organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 6| June 2014| Pages o666-o667

2-(5-Iodo-2-oxoindolin-3-yl­­idene)hydrazinecarbo­thio­amide including an unknown solvate

aEscola de Química e Alimentos, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Av. Itália, km 08, Campus Carreiros, 96203-900, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil, and bDepartamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Av. Roraima, Campus, 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
*Correspondence e-mail: vanessa.gervini@gmail.com

Edited by R. F. Baggio, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Argentina (Received 2 May 2014; accepted 11 May 2014; online 17 May 2014)

The mol­ecule of the title compound, C9H7IN4OS, is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0373 Å). In the mol­ecule, N—H⋯N and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds generate, respectively, S(5) and S(6) ring motifs. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains propagating along [010]. These chains are linked via S⋯I contacts [3.4915 (16) Å], forming sheets lying parallel to (100). A region of disordered electron density, probably a disordered tetra­hydro­furan solvent mol­ecule, was treated using the SQUEEZE routine in PLATON [Spek (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155]. The formula mass and unit-cell characteristics were not taken into account during refinement.

Related literature

For the synthesis, see: Chiyanzu et al. (2003[Chiyanzu, I., Hansell, E., Gut, J., Rosenthal, P. J., McKerrow, J. H. & Chibale, K. (2003). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 3527-3530.]). For applications, see: Silva et al. (2001[Silva, J. F. M., Garden, S. J. & Pinto, A. C. (2001). J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 12, 273-324.]); Chiyanzu et al. (2003[Chiyanzu, I., Hansell, E., Gut, J., Rosenthal, P. J., McKerrow, J. H. & Chibale, K. (2003). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 3527-3530.]). For similar structures, see: de Bittencourt et al. (2014[Bittencourt, V. C. D. de, Vicenti, J. R. de M., Velasques, J. M., Zambiazi, P. J. & Gervini, V. C. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o64-o65.]); Bandeira et al. (2013[Bandeira, K. C. T., Bresolin, L., Näther, C., Jess, I. & Oliveira, A. B. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o1251-o1252.]); de Oliveira et al. (2012[Oliveira, A. B. de, Silva, C. S., Feitosa, B. R. S., Näther, C. & Jess, I. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o2581.]). For S⋯I inter­actions, see: Auffinger et al. (2004[Auffinger, P., Hays, F. A., Westhof, E. & Ho, P. S. (2004). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 16789-16794.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C9H7IN4OS

  • Mr = 346.15

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 33.765 (5) Å

  • b = 4.4569 (5) Å

  • c = 19.977 (3) Å

  • β = 123.100 (4)°

  • V = 2518.4 (6) Å3

  • Z = 8

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.69 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 1.15 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: numerical (SADABS; Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.777

  • 18679 measured reflections

  • 2892 independent reflections

  • 2577 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.036

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028

  • wR(F2) = 0.062

  • S = 1.05

  • 2892 reflections

  • 161 parameters

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 1.50 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −1.52 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H12⋯N3 0.85 (4) 2.28 (4) 2.633 (3) 105 (3)
N2—H21⋯O1 0.83 (4) 2.07 (4) 2.725 (3) 135 (3)
N4—H41⋯O1i 0.77 (3) 2.04 (4) 2.809 (3) 178 (3)
N1—H11⋯S1ii 0.79 (3) 2.66 (4) 3.448 (3) 170 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y-{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}]; (ii) -x, -y+4, -z+1.

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006[Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]) and PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

Isatins and their derivatives are described as compounds with technological applications, such as organic analytical chemistry and pigments and dyes (Silva et al., 2001). Particularly, halogen substituted isatins containing thiosemicarbazone fragment demonstrated biological activity against some trypanosomes (cruzain and rhodesain) and malaria (falcipain-2) parasites (Chiyanzu et al., 2003). In this paper, we describe the crystal structure of 2-(5-Iodo-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)-hydrazinecarbothioamide, C9H7ON4SI. There is one molecule in the asymmetric unit (Figure 1), and it is very similar to that of the Cl analogue previously published by us (de Bittencourt et al., 2014). The molecule is almost planar (Bandeira et al., 2013; de Oliveira et al., 2012), displaying a r.m.s. deviation of 0.0373 Å for all fitted non-hydrogenoid atoms (with maximum deviation of 0.1057 (12) observed for S1 atom). Although the same intramolecular S(5) and S(6) ring motifs are verified (Table 1), the crystal packing differs totally when compared with the chloro substituted analog. In the present case, co-operative dimmers are formed through N1—H11···S1i interactions displaying distances of 2.67 (4) Å. The crystal structure is expanded along the [010] crystallographic direction through N4—H41···O1ii interactions with distances of 2.08 (4) Å, generating a one-dimensional polymer-like motif. One of the most interesting features are the S···Iiii contacts which further connects the molecules along the [001] crystallographic direction, presenting distances of 3.4915 (16) Å (Figure 2, symmetry codes: (i) –x, 2–y, –z; (ii) 1/2–x, -1/2 + y, 1/2–z; (iii) x, –y, 1/2 + z). Such S···I short interactions are related to be present in sulfur-containing proteins like cysteine and methionine (Auffinger et al., 2004), being mentioned to play an important hole in biological systems. As a second interesting feature, it was noted disordered solvent molecules occupying accessible voids of 83 Å3, suggestive of tetrahydrofuran, which was indeed used for crystallization. Due to this, collected data was treated using the SQUEEZE routine of the PLATON software (Spek, 2009) in order to remove solvent electronic density. The new HKP file generated was then used for further refinement of the final solvent free crystal structure. For solvent-voids position assignement in the unit cell, a solvent plot calculated by PLATON is shown in Figure 3.

Related literature top

For the synthesis, see: Chiyanzu et al. (2003). For applications, see: Silva et al. (2001); Chiyanzu et al. (2003). For similar structures, see: de Bittencourt et al. (2014); Bandeira et al. (2013); de Oliveira et al. (2012). For S···I interactions, see: Auffinger et al. (2004).

Experimental top

To 20 ml of ethanol it was mixed 500 mg (1.83 mmol s) of 5-iodo-isatine with 170 mg (1.83 mmol s) of thiosemicarbazide. Then, it was added ten drops of glacial acetic acid and the system was kept under reflux for four hours. After this time, the reaction mixture was cooled and an orange precipitated was filtered off under vacuum and dried at room temperature. m.p. 249–253 °C. Yield: 98%. Crystallization: needle single crystals of the title compound suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporating a solution containing 30 mg of the product dissolved in 5 ml of tetrahydrofuran.

Refinement top

All H atoms attached to C atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and were refined isotropic with Ueq(H) set to 1.2 times of the Ueq(C). It was used a riding model with aromatic C—H = 0.93 Å. Reflection 200 was omitted due to the large difference observed between Fo2 and Fc2.

The needle-like single crystals were very weakly diffracting for what an unusually large crystal (1.152mm, with a 0.6 mm collimator) was used.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Asymmetric unit of the title compound showing intramolecular hydrogen bond interactions represented with dashed lines. Ellipsoid probability: 50%.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram of the title compound showing hydrogen bond network generated through interactions represented as dashed lines. Some hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity. Symmetry codes: (i) –x, 2–y, –z; (ii) 1/2–x, -1/2 + y, 1/2–z; (iii) x, –y, 1/2 + z.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Plot generated by PLATON showing solvent accessible voids positions in the unit cell as dashed delimited circles.
2-(5-Iodo-2-oxoindolin-3-ylidene)hydrazinecarbothioamide top
Crystal data top
C9H7IN4OSF(000) = 1328
Mr = 346.15Dx = 1.826 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMelting point: 522 K
Hall symbol: -C 2ycMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 33.765 (5) ÅCell parameters from 9997 reflections
b = 4.4569 (5) Åθ = 2.4–28.3°
c = 19.977 (3) ŵ = 2.69 mm1
β = 123.100 (4)°T = 100 K
V = 2518.4 (6) Å3Needle, yellow
Z = 81.15 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2892 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2577 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.036
ϕ and ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.0°
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2009)
h = 4444
Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.777k = 35
18679 measured reflectionsl = 2626
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.062H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0208P)2 + 10.8261P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2892 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
161 parametersΔρmax = 1.50 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 1.52 e Å3
Crystal data top
C9H7IN4OSV = 2518.4 (6) Å3
Mr = 346.15Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 33.765 (5) ŵ = 2.69 mm1
b = 4.4569 (5) ÅT = 100 K
c = 19.977 (3) Å1.15 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm
β = 123.100 (4)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2892 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
(SADABS; Bruker, 2009)
2577 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.701, Tmax = 0.777Rint = 0.036
18679 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.062H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0208P)2 + 10.8261P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2892 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.50 e Å3
161 parametersΔρmin = 1.52 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C60.20209 (11)0.5198 (5)0.48073 (18)0.0190 (6)
H60.21600.37720.46580.023*
C70.22592 (10)0.6149 (6)0.55978 (17)0.0168 (5)
H70.25550.53820.59810.020*
C50.15782 (10)0.6347 (6)0.42365 (16)0.0170 (6)
H410.2442 (12)0.924 (7)0.693 (2)0.016 (8)*
H210.1270 (13)1.502 (7)0.631 (2)0.023 (9)*
H110.0129 (12)1.770 (7)0.4600 (19)0.019 (8)*
H120.0403 (15)1.560 (9)0.449 (3)0.043 (12)*
I10.125098 (8)0.47387 (4)0.306159 (11)0.02521 (7)
S10.06378 (3)1.88628 (14)0.62093 (4)0.01889 (15)
O10.19376 (7)1.3146 (4)0.70372 (11)0.0168 (4)
N40.22091 (9)0.9605 (5)0.65344 (15)0.0145 (5)
N30.11031 (8)1.3194 (4)0.53273 (13)0.0130 (4)
C90.18938 (9)1.1590 (5)0.64912 (16)0.0137 (5)
C10.06744 (9)1.6773 (5)0.55453 (16)0.0140 (5)
N10.03597 (10)1.6699 (6)0.47747 (15)0.0209 (5)
C30.15944 (9)0.9428 (5)0.52186 (16)0.0127 (5)
N20.10679 (9)1.5041 (4)0.58282 (15)0.0145 (5)
C80.20411 (9)0.8269 (5)0.57920 (15)0.0133 (5)
C20.14815 (9)1.1580 (5)0.56399 (15)0.0127 (5)
C40.13579 (10)0.8471 (5)0.44356 (16)0.0143 (5)
H40.10610.92220.40530.017*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C60.0251 (17)0.0160 (11)0.0226 (17)0.0021 (10)0.0173 (14)0.0005 (9)
C70.0115 (15)0.0176 (11)0.0198 (15)0.0015 (9)0.0076 (12)0.0034 (9)
C50.0212 (16)0.0181 (11)0.0129 (15)0.0041 (10)0.0101 (13)0.0011 (9)
I10.04097 (15)0.02153 (9)0.01480 (12)0.00098 (7)0.01630 (11)0.00167 (6)
S10.0206 (4)0.0199 (3)0.0160 (4)0.0050 (2)0.0099 (3)0.0011 (2)
O10.0125 (10)0.0216 (9)0.0106 (10)0.0011 (7)0.0026 (8)0.0027 (7)
N40.0091 (13)0.0177 (10)0.0095 (13)0.0006 (8)0.0005 (11)0.0010 (8)
N30.0119 (12)0.0143 (9)0.0125 (12)0.0011 (8)0.0065 (10)0.0002 (7)
C90.0106 (14)0.0153 (11)0.0124 (14)0.0029 (9)0.0044 (12)0.0013 (9)
C10.0101 (14)0.0154 (11)0.0160 (15)0.0001 (9)0.0068 (12)0.0019 (9)
N10.0137 (14)0.0276 (12)0.0147 (14)0.0078 (10)0.0034 (11)0.0008 (9)
C30.0110 (14)0.0139 (10)0.0123 (14)0.0017 (9)0.0057 (12)0.0019 (8)
N20.0130 (13)0.0168 (10)0.0091 (13)0.0007 (8)0.0030 (10)0.0001 (8)
C80.0117 (14)0.0144 (10)0.0111 (14)0.0011 (9)0.0044 (11)0.0020 (9)
C20.0131 (14)0.0135 (10)0.0090 (13)0.0025 (9)0.0043 (11)0.0008 (8)
C40.0119 (14)0.0159 (11)0.0110 (14)0.0025 (9)0.0036 (11)0.0010 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C6—C71.390 (4)N3—C21.292 (3)
C6—C51.391 (4)N3—N21.350 (3)
C6—H60.9300C9—C21.498 (4)
C7—C81.378 (4)C1—N11.309 (4)
C7—H70.9300C1—N21.364 (3)
C5—C41.389 (4)N1—H110.79 (3)
C5—I12.100 (3)N1—H120.82 (4)
S1—C11.680 (3)C3—C41.379 (4)
O1—C91.232 (3)C3—C81.402 (4)
N4—C91.350 (3)C3—C21.457 (3)
N4—C81.399 (3)N2—H210.83 (4)
N4—H410.77 (3)C4—H40.9300
C7—C6—C5121.0 (2)C1—N1—H11118 (2)
C7—C6—H6119.5C1—N1—H12119 (3)
C5—C6—H6119.5H11—N1—H12122 (4)
C6—C7—C8117.5 (3)C4—C3—C8120.7 (2)
C6—C7—H7121.2C4—C3—C2133.3 (3)
C8—C7—H7121.2C8—C3—C2105.9 (2)
C6—C5—C4121.3 (2)N3—N2—C1119.9 (2)
C6—C5—I1117.67 (19)N3—N2—H21121 (2)
C4—C5—I1121.0 (2)C1—N2—H21119 (2)
C9—N4—C8111.2 (2)C7—C8—N4128.4 (3)
C9—N4—H41122 (2)C7—C8—C3121.6 (2)
C8—N4—H41127 (2)N4—C8—C3110.0 (2)
C2—N3—N2116.5 (2)N3—C2—C3126.1 (2)
O1—C9—N4127.1 (3)N3—C2—C9127.4 (2)
O1—C9—C2126.5 (2)C3—C2—C9106.5 (2)
N4—C9—C2106.4 (2)C3—C4—C5117.8 (2)
N1—C1—N2117.0 (2)C3—C4—H4121.1
N1—C1—S1125.4 (2)C5—C4—H4121.1
N2—C1—S1117.5 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C80.1 (4)C2—C3—C8—N40.6 (3)
C7—C6—C5—C40.3 (4)N2—N3—C2—C3179.7 (2)
C7—C6—C5—I1179.88 (19)N2—N3—C2—C92.1 (4)
C8—N4—C9—O1179.3 (2)C4—C3—C2—N31.1 (5)
C8—N4—C9—C20.5 (3)C8—C3—C2—N3178.9 (2)
C2—N3—N2—C1178.7 (2)C4—C3—C2—C9179.7 (3)
N1—C1—N2—N34.7 (3)C8—C3—C2—C90.3 (3)
S1—C1—N2—N3176.33 (18)O1—C9—C2—N30.4 (4)
C6—C7—C8—N4178.9 (2)N4—C9—C2—N3178.4 (2)
C6—C7—C8—C30.3 (4)O1—C9—C2—C3179.0 (2)
C9—N4—C8—C7180.0 (2)N4—C9—C2—C30.1 (3)
C9—N4—C8—C30.7 (3)C8—C3—C4—C50.4 (4)
C4—C3—C8—C70.0 (4)C2—C3—C4—C5179.5 (3)
C2—C3—C8—C7180.0 (2)C6—C5—C4—C30.5 (4)
C4—C3—C8—N4179.4 (2)I1—C5—C4—C3179.85 (18)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H12···N30.85 (4)2.28 (4)2.633 (3)105 (3)
N2—H21···O10.83 (4)2.07 (4)2.725 (3)135 (3)
N4—H41···O1i0.77 (3)2.04 (4)2.809 (3)178 (3)
N1—H11···S1ii0.79 (3)2.66 (4)3.448 (3)170 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y1/2, z+3/2; (ii) x, y+4, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H12···N30.85 (4)2.28 (4)2.633 (3)105 (3)
N2—H21···O10.83 (4)2.07 (4)2.725 (3)135 (3)
N4—H41···O1i0.77 (3)2.04 (4)2.809 (3)178 (3)
N1—H11···S1ii0.79 (3)2.66 (4)3.448 (3)170 (3)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y1/2, z+3/2; (ii) x, y+4, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Professor Dr Manfredo Hörner (Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil) for his help and support with the X-ray measurements. We also acknowledge financial support through the DECIT/SCTIE-MS-CNPq-FAPERGS-Pronem-# 11/2029–1 and PRONEX-CNPq-FAPERGS projects.

References

First citationAuffinger, P., Hays, F. A., Westhof, E. & Ho, P. S. (2004). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 16789–16794.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBandeira, K. C. T., Bresolin, L., Näther, C., Jess, I. & Oliveira, A. B. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, o1251–o1252.  CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBittencourt, V. C. D. de, Vicenti, J. R. de M., Velasques, J. M., Zambiazi, P. J. & Gervini, V. C. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o64–o65.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2009). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationChiyanzu, I., Hansell, E., Gut, J., Rosenthal, P. J., McKerrow, J. H. & Chibale, K. (2003). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 3527–3530.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationOliveira, A. B. de, Silva, C. S., Feitosa, B. R. S., Näther, C. & Jess, I. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o2581.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSilva, J. F. M., Garden, S. J. & Pinto, A. C. (2001). J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 12, 273–324.  CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 6| June 2014| Pages o666-o667
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds