organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

1,4-Phenyl­enebis(methyl­ene) dicarbamate

aDepartment of Chemistry, School of Science, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, People's Republic of China
*Correspondence e-mail: zhili@bjtu.edu.cn

(Received 16 February 2012; accepted 23 March 2012; online 31 March 2012)

The title compound, C10H12N2O4, is a phenyl dicarbamate with crystallographically imposed inversion symmetry. The dihedral angle between the carbamo­yloxy plane [i.e. the plane of the N—C(O)—O fragment; r.m.s. deviation = 0.002 (3) Å] and the plane of the aryl ring is 29.2 (1)°. In the crystal, two different centrosymmetric N—H⋯O hydrogen-bond inter­actions are observed; these are described as R22(8) and R24(8) in graph-set notation. The rings form an alternating sequence, linking the mol­ecules into a sheet structure parallel to (011).

Related literature

For self-assembled monolayers of alkyl carbamate and alkyl dicarbamate, see: Kim et al. (2003[Kim, K., Plass, K. E. & Matzger, A. J. (2003). Langmuir, 19, 7149-7152.]); Kim et al. (2005a[Kim, K., Plass, K. E. & Matzger, A. J. (2005a). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4879-4887.],b[Kim, K., Plass, K. E. & Matzger, A. J. (2005b). Langmuir, 21, 647-655.]). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Takeuchi et al. (1971[Takeuchi, S. & Ninagawa, E. (1971). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 44, 3184-3185.], 1974[Takeuchi, S. (1974). Makromol. Chem. 175, 2241-2252.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C10H12N2O4

  • Mr = 224.22

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 4.9542 (14) Å

  • b = 6.4194 (18) Å

  • c = 8.418 (2) Å

  • α = 79.290 (4)°

  • β = 79.351 (4)°

  • γ = 88.640 (4)°

  • V = 258.50 (13) Å3

  • Z = 1

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.11 mm−1

  • T = 294 K

  • 0.30 × 0.28 × 0.22 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996[Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.]) Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.975

  • 1310 measured reflections

  • 902 independent reflections

  • 764 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.022

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038

  • wR(F2) = 0.100

  • S = 1.06

  • 902 reflections

  • 81 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.21 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1i 0.88 (2) 2.11 (2) 2.930 (2) 155.6 (17)
N1—H1B⋯O1ii 0.93 (2) 2.07 (2) 2.9888 (19) 169.8 (16)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) -x+1, -y+2, -z.

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007[Bruker (2007). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]); software used to prepare material for publication: Mercury and SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Recently, self-assembled monolayers of alkyl carbamate and alkyl dicarbamate have been investigated and characterizd (Kim et al., 2003, 2005a,b). For further study of the self-assembled activities of dicarbamates, herein, we report the synthesis and structure of a phenyl dicarbamate, 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene) dicarbamate (I) (Fig. 1). In (I), The dihedral angle between the carbamoyloxy plane [O1, C1, N1, O2 plane, mean deviation: 0.002 (3) Å] and the benzene plane is 29.2 (1)°. As shown in Fig 2, the O atom (O1 atom) of the carbonyl group acts as a double H-receptor. The two H atoms of the same amino group interact with the O atom (O1 atom) of the carbonyl group in the adjacent molecule to form two different intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds (N1—H1A···O1 and N1—H1B···O1; Table 1). These are described as R22(8) and R24(8) in graph set notation. The rings are located in an alternating sequence to link the molecules into a two dimensional sheet structure.

Related literature top

For self-assembled monolayers of alkyl carbamate and alkyl dicarbamate, see: Kim et al. (2003); Kim et al. (2005a,b). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Takeuchi et al. (1971, 1974).

Experimental top

The title compound was synthesized by transesterification of ethyl carbamate with 1,4-phenylenedimethanol (Takeuchi et al. 1971, 1974) as followed: A solution of 8.9 g (100 mmol) ethyl carbamate and 1.38 g (10 mmol) 1,4-phenylenedimethanol in 25 ml of toluene was heated to reflux in the presence of catalytic amount of zinc chloride for 10 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was evaporated under vacuum. The residue was subjected to flash chromatography and the title compound was obtained as colorless crystal. (1.34 g, Yield: 60%; m.p. 484–486 K). Crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray analysis were grown by slow evaporation of a DMF solution.

Refinement top

H atoms were placed in calculated positions [C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å] and allowed to ride on the parent atoms, with Uiso values constrained to be 1.2Ueq of the parent atom. The bond length of N1—H1A is 0.88 (2) Å and the bond length of N1—H1B is 0.93 (2) Å.

Structure description top

Recently, self-assembled monolayers of alkyl carbamate and alkyl dicarbamate have been investigated and characterizd (Kim et al., 2003, 2005a,b). For further study of the self-assembled activities of dicarbamates, herein, we report the synthesis and structure of a phenyl dicarbamate, 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene) dicarbamate (I) (Fig. 1). In (I), The dihedral angle between the carbamoyloxy plane [O1, C1, N1, O2 plane, mean deviation: 0.002 (3) Å] and the benzene plane is 29.2 (1)°. As shown in Fig 2, the O atom (O1 atom) of the carbonyl group acts as a double H-receptor. The two H atoms of the same amino group interact with the O atom (O1 atom) of the carbonyl group in the adjacent molecule to form two different intermolecular N—H···O hydrogen bonds (N1—H1A···O1 and N1—H1B···O1; Table 1). These are described as R22(8) and R24(8) in graph set notation. The rings are located in an alternating sequence to link the molecules into a two dimensional sheet structure.

For self-assembled monolayers of alkyl carbamate and alkyl dicarbamate, see: Kim et al. (2003); Kim et al. (2005a,b). For the synthesis of the title compound, see: Takeuchi et al. (1971, 1974).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2007); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2007); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2007; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure of the title compound. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram for (I). The dashed lines show N—H···O hydrogen bonds between neighboring molecules.
1,4-Phenylenebis(methylene) dicarbamate top
Crystal data top
C10H12N2O4Z = 1
Mr = 224.22F(000) = 118
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.440 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Melting point: 485 K
a = 4.9542 (14) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 6.4194 (18) ÅCell parameters from 819 reflections
c = 8.418 (2) Åθ = 2.5–26.1°
α = 79.290 (4)°µ = 0.11 mm1
β = 79.351 (4)°T = 294 K
γ = 88.640 (4)°Needle, colourless
V = 258.50 (13) Å30.30 × 0.28 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
902 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube764 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.022
phi and ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
h = 45
Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.975k = 75
1310 measured reflectionsl = 99
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.038Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.100H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0539P)2 + 0.0526P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
902 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
81 parametersΔρmax = 0.15 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
Crystal data top
C10H12N2O4γ = 88.640 (4)°
Mr = 224.22V = 258.50 (13) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 1
a = 4.9542 (14) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 6.4194 (18) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 8.418 (2) ÅT = 294 K
α = 79.290 (4)°0.30 × 0.28 × 0.22 mm
β = 79.351 (4)°
Data collection top
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
diffractometer
902 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
764 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.962, Tmax = 0.975Rint = 0.022
1310 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0380 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.100H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.15 e Å3
902 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
81 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.2931 (2)0.76540 (17)0.12334 (15)0.0498 (4)
O20.5723 (2)0.51407 (16)0.22471 (13)0.0427 (4)
N10.7519 (3)0.7787 (2)0.02862 (18)0.0451 (4)
C10.5223 (3)0.6939 (2)0.12480 (18)0.0361 (4)
C20.3389 (3)0.4099 (2)0.3354 (2)0.0419 (4)
H2A0.19590.38940.27490.050*
H2B0.26610.49630.41620.050*
C30.4273 (3)0.1990 (2)0.41993 (17)0.0348 (4)
C40.6516 (3)0.0921 (2)0.35056 (19)0.0432 (4)
H40.75550.15320.24960.052*
C50.2772 (3)0.1045 (2)0.57031 (19)0.0417 (4)
H50.12620.17410.61890.050*
H1A0.912 (4)0.735 (3)0.053 (2)0.057 (5)*
H1B0.740 (4)0.914 (3)0.031 (2)0.054 (5)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0332 (7)0.0417 (7)0.0668 (8)0.0023 (5)0.0147 (5)0.0152 (5)
O20.0355 (6)0.0318 (6)0.0531 (7)0.0018 (4)0.0082 (5)0.0120 (5)
N10.0345 (8)0.0387 (8)0.0538 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0088 (6)0.0135 (6)
C10.0359 (8)0.0287 (8)0.0421 (8)0.0007 (6)0.0127 (6)0.0029 (6)
C20.0373 (9)0.0350 (9)0.0468 (9)0.0009 (6)0.0043 (7)0.0060 (7)
C30.0364 (8)0.0291 (8)0.0373 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0086 (6)0.0001 (6)
C40.0470 (10)0.0375 (9)0.0368 (8)0.0027 (7)0.0021 (7)0.0042 (6)
C50.0417 (9)0.0348 (8)0.0432 (9)0.0071 (7)0.0005 (7)0.0013 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.2163 (19)C2—H2B0.9700
O2—C11.3430 (17)C3—C51.383 (2)
O2—C21.4348 (18)C3—C41.386 (2)
N1—C11.331 (2)C4—C5i1.384 (2)
N1—H1A0.88 (2)C4—H40.9300
N1—H1B0.93 (2)C5—C4i1.384 (2)
C2—C31.503 (2)C5—H50.9300
C2—H2A0.9700
C1—O2—C2116.37 (12)C3—C2—H2B109.9
C1—N1—H1A119.3 (12)H2A—C2—H2B108.3
C1—N1—H1B116.7 (11)C5—C3—C4118.33 (14)
H1A—N1—H1B118.9 (16)C5—C3—C2119.38 (14)
O1—C1—N1125.38 (14)C4—C3—C2122.27 (14)
O1—C1—O2123.02 (14)C5i—C4—C3120.78 (15)
N1—C1—O2111.59 (13)C5i—C4—H4119.6
O2—C2—C3108.74 (12)C3—C4—H4119.6
O2—C2—H2A109.9C3—C5—C4i120.89 (15)
C3—C2—H2A109.9C3—C5—H5119.6
O2—C2—H2B109.9C4i—C5—H5119.6
C2—O2—C1—O11.5 (2)C5—C3—C4—C5i0.2 (3)
C2—O2—C1—N1179.38 (13)C2—C3—C4—C5i178.21 (15)
C1—O2—C2—C3172.41 (12)C4—C3—C5—C4i0.2 (3)
O2—C2—C3—C5156.37 (14)C2—C3—C5—C4i178.25 (15)
O2—C2—C3—C425.2 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1ii0.88 (2)2.11 (2)2.930 (2)155.6 (17)
N1—H1B···O1iii0.93 (2)2.07 (2)2.9888 (19)169.8 (16)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) x+1, y+2, z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H12N2O4
Mr224.22
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)294
a, b, c (Å)4.9542 (14), 6.4194 (18), 8.418 (2)
α, β, γ (°)79.290 (4), 79.351 (4), 88.640 (4)
V3)258.50 (13)
Z1
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.11
Crystal size (mm)0.30 × 0.28 × 0.22
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
Tmin, Tmax0.962, 0.975
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
1310, 902, 764
Rint0.022
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.038, 0.100, 1.06
No. of reflections902
No. of parameters81
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.15, 0.21

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 2007), SAINT (Bruker, 2007), SAINT (Bruker, 2007, SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O1i0.88 (2)2.11 (2)2.930 (2)155.6 (17)
N1—H1B···O1ii0.93 (2)2.07 (2)2.9888 (19)169.8 (16)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y, z; (ii) x+1, y+2, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Beijing Jiaotong University for financial support. This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2011JBM295).

References

First citationBruker (2007). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationKim, K., Plass, K. E. & Matzger, A. J. (2003). Langmuir, 19, 7149–7152.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKim, K., Plass, K. E. & Matzger, A. J. (2005a). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4879–4887.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationKim, K., Plass, K. E. & Matzger, A. J. (2005b). Langmuir, 21, 647–655.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationTakeuchi, S. (1974). Makromol. Chem. 175, 2241–2252.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationTakeuchi, S. & Ninagawa, E. (1971). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 44, 3184–3185.  CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds