Acta Cryst. (2012). E68, o573 [ doi:10.1107/S1600536812002802 ]
Online 4 February 2012
No syntax errors found
Alert level C PLAT094_ALERT_2_C Ratio of Maximum / Minimum Residual Density .... 2.50 PLAT910_ALERT_3_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Below Th(Min) ..... 2 PLAT911_ALERT_3_C Missing # FCF Refl Between THmin & STh/L= 0.600 8 PLAT912_ALERT_4_C Missing # of FCF Reflections Above STh/L= 0.600 32 PLAT915_ALERT_3_C Low Friedel Pair Coverage ...................... 84 Perc.
Alert level G REFLT03_ALERT_4_G Please check that the estimate of the number of Friedel pairs is correct. If it is not, please give the correct count in the _publ_section_exptl_refinement section of the submitted CIF. From the CIF: _diffrn_reflns_theta_max 32.54 From the CIF: _reflns_number_total 8158 Count of symmetry unique reflns 4472 Completeness (_total/calc) 182.42% TEST3: Check Friedels for noncentro structure Estimate of Friedel pairs measured 3686 Fraction of Friedel pairs measured 0.824 Are heavy atom types Z>Si present yes PLAT005_ALERT_5_G No _iucr_refine_instructions_details in CIF .... ? PLAT917_ALERT_2_G The FCF is likely NOT based on a BASF/TWIN Flack !
0 ALERT level A = Most likely a serious problem - resolve or explain 0 ALERT level B = A potentially serious problem, consider carefully 5 ALERT level C = Check. Ensure it is not caused by an omission or oversight 3 ALERT level G = General information/check it is not something unexpected 0 ALERT type 1 CIF construction/syntax error, inconsistent or missing data 2 ALERT type 2 Indicator that the structure model may be wrong or deficient 3 ALERT type 3 Indicator that the structure quality may be low 2 ALERT type 4 Improvement, methodology, query or suggestion 1 ALERT type 5 Informative message, check
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography