metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Bromido(2,4,6-tri­methyl­phen­yl)mercury(II)

aInstitut für Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 7, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: bolte@chemie.uni-frankfurt.de

(Received 6 March 2012; accepted 8 March 2012; online 14 March 2012)

Mol­ecules of the title compound, [HgBr(C9H11)], are located on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis. Due to the mol­ecular symmetry, the HgII atom is linearly coordinated by the ipso-C of the mesityl group and the Br atom. In the crystal, mol­ecules lie in planes parallel to (001).

Related literature

For dimesityl-mercury, see: Hayashi et al. (2011[Hayashi, M., Bolte, M., Wagner, M. & Lerner, H.-W. (2011). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 637, 646-649.]). For the synthesis of Hg[Mes]2, see: Hübner et al. (2010[Hübner, A., Bernert, T., Sänger, I., Alig, E., Bolte, M., Fink, L., Wagner, M. & Lerner, H.-W. (2010). Dalton Trans. 39, 7528-7533.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [HgBr(C9H11)]

  • Mr = 399.68

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 10.0459 (8) Å

  • b = 15.3072 (13) Å

  • c = 8.1517 (7) Å

  • β = 126.912 (5)°

  • V = 1002.27 (14) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 19.28 mm−1

  • T = 173 K

  • 0.21 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm

Data collection
  • Stoe IPDS II two-circle diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (MULABS; Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]; Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]) Tmin = 0.107, Tmax = 0.595

  • 6756 measured reflections

  • 942 independent reflections

  • 892 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.103

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025

  • wR(F2) = 0.057

  • S = 1.05

  • 942 reflections

  • 55 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.19 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.71 e Å−3

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001[Stoe & Cie (2001). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.]); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-RED32; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: XP (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supporting information


Comment top

Very recently we have shown that Hg[Mes]2 could be synthesized when HgCl2 was treated with two equivalents of Li[Mes] (Hübner et al., 2010) in thf at ambient temperature (Hayashi et al., 2011). In addition, we have investigated the reaction of Hg[Mes]2 with BBr3 (Hayashi et al., 2011). In this paper we report the structure of the analogous Grignard compound Hg[Mes]Br which was obtained from the 1: 1 reaction of Hg[Mes]2 with BBr3.

Molecules of the title compound are located on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis with half a molecule in the asymmetric unit. Due to the molecular symmetry, the Hg centre is linearly coordinated by the ipso-C of the mesityl group and the Br atom. The Hg—C bond [2.053 (7) Å] is slightly shorter than that in dimesityl mercury [2.080 (6) Å] (Hübner et al., 2010).

In the crystal, the molecules lie in planes parallel to (0 0 1). In a plane, the molecules are oriented parallel to each other with the Hg—Br vectors pointing in the same direction. The shortest intermolecular Hg···Br contact is 4.1270 (4) Å and the shortest intermolecular Hg···Hg contact is 5.1078 (4) Å (symmetry operator for equivalent atoms: 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z).

Related literature top

For dimesityl-mercury, see: Hayashi et al. (2011). For the synthesis of Hg[Mes]2, see: Hübner et al. (2010).

Experimental top

In a round bottom flask Hg[Mes]2 (0.21 g, 0.48 mmol) in 40 ml benzene was treated with one equivalent of BBr3 (0.046 ml, 120 mg, 0.48 mmol) at ambient temperature. Single crystals of the title compound Hg[Mes]Br were obtained from a benzene solution after 2 days at 281 K. Yield 50 mg (26%). 1H NMR (300.0 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.00 (m, 2 H, meta-Ph), 2.47 (br., 6 H, ortho-Me), 2.34 (br., 3 H, para-Me). 13C{1H} NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 154.1 (ipso-Mes), 141.6 (ortho-Mes), 139.3 (para-Mes), 128.0 (meta-Mes), 25.8 (ortho-Me), 20.9 (para-Me). EI+ m/z (%): 396.1 (20.0) 397.1 (32.0) 398.1 (64.0) 399.1 (60.0) 400.1 (100.0) 401.1 (32.0) 402.1 (68.0) 403.1 (6.0) 404.1 (12.0) [M]+, calcd. for [M]+ 396.1 (30.8) 397.1 (54.4) 398.1 (100.0) 399.1 (93.1) 400.1 (95.5) 401.1 (45.8) 402.1 (25.5) 403.1 (11.0) 404.1 (20.9).

Refinement top

H atoms were refined using a riding model, with methyl C—H = 0.98 Å and aromatic C—H = 0.95 Å and with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl-H or 1.2Ueq(C) for aromatic-H. The methyl groups were allowed to rotate but not to tip. The methyl group in para position of the phenyl ring is disordered over two equally occupied positions.

Structure description top

Very recently we have shown that Hg[Mes]2 could be synthesized when HgCl2 was treated with two equivalents of Li[Mes] (Hübner et al., 2010) in thf at ambient temperature (Hayashi et al., 2011). In addition, we have investigated the reaction of Hg[Mes]2 with BBr3 (Hayashi et al., 2011). In this paper we report the structure of the analogous Grignard compound Hg[Mes]Br which was obtained from the 1: 1 reaction of Hg[Mes]2 with BBr3.

Molecules of the title compound are located on a crystallographic twofold rotation axis with half a molecule in the asymmetric unit. Due to the molecular symmetry, the Hg centre is linearly coordinated by the ipso-C of the mesityl group and the Br atom. The Hg—C bond [2.053 (7) Å] is slightly shorter than that in dimesityl mercury [2.080 (6) Å] (Hübner et al., 2010).

In the crystal, the molecules lie in planes parallel to (0 0 1). In a plane, the molecules are oriented parallel to each other with the Hg—Br vectors pointing in the same direction. The shortest intermolecular Hg···Br contact is 4.1270 (4) Å and the shortest intermolecular Hg···Hg contact is 5.1078 (4) Å (symmetry operator for equivalent atoms: 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z).

For dimesityl-mercury, see: Hayashi et al. (2011). For the synthesis of Hg[Mes]2, see: Hübner et al. (2010).

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); data reduction: X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XP (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. A perspective view of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radii. Only one set of the H atoms of the disordered methyl group is shown. Unlabelled atoms are related by the symmetry operation 1-x, y, 3/2-z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound viewed onto the bc plane. H atoms omitted for clarity.
Bromido(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)mercury(II) top
Crystal data top
[HgBr(C9H11)]F(000) = 720
Mr = 399.68Dx = 2.649 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2ycCell parameters from 8005 reflections
a = 10.0459 (8) Åθ = 4.1–25.9°
b = 15.3072 (13) ŵ = 19.28 mm1
c = 8.1517 (7) ÅT = 173 K
β = 126.912 (5)°Needle, colourless
V = 1002.27 (14) Å30.21 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS II two-circle
diffractometer
942 independent reflections
Radiation source: Genix 3D IµS microfocus X-ray source892 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Genix 3D multilayer optics monochromatorRint = 0.103
ω scansθmax = 25.6°, θmin = 4.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(MULABS; Spek, 2009; Blessing, 1995)
h = 1212
Tmin = 0.107, Tmax = 0.595k = 1818
6756 measured reflectionsl = 99
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.057H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.024P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
942 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
55 parametersΔρmax = 1.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.71 e Å3
Crystal data top
[HgBr(C9H11)]V = 1002.27 (14) Å3
Mr = 399.68Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 10.0459 (8) ŵ = 19.28 mm1
b = 15.3072 (13) ÅT = 173 K
c = 8.1517 (7) Å0.21 × 0.10 × 0.03 mm
β = 126.912 (5)°
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS II two-circle
diffractometer
942 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(MULABS; Spek, 2009; Blessing, 1995)
892 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.107, Tmax = 0.595Rint = 0.103
6756 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0250 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.057H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05Δρmax = 1.19 e Å3
942 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.71 e Å3
55 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. ;

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Hg10.50000.600559 (17)0.75000.03814 (13)
Br10.50000.44177 (5)0.75000.0531 (3)
C10.50000.7347 (5)0.75000.0336 (15)
C20.6166 (6)0.7798 (4)0.7414 (7)0.0331 (10)
C30.6142 (7)0.8712 (4)0.7429 (8)0.0375 (12)
H30.69400.90240.73890.045*
C40.50000.9178 (5)0.75000.0369 (18)
C50.7411 (7)0.7320 (4)0.7278 (9)0.0422 (13)
H5A0.79820.68750.83590.063*
H5B0.82290.77360.74530.063*
H5C0.68310.70370.59330.063*
C60.50001.0155 (5)0.75000.048 (2)
H6A0.61161.03680.85990.073*0.50
H6B0.42021.03680.77260.073*0.50
H6C0.46821.03680.61750.073*0.50
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Hg10.03770 (18)0.02853 (18)0.0464 (2)0.0000.02430 (15)0.000
Br10.0503 (5)0.0291 (5)0.0834 (7)0.0000.0419 (5)0.000
C10.038 (4)0.029 (3)0.032 (4)0.0000.020 (3)0.000
C20.030 (2)0.038 (3)0.026 (2)0.001 (2)0.014 (2)0.003 (2)
C30.037 (3)0.038 (3)0.034 (3)0.007 (2)0.019 (2)0.004 (2)
C40.043 (4)0.021 (3)0.032 (4)0.0000.014 (3)0.000
C50.038 (3)0.045 (3)0.044 (3)0.003 (2)0.025 (3)0.001 (2)
C60.060 (6)0.033 (4)0.045 (5)0.0000.028 (4)0.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Hg1—C12.053 (7)C4—C3i1.381 (7)
Hg1—Br12.4307 (8)C4—C61.495 (10)
C1—C2i1.397 (6)C5—H5A0.9800
C1—C21.397 (6)C5—H5B0.9800
C2—C31.400 (8)C5—H5C0.9800
C2—C51.510 (7)C6—H6A0.9800
C3—C41.381 (7)C6—H6B0.9800
C3—H30.9500C6—H6C0.9800
C1—Hg1—Br1180.000 (1)C2—C5—H5A109.5
C2i—C1—C2120.8 (7)C2—C5—H5B109.5
C2i—C1—Hg1119.6 (3)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C2—C1—Hg1119.6 (3)C2—C5—H5C109.5
C1—C2—C3118.3 (5)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C1—C2—C5121.4 (5)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C3—C2—C5120.3 (5)C4—C6—H6A109.5
C4—C3—C2122.4 (5)C4—C6—H6B109.5
C4—C3—H3118.8H6A—C6—H6B109.5
C2—C3—H3118.8C4—C6—H6C109.5
C3—C4—C3i117.8 (7)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
C3—C4—C6121.1 (3)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C3i—C4—C6121.1 (3)
C2i—C1—C2—C30.4 (3)C1—C2—C3—C40.8 (7)
Hg1—C1—C2—C3179.6 (3)C5—C2—C3—C4178.4 (4)
C2i—C1—C2—C5178.8 (5)C2—C3—C4—C3i0.4 (4)
Hg1—C1—C2—C51.2 (5)C2—C3—C4—C6179.6 (4)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+3/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[HgBr(C9H11)]
Mr399.68
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)173
a, b, c (Å)10.0459 (8), 15.3072 (13), 8.1517 (7)
β (°) 126.912 (5)
V3)1002.27 (14)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)19.28
Crystal size (mm)0.21 × 0.10 × 0.03
Data collection
DiffractometerStoe IPDS II two-circle
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(MULABS; Spek, 2009; Blessing, 1995)
Tmin, Tmax0.107, 0.595
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
6756, 942, 892
Rint0.103
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.608
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.025, 0.057, 1.05
No. of reflections942
No. of parameters55
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.19, 0.71

Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001), X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2001), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), XP (Sheldrick, 2008).

 

References

First citationBlessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationHayashi, M., Bolte, M., Wagner, M. & Lerner, H.-W. (2011). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 637, 646–649.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationHübner, A., Bernert, T., Sänger, I., Alig, E., Bolte, M., Fink, L., Wagner, M. & Lerner, H.-W. (2010). Dalton Trans. 39, 7528–7533.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStoe & Cie (2001). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds