organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

N,N′-(1,4-Phenyl­ene)bis­­(2-bromo-2-methyl­propanamide)

aDepartment of Chemistry, IIT Madras, Chennai, Tamil nadu, India
*Correspondence e-mail: damo@iitm.ac.in

(Received 3 November 2011; accepted 26 January 2012; online 24 February 2012)

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, C14H18Br2N2O2, has one half-mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecule has a crystallographic inversion centre in the middle of the benzene ring. The C—C—N—C torsion angle between the benzene ring and the bromo­amide group is 149.2 (7)°. The crystal is stabilized by a strong inter­molecular N—H⋯O bond and weak C—H⋯O inter­actions. These contacts give rise to a three-dimensional network.

Related literature

For the use of the title compound as an initiator in atom transfer radical polymerization and other polymerization studies, see: Ashraf et al. (1994[Ashraf, W., Dawling, S. & Farrow, L. J. (1994). Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 13, 167-170.]); Domenicano et al. (1977[Domenicano, A., Serantoni, E. F. & Riva di Sanseverino, L. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 1664-1668.]); Kuipers et al. (1989[Kuipers, W., Kanters, J. A. & Schouten, A. (1989). Acta Cryst. C45, 482-485.]); Matyjaszewski & Xia (2001[Matyjaszewski, K. & Xia, J. (2001). Chem. Rev. 101, 2921-2990.]); Miroshnikova et al. (2007[Miroshnikova, O. V., Hudson, T. H., Gerena, L., Kyle, D. E. & Lin, A. J. (2007). J. Med. Chem. 50, 889-896.]); Rollison et al. (2006[Rollison, D. E., Helzlsouer, K. J. & Pinney, S. M. (2006). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B9, 413-439.]). For similar structures, see: Haridharan et al. (2010[Haridharan, N., Ramkumar, V. & Dhamodharan, R. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o2007.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C14H18Br2N2O2

  • Mr = 406.12

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 13.834 (3) Å

  • b = 6.4746 (13) Å

  • c = 9.4642 (18) Å

  • β = 103.807 (9)°

  • V = 823.2 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.93 mm−1

  • T = 298 K

  • 0.35 × 0.22 × 0.05 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2 and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.278, Tmax = 0.791

  • 1834 measured reflections

  • 1834 independent reflections

  • 664 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.000

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056

  • wR(F2) = 0.146

  • S = 0.94

  • 1834 reflections

  • 93 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.54 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.56 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.86 2.23 3.057 (7) 162
C7—H7B⋯O1i 0.96 2.57 3.503 (9) 164
Symmetry code: (i) [x, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2 and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2 and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT-Plus and XPREP (Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2 and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

The title compound C14 H18 Br2 N2 O2 is a difunctional aromatic amide based derivative, which is used as an initiator in Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization (ATRP) (Matyjaszewski et al., (2001). We have already reported a similar ATRP initiator (Haridharan et al., 2010). The title compound reported here is a similar derivative with a diamide functionality (Domenicano et al. (1977); Kuipers et al. (1989). It is mainly used as a component of engineering polymers and composites (Ashraf et al., 1994). It is also an ingredient in hair dyes.

p-Phenylenediamine is a precursor to aramid plastics and fibers such as Kevlar (Rollison et al., 2006). p-Phenylenediamine is also used as a developing agent in the color photographic film development process, reacting with the silver grains in the film and creating the colored dyes that form the image. p-Phenylenediamine derivatives such as chloroquine are the most important and widely used class of drugs for treatment of malaria (Miroshnikova et al., 2007). In the title compound C14H18Br2N2O2, the torsion angle between the phenyl ring and the bromo amide group is 149.2 (7)° (C3—C1—N1—C4). The molecule has a crystallographic inversion centre in the middle of the phenyl ring. The crystal is stabilized by a strong intermolecular N—H···O bonding and weak C-H···O interactions. These contacts gives rise to a three dimensional network.

Related literature top

For the use of the title compound as an initiator in atom transfer radical polymerization and other polymerization studies, see: Ashraf et al. (1994); Domenicano et al. (1977); Kuipers et al. (1989); Matyjaszewski et al. (2001); Miroshnikova et al. (2007); Rollison et al., (2006). For similar structures, see: Haridharan et al. (2010).

Experimental top

p-Phenylene diamine (5 g, 0.012 moles), triethylamine (12 g, 0.05 moles) and THF (400 ml) were placed in a 3-neck round bottomed flask. Bromoisobutyrl bromide (13.7 g, 0.05 moles) was added slowly, using a syringe, with stirring, upon which a brown precipitate of triethylammonium bromide was formed. The mixture was left to react for 12 h, with stirring. Subsequently, triethylammonium bromide, the precipitate was removed by filtration and the THF was removed by rotary evaporation. The resulting crude product was dissolved in ethyl acetate, washed with bicarbonate solution and then with water thrice followed by brine solution and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The resulting solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The product was purified by column chromatography technique using 10% ethyl acetate in hexane as the eluent to obtain pure initiator as a bright yellow solid. Recrystallization of the compound from hexane gave X-ray diffraction quality crystals of N,N'-(1,4-phenylene)bis(2-bromo-2-methylpropanamide).

Refinement top

All hydrogen atoms were fixed geometrically and allowed to ride on the parent carbon atoms, with aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å, methyl C—H = 0.96 Å and methylene C—H = 0.97 Å. The displacement parameters were set for phenyl and methylene H atoms at Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and methyl H atoms at Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C).

The crystal data was collected up to 0.73 Å resolution, the crystal (the largest available) still diffracted quite weakly at high angle. On repeated crystallization we could get only small crystals which weakly diffracted. The data completeness we could get was only 93.6%.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT-Plus and XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP of the molecule with atoms represented as 30% probability ellipsoids.
2-bromo-N-[4-(2-bromo-2-methylpropanamido)phenyl]-2-methylpropanamide top
Crystal data top
C14H18Br2N2O2F(000) = 404
Mr = 406.12Dx = 1.638 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 1219 reflections
a = 13.834 (3) Åθ = 0.0–0.0°
b = 6.4746 (13) ŵ = 4.93 mm1
c = 9.4642 (18) ÅT = 298 K
β = 103.807 (9)°Block, colourless
V = 823.2 (3) Å30.35 × 0.22 × 0.05 mm
Z = 2
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1834 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube664 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.000
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 27.8°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
h = 1817
Tmin = 0.278, Tmax = 0.791k = 08
1834 measured reflectionsl = 011
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.146H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.94 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0575P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1834 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
93 parametersΔρmax = 0.54 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
Crystal data top
C14H18Br2N2O2V = 823.2 (3) Å3
Mr = 406.12Z = 2
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 13.834 (3) ŵ = 4.93 mm1
b = 6.4746 (13) ÅT = 298 K
c = 9.4642 (18) Å0.35 × 0.22 × 0.05 mm
β = 103.807 (9)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
1834 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
664 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.278, Tmax = 0.791Rint = 0.000
1834 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0560 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.146H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.94Δρmax = 0.54 e Å3
1834 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.56 e Å3
93 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.90343 (6)0.80012 (14)0.54184 (10)0.0699 (4)
O10.7011 (3)0.5876 (8)0.6804 (5)0.0520 (14)
N10.6647 (4)0.7640 (8)0.4699 (6)0.0436 (16)
H1A0.68090.77790.38820.052*
C10.5804 (5)0.8774 (11)0.4872 (7)0.0364 (18)
C20.5188 (5)0.8134 (11)0.5735 (8)0.050 (2)
H20.53080.68870.62340.060*
C30.5607 (5)1.0646 (13)0.4144 (7)0.045 (2)
H30.60211.10890.35610.054*
C40.7212 (5)0.6389 (10)0.5664 (8)0.0366 (18)
C50.8137 (4)0.5549 (10)0.5272 (7)0.0387 (18)
C60.8682 (6)0.4020 (14)0.6398 (9)0.079 (3)
H6A0.88810.46920.73270.118*
H6B0.92610.35180.61160.118*
H6C0.82500.28840.64650.118*
C70.7975 (5)0.4668 (11)0.3732 (7)0.051 (2)
H7A0.86010.42260.35670.076*
H7B0.76930.57140.30360.076*
H7C0.75290.35120.36270.076*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0573 (6)0.0714 (7)0.0882 (8)0.0096 (5)0.0316 (4)0.0175 (5)
O10.056 (3)0.074 (4)0.035 (3)0.008 (3)0.028 (3)0.009 (3)
N10.053 (4)0.056 (4)0.032 (4)0.018 (3)0.028 (3)0.011 (3)
C10.040 (4)0.046 (5)0.028 (4)0.003 (3)0.018 (3)0.000 (4)
C20.056 (5)0.050 (5)0.052 (5)0.013 (4)0.027 (4)0.018 (4)
C30.043 (4)0.066 (6)0.033 (5)0.010 (4)0.026 (3)0.009 (4)
C40.045 (4)0.032 (5)0.038 (5)0.007 (3)0.021 (4)0.004 (4)
C50.037 (4)0.044 (5)0.041 (5)0.012 (4)0.022 (3)0.012 (4)
C60.095 (7)0.092 (7)0.062 (6)0.042 (6)0.044 (5)0.028 (5)
C70.076 (5)0.041 (5)0.046 (5)0.013 (4)0.036 (4)0.006 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—C52.000 (7)C3—H30.9300
O1—C41.223 (7)C4—C51.516 (8)
N1—C41.326 (8)C5—C61.517 (9)
N1—C11.421 (8)C5—C71.531 (9)
N1—H1A0.8600C6—H6A0.9600
C1—C21.377 (8)C6—H6B0.9600
C1—C31.389 (9)C6—H6C0.9600
C2—C3i1.381 (9)C7—H7A0.9600
C2—H20.9300C7—H7B0.9600
C3—C2i1.381 (9)C7—H7C0.9600
C4—N1—C1127.0 (5)C6—C5—C7111.2 (6)
C4—N1—H1A116.5C4—C5—Br1104.2 (4)
C1—N1—H1A116.5C6—C5—Br1105.8 (5)
C2—C1—C3118.8 (6)C7—C5—Br1108.0 (4)
C2—C1—N1123.6 (7)C5—C6—H6A109.5
C3—C1—N1117.6 (5)C5—C6—H6B109.5
C1—C2—C3i119.7 (7)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C1—C2—H2120.2C5—C6—H6C109.5
C3i—C2—H2120.2H6A—C6—H6C109.5
C2i—C3—C1121.6 (6)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C2i—C3—H3119.2C5—C7—H7A109.5
C1—C3—H3119.2C5—C7—H7B109.5
O1—C4—N1123.5 (6)H7A—C7—H7B109.5
O1—C4—C5120.1 (6)C5—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—C5116.4 (6)H7A—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C5—C6111.7 (5)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C5—C7115.2 (6)
C4—N1—C1—C229.5 (11)C1—N1—C4—C5173.4 (6)
C4—N1—C1—C3149.4 (7)O1—C4—C5—C62.8 (10)
C3—C1—C2—C3i0.1 (12)N1—C4—C5—C6175.8 (7)
N1—C1—C2—C3i179.0 (6)O1—C4—C5—C7130.9 (7)
C2—C1—C3—C2i0.2 (12)N1—C4—C5—C747.8 (8)
N1—C1—C3—C2i179.1 (6)O1—C4—C5—Br1111.0 (6)
C1—N1—C4—O18.0 (11)N1—C4—C5—Br170.4 (7)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y+2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.862.233.057 (7)162
C7—H7B···O1ii0.962.573.503 (9)164
Symmetry code: (ii) x, y+3/2, z1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H18Br2N2O2
Mr406.12
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)298
a, b, c (Å)13.834 (3), 6.4746 (13), 9.4642 (18)
β (°) 103.807 (9)
V3)823.2 (3)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)4.93
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.22 × 0.05
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD area-detector
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
Tmin, Tmax0.278, 0.791
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1834, 1834, 664
Rint0.000
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.657
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.056, 0.146, 0.94
No. of reflections1834
No. of parameters93
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.54, 0.56

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004), APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2004), SAINT-Plus and XPREP (Bruker, 2004), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.862.233.057 (7)161.7
C7—H7B···O1i0.962.573.503 (9)164.3
Symmetry code: (i) x, y+3/2, z1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Department of Chemistry, IIT Madras, for the single-crystal X-ray data collection.

References

First citationAshraf, W., Dawling, S. & Farrow, L. J. (1994). Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 13, 167–170.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2 and SAINT-Plus. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationDomenicano, A., Serantoni, E. F. & Riva di Sanseverino, L. (1977). Acta Cryst. B33, 1664–1668.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationHaridharan, N., Ramkumar, V. & Dhamodharan, R. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o2007.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKuipers, W., Kanters, J. A. & Schouten, A. (1989). Acta Cryst. C45, 482–485.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMatyjaszewski, K. & Xia, J. (2001). Chem. Rev. 101, 2921–2990.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMiroshnikova, O. V., Hudson, T. H., Gerena, L., Kyle, D. E. & Lin, A. J. (2007). J. Med. Chem. 50, 889–896.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationRollison, D. E., Helzlsouer, K. J. & Pinney, S. M. (2006). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B9, 413–439.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds