2,4,5,6-Tetramethyl-3-phenylsulfinyl-1-benzofuran

In the title compound, C18H18O2S, the phenyl ring makes a dihedral angle of 87.47 (6)° with the mean plane of the benzofuran fragment. In the crystal, molecules are linked by weak intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and C—H⋯π interactions.

In the title compound, C 18 H 18 O 2 S, the phenyl ring makes a dihedral angle of 87.47 (6) with the mean plane of the benzofuran fragment. In the crystal, molecules are linked by weak intermolecular C-HÁ Á ÁO hydrogen bonds and C-HÁ Á Á interactions.
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: JJ2090). Galal et al. , 2009, Khan et al. , 2005. These types of compounds occur in a wide range of natural products (Akgul & Anil, 2003;Soekamto et al. , 2003). As a part of our study of the substituent effect on the solid state structures of 2-methyl-3phenylsulfinyl-1-benzofuran analogues (Choi et al., 2008a,b,c), we report hrerin the crystal structure of the title compound, In the title compound ( Fig. 1), the benzofuran unit is essentially planar, with a mean deviation of 0.017 (1) Å from the least-squares plane defined by the nine constituent atoms. The phenyl ring makes a dihedral angle of 87.47 (6)° with the mean plane of the benzofuran fragment. Crystal packing is stabilized by weak intermolecular C-H···O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 & Fig. 2) and weak C-H···Cg π-ring interactions ( Table 1 & Fig 3; Cg is the centroid of the C2-C7 benzene ring).

Experimental
77% 3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (247 mg, 1.1 mmol) was added in small portions to a stirred solution of 2,4,5,6-tetramethyl-3-phenylsulfanyl-1-benzofuran (310 mg, 1.1 mmol) in dichloromethane (40 mL) at 273 K. After being stirred at room temperature for 4h, the mixture was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and the organic layer was separated, dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and concentrated at reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane-ethyl acetate, 2:1 v/v) to afford the title compound as a colorless solid [yield 74%, m.p. 438-439 K; R f = 0.51 (hexane-ethyl acetate, 2:1 v/v)]. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were prepared by slow evaporation of a solution of the title compound in ethyl acetate at room temperature.

Refinement
All H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C-H = 0.95 Å for aryl and 0.99 Å for methyl H atoms. U iso (H) = 1.2U eq (C) for aryl and 1.5U eq (C) for methyl H atoms. Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are presented as a small spheres of arbitrary radius.

Special details
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F 2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F 2 , conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F 2 . The threshold expression of F 2 > 2sigma(F 2 ) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F 2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.