![[HTML version]](/e/graphics/htmlborder.gif)
![[PDF version]](/e/graphics/pdfborder.gif)
![[Article Abstract]](/e/graphics/abstractborder.gif)
![[CIF]](/e/graphics/cifborder.gif)
![[3d view]](/e/graphics/3dviewborder.gif)
![[Structure Factors]](/e/graphics/structurefactorsborder.gif)
![[Supplementary Material]](/e/graphics/supplementarymaterialsborder.gif)
![[Open access]](/e/graphics/free.gif)
![[Contents scheme]](bt5271contents.gif)
Acta Cryst. (2010). E66, o1393 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536810017927 ]
Online 19 May 2010
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT250_ALERT_2_C Large U3/U1 Ratio for Average U(i,j) Tensor .... 2.33 PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.595 22 PLAT913_ALERT_3_C Missing # of Very Strong Reflections in FCF .... 4 PLAT042_ALERT_1_C Calc. and Reported MoietyFormula Strings Differ ? PLAT125_ALERT_4_C No _symmetry_space_group_name_Hall Given ....... ? PLAT244_ALERT_4_C Low 'Solvent' Ueq as Compared to Neighbors of C14 PLAT244_ALERT_4_C Low 'Solvent' Ueq as Compared to Neighbors of C20
Alert level G FORMU01_ALERT_1_G There is a discrepancy between the atom counts in the _chemical_formula_sum and _chemical_formula_moiety. This is usually due to the moiety formula being in the wrong format. Atom count from _chemical_formula_sum: C20 H27 N3 O10 Atom count from _chemical_formula_moiety:C20 H27 N3 O11
0 ALERT level A = In general: serious problem 0 ALERT level B = Potentially serious problem 7 ALERT level C = Check and explain 1 ALERT level G = General alerts; check 2 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 1 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 2 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 3 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 0 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster