anti-Ethyl aceto­hydroximate

Hachuła, B.; Polasz, A.; Nowak, M.; Kusz, J.

doi:10.1107/S1600536813022368

organic compounds

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 69| Part 9| September 2013| Page o1418

doi:10.1107/S1600536813022368

Open

access

anti-Ethyl acetohydroximate

Barbara Hachuła,^a ^* Anna Polasz,^a Maria Nowak ^b and Joachim Kusz ^b

^aInstitute of Chemistry, University of Silesia, 14 Bankowa Street, 40-007 Katowice, Poland, and ^bInstitute of Physics, University of Silesia, 4 Uniwersytecka Street, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
^*Correspondence e-mail: bhachula@o2.pl

(Received 2 August 2013; accepted 8 August 2013; online 21 August 2013)

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₄H₉NO₂, the O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the molecules into supramolecular chains extending along the b-axis direction. The conformation of the NOH group in the nearly planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0546 Å) ethyl acetohydroximate molecule is trans to N=C.

Related literature

For related structures, see: Kjaer et al. (1977 ); Larsen (1971 ). For studies of the IR spectra of hydrogen bonding in oxime derivatives, see: Flakus et al. (2012 ). For typical bond distances, see: Allen et al. (1987 ). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995 ); Etter et al. (1990 ).

Experimental

Crystal data

C₄H₉NO₂
M_r = 103.12
Monoclinic, C 2/c
a = 19.9481 (9) Å
b = 4.4138 (1) Å
c = 13.3277 (5) Å
β = 109.027 (4)°
V = 1109.35 (7) Å³
Z = 8
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 0.10 mm⁻¹
T = 100 K
0.52 × 0.18 × 0.14 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire3 detector
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006 $[Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Wrocław, Poland.]$ ) T_min = 0.505, T_max = 1.000
6699 measured reflections
970 independent reflections
868 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R_int = 0.025

Refinement

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.034
wR(F²) = 0.098
S = 1.08
970 reflections
69 parameters
H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max = 0.22 e Å⁻³
Δρ_min = −0.22 e Å⁻³

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1ⁱ	0.871 (19)	1.954 (19)	2.8196 (14)	172.4 (16)
Symmetry code: (i) $[-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}]$ .

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 $[Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Wrocław, Poland.]$ ); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006 $[Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Wrocław, Poland.]$ ); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

Supporting information

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022368/ff2116sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022368/ff2116Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813022368/ff2116Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Comment top

Anti-ethyl acetohydroximate [systematic name: ethyl N-hydroxyacetimidate], (I), was investigated in a continuation of our studies of the IR spectra of hydrogen bonding in oxime derivatives (Flakus et al., 2012). In order to study interactions occurring via hydrogen bonds and molecular packing in this compound, we have now determined the structure of (I) using diffraction data collected at 100 K. Until now, the structures of syn-methyl acetohydroximate and syn- and anti-ethyl benzohydroximate were determined (Kjaer et al., 1977; Larsen et al., 1971). The crystal structure of syn-methyl acetohydroximate is composed of layers of molecules, which form cyclic, hydrogen-bonded trimers, whereas the crystals of syn- and anti-ethyl benzohydroximate are composed of dimers formed by pairs of O—H···N hydrogen- bonded molecules.

The molecule of (I) is nearly planar (r.m.s. deviations 0.0546 Å for all non-H atoms). The lengths of the bonds C=N (1.2771 (17) Å) and N—O (1.4286 (13) Å) in (I) are comparable to the mean values found in other oximes (C=N 1.281 Å; N—O 1.394 Å) (Allen et al., 1987). The conformation of the NOH group in the planar ethyl acetohydroximate molecule is trans to N=C. In the crystal, O—H···N are observed forming infinite chains along the b axis (Fig. 2) with a graph-set motif of C(3) (Etter et al., 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995).

Related literature top

For related structures, see: Kjaer et al. (1977); Larsen (1971). For studies of the IR spectra of hydrogen bonding in oxime derivatives, see: Flakus et al. (2012). For typical bond distances, see: Allen et al. (1987). For hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Bernstein et al. (1995); Etter et al. (1990).

Experimental top

Ethyl acetohydroximate was purchased from Aldrich-Sigma. Crystals of title compound, suitable for X-ray diffraction, were selected directly from purchased sample.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top

	Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of (I), with the atom-numbering scheme, showing 50% probability displacement ellipsoids. H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radius.
	Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the C(3) chains. The red lines indicate the hydrogen-bonding interactions. For the sake of clarity, all H atoms bonded to C atoms were omitted.

Ethyl N-hydroxyethanecarboximidate top

Crystal data top

C₄H₉NO₂	F(000) = 448
M_r = 103.12	D_x = 1.235 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, C2/c	Melting point = 296–298 K
Hall symbol: -C 2yc	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 19.9481 (9) Å	Cell parameters from 6376 reflections
b = 4.4138 (1) Å	θ = 3.1–34.4°
c = 13.3277 (5) Å	µ = 0.10 mm⁻¹
β = 109.027 (4)°	T = 100 K
V = 1109.35 (7) Å³	Needle, colourless
Z = 8	0.52 × 0.18 × 0.14 mm

Data collection top

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire3 detector	970 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	868 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.025
Detector resolution: 16.0328 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 25.1°, θ_min = 3.2°
ω–scan	h = −22→23
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)	k = −2→5
T_min = 0.505, T_max = 1.000	l = −15→15
6699 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.034	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.098	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0616P)² + 0.5949P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
970 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
69 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.22 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.22 e Å⁻³

Crystal data top

C₄H₉NO₂	V = 1109.35 (7) Å³
M_r = 103.12	Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/c	Mo Kα radiation
a = 19.9481 (9) Å	µ = 0.10 mm⁻¹
b = 4.4138 (1) Å	T = 100 K
c = 13.3277 (5) Å	0.52 × 0.18 × 0.14 mm
β = 109.027 (4)°

Data collection top

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer with a Sapphire3 detector	970 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)	868 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.505, T_max = 1.000	R_int = 0.025
6699 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.034	0 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.098	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.08	Δρ_max = 0.22 e Å⁻³
970 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.22 e Å⁻³
69 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
O1	0.31644 (5)	0.6668 (2)	0.82875 (7)	0.0201 (3)
O2	0.39491 (4)	0.1706 (2)	0.69431 (7)	0.0185 (3)
N1	0.31725 (5)	0.4501 (2)	0.74954 (8)	0.0165 (3)
C1	0.38102 (7)	0.3704 (3)	0.76216 (10)	0.0158 (3)
C2	0.44623 (7)	0.4799 (3)	0.84598 (10)	0.0215 (3)
H2A	0.4568	0.6871	0.8294	0.032*
H2B	0.4862	0.3472	0.8486	0.032*
H2C	0.4385	0.4774	0.9149	0.032*
C3	0.33586 (7)	0.0728 (3)	0.60358 (10)	0.0187 (3)
H3A	0.3103	0.2503	0.5636	0.022*
H3B	0.3022	−0.0497	0.6271	0.022*
C4	0.36699 (8)	−0.1145 (3)	0.53500 (11)	0.0235 (3)
H4A	0.3987	0.0118	0.5100	0.035*
H4B	0.3287	−0.1929	0.4739	0.035*
H4C	0.3938	−0.2843	0.5765	0.035*
H1	0.2735 (10)	0.740 (4)	0.8065 (13)	0.035*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
O1	0.0168 (5)	0.0243 (5)	0.0190 (5)	0.0038 (4)	0.0054 (4)	−0.0041 (4)
O2	0.0153 (5)	0.0230 (5)	0.0163 (5)	0.0012 (3)	0.0041 (4)	−0.0017 (4)
N1	0.0170 (6)	0.0172 (6)	0.0154 (6)	−0.0001 (4)	0.0052 (4)	0.0006 (4)
C1	0.0167 (7)	0.0174 (6)	0.0140 (6)	0.0000 (5)	0.0062 (5)	0.0034 (5)
C2	0.0152 (7)	0.0290 (7)	0.0193 (7)	0.0011 (5)	0.0042 (5)	−0.0014 (6)
C3	0.0175 (7)	0.0201 (7)	0.0164 (7)	−0.0019 (5)	0.0026 (5)	0.0002 (5)
C4	0.0282 (7)	0.0241 (7)	0.0188 (7)	−0.0025 (6)	0.0086 (6)	−0.0006 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O1—N1	1.4286 (13)	C2—H2C	0.9800
O1—H1	0.871 (19)	C3—C4	1.5082 (17)
O2—C1	1.3547 (15)	C3—H3A	0.9900
O2—C3	1.4517 (15)	C3—H3B	0.9900
N1—C1	1.2771 (17)	C4—H4A	0.9800
C1—C2	1.4922 (17)	C4—H4B	0.9800
C2—H2A	0.9800	C4—H4C	0.9800
C2—H2B	0.9800

N1—O1—H1	104.1 (11)	O2—C3—C4	106.57 (10)
C1—O2—C3	117.55 (9)	O2—C3—H3A	110.4
C1—N1—O1	109.76 (10)	C4—C3—H3A	110.4
N1—C1—O2	120.21 (12)	O2—C3—H3B	110.4
N1—C1—C2	126.66 (12)	C4—C3—H3B	110.4
O2—C1—C2	113.11 (10)	H3A—C3—H3B	108.6
C1—C2—H2A	109.5	C3—C4—H4A	109.5
C1—C2—H2B	109.5	C3—C4—H4B	109.5
H2A—C2—H2B	109.5	H4A—C4—H4B	109.5
C1—C2—H2C	109.5	C3—C4—H4C	109.5
H2A—C2—H2C	109.5	H4A—C4—H4C	109.5
H2B—C2—H2C	109.5	H4B—C4—H4C	109.5

O1—N1—C1—O2	−178.49 (9)	C3—O2—C1—C2	−174.04 (10)
O1—N1—C1—C2	0.24 (17)	C1—O2—C3—C4	173.10 (10)
C3—O2—C1—N1	4.85 (16)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1—H1···N1ⁱ	0.871 (19)	1.954 (19)	2.8196 (14)	172.4 (16)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1—H1···N1ⁱ	0.871 (19)	1.954 (19)	2.8196 (14)	172.4 (16)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2.

References

Allen, F. A., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19. CrossRef Google Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davies, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Flakus, H., Hachuła, B. & Garbacz, A. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. A116, 11553–11567. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Kjaer, A., Larsen, I. K. & Sivertsen, P. (1977). Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B, 31, 415–423. Google Scholar
Larsen, I. K. (1971). Acta Chem. Scand. 25, 2409–2420. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Wrocław, Poland. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 69| Part 9| September 2013| Page o1418

doi:10.1107/S1600536813022368

Open

access