2-(2,4-Di­chloro­phen­yl)-N-(1,3-thia­zol-2-yl)acetamide

Nayak, P.S.; Narayana, B.; Yathirajan, H.S.; Jasinski, J.P.; Butcher, R.J.

doi:10.1107/S1600536813008532

organic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 69| Part 5| May 2013| Pages o656-o657

https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008532

Open

access

2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)acetamide

Prakash S. Nayak,^a B. Narayana,^a H. S. Yathirajan,^b Jerry P. Jasinski ^c ^* and Ray J. Butcher ^d

^aDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, Mangalore University, Mangalagangotri 574 199, India, ^bDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore 570 006, India, ^cDepartment of Chemistry, Keene State College, 229 Main Street, Keene, NH 03435-2001, USA, and ^dDepartment of Chemistry, Howard University, 525 College Street NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA
^*Correspondence e-mail: jjasinski@keene.edu

(Received 24 March 2013; accepted 27 March 2013; online 5 April 2013)

In the title compound, C₁₁H₈Cl₂N₂OS, the mean plane of the dichlorophenyl ring is twisted by 72.4 (1)° from that of the thiazole ring. In the crystal, molecules are linked via pairs of N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds with an R₂²(8) graph-set motif and weak C—H⋯O interactions, forming inversion dimers which stack along the c-axis direction.

Related literature

For the structural similarity of N-substituted 2-arylacetamides to the lateral chain of natural benzylpenicillin, see: Mijin & Marinkovic (2006 ); Mijin et al. (2008 ). For the coordination abilities of amides, see: Wu et al. (2008 , 2010 ). For related structures, see: Fun et al. (2012a ,b ,c ,d ,e ); Butcher et al. (2013a ,b ). For standard bond lengths, see: Allen et al. (1987 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

C₁₁H₈Cl₂N₂OS
M_r = 287.15
Triclinic, $[P \overline 1]$
a = 5.3262 (2) Å
b = 10.5083 (4) Å
c = 10.8096 (4) Å
α = 83.900 (3)°
β = 86.301 (3)°
γ = 87.279 (4)°
V = 599.83 (4) Å³
Z = 2
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.70 mm⁻¹
T = 123 K
0.35 × 0.25 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

Agilent Xcalibur (Ruby, Gemini) diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED; Agilent, 2012 ) T_min = 0.873, T_max = 1.000
10769 measured reflections
6006 independent reflections
4329 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.033

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.046
wR(F²) = 0.112
S = 1.07
6006 reflections
154 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max = 0.65 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −0.36 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C5—H5A⋯O1ⁱ	0.95	2.50	3.3253 (15)	145
N1—H1A⋯N2ⁱⁱ	0.88	2.04	2.9052 (15)	168
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1; (ii) -x+1, -y, -z+2.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008532/hg5302sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008532/hg5302Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600536813008532/hg5302Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Comment top

N-Substituted 2-arylacetamides are very interesting compounds because of their structural similarity to the lateral chain of natural benzylpenicillin (Mijin et al., 2006, 2008). Amides are also used as ligands due to their excellent coordination abilities (Wu et al., 2008, 2010). Crystal structures of some acetamide derivatives viz., (2,2-diphenyl-N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)acetamide, 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)acetamide, 2-(naphthalen-1-yl)-N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)acetamide, N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)-2-(2,4,6-trimethyl phenyl)acetamide, 2-(2-fluorophenyl)-N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)acetamide (Fun et al., 2012a,b,c,d,e), 2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-N-(1,5-dimethyl-3-oxo-2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro- 1H-pyrazol-4-yl)acetamide, 2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-N-(1,5-dimethyl-3-oxo- 2-phenyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)acetamide (Butcher et al., 2013a,b) have been reported. In view of the importance of amides, we report herein the crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₁H₈Cl₂N₂OS, (I).

In (I), the mean plane of the dichlorophenyl ring is twisted by 72.4 (1)° from that of the thiazol ring (Fig. 1). Bond lengths are in normal ranges (Allen et al., 1987) In the crystal, the molecules are linked via pairs of N—H···N hydrogen bonds in a R2,2(8)graph-set motif and weak C—H···O intermolecular interactions forming inversion dimers which stack along the c axis (Fig. 2).

Related literature top

For the structural similarity of N-substituted 2-arylacetamides to the lateral chain of natural benzylpenicillin, see: Mijin & Marinkovic (2006); Mijin et al. (2008). For the coordination abilities of amides, see: Wu et al. (2008, 2010). For related structures, see: Fun et al. (2012a,b,c,d,e); Butcher et al. (2013a,b). For standard bond lengths, see: Allen et al. (1987).

Experimental top

2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acid (0.240 g, 1 mmol) and 2-aminothiazole (0.1 g, 1 mmol), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide hydrochloride (1.0 g, 0.01 mol) and were dissolved in dichloromethane (20 mL). The mixture was stirred in presence of triethylamine at 273 K for about 3 h. The contents were poured into 100 ml of ice-cold aqueous hydrochloric acid with stirring, which was extracted thrice with dichloromethane (Fig. 3). The organic layer was washed with saturated NaHCO₃ solution and brine solution, dried and concentrated under reduced pressure to give the title compound (I). Single crystals were grown from methanol and acetone mixture (1:1) by the slow evaporation method (M.P.: 493–495 K).

Structure description top

For the structural similarity of N-substituted 2-arylacetamides to the lateral chain of natural benzylpenicillin, see: Mijin & Marinkovic (2006); Mijin et al. (2008). For the coordination abilities of amides, see: Wu et al. (2008, 2010). For related structures, see: Fun et al. (2012a,b,c,d,e); Butcher et al. (2013a,b). For standard bond lengths, see: Allen et al. (1987).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top

	Fig. 1. Molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom labeling scheme and 30% probability displacement ellipsoids.
	Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound viewed along the a axis. Dashed lines indicate N—H···N intermolecular hydrogen bonds in an R2,2(8) graph-set motif and weak C—H···O intemolecular interactions forming inversion dimers which stack along the c axis.
	Fig. 3. Reaction scheme.

2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-N-(1,3-thiazol-2-yl)acetamide top

Crystal data top

C₁₁H₈Cl₂N₂OS	Z = 2
M_r = 287.15	F(000) = 292
Triclinic, P1	D_x = 1.590 Mg m⁻³
Hall symbol: -P 1	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.3262 (2) Å	Cell parameters from 4451 reflections
b = 10.5083 (4) Å	θ = 3.8–37.4°
c = 10.8096 (4) Å	µ = 0.70 mm⁻¹
α = 83.900 (3)°	T = 123 K
β = 86.301 (3)°	Prism, colorless
γ = 87.279 (4)°	0.35 × 0.25 × 0.12 mm
V = 599.83 (4) Å³

Data collection top

Agilent Xcalibur (Ruby, Gemini) diffractometer	6006 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source	4329 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.033
Detector resolution: 10.5081 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 37.5°, θ_min = 3.8°
ω scans	h = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED; Agilent, 2012)	k = −17→17
T_min = 0.873, T_max = 1.000	l = −18→11
10769 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.046	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.112	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0402P)²] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
6006 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.001
154 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.65 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.36 e Å⁻³

Crystal data top

C₁₁H₈Cl₂N₂OS	γ = 87.279 (4)°
M_r = 287.15	V = 599.83 (4) Å³
Triclinic, P1	Z = 2
a = 5.3262 (2) Å	Mo Kα radiation
b = 10.5083 (4) Å	µ = 0.70 mm⁻¹
c = 10.8096 (4) Å	T = 123 K
α = 83.900 (3)°	0.35 × 0.25 × 0.12 mm
β = 86.301 (3)°

Data collection top

Agilent Xcalibur (Ruby, Gemini) diffractometer	6006 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED; Agilent, 2012)	4329 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.873, T_max = 1.000	R_int = 0.033
10769 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.046	0 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.112	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.07	Δρ_max = 0.65 e Å⁻³
6006 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.36 e Å⁻³
154 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Cl1	0.79895 (7)	0.48741 (3)	0.89686 (3)	0.02461 (8)
Cl2	0.55890 (9)	0.83944 (4)	0.52220 (4)	0.03766 (11)
S1	1.04354 (7)	0.01947 (3)	0.74851 (3)	0.02147 (8)
O1	0.79783 (18)	0.25361 (10)	0.71093 (9)	0.0215 (2)
N1	0.6082 (2)	0.11595 (11)	0.86027 (10)	0.0186 (2)
H1A	0.4759	0.1039	0.9126	0.022*
N2	0.7798 (2)	−0.08345 (11)	0.93865 (10)	0.0192 (2)
C1	0.4325 (2)	0.45348 (12)	0.74111 (11)	0.0171 (2)
C2	0.6152 (2)	0.53376 (12)	0.77059 (11)	0.0174 (2)
C3	0.6586 (3)	0.65234 (13)	0.70372 (12)	0.0206 (3)
H3A	0.7876	0.7045	0.7242	0.025*
C4	0.5064 (3)	0.69139 (13)	0.60622 (12)	0.0217 (3)
C5	0.3151 (3)	0.61785 (14)	0.57565 (12)	0.0222 (3)
H5A	0.2096	0.6478	0.5102	0.027*
C6	0.2813 (3)	0.49878 (13)	0.64318 (12)	0.0199 (2)
H6A	0.1522	0.4469	0.6223	0.024*
C7	0.3992 (2)	0.32251 (13)	0.80963 (12)	0.0191 (2)
H7A	0.2454	0.2866	0.7829	0.023*
H7B	0.3745	0.3306	0.9001	0.023*
C8	0.6212 (2)	0.23051 (12)	0.78742 (11)	0.0166 (2)
C9	0.7900 (2)	0.01826 (12)	0.85656 (11)	0.0170 (2)
C10	1.1457 (3)	−0.12670 (14)	0.81987 (13)	0.0237 (3)
H10A	1.2938	−0.1734	0.7945	0.028*
C11	0.9844 (3)	−0.16548 (13)	0.91734 (13)	0.0216 (3)
H11A	1.0106	−0.2441	0.9678	0.026*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Cl1	0.02368 (17)	0.02474 (17)	0.02565 (16)	0.00123 (13)	−0.00852 (12)	−0.00047 (12)
Cl2	0.0557 (3)	0.02104 (18)	0.03370 (19)	−0.00763 (18)	−0.00098 (18)	0.01074 (15)
S1	0.02054 (16)	0.02107 (16)	0.02141 (15)	0.00019 (13)	0.00441 (12)	0.00039 (12)
O1	0.0212 (5)	0.0200 (5)	0.0211 (4)	0.0003 (4)	0.0032 (4)	0.0045 (4)
N1	0.0157 (5)	0.0160 (5)	0.0220 (5)	0.0006 (4)	0.0036 (4)	0.0045 (4)
N2	0.0183 (5)	0.0156 (5)	0.0224 (5)	0.0004 (4)	0.0010 (4)	0.0023 (4)
C1	0.0153 (5)	0.0155 (5)	0.0193 (5)	0.0004 (4)	0.0007 (4)	0.0018 (4)
C2	0.0164 (5)	0.0166 (5)	0.0189 (5)	0.0014 (4)	−0.0016 (4)	−0.0002 (4)
C3	0.0206 (6)	0.0169 (6)	0.0238 (6)	−0.0017 (5)	0.0011 (5)	−0.0008 (5)
C4	0.0277 (7)	0.0154 (6)	0.0201 (5)	0.0007 (5)	0.0041 (5)	0.0024 (4)
C5	0.0255 (7)	0.0208 (6)	0.0191 (5)	0.0030 (5)	−0.0022 (5)	0.0023 (5)
C6	0.0180 (6)	0.0197 (6)	0.0218 (5)	−0.0002 (5)	−0.0026 (4)	0.0002 (5)
C7	0.0169 (6)	0.0158 (5)	0.0231 (6)	−0.0005 (5)	0.0009 (4)	0.0036 (4)
C8	0.0178 (6)	0.0148 (5)	0.0170 (5)	−0.0013 (4)	−0.0026 (4)	0.0012 (4)
C9	0.0155 (5)	0.0165 (5)	0.0185 (5)	−0.0015 (4)	0.0003 (4)	0.0002 (4)
C10	0.0206 (6)	0.0205 (6)	0.0291 (6)	0.0041 (5)	0.0020 (5)	−0.0027 (5)
C11	0.0218 (6)	0.0166 (6)	0.0256 (6)	0.0008 (5)	−0.0007 (5)	0.0002 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Cl1—C2	1.7445 (12)	C2—C3	1.3939 (17)
Cl2—C4	1.7412 (13)	C3—C4	1.3866 (19)
S1—C10	1.7243 (14)	C3—H3A	0.9500
S1—C9	1.7272 (13)	C4—C5	1.384 (2)
O1—C8	1.2274 (15)	C5—C6	1.3933 (18)
N1—C8	1.3687 (15)	C5—H5A	0.9500
N1—C9	1.3794 (17)	C6—H6A	0.9500
N1—H1A	0.8800	C7—C8	1.5148 (19)
N2—C9	1.3155 (15)	C7—H7A	0.9900
N2—C11	1.3799 (18)	C7—H7B	0.9900
C1—C2	1.3912 (19)	C10—C11	1.3563 (19)
C1—C6	1.4009 (17)	C10—H10A	0.9500
C1—C7	1.5046 (17)	C11—H11A	0.9500

C10—S1—C9	88.73 (6)	C5—C6—H6A	119.1
C8—N1—C9	123.92 (11)	C1—C6—H6A	119.1
C8—N1—H1A	118.0	C1—C7—C8	113.05 (10)
C9—N1—H1A	118.0	C1—C7—H7A	109.0
C9—N2—C11	109.73 (11)	C8—C7—H7A	109.0
C2—C1—C6	117.23 (11)	C1—C7—H7B	109.0
C2—C1—C7	121.89 (11)	C8—C7—H7B	109.0
C6—C1—C7	120.88 (12)	H7A—C7—H7B	107.8
C1—C2—C3	122.75 (12)	O1—C8—N1	121.81 (12)
C1—C2—Cl1	119.76 (9)	O1—C8—C7	124.30 (11)
C3—C2—Cl1	117.49 (10)	N1—C8—C7	113.88 (10)
C4—C3—C2	117.54 (13)	N2—C9—N1	120.68 (11)
C4—C3—H3A	121.2	N2—C9—S1	115.46 (10)
C2—C3—H3A	121.2	N1—C9—S1	123.86 (9)
C5—C4—C3	122.29 (12)	C11—C10—S1	110.33 (11)
C5—C4—Cl2	119.82 (10)	C11—C10—H10A	124.8
C3—C4—Cl2	117.89 (11)	S1—C10—H10A	124.8
C4—C5—C6	118.37 (12)	C10—C11—N2	115.75 (12)
C4—C5—H5A	120.8	C10—C11—H11A	122.1
C6—C5—H5A	120.8	N2—C11—H11A	122.1
C5—C6—C1	121.75 (13)

C6—C1—C2—C3	−2.9 (2)	C6—C1—C7—C8	112.46 (14)
C7—C1—C2—C3	176.27 (13)	C9—N1—C8—O1	1.1 (2)
C6—C1—C2—Cl1	176.52 (10)	C9—N1—C8—C7	−179.52 (12)
C7—C1—C2—Cl1	−4.33 (19)	C1—C7—C8—O1	−8.1 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4	1.7 (2)	C1—C7—C8—N1	172.59 (11)
Cl1—C2—C3—C4	−177.67 (11)	C11—N2—C9—N1	−178.62 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C5	0.9 (2)	C11—N2—C9—S1	0.80 (15)
C2—C3—C4—Cl2	179.95 (11)	C8—N1—C9—N2	172.32 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C6	−2.1 (2)	C8—N1—C9—S1	−7.0 (2)
Cl2—C4—C5—C6	178.79 (11)	C10—S1—C9—N2	−0.69 (11)
C4—C5—C6—C1	0.9 (2)	C10—S1—C9—N1	178.71 (13)
C2—C1—C6—C5	1.5 (2)	C9—S1—C10—C11	0.35 (12)
C7—C1—C6—C5	−177.65 (13)	S1—C10—C11—N2	0.02 (18)
C2—C1—C7—C8	−66.66 (17)	C9—N2—C11—C10	−0.52 (19)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C5—H5A···O1ⁱ	0.95	2.50	3.3253 (15)	145
N1—H1A···N2ⁱⁱ	0.88	2.04	2.9052 (15)	168

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₁H₈Cl₂N₂OS
M_r	287.15
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P1
Temperature (K)	123
a, b, c (Å)	5.3262 (2), 10.5083 (4), 10.8096 (4)
α, β, γ (°)	83.900 (3), 86.301 (3), 87.279 (4)
V (Å³)	599.83 (4)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	0.70
Crystal size (mm)	0.35 × 0.25 × 0.12

Data collection
Diffractometer	Agilent Xcalibur (Ruby, Gemini)
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED; Agilent, 2012)
T_min, T_max	0.873, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	10769, 6006, 4329
R_int	0.033
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.857

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.046, 0.112, 1.07
No. of reflections	6006
No. of parameters	154
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.65, −0.36

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012), CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2012), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C5—H5A···O1ⁱ	0.95	2.50	3.3253 (15)	144.7
N1—H1A···N2ⁱⁱ	0.88	2.04	2.9052 (15)	167.9

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+2.

Acknowledgements

BN thanks the UGC for financial assistance through the BSR one-time grant for the purchase of chemicals. PSN thanks Mangalore University for research facilities and DST–PURSE financial assistance. RJB acknowledges the NSF–MRI program (grant No. CHE-0619278) for funds to purchase the X-ray diffractometer.

References

Agilent (2012). CrysAlis PRO and CrysAlis RED. Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19. CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Butcher, R. J., Mahan, A., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Yathirajan, H. S. (2013a). Acta Cryst. E69, o46–o47. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Butcher, R. J., Mahan, A., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Yathirajan, H. S. (2013b). Acta Cryst. E69, o39. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fun, H.-K., Ooi, C. W., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Sarojini, B. K. (2012a). Acta Cryst. E68, o1312–o1313. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fun, H.-K., Quah, C. K., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Sarojini, B. K. (2012b). Acta Cryst. E68, o2679. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fun, H.-K., Quah, C. K., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Sarojini, B. K. (2012c). Acta Cryst. E68, o2464. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fun, H.-K., Quah, C. K., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Sarojini, B. K. (2012d). Acta Cryst. E68, o2461. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fun, H.-K., Quah, C. K., Nayak, P. S., Narayana, B. & Sarojini, B. K. (2012e). Acta Cryst. E68, o2565. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mijin, D. & Marinkovic, A. (2006). Synth. Commun. 36, 193–198. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mijin, D. Z., Prascevic, M. & Petrovic, S. D. (2008). J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 73, 945–950. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wu, W.-N., Cheng, F.-X., Yan, L. & Tang, N. (2008). J. Coord. Chem. 61, 2207–2215. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wu, W.-N., Wang, Y., Zhang, A.-Y., Zhao, R.-Q. & Wang, Q.-F. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m288. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar