[Journal logo]

Volume 67 
Part 4 
Pages o808-o809  
April 2011  

Received 23 February 2011
Accepted 2 March 2011
Online 9 March 2011

Key indicators
Single-crystal X-ray study
T = 298 K
Mean [sigma](C-C) = 0.013 Å
Disorder in solvent or counterion
R = 0.087
wR = 0.199
Data-to-parameter ratio = 17.6
Details
Open access

2-[6,8-Dibromo-3-(4-hydroxycyclohexyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinazolin-2-yl]phenol methanol 0.25-solvate

aDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, People's Republic of China,bModern Medical Research Center, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, People's Republic of China, and cDepartment of Pharmacy, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, People's Republic of China
Correspondence e-mail: wangmingli09@163.com

The title compound, C20H22Br2N2O2·0.25CH4O, was synthesized by the condensation reaction of salicylaldehyde with 4-(2-amino-3,5-dibromobenzylamino)cyclohexanol in methanol. There are four independent main molecules and two half-occupied methanol solvent molecules in the asymmetric unit. The dihedral angles between the two benzene rings in the four molecules are 87.8 (6), 86.6 (6), 89.3 (6) and 83.1 (6)°. Each molecule features an intramolecular O-H...N hydrogen bond and a short N-H...Br link. In the crystal components are linked by O-H...O hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For details of the pharmaceutical uses of ambroxol, systematic name 4-(2-amino-3,5-dibromobenzylamino)cyclohexanol, a compound closely related to the title compound, see: Gaida et al. (2005[Gaida, W., Klinder, K., Arndt, K. & Weiser, T. (2005). Neuropharmacology, 49, 1220-1227.]); Lee et al. (2004[Lee, H. J., Joung, S. K., Kim, Y. G., Yoo, J.-Y. & Han, S. B. (2004). Pharm. Res. 49, 93-98.]). For the structures of similar compounds, see: Wang et al. (2009[Wang, Z.-G., Wang, R., Zhang, Y., Zhi, F. & Yang, Y.-L. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o550.], 2010[Wang, Z.-G., Xia, Z.-L., Wang, R. & Wang, M.-L. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1205-o1206.]). For standard bond-length data, see: Allen et al. (1987[Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1-19.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C20H22Br2N2O2·0.25CH4O

  • Mr = 490.23

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 11.733 (2) Å

  • b = 16.831 (3) Å

  • c = 21.721 (4) Å

  • [alpha] = 94.69 (3)°

  • [beta] = 96.88 (3)°

  • [gamma] = 99.44 (3)°

  • V = 4178.4 (14) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo K[alpha] radiation

  • [mu] = 3.90 mm-1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996[Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.]) Tmin = 0.468, Tmax = 0.509

  • 46008 measured reflections

  • 17573 independent reflections

  • 6508 reflections with I > 2[sigma](I)

  • Rint = 0.108

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2[sigma](F2)] = 0.087

  • wR(F2) = 0.199

  • S = 0.95

  • 17573 reflections

  • 1001 parameters

  • 38 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • [Delta][rho]max = 1.06 e Å-3

  • [Delta][rho]min = -0.78 e Å-3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D-H...A D-H H...A D...A D-H...A
O1-H1...N4 0.82 1.93 2.643 (8) 145
N1-H1A...Br2 0.91 (8) 2.69 (7) 3.081 (7) 107 (6)
O2-H2...O9i 0.82 1.85 2.660 (15) 167
O3-H3...N2 0.82 1.93 2.661 (9) 148
N3-H3B...Br4 0.91 (8) 2.77 (8) 3.097 (7) 103 (5)
O4-H4...O6ii 0.82 2.13 2.721 (10) 129
O5-H5...N6 0.82 1.95 2.650 (9) 143
N5-H5B...Br5 0.90 (6) 2.77 (8) 3.110 (7) 104 (6)
O6-H6...O8iii 0.82 1.95 2.735 (9) 160
O7-H7...N8 0.85 (6) 1.99 (8) 2.717 (9) 142 (6)
N7-H7B...Br7 0.90 (6) 2.61 (8) 3.100 (7) 115 (6)
O8-H8...O2iv 0.84 (9) 1.90 (8) 2.713 (11) 162 (8)
O9-H9...O10v 0.82 2.18 2.94 (2) 156
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z-1; (ii) x, y, z-1; (iii) -x+1, -y, -z+2; (iv) x-1, y, z+1; (v) x-1, y, z.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SAINT and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2002[Bruker (2002). SAINT and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.


Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB5804 ).


Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University is acknowledged.

References

Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1-19.
Bruker (2002). SAINT and SMART. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Gaida, W., Klinder, K., Arndt, K. & Weiser, T. (2005). Neuropharmacology, 49, 1220-1227.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [ChemPort]
Lee, H. J., Joung, S. K., Kim, Y. G., Yoo, J.-Y. & Han, S. B. (2004). Pharm. Res. 49, 93-98.  [ISI] [CrossRef] [ChemPort]
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.  [CrossRef] [details]
Wang, Z.-G., Wang, R., Zhang, Y., Zhi, F. & Yang, Y.-L. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o550.  [CSD] [CrossRef] [details]
Wang, Z.-G., Xia, Z.-L., Wang, R. & Wang, M.-L. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1205-o1206.  [CrossRef] [details]


Acta Cryst (2011). E67, o808-o809   [ doi:10.1107/S1600536811007987 ]

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.