organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

3,6-Di­aza­octane-1,8-diaminium diiodide

aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
*Correspondence e-mail: ignacy.cukrowski@up.ac.za

(Received 26 April 2012; accepted 2 July 2012; online 7 July 2012)

The asymmetric unit of the title salt, C6H20N42+·2I, comprises half a 3,6-diaza­octane-1,8-diaminium dication plus an I anion. The dications are symmetrical and lie across crystallographic centres of inversion. In the crystal, the ions form a network involving mainly weak N—H⋯I inter­molecular inter­actions: two H atoms of the ammonium group form inter­actions with two I anions and the H atom of the secondary amine forms a weak inter­action with a third I cation. The third ammonium H atom is hydrogen bonded to a secondary amine of an adjacent cation. The backbone of the cation does not form a uniformly trans chain, but is `kinked' [C—N—C—C torsion angle = 71.5 (2)°], probably to accommodate the direct hydrogen bond between the ammonium group and the secondary amine in an adjacent cation.

Related literature

For the structure of a dihydrate of the title compound, together with its isostructural Cl and Br analogues, see Ilioudis et al. (2000[Ilioudis, C. A., Hancock, K. S. B., Georganopoulou, D. G. & Steed, J. W. (2000). New J. Chem. 24, 787-798.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C6H20N42+·2I

  • Mr = 402.06

  • Orthorhombic, P b c a

  • a = 8.1253 (2) Å

  • b = 8.6138 (2) Å

  • c = 18.9368 (4) Å

  • V = 1325.38 (5) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.71 mm−1

  • T = 180 K

  • 0.14 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm

Data collection
  • Nonius KappaCCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SORTAV; Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]) Tmin = 0.688, Tmax = 0.820

  • 13267 measured reflections

  • 2635 independent reflections

  • 1905 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.042

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023

  • wR(F2) = 0.053

  • S = 0.97

  • 2635 reflections

  • 67 parameters

  • 1 restraint

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.55 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.05 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1C⋯N4i 1.10 (2) 1.71 (2) 2.800 (2) 168.3 (19)
N1—H1A⋯I1 0.846 (19) 2.78 (2) 3.5761 (16) 157.2 (16)
N1—H1B⋯I1ii 0.94 (2) 2.77 (2) 3.6156 (16) 150.1 (16)
N4—H4⋯I1iii 0.83 (1) 3.15 (2) 3.8882 (14) 149 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, z]; (ii) [-x, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (iii) [x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998[Nonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]), SCALEPACK and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994[Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997[Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.]), POV-RAY (Cason, 2004[Cason, C. J. (2004). POV-RAY for Windows. Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty Ltd, Victoria, Australia. URL: http://www.povray.org.]) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

The title compound [C6H20N42+ 2(I-)] (1) was obtained during an attempt to prepare an iodide salt of a singly protonated N,N'-di(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethane-1-ammonium ion (C6H19N4+ I-). In the crystal structure of 1 the cation lies across a centre of inversion with the centre of inversion bisecting the C5—C5i (symmetry code (i): -x + 1,-y + 1,-z + 1) bond. The backbone of the cation does not form a uniformly trans chain (Fig. 1): the torsion angles N1—C2—C3—N4 and C2—C3—N4—C5 are -177.22 (14) and 177.58 (13)° respectively, but the C3—N4—C5—C5i torsion angle is 71.5 (2)° (the N4—C5—C5i—N4i torsion is, perforce, 180°). Two H atoms of the ammonium group N1, H1A and H1B, form weak intermolecular interactions with two I- anions whereas the third, H1C, is hydrogen bonded to a secondary amine, N4, of an adjacent cation. The refined N1—H1C bond length (1.10 (2) Å) is longer than expected and may indicate a weakening of the N1—H1C bond and a shift of the electron density maximum away from N1 towards the hydrogen bond. There is a weak interaction between the secondary amine N4— H4 donor and a third I- cation. Thus each I- anion is an acceptor for three hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen bonds link the anions and cations in a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2).

The crystal structures of a dihydrate of 1 [C6H20N42+ 2(I-) 2(H2O)], together with the isostructural Cl- and Br- analogues, have been reported (Ilioudis, et al., 2000). In these structures the C6H20N42+ cations again lie across centres of inversion, but they form uniformly trans chains with the magnitudes of the backbone torsion angles all in the range 177.0 (2) – 180°. The presence of water in these hydrates changes the hydrogen bonding / intermolecular interaction pattern compared with 1. Two ammonium and the secondary amine H atoms interact with halide anions as in 1, but there is no direct hydrogen bond between the ammonium group and the secondary amine of a neighbouring cation. Instead, the water molecule acts as an acceptor for a hydrogen bond involving the third ammonium H atom and, in turn, acts as a donor to the secondary amine N atom of a second cation. The second H atom of the water molecule forms a fourth hydrogen bond to a halide anion.

The "kink" in the backbone chain of the cation in 1 probably occurs to accommodate the direct hydrogen bond between the ammonium group and the secondary amine in an adjacent cation, whereas in the hydrates the intervening water molecule in the hydrogen bonding network allows more flexibility and allows the cations to adopt a uniformly trans configuration.

Related literature top

For the structure of a dihydrate of the title compound, together with its isostructural Cl- and Br- analogues, see Ilioudis et al. (2000).

Experimental top

0.9 ml of a 57% aqueous solution of HI (6.8 mmol) was added to 1.0 ml of a 6.65M aqueous solution of N,N'-di(2-aminoethyl)-ethane-1,2-diamine (C6H18N4, 6.65 mmol) (QinHuangDao JinLei Chemical Co.Ltd). An exothermic reaction occurred and a greenish-yellow solution was observed. 0.3 ml of water was then added. This solution was heated at 70 °C for 4 h, cooled to room temperature and then left covered for six days. It was then allowed to slowly evaporate by covering the container with perforated aluminium foil. Colourless crystals were obtained after three days of slow evaporation.

Refinement top

H1A, H1B, H1C and H4 were located by a difference map and their coordinates were freely refined, except that the N4—H4 bond length was restrained (target: 0.91 (2) Å, refined length: 0.833 (14) Å) as unrestrained refinement led to an unacceptably short N—H bond length. All of the remaining H atoms were placed in their calculated positions and then refined using the riding model with Atom—H lengths of 0.95 Å, (CH) or 0.99 Å (CH2). Isotropic displacement parameters for all hydrogen atoms were set to 1.20 times Ueq of the parent atom.

Structure description top

The title compound [C6H20N42+ 2(I-)] (1) was obtained during an attempt to prepare an iodide salt of a singly protonated N,N'-di(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethane-1-ammonium ion (C6H19N4+ I-). In the crystal structure of 1 the cation lies across a centre of inversion with the centre of inversion bisecting the C5—C5i (symmetry code (i): -x + 1,-y + 1,-z + 1) bond. The backbone of the cation does not form a uniformly trans chain (Fig. 1): the torsion angles N1—C2—C3—N4 and C2—C3—N4—C5 are -177.22 (14) and 177.58 (13)° respectively, but the C3—N4—C5—C5i torsion angle is 71.5 (2)° (the N4—C5—C5i—N4i torsion is, perforce, 180°). Two H atoms of the ammonium group N1, H1A and H1B, form weak intermolecular interactions with two I- anions whereas the third, H1C, is hydrogen bonded to a secondary amine, N4, of an adjacent cation. The refined N1—H1C bond length (1.10 (2) Å) is longer than expected and may indicate a weakening of the N1—H1C bond and a shift of the electron density maximum away from N1 towards the hydrogen bond. There is a weak interaction between the secondary amine N4— H4 donor and a third I- cation. Thus each I- anion is an acceptor for three hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen bonds link the anions and cations in a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2).

The crystal structures of a dihydrate of 1 [C6H20N42+ 2(I-) 2(H2O)], together with the isostructural Cl- and Br- analogues, have been reported (Ilioudis, et al., 2000). In these structures the C6H20N42+ cations again lie across centres of inversion, but they form uniformly trans chains with the magnitudes of the backbone torsion angles all in the range 177.0 (2) – 180°. The presence of water in these hydrates changes the hydrogen bonding / intermolecular interaction pattern compared with 1. Two ammonium and the secondary amine H atoms interact with halide anions as in 1, but there is no direct hydrogen bond between the ammonium group and the secondary amine of a neighbouring cation. Instead, the water molecule acts as an acceptor for a hydrogen bond involving the third ammonium H atom and, in turn, acts as a donor to the secondary amine N atom of a second cation. The second H atom of the water molecule forms a fourth hydrogen bond to a halide anion.

The "kink" in the backbone chain of the cation in 1 probably occurs to accommodate the direct hydrogen bond between the ammonium group and the secondary amine in an adjacent cation, whereas in the hydrates the intervening water molecule in the hydrogen bonding network allows more flexibility and allows the cations to adopt a uniformly trans configuration.

For the structure of a dihydrate of the title compound, together with its isostructural Cl- and Br- analogues, see Ilioudis et al. (2000).

Computing details top

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SCALEPACK and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), POV-RAY (Cason, 2004) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom labeling scheme and 50° probability displacement ellipsoids. Broken lines indicate the N—H···N hydrogen bond and the weak N—H···I intermolecular interactions. Symmetry codes: (ii) -x + 1/2, y - 1/2, z; (iii) -x, y + 1/2, -z + 1/2; (iv) x + 1/2, y, -z + 1/2; (v) -x + 1/2, y + 1/2, z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound viewed offset from along the a axis. Dashed lines indicate N—H···N hydrogen bonds and weak N—H···I intermolecular interactions.forming a three-dimensional network
3,6-Diazaoctane-1,8-diaminium diiodide top
Crystal data top
C6H20N42+·2IF(000) = 760
Mr = 402.06Dx = 2.015 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71070 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 8314 reflections
a = 8.1253 (2) Åθ = 1.0–33.7°
b = 8.6138 (2) ŵ = 4.71 mm1
c = 18.9368 (4) ÅT = 180 K
V = 1325.38 (5) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.14 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2635 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1905 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.042
Thin slice ω and φ scansθmax = 33.7°, θmin = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)
h = 1212
Tmin = 0.688, Tmax = 0.820k = 1313
13267 measured reflectionsl = 2929
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.053H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.97 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0251P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2635 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
67 parametersΔρmax = 0.55 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = 1.05 e Å3
0 constraints
Crystal data top
C6H20N42+·2IV = 1325.38 (5) Å3
Mr = 402.06Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation
a = 8.1253 (2) ŵ = 4.71 mm1
b = 8.6138 (2) ÅT = 180 K
c = 18.9368 (4) Å0.14 × 0.10 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Nonius KappaCCD
diffractometer
2635 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)
1905 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.688, Tmax = 0.820Rint = 0.042
13267 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0231 restraint
wR(F2) = 0.053H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.97Δρmax = 0.55 e Å3
2635 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.05 e Å3
67 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
I10.151716 (14)0.140690 (14)0.149443 (6)0.03028 (5)
N10.07593 (17)0.28497 (19)0.32351 (8)0.0259 (3)
H1A0.063 (2)0.258 (2)0.2810 (11)0.031*
H1B0.012 (3)0.349 (2)0.3373 (10)0.031*
H1C0.093 (3)0.175 (3)0.3520 (9)0.031*
C20.2280 (2)0.37794 (18)0.32818 (10)0.0273 (4)
H2A0.21380.47550.30120.033*
H2B0.32010.31940.30670.033*
C30.2694 (2)0.4159 (2)0.40401 (8)0.0282 (3)
H3A0.17590.47070.42640.034*
H3B0.29010.31900.43070.034*
N40.41655 (16)0.51470 (17)0.40564 (7)0.0241 (3)
H40.4916 (18)0.465 (2)0.3862 (10)0.029*
C50.4643 (2)0.5645 (2)0.47735 (8)0.0277 (3)
H5A0.36630.60760.50140.033*
H5B0.54670.64880.47340.033*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
I10.02627 (7)0.02885 (7)0.03570 (8)0.00126 (4)0.00130 (4)0.00008 (4)
N10.0236 (7)0.0278 (8)0.0264 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0020 (6)0.0004 (6)
C20.0240 (8)0.0330 (10)0.0249 (8)0.0035 (7)0.0018 (6)0.0000 (6)
C30.0270 (8)0.0331 (9)0.0245 (8)0.0044 (7)0.0020 (6)0.0020 (6)
N40.0219 (6)0.0265 (7)0.0238 (6)0.0007 (5)0.0013 (5)0.0011 (5)
C50.0305 (8)0.0253 (9)0.0271 (8)0.0005 (7)0.0045 (7)0.0004 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C21.475 (2)C3—H3A0.9900
N1—H1A0.846 (19)C3—H3B0.9900
N1—H1B0.94 (2)N4—C51.476 (2)
N1—H1C1.10 (2)N4—H40.833 (14)
C2—C31.511 (2)C5—C5i1.519 (3)
C2—H2A0.9900C5—H5A0.9900
C2—H2B0.9900C5—H5B0.9900
C3—N41.467 (2)
C2—N1—H1A108.2 (13)C2—C3—H3A109.9
C2—N1—H1B107.8 (12)N4—C3—H3B109.9
H1A—N1—H1B109.4 (17)C2—C3—H3B109.9
C2—N1—H1C109.6 (13)H3A—C3—H3B108.3
H1A—N1—H1C104.0 (16)C3—N4—C5113.71 (12)
H1B—N1—H1C117.5 (16)C3—N4—H4106.6 (13)
N1—C2—C3111.17 (15)C5—N4—H4111.4 (13)
N1—C2—H2A109.4N4—C5—C5i114.02 (18)
C3—C2—H2A109.4N4—C5—H5A108.7
N1—C2—H2B109.4C5i—C5—H5A108.7
C3—C2—H2B109.4N4—C5—H5B108.7
H2A—C2—H2B108.0C5i—C5—H5B108.7
N4—C3—C2109.09 (13)H5A—C5—H5B107.6
N4—C3—H3A109.9
N1—C2—C3—N4177.22 (14)C3—N4—C5—C5i71.5 (2)
C2—C3—N4—C5177.58 (13)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1C···N4ii1.10 (2)1.71 (2)2.800 (2)168.3 (19)
N1—H1A···I10.846 (19)2.78 (2)3.5761 (16)157.2 (16)
N1—H1B···I1iii0.94 (2)2.77 (2)3.6156 (16)150.1 (16)
N4—H4···I1iv0.83 (1)3.15 (2)3.8882 (14)149 (2)
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (iii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC6H20N42+·2I
Mr402.06
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)180
a, b, c (Å)8.1253 (2), 8.6138 (2), 18.9368 (4)
V3)1325.38 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)4.71
Crystal size (mm)0.14 × 0.10 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerNonius KappaCCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SORTAV; Blessing, 1995)
Tmin, Tmax0.688, 0.820
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
13267, 2635, 1905
Rint0.042
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.781
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.023, 0.053, 0.97
No. of reflections2635
No. of parameters67
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.55, 1.05

Computer programs: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998), SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SCALEPACK and SORTAV (Blessing, 1995), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 1997), POV-RAY (Cason, 2004) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1C···N4i1.10 (2)1.71 (2)2.800 (2)168.3 (19)
N1—H1A···I10.846 (19)2.78 (2)3.5761 (16)157.2 (16)
N1—H1B···I1ii0.94 (2)2.77 (2)3.6156 (16)150.1 (16)
N4—H4···I1iii0.833 (14)3.151 (16)3.8882 (14)148.9 (16)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y1/2, z; (ii) x, y+1/2, z+1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr John E. Davies of the University of Cambridge (England) for the data collection.

References

First citationAltomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435.  CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBlessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationCason, C. J. (2004). POV-RAY for Windows. Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty Ltd, Victoria, Australia. URL: http://www.povray.org.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationIlioudis, C. A., Hancock, K. S. B., Georganopoulou, D. G. & Steed, J. W. (2000). New J. Chem. 24, 787–798.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNonius (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds