organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]hept-2-en-7-yl 4-bromo­benzoate

aDepartment of Chemistry, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah 84403, USA, and bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: blloyd@weber.edu

(Received 30 April 2012; accepted 19 June 2012; online 27 June 2012)

The structure of the title compound, C14H13BrO2, which contains a norbornenyl group and a 4-bromo­benzoate ester at the single C-atom bridge, has been redetermined [see McDonald & Trotter (1965[Macdonald, A. C. & Trotter, J. (1965). Acta Cryst. 19, 456-463.]). Acta Cryst. 19, 456–463] to modern standards to establish high-precision geometrical data to compare with norbornyl and other tetra­cyclic 4-bromo­benzoates. Possible structural evidence is sought to help explain solvolytic reactivities.

Related literature

For the previous structure determination of the title compound, see: McDonald & Trotter (1965[Macdonald, A. C. & Trotter, J. (1965). Acta Cryst. 19, 456-463.]). For a discussion, see: Coots (1983[Coots, R. J. (1983). PhD Dissertation, Chemistry Department, University of Utah, USA.]); Lloyd et al. (1995[Lloyd, B. A., Arif, A. M., Coots, R. J. & Allred, E. L. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 2059-2062.]). For an analogous p-nitro­benzoate structure, see: Jones et al. (1992[Jones, P. G., Kirby, A. J. & Percy, J. M. (1992). Acta Cryst. C48, 829-832.]). For related tetra­cyclic 4-bromo­benzoate structures, see: Lloyd et al. (2000[Lloyd, B. A., Arif, A. M. & Allred, E. L. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 1377-1379.]) and references therein. For a theoretical discussion, solvolysis rates and mol­ecular orbital calculations, see: Chow (1998[Chow, T. J. (1998). J. Phys. Org. Chem. 11, 871-878.]). For further synthetic details, see: Coots (1983[Coots, R. J. (1983). PhD Dissertation, Chemistry Department, University of Utah, USA.]); Lloyd et al. (1993[Lloyd, B. A., Ericson, C., Arif, A. M. & Allred, E. L. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 257-261.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C14H13BrO2

  • Mr = 293.15

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /c

  • a = 14.0633 (2) Å

  • b = 10.0488 (1) Å

  • c = 8.6668 (1) Å

  • β = 100.0718 (7)°

  • V = 1205.91 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 3.40 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.35 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]) Tmin = 0.383, Tmax = 0.429

  • 5345 measured reflections

  • 2754 independent reflections

  • 2509 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.011

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021

  • wR(F2) = 0.051

  • S = 1.05

  • 2754 reflections

  • 207 parameters

  • All H-atom parameters refined

  • Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: DENZO-SMN; program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999[Altomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115-119.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999[Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837-838.]), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]) and PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

Considerably improved precision is obtained for the present, low temperature structure of the title compound 1 over earlier structures. An ORTEP-3 drawing of 1 is shown in Fig. 1, and a cell packing diagram is shown in Fig. 2.

No nonhydrogen atom intermolecular contacts exist shorter than van der Waals radii sums. The closest contacts are shown in Table 1. Structure 1 least squares planes are defined as C1—C7—C4 (plane 1), C2—C3—C4—C5 (plane 2), C1—C6—C5—C4 (plane 3) and H2—C2—C3—H3 (plane 4). Structure 1 interplanar angles are compared to those of norbornyl structure 2 in Table 2.

The 2:4 angle shows that C2 and C3 are pyramidalized similarly as in other norbornenyl containing 4-bromobenzoate structures. The larger 1:2 and smaller 1:3 angle in 1 versus 2 may be a consequence of substituting an etheno bridge for an ethano bridge. The C1—C2, C2=C3, and C3—C4 bonds are shorter in 1 versus 2 as expected, but C1—C7 and C4—C7 are longer in 1 than in 2. These longer bonds possibly compensate for what might otherwise be even closer C2···C7 and C3···C7 intramolecular contacts in 1 (Table 3). A wider 1:2 angle in 1 versus 2 should also help relieve these contacts. Norbornenyl group bond lengths are all longer by 0.010 to 0.032 Å for structure 1 versus the 293 K p-nitrobenzoate ester (Jones et al.,1992). The C7—O2 bond length, 1.445 (2) Å, is shorter than in the p-nitrobenzoate, 1.458 (3) Å, but is virtually the same as that of 2, 1.447 (2) Å, and gives no indication of the huge solvolytic reactivity difference between 1 and 2 derivatives.

Related literature top

For the previous structure determination of the title compound, see: McDonald & Trotter (1965). For a discussion, see: Coots (1983); Lloyd et al. (1995). For an analogous p-nitrobenzoate structure, see: Jones et al. (1992). For related tetracyclic 4-bromobenzoate structures, see: Lloyd et al. (2000) and references therein. For a theoretical discussion, solvolysis rates and molecular orbital calculations, see: Chow (1998). For further synthetic details, see: Coots (1983); Lloyd et al. (1993).

Experimental top

Anti-7-norbornenyl 4-bromobenzoate (title compound 1) was prepared (Coots, 1983) from anti-7-norbornenol, which was made from 7-norbornenone reduction (Lloyd et al., 1993, and references therein). In 25 ml of freshly distilled (from KOH under N2) dry pyridine was dissolved 0.700 g of sublimed (373 K, 1600 Pa) anti-7-norbornenol and 1.80 g of sublimed (373 K, 7 Pa) 4-bromobenzoyl chloride was added with stirring. The mixture was heated to 373 K for 5 min and set in a refrigerator overnight. The mixture was poured into 100 ml of cold water, and extracted three times with 100 ml of ether. Combined ether extracts were washed with cold 10% H2SO4 solution, saturated NaHCO3 solution, water, and finally saturated brine solution. The ether mixture was filtered, and ether was removed on a rotary evaporator (333 K maximum, 1600 Pa). Crude 1 residue was recrystallized from hexane yielding 1.21 g (65.0% yield) of 1. Sublimation (343 K, 1 Pa) further purified 1: mp 345–346 K. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 90 MHz): δ 1.10–1.14 (2 H, AB q, J= 4 Hz), 1.85 (2 H, m), 2.89 (2 H, m), 4.58 (1 H, bs), 6.08 (2 H, m), 7.56 (2 H, d, J = 9 Hz), 7.87 (2 H, d, J = 9 Hz), infrared (CCl4): 3066, 2980, 2878, 1723, 1597, 1485, 1396, 1308, 1275, 1118, 1088, 1011, 854, 760 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for C14H13BrO2: C 57.36, H 4.47. Found: C 57.11, H 4.49.

A 63.5 mg sample of 1 was dissolved by warming in 1.2 ml of freshly distilled absolute ethanol in a 10 ml beaker. The beaker was covered with aluminium foil, secured by a rubber band, and a pinhole was made in the foil for slow evaporation. About half of the ethanol had evaporated after 40 h at 296 K. A few small seed crystals were then added, which did not visibly dissolve. Crystal clumps began to grow. After 5 d total, about 0.2 ml of ethanol remained, and crystals were filtered out. One of these crystals was selected for X-ray analysis.

Refinement top

A colorless prism shaped crystal 0.35 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm in size was mounted on a glass fiber with traces of viscous oil and then transferred to a Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer equipped with Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Ten frames of data were collected at 150 (1) K with an oscillation range of 1 °/frame and an exposure time of 20 sec/frame (Nonius, 1998). Indexing and unit cell refinement based on all observed reflections from those ten frames, indicated a monoclinic P lattice. A total of 5345 reflections (Θmax = 27.46°) were indexed, integrated and corrected for Lorentz, polarization and absorption effects using DENZO– SMN and SCALEPAC (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997). Post refinement of the unit cell gave a = 14.0633 (2) Å, b = 10.04880 (10) Å, c = 8.66680 (10) Å, β =100.0718 (7)°, and V = 1205.91 (3) Å3. Axial photographs and systematic absences were consistent with the compound having crystallized in the monoclinic space group P21/c.

The structure was solved by a combination of direct and heavy atom methods using SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999). All of the non-hydrogen atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement coefficients. Hydrogen atoms were located and refined isotropically using SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008). The weighting scheme employed was w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0214P)2 + 0.7334P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2) /3. The refinement converged to R1 = 0.0211, wR2 = 0.0494, and S = 1.052 for 2509 reflections with I > 2σ(I), and R1 = 0.0245, wR2 = 0.0508, and S = 1.052 for 2754 unique reflections and 207 parameters, where R1 = Σ (|| Fo | – |Fc ||) / Σ |Fo|, wR2 = [Σ(w(Fo2 – Fc2)2) / Σ(Fo2)2]1/2, and S = Goodness-of-fit on F2 = [Σ (w(Fo2 – Fc2)2 / (n-p)] 1/2, n is the number of reflections and p is the number of parameters refined. The maximum Δ/σ in the final cycle of the least-squares was 0.002, and the residual peaks on the final difference-Fourier map ranged from -0.311 to 0.365 e/Å3. The structure was analyzed with WinGX (Farrugia, 1999) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Structure description top

Considerably improved precision is obtained for the present, low temperature structure of the title compound 1 over earlier structures. An ORTEP-3 drawing of 1 is shown in Fig. 1, and a cell packing diagram is shown in Fig. 2.

No nonhydrogen atom intermolecular contacts exist shorter than van der Waals radii sums. The closest contacts are shown in Table 1. Structure 1 least squares planes are defined as C1—C7—C4 (plane 1), C2—C3—C4—C5 (plane 2), C1—C6—C5—C4 (plane 3) and H2—C2—C3—H3 (plane 4). Structure 1 interplanar angles are compared to those of norbornyl structure 2 in Table 2.

The 2:4 angle shows that C2 and C3 are pyramidalized similarly as in other norbornenyl containing 4-bromobenzoate structures. The larger 1:2 and smaller 1:3 angle in 1 versus 2 may be a consequence of substituting an etheno bridge for an ethano bridge. The C1—C2, C2=C3, and C3—C4 bonds are shorter in 1 versus 2 as expected, but C1—C7 and C4—C7 are longer in 1 than in 2. These longer bonds possibly compensate for what might otherwise be even closer C2···C7 and C3···C7 intramolecular contacts in 1 (Table 3). A wider 1:2 angle in 1 versus 2 should also help relieve these contacts. Norbornenyl group bond lengths are all longer by 0.010 to 0.032 Å for structure 1 versus the 293 K p-nitrobenzoate ester (Jones et al.,1992). The C7—O2 bond length, 1.445 (2) Å, is shorter than in the p-nitrobenzoate, 1.458 (3) Å, but is virtually the same as that of 2, 1.447 (2) Å, and gives no indication of the huge solvolytic reactivity difference between 1 and 2 derivatives.

For the previous structure determination of the title compound, see: McDonald & Trotter (1965). For a discussion, see: Coots (1983); Lloyd et al. (1995). For an analogous p-nitrobenzoate structure, see: Jones et al. (1992). For related tetracyclic 4-bromobenzoate structures, see: Lloyd et al. (2000) and references therein. For a theoretical discussion, solvolysis rates and molecular orbital calculations, see: Chow (1998). For further synthetic details, see: Coots (1983); Lloyd et al. (1993).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing 50% displacement ellipsoids.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram for the title compound.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Compounds 1 and 2.
Bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-en-7-yl 4-bromobenzoate top
Crystal data top
C14H13BrO2F(000) = 592
Mr = 293.15Dx = 1.615 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 2911 reflections
a = 14.0633 (2) Åθ = 1.0–27.5°
b = 10.0488 (1) ŵ = 3.40 mm1
c = 8.6668 (1) ÅT = 150 K
β = 100.0718 (7)°Prism, colourless
V = 1205.91 (3) Å30.35 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm
Z = 4
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2754 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2509 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.011
Phi and ω scanθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
h = 1818
Tmin = 0.383, Tmax = 0.429k = 1312
5345 measured reflectionsl = 1111
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.051 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0214P)2 + 0.7334P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.05(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
2754 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
207 parametersΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0136 (7)
Crystal data top
C14H13BrO2V = 1205.91 (3) Å3
Mr = 293.15Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 14.0633 (2) ŵ = 3.40 mm1
b = 10.0488 (1) ÅT = 150 K
c = 8.6668 (1) Å0.35 × 0.33 × 0.30 mm
β = 100.0718 (7)°
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2754 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
2509 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.383, Tmax = 0.429Rint = 0.011
5345 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0210 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.051All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.37 e Å3
2754 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.31 e Å3
207 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. The program DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) uses a scaling algorithm which effectively corrects for absorption effects. High redundancy data were used in the scaling program hence the 'multi-scan' code word was used. No transmission coefficients are available from the program (only scale factors for each frame). The scale factors in the experimental table are calculated from the 'size' command in the SHELXL-97 input file.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.231948 (11)0.573233 (17)0.252195 (18)0.02573 (7)
O10.65735 (9)0.74458 (13)0.02284 (16)0.0335 (3)
O20.70549 (8)0.56513 (11)0.17202 (13)0.0208 (2)
C10.86438 (11)0.67318 (16)0.27173 (19)0.0211 (3)
C20.96258 (12)0.64248 (18)0.2314 (2)0.0251 (3)
C30.96191 (11)0.51593 (18)0.18542 (18)0.0240 (3)
C40.86326 (11)0.45889 (16)0.19263 (18)0.0201 (3)
C50.85573 (12)0.44703 (16)0.36921 (18)0.0221 (3)
C60.85694 (12)0.59406 (17)0.42354 (19)0.0232 (3)
C70.80342 (11)0.58488 (15)0.14674 (18)0.0189 (3)
C80.63967 (11)0.65365 (15)0.10386 (18)0.0203 (3)
C90.54164 (11)0.62660 (15)0.13984 (17)0.0180 (3)
C100.52464 (12)0.53263 (16)0.25011 (18)0.0214 (3)
C110.43223 (12)0.51475 (16)0.28209 (18)0.0218 (3)
C120.35770 (11)0.59175 (15)0.20240 (17)0.0193 (3)
C130.37227 (11)0.68339 (16)0.08950 (19)0.0219 (3)
C140.46492 (11)0.69994 (16)0.05865 (18)0.0213 (3)
H10.8462 (13)0.7672 (19)0.273 (2)0.024 (5)*
H21.0163 (16)0.701 (2)0.248 (2)0.036 (5)*
H31.0125 (16)0.463 (2)0.159 (2)0.034 (5)*
H40.8436 (14)0.380 (2)0.131 (2)0.028 (5)*
H5A0.9080 (15)0.3962 (19)0.426 (2)0.026 (5)*
H5B0.7950 (15)0.4041 (19)0.381 (2)0.027 (5)*
H6A0.9089 (14)0.615 (2)0.506 (2)0.026 (5)*
H6B0.7984 (15)0.617 (2)0.459 (2)0.027 (5)*
H70.8006 (13)0.6132 (18)0.037 (2)0.017 (4)*
H140.4765 (15)0.761 (2)0.018 (2)0.033 (5)*
H130.3204 (15)0.731 (2)0.033 (2)0.029 (5)*
H110.4224 (15)0.452 (2)0.359 (2)0.030 (5)*
H100.5770 (16)0.482 (2)0.304 (2)0.036 (5)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.01967 (10)0.03112 (11)0.02766 (10)0.00351 (6)0.00762 (6)0.00290 (6)
O10.0210 (6)0.0299 (7)0.0502 (8)0.0011 (5)0.0083 (5)0.0176 (6)
O20.0139 (5)0.0219 (6)0.0261 (5)0.0013 (4)0.0024 (4)0.0042 (4)
C10.0182 (7)0.0185 (7)0.0269 (8)0.0005 (6)0.0048 (6)0.0018 (6)
C20.0170 (7)0.0291 (9)0.0296 (8)0.0016 (7)0.0048 (6)0.0040 (7)
C30.0184 (8)0.0313 (9)0.0236 (8)0.0053 (7)0.0070 (6)0.0031 (7)
C40.0200 (7)0.0193 (8)0.0212 (7)0.0033 (6)0.0037 (6)0.0018 (6)
C50.0200 (8)0.0245 (8)0.0224 (7)0.0032 (6)0.0054 (6)0.0052 (6)
C60.0214 (8)0.0290 (9)0.0195 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0040 (6)0.0033 (6)
C70.0158 (7)0.0215 (8)0.0198 (7)0.0012 (6)0.0042 (5)0.0012 (6)
C80.0174 (7)0.0190 (8)0.0235 (7)0.0005 (6)0.0005 (6)0.0010 (6)
C90.0172 (7)0.0161 (7)0.0199 (7)0.0012 (6)0.0007 (5)0.0024 (6)
C100.0220 (8)0.0197 (7)0.0216 (7)0.0023 (6)0.0009 (6)0.0018 (6)
C110.0246 (8)0.0201 (8)0.0206 (7)0.0005 (6)0.0034 (6)0.0015 (6)
C120.0173 (7)0.0205 (8)0.0202 (7)0.0034 (6)0.0034 (6)0.0044 (6)
C130.0177 (7)0.0211 (8)0.0253 (8)0.0014 (6)0.0012 (6)0.0015 (6)
C140.0197 (7)0.0186 (7)0.0245 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0011 (6)0.0042 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Br1—C121.9014 (15)C5—H5A0.96 (2)
O1—C81.2045 (19)C5—H5B0.98 (2)
O2—C81.3438 (18)C6—H6A0.95 (2)
O2—C71.4454 (18)C6—H6B0.96 (2)
C1—C21.514 (2)C7—H70.985 (18)
C1—C71.540 (2)C8—C91.491 (2)
C1—C61.556 (2)C9—C141.392 (2)
C1—H10.979 (19)C9—C101.394 (2)
C2—C31.332 (3)C10—C111.387 (2)
C2—H20.95 (2)C10—H100.95 (2)
C3—C41.512 (2)C11—C121.386 (2)
C3—H30.95 (2)C11—H110.95 (2)
C4—C71.534 (2)C12—C131.385 (2)
C4—C51.557 (2)C13—C141.385 (2)
C4—H40.97 (2)C13—H130.94 (2)
C5—C61.550 (2)C14—H140.94 (2)
C8—O2—C7116.34 (12)C1—C6—H6B109.7 (12)
C2—C1—C797.94 (12)H6A—C6—H6B107.3 (16)
C2—C1—C6106.86 (13)O2—C7—C4109.97 (12)
C7—C1—C6100.89 (12)O2—C7—C1113.61 (12)
C2—C1—H1116.7 (11)C4—C7—C194.61 (12)
C7—C1—H1116.6 (11)O2—C7—H7107.9 (10)
C6—C1—H1115.3 (11)C4—C7—H7114.6 (11)
C3—C2—C1107.73 (14)C1—C7—H7115.8 (11)
C3—C2—H2127.0 (13)O1—C8—O2124.19 (14)
C1—C2—H2124.9 (13)O1—C8—C9123.57 (14)
C2—C3—C4107.94 (14)O2—C8—C9112.24 (13)
C2—C3—H3129.8 (13)C14—C9—C10119.66 (14)
C4—C3—H3122.1 (13)C14—C9—C8117.47 (14)
C3—C4—C798.17 (12)C10—C9—C8122.87 (14)
C3—C4—C5106.87 (13)C11—C10—C9120.26 (14)
C7—C4—C5100.92 (12)C11—C10—H10120.3 (13)
C3—C4—H4117.4 (12)C9—C10—H10119.4 (13)
C7—C4—H4116.1 (12)C12—C11—C10118.78 (15)
C5—C4—H4114.8 (12)C12—C11—H11122.2 (13)
C6—C5—C4103.10 (12)C10—C11—H11119.0 (13)
C6—C5—H5A112.8 (12)C13—C12—C11122.07 (15)
C4—C5—H5A111.4 (12)C13—C12—Br1118.94 (12)
C6—C5—H5B110.7 (12)C11—C12—Br1118.99 (12)
C4—C5—H5B110.2 (11)C12—C13—C14118.46 (14)
H5A—C5—H5B108.6 (16)C12—C13—H13120.9 (12)
C5—C6—C1103.23 (12)C14—C13—H13120.6 (12)
C5—C6—H6A114.0 (12)C13—C14—C9120.74 (15)
C1—C6—H6A111.2 (12)C13—C14—H14120.0 (13)
C5—C6—H6B111.4 (12)C9—C14—H14119.2 (13)
C7—C1—C2—C334.61 (16)C2—C1—C7—C452.53 (13)
C6—C1—C2—C369.37 (17)C6—C1—C7—C456.44 (13)
C1—C2—C3—C40.40 (18)C7—O2—C8—O11.3 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C734.14 (16)C7—O2—C8—C9178.68 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C569.96 (16)O1—C8—C9—C148.7 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C666.21 (15)O2—C8—C9—C14171.27 (13)
C7—C4—C5—C635.90 (15)O1—C8—C9—C10171.07 (16)
C4—C5—C6—C10.34 (15)O2—C8—C9—C108.9 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C566.69 (16)C14—C9—C10—C111.8 (2)
C7—C1—C6—C535.16 (15)C8—C9—C10—C11178.00 (14)
C8—O2—C7—C4164.96 (12)C9—C10—C11—C120.1 (2)
C8—O2—C7—C190.43 (15)C10—C11—C12—C131.6 (2)
C3—C4—C7—O2169.53 (12)C10—C11—C12—Br1177.29 (12)
C5—C4—C7—O260.49 (15)C11—C12—C13—C141.5 (2)
C3—C4—C7—C152.35 (13)Br1—C12—C13—C14177.42 (12)
C5—C4—C7—C156.70 (13)C12—C13—C14—C90.3 (2)
C2—C1—C7—O2166.68 (12)C10—C9—C14—C131.9 (2)
C6—C1—C7—O257.71 (15)C8—C9—C14—C13177.88 (14)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC14H13BrO2
Mr293.15
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)14.0633 (2), 10.0488 (1), 8.6668 (1)
β (°) 100.0718 (7)
V3)1205.91 (3)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)3.40
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.33 × 0.30
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(DENZO-SMN; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
Tmin, Tmax0.383, 0.429
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5345, 2754, 2509
Rint0.011
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.649
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.021, 0.051, 1.05
No. of reflections2754
No. of parameters207
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.37, 0.31

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SIR97 (Altomare et al., 1999), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), WinGX (Farrugia, 1999), ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and PLATON (Spek, 2009), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Intermolecular close contacts.* top
ContactDistance (Å)ContactDistance (Å)
Br1i···C5vi3.707 (2)Br1i···H7iv3.10 (2)
Br1i···C6vi3.676 (2)O1i···H6Bv2.56 (2)
H11i···O1ii2.66 (2)H14i···C11v2.84 (2)
* [symmetry codes: (ii) 1-x, -1/2+y, 1/2 -z; (iv) 1-x, 1-y, -z; (v) x, 3/2-y, -1/2+z; (vi) 1-x, 1-y, 1-z]
Interplanar angles (°). top
Structure1 : 21 : 32 : 32 : 4
1124.5 (1)122.7 (1)112.8 (1)6 (1)
2121.2 (1)125.5 (1)113.3 (1)
Intramolecular contact comparison. top
ContactStructure 1 Distance (Å)Structure 2 Distance (Å)
C2···C72.304 (2)2.342 (2)
C3···C72.302 (2)2.343 (3)
C5···C72.384 (2)2.381 (3)
C6···C72.387 (2)2.379 (3)
C2···C62.466 (2)2.496 (3)
C3···C52.465 (2)2.495 (3)
H3B···H5A2.35 (3)
H2B···H6A2.40 (3)
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Weber State Chemistry Department, the University of Utah Chemistry Department X-ray crystallographic facility, Professor Evan L. Allred who began this work, and Dr Robert J. Coots for synthesizing the 4-bromo­benzoate ester from anti-7-norbornenol.

References

First citationAltomare, A., Burla, M. C., Camalli, M., Cascarano, G. L., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Moliterni, A. G. G., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 115–119.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationChow, T. J. (1998). J. Phys. Org. Chem. 11, 871–878.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationCoots, R. J. (1983). PhD Dissertation, Chemistry Department, University of Utah, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationJones, P. G., Kirby, A. J. & Percy, J. M. (1992). Acta Cryst. C48, 829–832.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLloyd, B. A., Arif, A. M. & Allred, E. L. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 1377–1379.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLloyd, B. A., Arif, A. M., Coots, R. J. & Allred, E. L. (1995). Acta Cryst. C51, 2059–2062.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLloyd, B. A., Ericson, C., Arif, A. M. & Allred, E. L. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 257–261.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMacdonald, A. C. & Trotter, J. (1965). Acta Cryst. 19, 456–463.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds