metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Tri­methyl­phospho­nium trans-tetra­chlorido­bis­­(tri­methyl­phosphane-κP)iridate(III)

aDepartment of Chemistry, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: jmerola@vt.edu

(Received 30 January 2014; accepted 17 February 2014; online 22 February 2014)

The title compound, [HP(CH3)3][IrCl4{(H3C)3P}2], consists of a tri­methyl­phospho­nium cation and a tetra­chlorido­bis­(tri­methyl­phosphane)iridate(III) anion. The anion has an octa­hedral arrangement of ligands, with the tri­methyl­phosphane groups occupying trans positions. The IrIII atom sits on an inversion center with one P(CH3)3 ligand and two chloride ligands in the asymmetric unit. The tri­methyl­phospho­nium cation is disordered about a twofold rotation axis. The title compound is the first structurally characterized tetra­chlorido­bis­(phosphane)iridate complex.

Related literature

The structure of [((H3C)3As)ClPd(μ-Cl)2IrCl2(P(CH3)2(C6H5))2] can be found in: Briant et al. (1981[Briant, C. E., Rowland, K. A., Webber, C. T. & Mingos, D. M. P. (1981). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1515-1519.]) (CCDC:530747). The structure of [P(C6H5)4][((H3C—CH2)3P)2RhCl4] can be found in: Cotton & Kang (1993[Cotton, F. A. & Kang, S. J. (1993). Inorg. Chem. 32, 2336-2342.]) (CCDC:632517). Previous work on ((H3C)3P)3IrCl3 can be found in: Merola et al. (2013[Merola, J. S., Franks, M. A. & Frazier, J. F. (2013). Polyhedron, 54, 67-73.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • (C3H10P)[IrCl4(C3H9P)2]

  • Mr = 563.22

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 15.1814 (5) Å

  • b = 9.8502 (3) Å

  • c = 13.0943 (3) Å

  • β = 91.843 (2)°

  • V = 1957.09 (9) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 7.60 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.20 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm

Data collection
  • Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: Gaussian (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013[Agilent (2013). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies UK Ltd, Yarnton, England.]) Tmin = 0.360, Tmax = 0.570

  • 10332 measured reflections

  • 3121 independent reflections

  • 2511 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.031

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028

  • wR(F2) = 0.079

  • S = 0.98

  • 3121 reflections

  • 97 parameters

  • 3 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 1.97 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.93 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013[Agilent (2013). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies UK Ltd, Yarnton, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009[Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339-341.]); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2.

Supporting information


Comment top

We have been investigating the chemistry of iridium with the strongly electron-donating ligand, trimethylphosphane, for some time. In a recent publication, we discussed how [Ir(COD)(P(CH3)3)3]Cl can be converted into mer,tris-(trimethylphosphane)trichloroiridium whose crystals tenaciously hold onto many different solvents (Merola et al., 2013). A direct reaction between IrCl3·H2O and P(CH3)3 was attempted to make the same compound in a more direct way, but that reaction did not give a clean product and only a small number of crystals of the title product were obtained.

The title compound crystallizes in the C2/c space group and the iridium sits on an inversion center. Thus, the iridium (1/2 occupancy), two chlorine atoms and one P(CH3)3 group are unique with the remainder of the [((CH3)3P)2IrCl4] anion being generated by the inversion operator. The cation, trimethylphosphonium, lies slightly offset from a 2-fold rotation axis resulting in a disordered [HP(CH3)3]+ ion where the two sites are generated by the rotation. In aqueous ethanol, reduction of some of the iridium(III)chloride to iridium(I) species will generate HCl and thus lead to the formation of the trimethylphosphonium cation.

This compound is the first crystallographically characterized compound with the [(Me3P)2IrCl4]- ion. The closest analog in the iridium family is a bis-phenyldimethylphosphane complex of iridium with two terminal chlorines and two chlorines bridging between iridium and palladium (Briant et al., 1981). The closest structure to the title iridium compound in the literature is the rhodium analog with triethylphosphane ligands (Cotton & Kang, 1993).

Related literature top

The structure of [((H3C)3As)ClPd(µ-Cl)2IrCl2(P(CH3)2(C6H5))2] can be found in: Briant et al. (1981) (CCDC:530747). The structure of [P(C6H5)4][((H3C—CH2)3P)2IrCl4] can be found in: Cotton & Kang (1993) (CCDC:632517). Previous work on ((H3C)3P)3IrCl3 can be found in: Merola et al. (2013).

Experimental top

Trimethylphosphane (0.19 g, 2.55 mmol) and IrCl3.H2O (0.100 g, 0.80 mmol) were refluxed in 95% aqueous ethanol for 3 hr. At the end of that time, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure yielding 0.20 g of a dark, brown, sticky powder. 1H NMR spectroscopy indicated that a number of different species were present, possibly with various numbers of PMe3 and chloride on iridium as well as a mixture of iridium(III) and iridium(I) species. Attempts to separate different complexes were unsuccessful. A small portion of the solid was dissolved in dichloromethane and the solvent was allowed to evaporate slowly. After evaporation, a very few crystals of the title compound suitable for X-ray diffraction were formed and used for this experiment.

Refinement top

The trimethylphosphonium cation is disordered about a twofold axis and was modeled with each trimethylphosphonium fragment at 50% occupancy. P—C distances within the disordered fragment were restrained to be similar (esd 0.02 Å). Methyl carbon atoms C4 and C5 of the two disordered moieties do overlap substantially and were constrained to have identical ADPs. H atoms were placed at calculated positions and refined using a model in which the hydrogen rides on the atom to which it is attached. For methyl hydrogen atoms Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C). The phosphonium H atom was treated with an idealized tetrahedral geometry (AFIX 13) with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(P).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The thermal ellipsoid representation of the fully grown anion/cation pair with atoms labeled with the symmetry operation generating them. Each trimethylphosphonium fragment has 50% occupancy with one fragment indicated by different shading. With the exception of the P—H hydrogen atoms, H atoms are omitted for clarity. The displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
Trimethylphosphonium trans-tetrachloridobis(trimethylphosphane-κP)iridate(III) top
Crystal data top
(C3H10P)[IrCl4(C3H9P)2]F(000) = 1088
Mr = 563.22Dx = 1.912 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 15.1814 (5) ÅCell parameters from 4635 reflections
b = 9.8502 (3) Åθ = 4.5–31.7°
c = 13.0943 (3) ŵ = 7.60 mm1
β = 91.843 (2)°T = 100 K
V = 1957.09 (9) Å3Prism, clear light brown
Z = 40.20 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm
Data collection top
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
diffractometer
3121 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source2511 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
Detector resolution: 16.0355 pixels mm-1θmax = 32.0°, θmin = 4.1°
ω and π scansh = 2217
Absorption correction: gaussian
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013)
k = 1414
Tmin = 0.360, Tmax = 0.570l = 1819
10332 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.079H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0438P)2 + 4.5906P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3121 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
97 parametersΔρmax = 1.97 e Å3
3 restraintsΔρmin = 0.93 e Å3
Crystal data top
(C3H10P)[IrCl4(C3H9P)2]V = 1957.09 (9) Å3
Mr = 563.22Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 15.1814 (5) ŵ = 7.60 mm1
b = 9.8502 (3) ÅT = 100 K
c = 13.0943 (3) Å0.20 × 0.13 × 0.09 mm
β = 91.843 (2)°
Data collection top
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
diffractometer
3121 independent reflections
Absorption correction: gaussian
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013)
2511 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.360, Tmax = 0.570Rint = 0.031
10332 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0283 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.079H-atom parameters constrained
S = 0.98Δρmax = 1.97 e Å3
3121 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.93 e Å3
97 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Absorption correction: CrysAlisPro (Agilent, 2013) Numerical absorption correction based on gaussian integration over a multifaceted crystal model

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Ir10.25000.25000.50000.02041 (7)
Cl10.10488 (6)0.33083 (11)0.52340 (8)0.0362 (2)
Cl20.26795 (8)0.22552 (10)0.67847 (7)0.0333 (2)
P10.31064 (7)0.46585 (10)0.51853 (7)0.02636 (19)
C10.4083 (3)0.4741 (4)0.6014 (3)0.0372 (9)
H1A0.39290.45010.67130.056*
H1B0.43230.56650.60070.056*
H1C0.45260.41040.57720.056*
C20.2402 (3)0.5911 (4)0.5739 (3)0.0380 (9)
H2A0.21820.55660.63850.057*
H2B0.19030.61010.52660.057*
H2C0.27370.67480.58660.057*
C30.3468 (3)0.5433 (4)0.4021 (3)0.0315 (8)
H3A0.37400.63140.41780.047*
H3B0.29610.55630.35490.047*
H3C0.39000.48420.37030.047*
P20.50757 (18)0.99525 (19)0.22786 (14)0.0272 (4)0.50
H20.53660.96180.16520.033*0.50
C40.5875 (7)1.0818 (16)0.3085 (10)0.0316 (17)0.50
H4A0.62901.01560.33860.047*0.50
H4B0.55751.12930.36320.047*0.50
H4C0.61971.14760.26780.047*0.50
C50.4190 (7)1.1060 (16)0.1915 (11)0.0316 (17)0.50
H5A0.37851.05910.14360.047*0.50
H5B0.44251.18710.15870.047*0.50
H5C0.38731.13280.25230.047*0.50
C60.4725 (6)0.8538 (9)0.3010 (7)0.042 (2)0.50
H6A0.52360.79790.32070.063*0.50
H6B0.43050.79950.25990.063*0.50
H6C0.44400.88640.36250.063*0.50
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Ir10.02394 (11)0.02238 (11)0.01471 (10)0.00069 (6)0.00252 (7)0.00009 (6)
Cl10.0274 (4)0.0375 (5)0.0434 (5)0.0035 (4)0.0001 (4)0.0059 (4)
Cl20.0483 (6)0.0369 (5)0.0145 (4)0.0021 (4)0.0047 (4)0.0010 (3)
P10.0321 (5)0.0243 (4)0.0223 (4)0.0017 (4)0.0043 (4)0.0002 (3)
C10.043 (2)0.031 (2)0.036 (2)0.0080 (17)0.0141 (18)0.0007 (17)
C20.052 (3)0.0272 (19)0.035 (2)0.0029 (18)0.0015 (19)0.0082 (16)
C30.034 (2)0.031 (2)0.0292 (18)0.0034 (15)0.0006 (15)0.0042 (15)
P20.0301 (11)0.0283 (8)0.0233 (13)0.0010 (8)0.0010 (11)0.0018 (6)
C40.030 (2)0.021 (5)0.044 (2)0.000 (3)0.0014 (19)0.001 (4)
C50.030 (2)0.021 (5)0.044 (2)0.000 (3)0.0014 (19)0.001 (4)
C60.036 (4)0.040 (5)0.050 (5)0.014 (4)0.014 (4)0.020 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Ir1—Cl1i2.3717 (9)C3—H3B0.9800
Ir1—Cl12.3717 (9)C3—H3C0.9800
Ir1—Cl22.3564 (9)P2—H21.0000
Ir1—Cl2i2.3564 (9)P2—C41.798 (10)
Ir1—P12.3264 (10)P2—C51.785 (12)
Ir1—P1i2.3264 (10)P2—C61.781 (7)
P1—C11.811 (4)C4—H4A0.9800
P1—C21.800 (4)C4—H4B0.9800
P1—C31.807 (4)C4—H4C0.9800
C1—H1A0.9800C5—H5A0.9800
C1—H1B0.9800C5—H5B0.9800
C1—H1C0.9800C5—H5C0.9800
C2—H2A0.9800C6—H6A0.9800
C2—H2B0.9800C6—H6B0.9800
C2—H2C0.9800C6—H6C0.9800
C3—H3A0.9800
Cl1—Ir1—Cl1i180.0P1—C1—H1C109.5
Cl2i—Ir1—Cl1i89.11 (4)H1A—C1—H1B109.5
Cl2—Ir1—Cl1i90.89 (4)H1A—C1—H1C109.5
Cl2i—Ir1—Cl190.89 (4)H1B—C1—H1C109.5
Cl2—Ir1—Cl189.11 (4)P1—C2—H2A109.5
Cl2—Ir1—Cl2i180.0P1—C2—H2B109.5
P1—Ir1—Cl192.63 (3)P1—C2—H2C109.5
P1i—Ir1—Cl187.37 (3)H2A—C2—H2B109.5
P1i—Ir1—Cl1i92.63 (3)H2A—C2—H2C109.5
P1—Ir1—Cl1i87.37 (3)H2B—C2—H2C109.5
P1i—Ir1—Cl2i87.56 (3)P1—C3—H3A109.5
P1—Ir1—Cl2i92.44 (3)P1—C3—H3B109.5
P1—Ir1—Cl287.56 (3)P1—C3—H3C109.5
P1i—Ir1—Cl292.44 (3)H3A—C3—H3B109.5
P1i—Ir1—P1180.0H3A—C3—H3C109.5
C1—P1—Ir1114.66 (14)H3B—C3—H3C109.5
C1—P1—C3102.8 (2)C4—P2—H2109.3
C2—P1—Ir1115.48 (15)C5—P2—H2109.3
C2—P1—C1102.3 (2)C5—P2—C4110.8 (4)
C2—P1—C3104.5 (2)C6—P2—H2109.3
C3—P1—Ir1115.34 (14)C6—P2—C4105.2 (6)
P1—C1—H1A109.5C6—P2—C5112.7 (5)
P1—C1—H1B109.5
Cl1i—Ir1—P1—C145.68 (17)Cl2—Ir1—P1—C145.32 (17)
Cl1—Ir1—P1—C1134.32 (17)Cl2i—Ir1—P1—C1134.68 (17)
Cl1—Ir1—P1—C215.72 (17)Cl2i—Ir1—P1—C2106.72 (17)
Cl1i—Ir1—P1—C2164.28 (17)Cl2—Ir1—P1—C273.28 (17)
Cl1—Ir1—P1—C3106.51 (15)Cl2—Ir1—P1—C3164.50 (15)
Cl1i—Ir1—P1—C373.49 (15)Cl2i—Ir1—P1—C315.50 (15)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula(C3H10P)[IrCl4(C3H9P)2]
Mr563.22
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)15.1814 (5), 9.8502 (3), 13.0943 (3)
β (°) 91.843 (2)
V3)1957.09 (9)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)7.60
Crystal size (mm)0.20 × 0.13 × 0.09
Data collection
DiffractometerAgilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
diffractometer
Absorption correctionGaussian
(CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2013)
Tmin, Tmax0.360, 0.570
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
10332, 3121, 2511
Rint0.031
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.746
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.079, 0.98
No. of reflections3121
No. of parameters97
No. of restraints3
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)1.97, 0.93

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2013), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

 

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Science Foundation for funds (grant CHE-01311288) for the purchase of the Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur2 single-crystal diffractometer. We also thank the Virginia Tech Subvention Fund for covering the open source fee for publication.

References

First citationAgilent (2013). CrysAlis PRO. Agilent Technologies UK Ltd, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
First citationBriant, C. E., Rowland, K. A., Webber, C. T. & Mingos, D. M. P. (1981). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1515–1519.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCotton, F. A. & Kang, S. J. (1993). Inorg. Chem. 32, 2336–2342.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMerola, J. S., Franks, M. A. & Frazier, J. F. (2013). Polyhedron, 54, 67–73.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds