Volume 69 Received 22 November 2012 | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
aLatvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, 21 Aizkraukles Street, Riga LV-1006, Latvia
Correspondence e-mail: mishnevs@osi.lv
In the title salt, C37H51N2O10+·Br-, the 1,4-dihydropyridine (1,4-DHP) ring adopts a slighly puckered boat conformation. The N and opposite C atoms deviate from the least-squares plane calculated through the four other ring atoms by 0.068 (5) and 0.224 (5) Å, respectively. The orientation of both C=O groups is similar (cis with respect to the double bonds of 1,4-DHP. The pyridinium ring has an axial orientation with respect to the1,4-DHP ring and is almost perpendicular to the least-squares plane of the 1,4-DHP ring, making a dihedral angle of 89.2 (3)°. The molecule has a compact shape due to the parallel orientation of the long-chain substituents. One of the butoxy groups was fond to be disordered (occupancy ratio 0.70:0.30). In the crystal, the bromide anion accepts a weak hydrogen bond from the N-H group of a neighboring 1,4-DHP ring.
For general information on the relationship between 1,4-dihydropyridine ring substituents and pharmaceutical effects, see: Hasko & Pacher (2008
); Niebauer & Robinson (2006
); Ruiz et al. (2012
); Swarnalatha et al. (2011
). For the synthesis of the DHP 3-pyridyl derivative, see: Saini et al. (2008
).
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
Data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998
); cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997
); data reduction: DENZO (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997
) and SCALEPACK; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008
); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008
); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 2012
); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: VM2184 ).
The study was supported by the Latvian National Research programme 2010-2013 `Development of prevention, treatment, diagnostic means and practices, and biomedicine technologies for improvement of public health'.
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.
![[details]](../../../../../../j/graphics/details.gif)
Hasko, G. & Pacher, P. (2008). J. Leukoc. Biol. 83, 447-455.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Hooft, R. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.
Niebauer, R. T. & Robinson, A. S. (2006). Protein Expres. Purif. 46, 204-211.
![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.
Ruiz, E., Rodriguez, H., Coro, J., Niebla, V., Rodriguez, A., Martinez-Alvarez, R., Novoa de Armas, H., Suarez, M. & Nazario, M. (2012). Ultrason. Sonochem. 19, 221-226.
![[PubMed]](../../../../../../logos/pubmedborder.gif)
Saini, A., Kumar, S. & Sandhu, J. S. J. (2008). J. Sci. Ind. Res. 67, 95-111. ![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.
![[details]](../../../../../../a/graphics/details.gif)
Swarnalatha, G., Prasanthi, G., Sirisha, N. & Madhusudhana Chetty, C. (2011). Int. J. ChemTech Res. 3, 75-89. ![[ChemPort]](../../../../../../logos/chemportborder.gif)