organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

2-(1,3-Benzoxazol-2-yl)-1-phenyl­ethenyl benzoate

aFalavarjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Falavarjan, Isfahan, Iran
*Correspondence e-mail: ghorbani@iaufala.ac.ir, moha_ghorbani@yahoo.com

(Received 17 August 2011; accepted 12 September 2011; online 30 September 2011)

In the title mol­ecule, C22H15NO3, the configuration about the ethyl­enic double bond is Z configuration and it is approximately coplanar with the adjacent phenyl ring and benzoxazole ring system as indicated by the C(H)=C(O)—Cphen­yl—Cphen­yl and Obenzoxazole—C—C(H)=C(O) torsion angles of 179.88 (15) and 5.7 (2)°, respectively. The dihedral angle between the essentially planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.080 Å) 2-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl)-1-phenyl­ethenyl group and the benzoate phenyl ring is 61.51 (6)°. A short intra­molecular O⋯O non-bonded inter­action of 2.651 (2) Å is present.

Related literature

For background and synthetic details, see: Ciurdaru & Ciuciu (1979[Ciurdaru, G. & Ciuciu, M. (1979). J. Prakt. Chem. 321, 320-322.]); Zhou & Pittman (2004[Zhou, A. & Pittman, C. U. Jr (2004). Tetrahedron Lett. 45, 8899-8903.]). For related structures, see: Markham et al. (1999[Markham, G. D., Bock, C. L., Trachtman, M. & Bock, C. W. (1999). J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 459, 187-199.]); Punte et al. (1990[Punte, G., Rivero, B. E., Cerdeira, S. & Nudelman, N. S. (1990). Can. J. Chem. 68, 298-301.]); Loghmani et al. (2007)[Loghmani, K.-H., Sadeghi, M. M., Habibi, M. H., Harrington, R. W., Clegg, W. & Ghorbani, M. H. (2007). Anal. Sci. X-ray Struct. Anal. Online, 23, x41-x42.]. For van der Waals radii, see: Bondi (1964[Bondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441-451.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C22H15NO3

  • Mr = 341.35

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 10.0152 (11) Å

  • b = 13.1911 (15) Å

  • c = 13.4430 (15) Å

  • β = 110.957 (2)°

  • V = 1658.5 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART 1K CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.] Tmin = 0.973, Tmax = 0.982

  • 10417 measured reflections

  • 3254 independent reflections

  • 2656 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.021

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037

  • wR(F2) = 0.093

  • S = 1.08

  • 3254 reflections

  • 236 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.21 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.17 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006[Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453-457.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

The reaction of 2-methylbenzoxazole (A) (Fig. 1) with acyl chlorides such as benzoyl chloride was carried out for the first time by Ciurdaru and Ciuciu (1979), who used the same conditions for reactions of other 2-methylbenzoazoles with acyl chlorides. After infra red and mass spectral investigations and elemental analysis of acylated derivatives, it was suggested that the double acylated structure of (C) was the product of these reactions. This structure differs with the double acylated structure of (D) for the product of acylation of some azoles such as 2-methylthiazoles (Zhou & Pittman, 2004), although these reactions have been done under the same conditions. In fact, based on the presented data, not only the enolester (C) but also the conjugated ketone (D) can be considered as product of the reactions of 2-methylbenzoazoles with acyl chlorides. In addition to the molecular structure, the configuration of the ethylenic double bond in both probable structures was also questionable. In order to clarify these ambiguous situations, the crystal structure determination of the title compound was carried out.

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 2. The enolester structure is confirmed as product of the reaction and the ethylenic double bond (C8C9) has a Z configuration. The ethylenic double bond is co-planar with the connected phenyl ring (the torsion angle of C8—C9—C10—C15 is 179.88 (15)°) and also is approximately co-planar with the planar benzoxazole rings (the torsion angles of O1—C7—C8—C9 and N—C7—C8—C9 are equal to 5.7 (2)° and -174.08 (15)°, respectively). On the other hand, the benzoyl moiety is stituated out of the plane of co-planar components (the torsion angles of C16—O2—C9—C8 and C16—O2—C9—C10 are -89.17 (16) and 95.31 (14), respectively).

The C8—C9 bond length (1.335 (2) Å) in the structure is within the normal range of an unconjugated ethylenic double bond. Also, due to the more resonance interaction of nonbonding electrons on the O2 with the π system of C=O relative to C=C, the O2—C16 bond length (1.3641 (17) Å) is shorter than O2—C9 (1.4010 (16) Å). These values may indicate that the π system of ethylenic double bond is not fully delocalized.

An intramolecular O1···O2 non-bonded distance (2.651 (2) Å) is shorter than the sum of the corresponding van der Waals radii (3.04 Å) (Bondi, 1964). This phenomenon is similar to the intramolecular non-bonded interactions between an oxygen atom and atoms of group VIA in the periodic table (S, Se and Te) (Markham et al., 1999) and shows that an attractive non-bonded interaction between O1 and O2 must be present in the molecule (Punte et al., 1990). This attraction may be responsible for the Z configuration becoming the preferred configuration for the ethylenic double bond (Loghmani et al., 2007).

Related literature top

For background and synthetic details, see: Ciurdaru & Ciuciu (1979); Zhou & Pittman (2004). For related structures, see: Markham et al. (1999); Punte et al. (1990); Loghmani et al. (2007). For van der Waals radii, see: Bondi (1964).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared as in the literature (Ciurdaru & Ciuciu, 1979), except that benzoyl chloride and triethylamine (both 30 mmol) were used to complete the reaction. Suitable single crystals for X-ray analysis were obtained from an ethanol solution of the title compound at room temperature.

Refinement top

All H-atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model with C—H distances = 0.95 Å (both aryl and vinyl-H) and isotropic displacement parameters for these atoms were Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Structure description top

The reaction of 2-methylbenzoxazole (A) (Fig. 1) with acyl chlorides such as benzoyl chloride was carried out for the first time by Ciurdaru and Ciuciu (1979), who used the same conditions for reactions of other 2-methylbenzoazoles with acyl chlorides. After infra red and mass spectral investigations and elemental analysis of acylated derivatives, it was suggested that the double acylated structure of (C) was the product of these reactions. This structure differs with the double acylated structure of (D) for the product of acylation of some azoles such as 2-methylthiazoles (Zhou & Pittman, 2004), although these reactions have been done under the same conditions. In fact, based on the presented data, not only the enolester (C) but also the conjugated ketone (D) can be considered as product of the reactions of 2-methylbenzoazoles with acyl chlorides. In addition to the molecular structure, the configuration of the ethylenic double bond in both probable structures was also questionable. In order to clarify these ambiguous situations, the crystal structure determination of the title compound was carried out.

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 2. The enolester structure is confirmed as product of the reaction and the ethylenic double bond (C8C9) has a Z configuration. The ethylenic double bond is co-planar with the connected phenyl ring (the torsion angle of C8—C9—C10—C15 is 179.88 (15)°) and also is approximately co-planar with the planar benzoxazole rings (the torsion angles of O1—C7—C8—C9 and N—C7—C8—C9 are equal to 5.7 (2)° and -174.08 (15)°, respectively). On the other hand, the benzoyl moiety is stituated out of the plane of co-planar components (the torsion angles of C16—O2—C9—C8 and C16—O2—C9—C10 are -89.17 (16) and 95.31 (14), respectively).

The C8—C9 bond length (1.335 (2) Å) in the structure is within the normal range of an unconjugated ethylenic double bond. Also, due to the more resonance interaction of nonbonding electrons on the O2 with the π system of C=O relative to C=C, the O2—C16 bond length (1.3641 (17) Å) is shorter than O2—C9 (1.4010 (16) Å). These values may indicate that the π system of ethylenic double bond is not fully delocalized.

An intramolecular O1···O2 non-bonded distance (2.651 (2) Å) is shorter than the sum of the corresponding van der Waals radii (3.04 Å) (Bondi, 1964). This phenomenon is similar to the intramolecular non-bonded interactions between an oxygen atom and atoms of group VIA in the periodic table (S, Se and Te) (Markham et al., 1999) and shows that an attractive non-bonded interaction between O1 and O2 must be present in the molecule (Punte et al., 1990). This attraction may be responsible for the Z configuration becoming the preferred configuration for the ethylenic double bond (Loghmani et al., 2007).

For background and synthetic details, see: Ciurdaru & Ciuciu (1979); Zhou & Pittman (2004). For related structures, see: Markham et al. (1999); Punte et al. (1990); Loghmani et al. (2007). For van der Waals radii, see: Bondi (1964).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Reactions of 2-methylbenzoazoles with acyl chlorides (benzoyl chloride) in the presence Et3N under reflux conditions and probable products.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing 50% probability displacement.
2-(1,3-Benzoxazol-2-yl)-1-phenylethenyl benzoate top
Crystal data top
C22H15NO3F(000) = 712
Mr = 341.35Dx = 1.367 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 6385 reflections
a = 10.0152 (11) Åθ = 2.2–28.2°
b = 13.1911 (15) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 13.4430 (15) ÅT = 150 K
β = 110.957 (2)°Block, colourless
V = 1658.5 (3) Å30.30 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1K CCD
diffractometer
3254 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed tube2656 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
thin–slice ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
h = 1212
Tmin = 0.973, Tmax = 0.982k = 1616
10417 measured reflectionsl = 1416
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.093 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.034P)2 + 0.6798P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3254 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.21 e Å3
236 parametersΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0063 (8)
Crystal data top
C22H15NO3V = 1658.5 (3) Å3
Mr = 341.35Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 10.0152 (11) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 13.1911 (15) ÅT = 150 K
c = 13.4430 (15) Å0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
β = 110.957 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART 1K CCD
diffractometer
3254 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
2656 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.973, Tmax = 0.982Rint = 0.021
10417 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0370 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.093H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08Δρmax = 0.21 e Å3
3254 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
236 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.52934 (10)0.29679 (7)0.67880 (8)0.0276 (2)
O20.67141 (10)0.39020 (7)0.57269 (8)0.0242 (2)
O30.87424 (12)0.36358 (9)0.71372 (9)0.0385 (3)
N0.40724 (13)0.39634 (9)0.75280 (10)0.0275 (3)
C10.44901 (15)0.23434 (11)0.71744 (11)0.0256 (3)
C20.44378 (17)0.12991 (11)0.71550 (13)0.0330 (4)
H2A0.49900.09020.68550.040*
C30.35225 (17)0.08696 (13)0.76035 (14)0.0386 (4)
H3A0.34340.01530.76090.046*
C40.27291 (17)0.14641 (14)0.80472 (14)0.0397 (4)
H4A0.21070.11400.83410.048*
C50.28183 (16)0.25104 (13)0.80738 (13)0.0353 (4)
H5A0.22820.29100.83850.042*
C60.37305 (15)0.29498 (11)0.76227 (12)0.0266 (3)
C70.49753 (15)0.39237 (11)0.70353 (12)0.0260 (3)
C80.56266 (15)0.47952 (11)0.67458 (12)0.0266 (3)
H8A0.54350.54320.69970.032*
C90.64666 (14)0.48137 (10)0.61670 (11)0.0239 (3)
C100.70965 (14)0.57141 (11)0.58589 (11)0.0242 (3)
C110.68438 (15)0.66894 (11)0.61587 (12)0.0274 (3)
H11A0.62630.67780.65770.033*
C120.74315 (16)0.75261 (11)0.58514 (13)0.0315 (4)
H12A0.72440.81850.60550.038*
C130.82906 (16)0.74112 (12)0.52499 (13)0.0331 (4)
H13A0.86970.79880.50440.040*
C140.85531 (17)0.64518 (12)0.49504 (13)0.0328 (4)
H14A0.91430.63690.45380.039*
C150.79595 (16)0.56091 (11)0.52499 (12)0.0288 (3)
H15A0.81430.49530.50380.035*
C160.78482 (15)0.33301 (11)0.63327 (12)0.0251 (3)
C170.78117 (15)0.23113 (11)0.58611 (11)0.0246 (3)
C180.90826 (17)0.17707 (12)0.61258 (13)0.0313 (3)
H18A0.99540.20640.65810.038*
C190.90733 (19)0.08035 (13)0.57236 (14)0.0392 (4)
H19A0.99420.04350.58950.047*
C200.7804 (2)0.03741 (12)0.50741 (14)0.0413 (4)
H20A0.78010.02920.48050.050*
C210.65337 (19)0.09079 (12)0.48128 (14)0.0382 (4)
H21A0.56630.06080.43650.046*
C220.65338 (16)0.18795 (11)0.52046 (12)0.0292 (3)
H22A0.56650.22490.50260.035*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0315 (5)0.0228 (5)0.0324 (6)0.0026 (4)0.0162 (5)0.0022 (4)
O20.0245 (5)0.0210 (5)0.0272 (5)0.0009 (4)0.0092 (4)0.0023 (4)
O30.0312 (6)0.0364 (6)0.0385 (7)0.0019 (5)0.0013 (5)0.0067 (5)
N0.0280 (6)0.0262 (6)0.0315 (7)0.0010 (5)0.0145 (6)0.0030 (5)
C10.0240 (7)0.0286 (8)0.0224 (7)0.0049 (6)0.0061 (6)0.0003 (6)
C20.0375 (8)0.0263 (8)0.0321 (8)0.0049 (7)0.0088 (7)0.0029 (7)
C30.0376 (9)0.0310 (8)0.0394 (10)0.0105 (7)0.0041 (7)0.0052 (7)
C40.0296 (8)0.0492 (10)0.0369 (9)0.0125 (7)0.0077 (7)0.0110 (8)
C50.0283 (8)0.0477 (10)0.0320 (9)0.0034 (7)0.0131 (7)0.0026 (7)
C60.0237 (7)0.0299 (8)0.0240 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0058 (6)0.0005 (6)
C70.0266 (7)0.0232 (7)0.0280 (8)0.0001 (6)0.0096 (6)0.0021 (6)
C80.0284 (7)0.0206 (7)0.0313 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0116 (6)0.0031 (6)
C90.0231 (7)0.0208 (7)0.0256 (8)0.0009 (5)0.0059 (6)0.0030 (6)
C100.0206 (6)0.0247 (7)0.0234 (7)0.0003 (6)0.0032 (6)0.0003 (6)
C110.0255 (7)0.0255 (7)0.0297 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0082 (6)0.0002 (6)
C120.0312 (8)0.0220 (7)0.0354 (9)0.0007 (6)0.0049 (7)0.0018 (6)
C130.0303 (8)0.0303 (8)0.0344 (9)0.0050 (6)0.0062 (7)0.0085 (7)
C140.0308 (8)0.0372 (9)0.0322 (9)0.0013 (7)0.0134 (7)0.0039 (7)
C150.0301 (8)0.0258 (7)0.0303 (8)0.0007 (6)0.0107 (6)0.0009 (6)
C160.0227 (7)0.0265 (7)0.0284 (8)0.0000 (6)0.0119 (6)0.0018 (6)
C170.0286 (7)0.0236 (7)0.0256 (8)0.0028 (6)0.0147 (6)0.0033 (6)
C180.0321 (8)0.0341 (8)0.0300 (8)0.0080 (7)0.0139 (7)0.0062 (7)
C190.0500 (10)0.0355 (9)0.0383 (10)0.0206 (8)0.0236 (8)0.0109 (8)
C200.0667 (12)0.0214 (7)0.0448 (10)0.0061 (8)0.0312 (9)0.0011 (7)
C210.0468 (10)0.0288 (8)0.0433 (10)0.0056 (7)0.0215 (8)0.0072 (7)
C220.0313 (8)0.0251 (7)0.0346 (9)0.0002 (6)0.0159 (7)0.0021 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.3764 (17)C10—C151.394 (2)
O1—C71.3703 (17)C11—H11A0.9500
O2—C91.4010 (16)C11—C121.382 (2)
O2—C161.3641 (17)C12—H12A0.9500
O3—C161.2006 (18)C12—C131.384 (2)
N—C61.3973 (19)C13—H13A0.9500
N—C71.2990 (18)C13—C141.381 (2)
C1—C21.378 (2)C14—H14A0.9500
C1—C61.382 (2)C14—C151.387 (2)
C2—H2A0.9500C15—H15A0.9500
C2—C31.386 (2)C16—C171.481 (2)
C3—H3A0.9500C17—C181.390 (2)
C3—C41.393 (3)C17—C221.390 (2)
C4—H4A0.9500C18—H18A0.9500
C4—C51.383 (2)C18—C191.384 (2)
C5—H5A0.9500C19—H19A0.9500
C5—C61.391 (2)C19—C201.380 (3)
C7—C81.442 (2)C20—H20A0.9500
C8—H8A0.9500C20—C211.385 (2)
C8—C91.335 (2)C21—H21A0.9500
C9—C101.472 (2)C21—C221.386 (2)
C10—C111.398 (2)C22—H22A0.9500
C1—O1—C7103.96 (11)H11A—C11—C12119.7
C9—O2—C16117.25 (11)C11—C12—H12A119.7
C6—N—C7104.24 (12)C11—C12—C13120.51 (14)
O1—C1—C2127.91 (14)H12A—C12—C13119.7
O1—C1—C6107.78 (12)C12—C13—H13A120.2
C2—C1—C6124.30 (14)C12—C13—C14119.58 (14)
C1—C2—H2A122.4H13A—C13—C14120.2
C1—C2—C3115.27 (15)C13—C14—H14A119.9
H2A—C2—C3122.4C13—C14—C15120.25 (15)
C2—C3—H3A119.2H14A—C14—C15119.9
C2—C3—C4121.57 (15)C10—C15—C14120.75 (14)
H3A—C3—C4119.2C10—C15—H15A119.6
C3—C4—H4A118.9C14—C15—H15A119.6
C3—C4—C5122.10 (15)O2—C16—O3123.06 (13)
H4A—C4—C5118.9O2—C16—C17111.01 (12)
C4—C5—H5A121.6O3—C16—C17125.93 (13)
C4—C5—C6116.82 (15)C16—C17—C18118.42 (14)
H5A—C5—C6121.6C16—C17—C22121.31 (13)
N—C6—C1108.85 (12)C18—C17—C22120.21 (14)
N—C6—C5131.23 (14)C17—C18—H18A120.2
C1—C6—C5119.92 (14)C17—C18—C19119.68 (16)
O1—C7—N115.18 (12)H18A—C18—C19120.2
O1—C7—C8120.07 (12)C18—C19—H19A120.0
N—C7—C8124.75 (13)C18—C19—C20120.08 (15)
C7—C8—H8A116.1H19A—C19—C20120.0
C7—C8—C9127.73 (14)C19—C20—H20A119.8
H8A—C8—C9116.1C19—C20—C21120.43 (15)
O2—C9—C8118.30 (12)H20A—C20—C21119.8
O2—C9—C10114.55 (12)C20—C21—H21A120.0
C8—C9—C10126.98 (13)C20—C21—C22119.92 (16)
C9—C10—C11121.43 (13)H21A—C21—C22120.0
C9—C10—C15120.22 (13)C17—C22—C21119.67 (14)
C11—C10—C15118.35 (13)C17—C22—H22A120.2
C10—C11—H11A119.7C21—C22—H22A120.2
C10—C11—C12120.57 (14)
C7—O1—C1—C2178.43 (15)O2—C9—C10—C155.06 (19)
C7—O1—C1—C60.41 (15)C8—C9—C10—C110.5 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3179.83 (14)C8—C9—C10—C15179.88 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C31.5 (2)C9—C10—C11—C12179.26 (13)
C1—C2—C3—C40.5 (2)C15—C10—C11—C120.4 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C50.6 (3)C10—C11—C12—C130.6 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C60.7 (2)C11—C12—C13—C140.4 (2)
O1—C1—C6—N0.68 (16)C12—C13—C14—C150.0 (2)
O1—C1—C6—C5179.74 (13)C13—C14—C15—C100.3 (2)
C2—C1—C6—N178.21 (14)C9—C10—C15—C14179.68 (14)
C2—C1—C6—C51.4 (2)C11—C10—C15—C140.1 (2)
C4—C5—C6—N179.30 (15)C9—O2—C16—O311.2 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C10.2 (2)C9—O2—C16—C17169.02 (11)
C7—N—C6—C10.66 (16)O2—C16—C17—C18157.19 (13)
C7—N—C6—C5179.81 (16)O2—C16—C17—C2225.54 (18)
C6—N—C7—O10.42 (17)O3—C16—C17—C1822.6 (2)
C6—N—C7—C8179.39 (14)O3—C16—C17—C22154.63 (15)
C1—O1—C7—N0.01 (16)C16—C17—C18—C19177.96 (14)
C1—O1—C7—C8179.80 (13)C22—C17—C18—C190.7 (2)
O1—C7—C8—C95.7 (2)C17—C18—C19—C200.8 (2)
N—C7—C8—C9174.08 (15)C18—C19—C20—C210.5 (3)
C7—C8—C9—O23.6 (2)C19—C20—C21—C220.0 (3)
C7—C8—C9—C10178.51 (14)C20—C21—C22—C170.2 (2)
C16—O2—C9—C889.17 (16)C16—C17—C22—C21177.38 (14)
C16—O2—C9—C1095.31 (14)C18—C17—C22—C210.2 (2)
O2—C9—C10—C11174.55 (12)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC22H15NO3
Mr341.35
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)10.0152 (11), 13.1911 (15), 13.4430 (15)
β (°) 110.957 (2)
V3)1658.5 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.30 × 0.20
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART 1K CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
Tmin, Tmax0.973, 0.982
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
10417, 3254, 2656
Rint0.021
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.037, 0.093, 1.08
No. of reflections3254
No. of parameters236
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.21, 0.17

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2007), SAINT (Bruker, 2007), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006).

 

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the Islamic Azad University-Falavarjan Branch for financial support. He also wishes to thank Professor M. H. Habibi, University of Isfahan, and Dr M. Pourayoubi, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, for their helpful assistance.

References

First citationBondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441–451.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2007). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCiurdaru, G. & Ciuciu, M. (1979). J. Prakt. Chem. 321, 320–322.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationLoghmani, K.-H., Sadeghi, M. M., Habibi, M. H., Harrington, R. W., Clegg, W. & Ghorbani, M. H. (2007). Anal. Sci. X-ray Struct. Anal. Online, 23, x41–x42.  Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMarkham, G. D., Bock, C. L., Trachtman, M. & Bock, C. W. (1999). J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 459, 187–199.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationPunte, G., Rivero, B. E., Cerdeira, S. & Nudelman, N. S. (1990). Can. J. Chem. 68, 298–301.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZhou, A. & Pittman, C. U. Jr (2004). Tetrahedron Lett. 45, 8899–8903.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds