the reagents and solvents employed were commercially available and used as received without further purification.

Syntheses of bib 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid (2.31 g, 13.9 mmol), ethylenediamine (3.70 ml, 50 mmol), ethylenediamine dihydrochloride(6.64 g, 50 mmol) and toluene-p-sulfonic acid (0.208 g, 1.09 mmol) were added to the solvent of ethyleneglycol (20 ml), and the mixture solution was refluxed for 3 hr. About half of the ethylene glycol solvent was then slowly removed by distillation. The residue was dissolved in a mixture of water (40 ml) and concentrated HCl (11 M, 3 ml). The addition of 50% aqueous NaOH gave a yellow precipitate that was purified by recrystallization. The ligand bib was obtained in 83% based on 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid (ca 2.50 g). Found: C 66.98; H 6.92; N 26.08%. Calc. for C12H14N4: C 67.27; H 6.59; N 26.15%. Main IR bonds (KBr, cm-1): 3188m, 2936m, 2866m, 1606 s, 1532 s, 1466 s, 1345m, 1270 s, 1191w, 1080w, 981m, 907w, 767w, 687m.

Syntheses of bib.TA.4H2O (I) To a solution of bib (0.043 g, 0.2 mmol) in MeOH (15 ml), an aqueous solution (5 ml) of TA (0.034 g, 0.2 mmol) was added. The solution was allowed at room temperature in air for 48 hr by slow evaporation. Large colourless prismatic crystals of bib.TA.4H2O were obtained, which were collected by filtration, washed with water and dried in vacuum desiccator over silica gel (0.052 g, 56%). Found: C 53.02; H 6.20; N 12.31%. Calc. for C10H14N2O4: C 53.09; H 6.24; N 12.38%. Main IR bonds (KBr,cm-1): 3351m, 3142m, 2985m, 1626 s, 1601 s, 1582 s, 1516w, 1366 s, 1351 s, 1281m, 1040w, 864w, 822m, 752w, 689m.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C atoms and N atom were fixed geometrically and treated as riding with C—H = 0.93 Å (aromatic) or 0.97 Å (methylene) and N—H = 0.86 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C or N). The positions of H atoms for water molecules were calculated (Nardelli, 1999) and included in the subsequent refinement as riding with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Structure description top

Attention has recently focused on the use of supramolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding and ππ interactions, in addition to coordinate bonds, in the controlled assembly of supramolecular architectures (Jeffrey, 1997). Hydrogen bonds often play a dominant role in crystal engineering because of their combine strength with directionality (Thaimattam, et al., 1998). On the other hand, supramolecular systems sustained by soft connections, such as hydrogen bonds, are comparatively more flexible and sensitive to the chemical environment. We described previously a number of such complexes, including the imidazole ligand, and have concluded that hydrogen bonding involving this group influences the geometry around the metal atom and the crystallization mechanism [Ren, et al. (2007, 2009 and literature cited therein); Shang et al. (2009)]. We describe herewith the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, (Fig. 1), namely bib.TA.4H2O (I) (bib = 1,4-bis(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)benzene, TA = terephthalate), which exhibits a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded molecular architecture.

The crystal lattice contains two bib, two TA and eight lattice water molecules in the solid. The bib and TA in a trans, trans configuration are in a face-to-face orientation and the dihedral angle between acid TA and base bib components is 9.5°. And the bib and TA ligands are joined together by two water molecules through hydrogen bonds between the carboxy oxygen atom in TA and the nitrogen atom of –C=N– in bib to give a macrocycle O1W–H1WB···O2W, O2W—H2WB···O1, O1W—H1WA···O2, N2—H2C···O1W and O2–H2D···N1 with the hydrogen bond geometry given in Table 1, and a face-to-face intracyclic \<i>p-\<i>p interaction at 3.69 Å (Fig. 1). Each bib group also features another macrocycles, resulting in 1-D chains running along the a axis. As illustrated in Fig. 2, the adjacent TA ligands are furthermore linked in the antiparallel alignment with offset along the ab plane by hydrogen bonds between the water molecules and the oxygen of TA groups (O2W—H2WA···O1, O1W—H1WA···O2, O2W—H2WB···O1, and O1W—H1WB···O2W (see Table 1). These ab planes are packed and stabilized by the hydrogen bonds between the lattice water and oxygen atom of TA ligands (O2w—H2wa···O1 = 2.82 Å) into a 3-D structure. Weak intermolecular C—H···O contacts contribute to the stability of the layered structure (Table 1).

For general background, see: Jeffrey (1997). For hydrogen bonding in molecular complexes of disubstituted biphenyls, see: Thaimattam et al. (1998). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Ren et al. (2007). For related structures, see: Ren et al. (2007, 2009 and literature cited therein); Shang et al. (2009). For experimental refinement details, see: Nardelli, (1999).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title molecule, with the atom-numbering scheme. Symmetry-related atoms shown labelled A and B. [symmetry codes A: (-x + 1, -y + 2, -z); B: (-x + 1, -y + 1, -z).
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. A partial packing diagram for the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
1,4-Bis(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)benzene–terephthalic acid–water (1/1/4) top
Crystal data top
C12H14N4·C8H6O4·4H2OF(000) = 480
Mr = 452.46Dx = 1.407 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.9929 (13) ÅCell parameters from 978 reflections
b = 16.847 (3) Åθ = 2.4–22.2°
c = 7.9615 (12) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 94.899 (3)°T = 273 K
V = 1068.2 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 20.50 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2300 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube832 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.075
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)
h = 1010
Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.968k = 2121
5588 measured reflectionsl = 510
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.090H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.257 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1628P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.79(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
2300 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.71 e Å3
158 parametersΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
6 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.12 (2)
Crystal data top
C12H14N4·C8H6O4·4H2OV = 1068.2 (3) Å3
Mr = 452.46Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 7.9929 (13) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 16.847 (3) ÅT = 273 K
c = 7.9615 (12) Å0.50 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm
β = 94.899 (3)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
2300 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)
832 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.947, Tmax = 0.968Rint = 0.075
5588 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0906 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.257H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.79Δρmax = 0.71 e Å3
2300 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
158 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.2209 (4)0.83842 (17)0.1428 (4)0.0622 (10)
N20.0932 (4)0.95122 (17)0.1837 (4)0.0621 (10)
H2C0.07441.00150.17970.074*
C10.0182 (6)0.8931 (2)0.2516 (6)0.0704 (13)
H1A0.13180.89810.19910.085*
H1B0.01990.89890.37260.085*
C20.0597 (6)0.8138 (2)0.2069 (6)0.0692 (13)
H2A0.07850.78000.30530.083*
H2B0.01090.78600.12080.083*
C30.2264 (5)0.9167 (2)0.1292 (4)0.0558 (11)
C40.3678 (5)0.9588 (2)0.0625 (4)0.0541 (11)
C50.4927 (6)0.9183 (2)0.0102 (5)0.0684 (13)
H50.48860.86320.01770.082*
O10.4731 (4)0.71811 (16)0.0453 (4)0.0702 (9)
O20.2324 (5)0.66542 (18)0.1033 (4)0.0915 (11)
H2D0.21100.71240.11830.137*
C60.3758 (6)1.0410 (2)0.0723 (5)0.0659 (12)
H60.29211.06890.12120.079*
C70.3793 (7)0.6590 (2)0.0620 (5)0.0649 (12)
C80.4386 (5)0.5771 (2)0.0299 (5)0.0570 (11)
C90.6008 (6)0.5648 (2)0.0226 (5)0.0647 (12)
H90.66940.60820.03910.078*
C100.3416 (6)0.5107 (2)0.0509 (5)0.0644 (12)
H100.23390.51700.08490.077*
O1W0.9737 (5)0.61448 (19)0.2736 (5)0.0901 (12)
H1WA1.053 (4)0.627 (2)0.212 (5)0.11 (2)*
H1WB0.904 (5)0.6509 (19)0.296 (6)0.10 (2)*
O2W0.7204 (4)0.76340 (18)0.8161 (5)0.0821 (11)
H2WA0.64590.76910.73410.098*
H2WB0.700 (6)0.776 (7)0.916 (3)0.31 (7)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.076 (2)0.0398 (17)0.073 (2)0.0058 (16)0.0184 (18)0.0054 (15)
N20.074 (2)0.0401 (18)0.074 (2)0.0037 (17)0.0201 (19)0.0008 (15)
C10.082 (3)0.050 (2)0.082 (3)0.003 (2)0.021 (2)0.002 (2)
C20.087 (3)0.047 (2)0.076 (3)0.002 (2)0.022 (2)0.0008 (19)
C30.078 (3)0.040 (2)0.050 (2)0.000 (2)0.007 (2)0.0006 (16)
C40.072 (3)0.043 (2)0.048 (2)0.0032 (19)0.015 (2)0.0032 (16)
C50.094 (3)0.039 (2)0.077 (3)0.003 (2)0.033 (3)0.003 (2)
O10.089 (2)0.0440 (15)0.080 (2)0.0001 (15)0.0227 (16)0.0008 (13)
O20.099 (3)0.0495 (17)0.132 (3)0.0123 (16)0.046 (2)0.0028 (16)
C60.079 (3)0.042 (2)0.081 (3)0.004 (2)0.029 (2)0.0007 (19)
C70.080 (3)0.050 (2)0.067 (3)0.003 (2)0.018 (2)0.0043 (19)
C80.069 (3)0.047 (2)0.056 (2)0.0062 (19)0.012 (2)0.0006 (17)
C90.082 (3)0.042 (2)0.071 (3)0.007 (2)0.011 (2)0.0018 (19)
C100.080 (3)0.040 (2)0.075 (3)0.0062 (19)0.020 (2)0.0006 (18)
O1W0.100 (3)0.0528 (19)0.123 (3)0.0071 (19)0.038 (2)0.0076 (17)
O2W0.076 (2)0.077 (2)0.094 (3)0.0043 (16)0.0140 (17)0.0025 (18)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C31.324 (5)O2—C71.251 (5)
N1—C21.485 (5)O2—H2D0.8200
N2—C31.319 (5)C6—C5i1.381 (5)
N2—C11.458 (5)C6—H60.9300
N2—H2C0.8600C7—C81.487 (6)
C1—C21.528 (5)C8—C101.379 (5)
C1—H1A0.9700C8—C91.412 (6)
C1—H1B0.9700C9—C10ii1.377 (5)
C2—H2A0.9700C9—H90.9300
C2—H2B0.9700C10—C9ii1.377 (5)
C3—C41.472 (6)C10—H100.9300
C4—C51.377 (5)O1W—H1WA0.86 (3)
C4—C61.389 (5)O1W—H1WB0.86 (4)
C5—C6i1.381 (5)O2W—H2WA0.85
C5—H50.9299O2W—H2WB0.85 (4)
O1—C71.260 (5)
C3—N1—C2110.0 (3)C4—C5—C6i120.4 (3)
C3—N2—C1111.2 (3)C4—C5—H5119.9
C3—N2—H2C124.4C6i—C5—H5119.7
C1—N2—H2C124.4C7—O2—H2D109.5
N2—C1—C2103.1 (3)C5i—C6—C4120.5 (4)
N2—C1—H1A111.1C5i—C6—H6119.7
C2—C1—H1A111.1C4—C6—H6119.8
N2—C1—H1B111.1O2—C7—O1122.7 (4)
C2—C1—H1B111.1O2—C7—C8116.4 (4)
H1A—C1—H1B109.1O1—C7—C8120.9 (4)
N1—C2—C1102.7 (3)C10—C8—C9117.1 (3)
N1—C2—H2A111.2C10—C8—C7122.8 (4)
C1—C2—H2A111.2C9—C8—C7120.1 (4)
N1—C2—H2B111.2C10ii—C9—C8120.9 (4)
C1—C2—H2B111.2C10ii—C9—H9119.6
H2A—C2—H2B109.1C8—C9—H9119.5
N2—C3—N1112.3 (4)C9ii—C10—C8122.0 (4)
N2—C3—C4124.9 (3)C9ii—C10—H10118.8
N1—C3—C4122.8 (4)C8—C10—H10119.1
C5—C4—C6119.1 (4)H1WA—O1W—H1WB118 (2)
C5—C4—C3121.3 (3)H2WA—O2W—H2WB120.8
C6—C4—C3119.6 (4)
C3—N2—C1—C27.5 (4)C3—C4—C5—C6i179.9 (4)
C3—N1—C2—C17.6 (4)C5—C4—C6—C5i0.1 (7)
N2—C1—C2—N18.6 (4)C3—C4—C6—C5i179.9 (4)
C1—N2—C3—N12.9 (5)O2—C7—C8—C102.8 (6)
C1—N2—C3—C4176.3 (4)O1—C7—C8—C10178.3 (4)
C2—N1—C3—N23.3 (5)O2—C7—C8—C9177.9 (4)
C2—N1—C3—C4177.5 (3)O1—C7—C8—C91.0 (6)
N2—C3—C4—C5172.2 (4)C10—C8—C9—C10ii0.1 (6)
N1—C3—C4—C58.6 (6)C7—C8—C9—C10ii179.2 (4)
N2—C3—C4—C67.6 (6)C9—C8—C10—C9ii0.1 (6)
N1—C3—C4—C6171.6 (4)C7—C8—C10—C9ii179.2 (4)
C6—C4—C5—C6i0.1 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+2, z; (ii) x+1, y+1, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2W—H2WB···O1iii0.85 (4)2.37 (6)2.904 (5)121 (7)
O2W—H2WA···O1iv0.851.962.815 (5)180
O1W—H1WB···O2Wv0.85 (4)2.08 (4)2.926 (5)172 (5)
O1W—H1WA···O2vi0.86 (3)1.85 (2)2.707 (5)172 (3)
O2—H2D···N10.822.132.934 (4)165
N2—H2C···O1Wvii0.861.982.828 (4)167
C5—H5···O10.932.503.407 (4)165
C6—H6···O1Wvii0.932.473.380 (6)166
Symmetry codes: (iii) x, y, z+1; (iv) x, y+3/2, z+1/2; (v) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (vi) x+1, y, z; (vii) x+1, y+1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC12H14N4·C8H6O4·4H2O
Mr452.46
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)273
a, b, c (Å)7.9929 (13), 16.847 (3), 7.9615 (12)
β (°) 94.899 (3)
V3)1068.2 (3)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.50 × 0.35 × 0.30
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 1998)
Tmin, Tmax0.947, 0.968
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5588, 2300, 832
Rint0.075
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.639
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.090, 0.257, 0.79
No. of reflections2300
No. of parameters158
No. of restraints6
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.71, 0.43

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 1998), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2W—H2WB···O1i0.85 (4)2.37 (6)2.904 (5)121 (7)
O2W—H2WA···O1ii0.851.962.815 (5)179.7
O1W—H1WB···O2Wiii0.85 (4)2.08 (4)2.926 (5)172 (5)
O1W—H1WA···O2iv0.86 (3)1.851 (15)2.707 (5)172 (3)
O2—H2D···N10.822.132.934 (4)165.2
N2—H2C···O1Wv0.861.982.828 (4)166.9
C5—H5···O10.932.503.407 (4)165
C6—H6···O1Wv0.932.473.380 (6)166
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z+1; (ii) x, y+3/2, z+1/2; (iii) x, y+3/2, z1/2; (iv) x+1, y, z; (v) x+1, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

This work was generously supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20701016).

References

First citationBruker (1998). SMART, SAINT-Plus and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationJeffrey, G. A. (1997). An introduction to Hydrogen Bonding. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
First citationNardelli, M. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 563–571.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationRen, C.-X., Cheng, L., Ye, B.-H. & Chen, X.-M. (2007). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 360, 3741–3747.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRen, C.-X., Li, S.-Y., Yin, Z.-Z., Lu, X. & Ding, Y.-Q. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m572–m573.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationShang, S.-M., Ren, C.-X., Wang, X., Lu, L.-D. & Yang, X.-J. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2221–o2222.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationThaimattam, R., Reddy, D. S., Xue, F., Mak, T. C. W., Nangia, A. & Desiraju, G. R. (1998). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1783–1789.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds