[Journal logo]

Volume 66 
Part 8 
Page o1883  
August 2010  

Received 24 June 2010
Accepted 26 June 2010
Online 3 July 2010

Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T = 100 K
Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.001 Å
R = 0.035
wR = 0.108
Data-to-parameter ratio = 15.1
Details
Open access

5-Hydroxy-7-methoxy-2-methyl-4H-chromen-4-one from Dysoxylum macrocarpum (Meliaceae)

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, and bDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Correspondence e-mail: seikweng@um.edu.my

Both independent molecules in the asymmetric unit of the title compound, C11H10O4, are almost planar (r.m.s. deviations = 0.011 and 0.033 Å). In both molecules, the hydroxy group is intramolecularly hydrogen bonded to the ketonic O atom. The independent molecules are stacked alternately along the a axis, with the centroids of their chromene ring separated by distances of 4.490 (1) and 3.621 (1) Å.

Related literature

For studies on other Dysoxylum species, see: Ismail et al. (2009[Ismail, I. F., Nagakura, Y., Hirasawa, Y., Hosoya, T., Mohd Lazim, M. I., Hj Lajis, N. & Morita, H. (2009). Tetrahedron Lett. 50, 4830-4832.]); Lakshmi et al. (2007[Lakshmi, V., Pandey, K., Kapil, A., Singh, N., Samant, M. & Dube, A. (2007). Phytomedicine, 14, 36-42.]); Mohamad et al. (1999[Mohamad, K., Martin, M. T., Litaudon, M. C., Gaspard, C., Sevenet, T. & Pais, M. (1999). Phytochemistry, 52, 1461-1468.]); Mohanakumara et al. (2010[Mohanakumara, P., Sreejayan, N., Priti, V., Ramesha, B. T., Ravikanth, G., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Vasudeva, R., Mohan, J., Santhoshkumar, T. R. & Shaanker, R. U. (2010). Fitoterapia, 81, 145-148.]); Senthil Nathan et al. (2008[Senthil Nathan, S., Hisham, A. & Jayakumar, G. (2008). Fitoterapia, 79, 106-111.]); Xie et al. (2008[Xie, J.-B., Yang, S.-P. & Yue, J.-M. (2008). Phytochemistry, 69, 2993-2997.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C11H10O4

  • Mr = 206.19

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 7.7393 (3) Å

  • b = 14.5373 (6) Å

  • c = 16.8263 (7) Å

  • [beta] = 98.848 (1)°

  • V = 1870.57 (13) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo K[alpha] radiation

  • [mu] = 0.11 mm-1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.35 × 0.35 × 0.02 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART APEXII area-detector diffractometer

  • 17796 measured reflections

  • 4285 independent reflections

  • 3795 reflections with I > 2[sigma](I)

  • Rint = 0.017

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2[sigma](F2)] = 0.035

  • wR(F2) = 0.108

  • S = 1.02

  • 4285 reflections

  • 283 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • [Delta][rho]max = 0.34 e Å-3

  • [Delta][rho]min = -0.28 e Å-3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D-H...A D-H H...A D...A D-H...A
O3-H3...O2 0.85 (1) 1.83 (1) 2.618 (1) 154 (2)
O7-H7...O6 0.85 (1) 1.79 (1) 2.595 (1) 156 (2)

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: X-SEED (Barbour, 2001[Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189-191.]); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).


Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: CI5120 ).


Acknowledgements

The authors thank the University of Malaya (PPP PS378/009B) for supporting this study.

References

Barbour, L. J. (2001). J. Supramol. Chem. 1, 189-191.  [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Bruker (2009). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ismail, I. F., Nagakura, Y., Hirasawa, Y., Hosoya, T., Mohd Lazim, M. I., Hj Lajis, N. & Morita, H. (2009). Tetrahedron Lett. 50, 4830-4832.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Lakshmi, V., Pandey, K., Kapil, A., Singh, N., Samant, M. & Dube, A. (2007). Phytomedicine, 14, 36-42.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [ChemPort]
Mohamad, K., Martin, M. T., Litaudon, M. C., Gaspard, C., Sevenet, T. & Pais, M. (1999). Phytochemistry, 52, 1461-1468.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Mohanakumara, P., Sreejayan, N., Priti, V., Ramesha, B. T., Ravikanth, G., Ganeshaiah, K. N., Vasudeva, R., Mohan, J., Santhoshkumar, T. R. & Shaanker, R. U. (2010). Fitoterapia, 81, 145-148.  [CrossRef] [PubMed] [ChemPort]
Senthil Nathan, S., Hisham, A. & Jayakumar, G. (2008). Fitoterapia, 79, 106-111.  [PubMed]
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.  [CrossRef] [details]
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [ChemPort] [details]
Xie, J.-B., Yang, S.-P. & Yue, J.-M. (2008). Phytochemistry, 69, 2993-2997.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [ChemPort]


Acta Cryst (2010). E66, o1883  [ doi:10.1107/S1600536810025146 ]

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.