organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Acetyl­ene–ammonia–18-crown-6 (1/2/1)

aInstitut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 31, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: nikolaus.korber@chemie.uni-regensburg.de

(Received 27 July 2012; accepted 10 September 2012; online 15 September 2012)

The title compound, C2H2·C12H24O6·2NH3, was formed by co-crystallization of 18-crown-6 and acetyl­ene in liquid ammonia. The 18-crown-6 mol­ecule has threefold rotoinversion symmetry. The acteylene mol­ecule lies on the threefold axis and the whole mol­ecule is generated by an inversion center. The two ammonia mol­ecules are also located on the threefold axis and are related by inversion symmetry. In the crystal, the ammonia mol­ecules are located below and above the crown ether plane and are connected by inter­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The acetyl­ene mol­ecules are additionally linked by weak C—H⋯N inter­actions into chains that propagate in the direction of the crystallographic c axis. The 18-crown-6 mol­ecule [occupancy ratio 0.830 (4):0.170 (4)] is disordered and was refined using a split model.

Related literature

For weak inter­molecular inter­actions such as hydrogen bonds and their application in crystal engineering, see: Desiraju (2002[Desiraju, G. R. (2002). Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 565-573.], 2007[Desiraju, G. R. (2007). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8342-8356.]); Boese et al. (2003[Boese, R., Kirchner, M. T., Billups, W. E. & Norman, L. N. (2003). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 1961-1963.], 2009[Boese, R., Bläser, D. & Jansen, G. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2104-2106.]); Kirchner et al. (2004[Kirchner, M. T., Boese, R., Gehrke, A. & Bläser, D. (2004). CrystEngComm, 6, 360-366.]); Steiner (2002[Steiner, T. (2002). Angew. Chem. 114, 50-80.])

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C2H2·C12H24O6·2NH3

  • Mr = 324.42

  • Trigonal, [R \overline 3]

  • a = 11.8915 (1) Å

  • c = 11.5736 (2) Å

  • V = 1417.33 (3) Å3

  • Z = 3

  • Cu Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.73 mm−1

  • T = 123 K

  • 0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm

Data collection
  • Oxford Diffraction SuperNova diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: analytical [CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012[Agilent (2012). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England.]), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995[Clark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887-897.])] Tmin = 0.798, Tmax = 0.841

  • 5835 measured reflections

  • 640 independent reflections

  • 598 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.032

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036

  • wR(F2) = 0.100

  • S = 1.11

  • 640 reflections

  • 53 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.19 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O1 0.88 2.40 3.2709 (12) 171
N1—H1A⋯O1A 0.88 2.43 3.270 (4) 159
C1—H1⋯N1 0.95 2.34 3.292 (2) 180

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012[Agilent (2012). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: olex2.solve (Bourhis et al., 2012[Bourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2012). In preparation.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, H, 2011[Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2011). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany.]); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009[Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339-341.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

The crystal structure of the title compound was determined in the course of investigations regarding the reactivity of acetylene in liquid ammonia.

In the crystal structure the acetylene molecule shows moderate hydrogen bonding in axial direction to an ammonia molecule on each side with a H···N distance of 2.3422 (15) Å and a C—H···N angle of 180°. Two ammonia molecules are located below and above the crown ether plane, bound by hydrogen bonds to the oxygen atoms in the ring (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Both ammonia molecules are connected to 18-crown-6 via three hydrogen bonds each with a H···O distance of 2.40 Å and a N—H···O angle of 171.0° for the crown ether part with a site occupation factor of 0.83 and with a H···O distance of 2.43 Å and a N—H···O angle of 159.4° for the crown ether part with a site occupation factor of 0.17 (Fig. 2 and Table 1).This arrangement leads to one-dimensional strands along the crystallographic c-axis, that are packed in a kind of hexagonal closest arrangement (Fig. 3). The formation of hydrogen bonds between acetylene and ammonia molecules as well as the interaction of ammonia molecules with the crown ether is essential to stabilize the fugitive acetylene molecule in the solid state as was shown previously by Boese et al. (Boese et al., 2009) in C2H2*NH3. Due to the absence of stronger intermolecular interactions the optimization of hydrogen bonds is the driving force for the axial stacking of the molecules along the crystallographic c-axis. This can also be observed in acetylene containing material such as co-crystallized C2H2*NH3 (Boese et al., 2009) and co-crystals of acetylene and acetone/DMSO (Boese et al., 2003) or azacycles (Kirchner et al., 2004).

Related literature top

For weak intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonds and their application in crystal engineering, see: Desiraju (2002, 2007); Boese et al. (2003, 2009); Kirchner et al. (2004); Steiner (2002)

Experimental top

0.039 g(1.0 mmol) potassium and 0.264 g(1.00 mmol)18-crown-6 were placed under argon atmosphere in a baked-out reaction vessel and 30 ml of dry liquid ammonia were condensed. The mixture was stored at 236 K for one week to ensure that all substances were completely dissolved. Afterwards an excess of acetylene gas was fed into the solution until the colour changed from deep blue to colourless. Colourless crystals of the title compound were obtained after further storage at 236 K for nine month. Well soluble potassium hydrogen acetylide KC2H remained in solution.

Refinement top

The O atom and one C atom of the crown ether are disordered and were refined using a split model with sof of 0.830 (4) and 0.170 (4). The C—H H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and refined isotropic with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C) using a riding model. The N-H H atom was located in difference map and refined in the riding mode approximation.

Structure description top

The crystal structure of the title compound was determined in the course of investigations regarding the reactivity of acetylene in liquid ammonia.

In the crystal structure the acetylene molecule shows moderate hydrogen bonding in axial direction to an ammonia molecule on each side with a H···N distance of 2.3422 (15) Å and a C—H···N angle of 180°. Two ammonia molecules are located below and above the crown ether plane, bound by hydrogen bonds to the oxygen atoms in the ring (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2). Both ammonia molecules are connected to 18-crown-6 via three hydrogen bonds each with a H···O distance of 2.40 Å and a N—H···O angle of 171.0° for the crown ether part with a site occupation factor of 0.83 and with a H···O distance of 2.43 Å and a N—H···O angle of 159.4° for the crown ether part with a site occupation factor of 0.17 (Fig. 2 and Table 1).This arrangement leads to one-dimensional strands along the crystallographic c-axis, that are packed in a kind of hexagonal closest arrangement (Fig. 3). The formation of hydrogen bonds between acetylene and ammonia molecules as well as the interaction of ammonia molecules with the crown ether is essential to stabilize the fugitive acetylene molecule in the solid state as was shown previously by Boese et al. (Boese et al., 2009) in C2H2*NH3. Due to the absence of stronger intermolecular interactions the optimization of hydrogen bonds is the driving force for the axial stacking of the molecules along the crystallographic c-axis. This can also be observed in acetylene containing material such as co-crystallized C2H2*NH3 (Boese et al., 2009) and co-crystals of acetylene and acetone/DMSO (Boese et al., 2003) or azacycles (Kirchner et al., 2004).

For weak intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonds and their application in crystal engineering, see: Desiraju (2002, 2007); Boese et al. (2003, 2009); Kirchner et al. (2004); Steiner (2002)

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); program(s) used to solve structure: olex2.solve (Bourhis et al., 2012); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, H, 2011); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. : Crystal structure of the title compound with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Disordering is shown as full and open bonds. Symmetry codes: (i) 2/3 - x, 4/3 - y, 1/3 - z; (ii) -1/3 + y, 1/3 - x + y, 4/3 - z; (iii) 2/3 + x-y, 1/3 + x, 4/3 - z.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. : Crystal structure with view along the b-axis showing the hydrogen bonding interactions. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and disorder is shown as full and open bonds.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. : Projection of the unit cell along the crystallographic c-axis. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and disorder is shown as full and open bonds
Ethyne–ammonia–1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaoxacyclooctadecane (1/2/1) top
Crystal data top
C2H2·C12H24O6·2NH3Dx = 1.140 Mg m3
Mr = 324.42Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Trigonal, R3Cell parameters from 3585 reflections
Hall symbol: -R 3θ = 5.8–73.3°
a = 11.8915 (1) ŵ = 0.73 mm1
c = 11.5736 (2) ÅT = 123 K
V = 1417.33 (3) Å3Block, clear colourless
Z = 30.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
F(000) = 534
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction SuperNova
diffractometer
640 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube598 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.032
ω scansθmax = 73.3°, θmin = 5.8°
Absorption correction: analytical
[CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]
h = 1414
Tmin = 0.798, Tmax = 0.841k = 1414
5835 measured reflectionsl = 1414
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: iterative
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.100H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0481P)2 + 0.8298P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
640 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
53 parametersΔρmax = 0.18 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
Crystal data top
C2H2·C12H24O6·2NH3Z = 3
Mr = 324.42Cu Kα radiation
Trigonal, R3µ = 0.73 mm1
a = 11.8915 (1) ÅT = 123 K
c = 11.5736 (2) Å0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm
V = 1417.33 (3) Å3
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction SuperNova
diffractometer
640 independent reflections
Absorption correction: analytical
[CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]
598 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.798, Tmax = 0.841Rint = 0.032
5835 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0360 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.100H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.18 e Å3
640 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.19 e Å3
53 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Absorption correction: Crysalis Pro, Agilent Technologies, Version 1.171.35.21, Analytical numeric absorption correction using a multifaceted crystal model based on expressions derived by R. C. Clark & J. S. Reid (1995).

Crystal mounting in perfluorether

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
O10.34988 (11)0.43774 (10)0.64475 (7)0.0298 (4)0.830 (4)
C20.23519 (11)0.32279 (10)0.67833 (11)0.0387 (4)
H2AA0.23140.31640.76370.046*0.830 (4)
H2AB0.23750.24630.64760.046*0.830 (4)
H2BC0.19120.24730.73090.046*0.170 (4)
H2BD0.22250.28800.59870.046*0.170 (4)
C30.46325 (13)0.45185 (13)0.69816 (12)0.0344 (4)0.830 (4)
H3B0.47110.37430.68190.041*0.830 (4)
H3A0.45680.45860.78290.041*0.830 (4)
O1A0.4390 (5)0.5013 (5)0.6463 (3)0.0254 (17)0.170 (4)
C3A0.3587 (6)0.3803 (6)0.7006 (6)0.0312 (12)0.17
H3AB0.39050.32060.67860.037*0.170 (4)
H3AA0.37000.39340.78520.037*0.170 (4)
N10.33330.66670.50242 (13)0.0330 (4)
H1A0.34300.60460.53400.040*
C10.33330.66670.21796 (16)0.0289 (4)
H10.33330.66670.30000.035*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0306 (8)0.0310 (6)0.0287 (5)0.0160 (5)0.0010 (4)0.0042 (4)
C20.0397 (7)0.0276 (6)0.0487 (7)0.0168 (5)0.0111 (5)0.0046 (4)
C30.0379 (8)0.0347 (7)0.0359 (8)0.0220 (7)0.0045 (5)0.0002 (5)
O1A0.027 (3)0.029 (3)0.022 (2)0.016 (2)0.0035 (16)0.0004 (17)
C3A0.027 (3)0.029 (3)0.040 (3)0.016 (3)0.002 (2)0.000 (3)
N10.0363 (6)0.0363 (6)0.0263 (7)0.0182 (3)0.0000.000
C10.0257 (5)0.0257 (5)0.0351 (8)0.0129 (3)0.0000.000
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C21.4196 (15)C3—H3B0.9900
O1—C31.4148 (18)C3—H3A0.9900
C2—H2AA0.9900O1A—C2ii1.446 (5)
C2—H2AB0.9900O1A—C3A1.416 (8)
C2—H2BC0.9900C3A—H3AB0.9900
C2—H2BD0.9900C3A—H3AA0.9900
C2—C3i1.4698 (18)N1—H1A0.8810
C2—O1Ai1.446 (5)C1—C1iii1.187 (4)
C2—C3A1.298 (6)C1—H10.9500
C3—C2ii1.4698 (18)
C3—O1—C2113.22 (10)C3A—C2—H2BC107.5
O1—C2—H2AA109.4C3A—C2—H2BD107.5
O1—C2—H2AB109.4C3A—C2—C3i152.4 (3)
O1—C2—H2BC149.2C3A—C2—O1Ai119.3 (3)
O1—C2—H2BD91.2O1—C3—C2ii110.55 (11)
O1—C2—C3i111.27 (10)O1—C3—H3B109.5
O1—C2—O1Ai89.71 (18)O1—C3—H3A109.5
H2AA—C2—H2AB108.0C2ii—C3—H3B109.5
H2BC—C2—H2BD107.0C2ii—C3—H3A109.5
C3i—C2—H2AA109.4H3B—C3—H3A108.1
C3i—C2—H2AB109.4C3A—O1A—C2ii122.5 (4)
C3i—C2—H2BC97.7C2—C3A—O1A117.3 (5)
C3i—C2—H2BD74.6C2—C3A—H3AB108.0
O1Ai—C2—H2AA87.6C2—C3A—H3AA108.0
O1Ai—C2—H2AB148.6O1A—C3A—H3AB108.0
O1Ai—C2—H2BC107.5O1A—C3A—H3AA108.0
O1Ai—C2—H2BD107.5H3AB—C3A—H3AA107.2
C3A—C2—H2AA80.7C1iii—C1—H1180.0
C3A—C2—H2AB90.6
Symmetry codes: (i) y1/3, x+y+1/3, z+4/3; (ii) xy+2/3, x+1/3, z+4/3; (iii) x+2/3, y+4/3, z+1/3.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.882.403.2709 (12)171
N1—H1A···O1A0.882.433.270 (4)159
C1—H1···N10.952.343.292 (2)180

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC2H2·C12H24O6·2NH3
Mr324.42
Crystal system, space groupTrigonal, R3
Temperature (K)123
a, c (Å)11.8915 (1), 11.5736 (2)
V3)1417.33 (3)
Z3
Radiation typeCu Kα
µ (mm1)0.73
Crystal size (mm)0.1 × 0.1 × 0.1
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction SuperNova
Absorption correctionAnalytical
[CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012), based on expressions derived by Clark & Reid (1995)]
Tmin, Tmax0.798, 0.841
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5835, 640, 598
Rint0.032
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.621
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.036, 0.100, 1.11
No. of reflections640
No. of parameters53
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.18, 0.19

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012), olex2.solve (Bourhis et al., 2012), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, H, 2011), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···O10.882.403.2709 (12)171.0
N1—H1A···O1A0.882.433.270 (4)159.4
C1—H1···N10.952.343.292 (2)180.0
 

References

First citationAgilent (2012). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
First citationBoese, R., Bläser, D. & Jansen, G. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2104–2106.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBoese, R., Kirchner, M. T., Billups, W. E. & Norman, L. N. (2003). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 1961–1963.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2012). In preparation.  Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2011). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationClark, R. C. & Reid, J. S. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 887–897.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationDesiraju, G. R. (2002). Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 565–573.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationDesiraju, G. R. (2007). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8342–8356.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKirchner, M. T., Boese, R., Gehrke, A. & Bläser, D. (2004). CrystEngComm, 6, 360–366.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSteiner, T. (2002). Angew. Chem. 114, 50–80.  CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds