organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

2,4-Bis(di­methyl­amino)-1,3,5-tri­methyl-6-(nitro­­oxy)borazine

aPO Box 5800, MS 1411, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-1411, USA, and bPO Box 5800, MS 0892, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185-0892, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: marodri@sandia.gov

(Received 11 March 2013; accepted 18 March 2013; online 5 April 2013)

In the title compound, C7H21B3N6O3, the r.m.s. deviation of the borazine ring atoms is 0.019 Å. The dimethyl­amino groups are orientated at 41.80 (7) and 36.43 (7)° with respect to the borazine ring. The nitro­oxy group is almost normal to the borazine ring [dihedral angle = 85.33 (14)°]. The methyl C atom trans to the NO3 group is displaced by −0.512 (3) Å from the ring plane, whereas the two ortho-methyl C atoms are displaced by 0.239 (3) and 0.178 (3) Å.

Related literature

2,4-Bis(dimethyl­amino)-6-chloro-1,3,5-trimethyl­borazine (II) (Rodriguez & Borek, 2013[Rodriguez, M. A. & Borek, T. T. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o309.]) displays a similar structure to the title compound. However, the title compound displays a near planar borazine ring, whereas (II) shows a boat conformation. For further synthetic details, see: Brennan et al. (1960[Brennan, G. L., Dahl, G. H. & Schaeffer, R. (1960). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 6248-6250.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C7H21B3N6O3

  • Mr = 269.73

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 8.7017 (15) Å

  • b = 10.2205 (16) Å

  • c = 10.3082 (15) Å

  • α = 117.624 (2)°

  • β = 92.371 (2)°

  • γ = 113.744 (2)°

  • V = 713.5 (2) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.09 mm−1

  • T = 193 K

  • 0.21 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker APEX CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2005[Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.981, Tmax = 0.990

  • 5210 measured reflections

  • 2515 independent reflections

  • 1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.024

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046

  • wR(F2) = 0.124

  • S = 1.03

  • 2515 reflections

  • 179 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.16 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005[Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005[Bruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: XSHELL. (Bruker, 2000[Bruker (2000). XSHELL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006[Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453-457.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information


Comment top

The 2,4-bis(dimethylamino)-6-nitrooxy-1,3,5-trimethylborazine (I) is a buff-colored solid that has not been previously reported. Figure 1 shows the molecule for this compound as an atomic displacement ellipsoid plot. Bond lengths for the dimethylamine (DMA) ligands, B—N, N—O, and B—O bonds are consistent with expected values. This molecule is very similar to that the previously reported 2,4-Bis(dimethylamino)-6-chloro-1,3,5-trimethylborazine (II); see Rodriguez and Borek, (2013). The difference is merely the exchange of Cl in (II) for a nitrooxy group shown here in (I). The steric nature of the DMA ligands and their proximity to methyl groups bound to the nitrogen atoms of the borazine ring appears to create conditions in the molecule that drive these borazine-bound methyl groups away from the plane created by the borazine ring. Figure 2 shows the molecule of (I) bisected by the plane defined by the borazine ring; the plane is extended through the bound ligands. The view in Figure 2 shows how the C3 methyl, bracketed by the rotated DMA molecules, is displaced upward, out-of-the-plane of the borazine ring (in terms of the molecule orientation in the figure) by an angle of 20.9 (1)°. Likewise, C1 and C2 methyls are displaced downward from the borazine plane by tilt angles of 8.80 (9)° and 7.24 (9)°, respectively. The rotation of the DMA ligands from the borazine plane generates dihedral angles of 41.80 (7)° and 36.43 (7)° for the B2/N4/C4/C5 and B3/N5/C6/C7 DMA groups, respectively. The counter-rotation of the two DMA ligands relative to the C3 methyl is the likely steric mechanism to displace the C3 methyl at a much larger angle compared to the C1 and C2 methyl groups (which are each bracketed by a DMA and the nitrooxy group). The plane defined by the nitrooxy group is nearly perpendicular to the borazine ring, having a dihedral angle of 85.0 (1)° as shown in Figure 2. The O2 and O3 O atoms are terminal and no detection of H atoms was observed in the difference-fourier maps. The molecule is charge balanced as shown.

Figure 3 shows the packing arrangement of the two molecules of (I) within the triclinic unit cell. Additional molecules extending beyond the defined cell are also shown so as to give the viewer a sense of the packing arrangement as it extends in space. Observation of Figure 3 with an eye for symmetry reveals the inversion center present in the unit cell, generating the two formula units per cell (Z=2). Based on the absence of any clearly defined donor-acceptor pairs within the structure, there did not appear to be strong hydrogen-bonding interactions within this structure. This was supported by software tests (HTAB) that also indicated the absence of any donor-acceptor pairs. Careful visual inspection of the packing of (I) molecules indicated that the positioning of the terminal O atoms (O2 and O3) were such that they pointed toward H atoms of neighboring methyl groups. Therefore, some weak C—H···O interactions are likely present. However, the distances between the nitrooxy O atoms and neighboring protons exceeded 2.6 Å for C—H···O interactions and the estimated C—H···O bond angles were atypical of hydrogen bonds. Therefore, the packing appears to be dictated by Van der Waals interactions coupled with perhaps weak nitrooxy-methyl interactions.

Related literature top

2,4-Bis(dimethylamino)-6-chloro-1,3,5-trimethylborazine (II) (Rodriguez & Borek, 2013) displays a similar structure to the title compound. However, the title compound displays a near planar borazine ring, whereas (II) shows a boat conformation. For further synthetic details, see: Brennan et al. (1960).

Experimental top

Compound (I) was obtained using a modification of the published procedure of Brennan, et al. (1960). One equivalent of 2,4-Bis(dimethylamino)-6-chloro-1,3,5-trimethylborazine was reacted with one equivalent of silver nitrate in acetonitrile. After stirring the reaction mixture, the solution was filtered to remove precipitated silver chloride, and the solvent was removed using vacuum techniques. This product was then recrystallized from anhydrous hexanes, and then was vacuum distilled (bp 114–116°C at 800 mTorr). The liquid distillate slowly crystallized upon standing at room temperature resulting in a buff-colored solid with a melting point of 68 to 72°C. Crystals formed in this manner were of sufficient quality for single-crystal structure analysis. The product purity was determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (1H, 11B, 13C).

Structure description top

The 2,4-bis(dimethylamino)-6-nitrooxy-1,3,5-trimethylborazine (I) is a buff-colored solid that has not been previously reported. Figure 1 shows the molecule for this compound as an atomic displacement ellipsoid plot. Bond lengths for the dimethylamine (DMA) ligands, B—N, N—O, and B—O bonds are consistent with expected values. This molecule is very similar to that the previously reported 2,4-Bis(dimethylamino)-6-chloro-1,3,5-trimethylborazine (II); see Rodriguez and Borek, (2013). The difference is merely the exchange of Cl in (II) for a nitrooxy group shown here in (I). The steric nature of the DMA ligands and their proximity to methyl groups bound to the nitrogen atoms of the borazine ring appears to create conditions in the molecule that drive these borazine-bound methyl groups away from the plane created by the borazine ring. Figure 2 shows the molecule of (I) bisected by the plane defined by the borazine ring; the plane is extended through the bound ligands. The view in Figure 2 shows how the C3 methyl, bracketed by the rotated DMA molecules, is displaced upward, out-of-the-plane of the borazine ring (in terms of the molecule orientation in the figure) by an angle of 20.9 (1)°. Likewise, C1 and C2 methyls are displaced downward from the borazine plane by tilt angles of 8.80 (9)° and 7.24 (9)°, respectively. The rotation of the DMA ligands from the borazine plane generates dihedral angles of 41.80 (7)° and 36.43 (7)° for the B2/N4/C4/C5 and B3/N5/C6/C7 DMA groups, respectively. The counter-rotation of the two DMA ligands relative to the C3 methyl is the likely steric mechanism to displace the C3 methyl at a much larger angle compared to the C1 and C2 methyl groups (which are each bracketed by a DMA and the nitrooxy group). The plane defined by the nitrooxy group is nearly perpendicular to the borazine ring, having a dihedral angle of 85.0 (1)° as shown in Figure 2. The O2 and O3 O atoms are terminal and no detection of H atoms was observed in the difference-fourier maps. The molecule is charge balanced as shown.

Figure 3 shows the packing arrangement of the two molecules of (I) within the triclinic unit cell. Additional molecules extending beyond the defined cell are also shown so as to give the viewer a sense of the packing arrangement as it extends in space. Observation of Figure 3 with an eye for symmetry reveals the inversion center present in the unit cell, generating the two formula units per cell (Z=2). Based on the absence of any clearly defined donor-acceptor pairs within the structure, there did not appear to be strong hydrogen-bonding interactions within this structure. This was supported by software tests (HTAB) that also indicated the absence of any donor-acceptor pairs. Careful visual inspection of the packing of (I) molecules indicated that the positioning of the terminal O atoms (O2 and O3) were such that they pointed toward H atoms of neighboring methyl groups. Therefore, some weak C—H···O interactions are likely present. However, the distances between the nitrooxy O atoms and neighboring protons exceeded 2.6 Å for C—H···O interactions and the estimated C—H···O bond angles were atypical of hydrogen bonds. Therefore, the packing appears to be dictated by Van der Waals interactions coupled with perhaps weak nitrooxy-methyl interactions.

2,4-Bis(dimethylamino)-6-chloro-1,3,5-trimethylborazine (II) (Rodriguez & Borek, 2013) displays a similar structure to the title compound. However, the title compound displays a near planar borazine ring, whereas (II) shows a boat conformation. For further synthetic details, see: Brennan et al. (1960).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2005); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: XSHELL. (Bruker, 2000) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The molecular structure of (I), with atom labels and 50% probability displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of molecule (I) with superimposed borazine plane to illustrate devaitions of methyl, dimethylamine, and nitrooxy ligands from the borazine plane. H atoms have been removed for clarity. See text for details.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Packing diagram for (I) showing relative orientation of molecules in unit cell. H atoms have been removed for clarity.
2,4-Bis(dimethylamino)-1,3,5-trimethyl-6-(nitrooxy)borazine top
Crystal data top
C7H21B3N6O3Z = 2
Mr = 269.73F(000) = 288
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.255 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.7017 (15) ÅCell parameters from 200 reflections
b = 10.2205 (16) Åθ = 1.0–25.0°
c = 10.3082 (15) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
α = 117.624 (2)°T = 193 K
β = 92.371 (2)°Irregular, colorless
γ = 113.744 (2)°0.21 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm
V = 713.5 (2) Å3
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD
diffractometer
2515 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.024
ω and φ scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
h = 1010
Tmin = 0.981, Tmax = 0.990k = 1212
5210 measured reflectionsl = 1212
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.124H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0544P)2 + 0.1672P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2515 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
179 parametersΔρmax = 0.16 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
Crystal data top
C7H21B3N6O3γ = 113.744 (2)°
Mr = 269.73V = 713.5 (2) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 8.7017 (15) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 10.2205 (16) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
c = 10.3082 (15) ÅT = 193 K
α = 117.624 (2)°0.21 × 0.14 × 0.12 mm
β = 92.371 (2)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEX CCD
diffractometer
2515 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
1754 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.981, Tmax = 0.990Rint = 0.024
5210 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0460 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.124H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.16 e Å3
2515 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
179 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor (wR) and goodness of fit (S) are based on F2, conventional R-factors (R) are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
B10.4283 (3)0.6785 (3)0.6075 (3)0.0344 (5)
B20.2976 (3)0.5242 (3)0.7345 (3)0.0326 (5)
B30.1777 (3)0.3931 (3)0.4492 (3)0.0312 (5)
N10.42950 (19)0.67279 (19)0.74152 (18)0.0326 (4)
N20.3103 (2)0.5465 (2)0.46384 (18)0.0327 (4)
N30.1733 (2)0.39008 (19)0.58808 (18)0.0323 (4)
N40.2920 (2)0.5148 (2)0.8690 (2)0.0424 (5)
N50.0574 (2)0.2537 (2)0.30467 (19)0.0380 (4)
N60.5525 (2)0.9520 (2)0.6490 (2)0.0494 (5)
O10.57519 (18)0.82087 (18)0.61309 (18)0.0487 (4)
O20.4182 (2)0.9481 (2)0.6800 (2)0.0697 (6)
O30.6707 (3)1.0656 (2)0.6479 (3)0.0882 (7)
C10.5786 (3)0.8066 (3)0.8791 (2)0.0450 (6)
H1A0.68550.84430.84860.068*
H1B0.59310.76280.94280.068*
H1C0.55610.90140.93700.068*
C20.3408 (3)0.5590 (3)0.3290 (2)0.0436 (5)
H2A0.27950.61440.31230.065*
H2B0.29670.44620.23890.065*
H2C0.46650.62490.34640.065*
C30.0057 (3)0.2695 (3)0.5884 (3)0.0437 (5)
H3A0.01090.16740.56600.066*
H3B0.09040.24090.51050.066*
H3C0.01390.32070.68890.066*
C40.3033 (3)0.6486 (3)1.0146 (3)0.0545 (6)
H4A0.32240.74581.00700.082*
H4B0.40110.68111.09360.082*
H4C0.19410.60931.04160.082*
C50.2485 (3)0.3612 (3)0.8680 (3)0.0579 (7)
H5A0.13140.31750.88160.087*
H5B0.33420.38510.95130.087*
H5C0.25050.27750.77030.087*
C60.0062 (3)0.0790 (3)0.2594 (3)0.0477 (6)
H6A0.06330.07350.33220.072*
H6B0.00470.01620.15720.072*
H6C0.12920.02970.25840.072*
C70.0354 (3)0.2692 (3)0.1965 (3)0.0513 (6)
H7A0.00140.38780.23790.077*
H7B0.16170.20600.17850.077*
H7C0.00570.22410.10000.077*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
B10.0302 (12)0.0340 (13)0.0503 (15)0.0175 (11)0.0181 (11)0.0278 (12)
B20.0330 (12)0.0344 (12)0.0384 (13)0.0189 (11)0.0130 (10)0.0222 (11)
B30.0310 (12)0.0336 (12)0.0382 (13)0.0195 (10)0.0148 (10)0.0215 (11)
N10.0298 (9)0.0288 (9)0.0360 (9)0.0111 (7)0.0079 (7)0.0171 (8)
N20.0364 (9)0.0378 (10)0.0360 (10)0.0204 (8)0.0162 (8)0.0252 (8)
N30.0298 (9)0.0298 (9)0.0389 (10)0.0116 (7)0.0114 (7)0.0213 (8)
N40.0514 (11)0.0428 (10)0.0394 (10)0.0204 (9)0.0135 (9)0.0279 (9)
N50.0396 (10)0.0350 (10)0.0364 (10)0.0180 (8)0.0082 (8)0.0166 (8)
N60.0421 (11)0.0373 (11)0.0612 (13)0.0101 (10)0.0209 (10)0.0274 (10)
O10.0400 (9)0.0435 (9)0.0698 (11)0.0172 (7)0.0247 (8)0.0364 (8)
O20.0573 (11)0.0499 (11)0.1124 (16)0.0299 (9)0.0396 (11)0.0452 (11)
O30.0787 (14)0.0491 (11)0.140 (2)0.0195 (10)0.0572 (13)0.0593 (13)
C10.0400 (12)0.0383 (12)0.0465 (13)0.0133 (10)0.0063 (10)0.0199 (11)
C20.0509 (13)0.0536 (14)0.0459 (13)0.0294 (12)0.0248 (11)0.0356 (12)
C30.0372 (12)0.0401 (12)0.0496 (13)0.0097 (10)0.0158 (10)0.0278 (11)
C40.0605 (16)0.0692 (17)0.0397 (14)0.0317 (14)0.0174 (11)0.0318 (13)
C50.0638 (16)0.0626 (16)0.0682 (17)0.0261 (13)0.0186 (13)0.0525 (15)
C60.0429 (13)0.0338 (12)0.0505 (14)0.0151 (10)0.0131 (11)0.0134 (11)
C70.0514 (14)0.0568 (15)0.0414 (13)0.0279 (12)0.0064 (11)0.0215 (12)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
B1—N21.405 (3)C1—H1B0.9800
B1—N11.410 (3)C1—H1C0.9800
B1—O11.474 (2)C2—H2A0.9800
B2—N41.434 (3)C2—H2B0.9800
B2—N31.442 (3)C2—H2C0.9800
B2—N11.455 (3)C3—H3A0.9800
B3—N51.430 (3)C3—H3B0.9800
B3—N31.448 (3)C3—H3C0.9800
B3—N21.456 (3)C4—H4A0.9800
N1—C11.478 (3)C4—H4B0.9800
N2—C21.479 (2)C4—H4C0.9800
N3—C31.484 (2)C5—H5A0.9800
N4—C41.453 (3)C5—H5B0.9800
N4—C51.454 (3)C5—H5C0.9800
N5—C71.454 (3)C6—H6A0.9800
N5—C61.457 (3)C6—H6B0.9800
N6—O31.207 (2)C6—H6C0.9800
N6—O21.214 (2)C7—H7A0.9800
N6—O11.316 (2)C7—H7B0.9800
C1—H1A0.9800C7—H7C0.9800
N2—B1—N1124.20 (18)N2—C2—H2B109.5
N2—B1—O1117.31 (19)H2A—C2—H2B109.5
N1—B1—O1117.86 (18)N2—C2—H2C109.5
N4—B2—N3122.28 (18)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
N4—B2—N1120.72 (19)H2B—C2—H2C109.5
N3—B2—N1117.00 (18)N3—C3—H3A109.5
N5—B3—N3122.07 (18)N3—C3—H3B109.5
N5—B3—N2121.33 (18)H3A—C3—H3B109.5
N3—B3—N2116.59 (18)N3—C3—H3C109.5
B1—N1—B2118.96 (17)H3A—C3—H3C109.5
B1—N1—C1118.86 (17)H3B—C3—H3C109.5
B2—N1—C1121.61 (17)N4—C4—H4A109.5
B1—N2—B3119.30 (17)N4—C4—H4B109.5
B1—N2—C2118.29 (17)H4A—C4—H4B109.5
B3—N2—C2121.85 (17)N4—C4—H4C109.5
B2—N3—B3123.84 (17)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
B2—N3—C3116.89 (17)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
B3—N3—C3116.69 (16)N4—C5—H5A109.5
B2—N4—C4123.85 (18)N4—C5—H5B109.5
B2—N4—C5123.12 (18)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C4—N4—C5112.45 (18)N4—C5—H5C109.5
B3—N5—C7123.88 (17)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
B3—N5—C6123.55 (18)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C7—N5—C6111.94 (17)N5—C6—H6A109.5
O3—N6—O2126.7 (2)N5—C6—H6B109.5
O3—N6—O1115.25 (19)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
O2—N6—O1118.09 (17)N5—C6—H6C109.5
N6—O1—B1115.66 (15)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—H1A109.5H6B—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—H1B109.5N5—C7—H7A109.5
H1A—C1—H1B109.5N5—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C1—H1C109.5H7A—C7—H7B109.5
H1A—C1—H1C109.5N5—C7—H7C109.5
H1B—C1—H1C109.5H7A—C7—H7C109.5
N2—C2—H2A109.5H7B—C7—H7C109.5

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC7H21B3N6O3
Mr269.73
Crystal system, space groupTriclinic, P1
Temperature (K)193
a, b, c (Å)8.7017 (15), 10.2205 (16), 10.3082 (15)
α, β, γ (°)117.624 (2), 92.371 (2), 113.744 (2)
V3)713.5 (2)
Z2
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.21 × 0.14 × 0.12
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEX CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2005)
Tmin, Tmax0.981, 0.990
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
5210, 2515, 1754
Rint0.024
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.046, 0.124, 1.03
No. of reflections2515
No. of parameters179
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.16, 0.24

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005), SAINT (Bruker, 2005), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), XSHELL. (Bruker, 2000) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006).

 

Acknowledgements

Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE–AC04-94 A L85000.

References

First citationBrennan, G. L., Dahl, G. H. & Schaeffer, R. (1960). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 82, 6248–6250.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2000). XSHELL. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2005). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationRodriguez, M. A. & Borek, T. T. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o309.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds