structural communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Volume 67| Part 9| September 2011| Pages 1055-1059

Structure of fructose bis­phosphate aldolase from Encephalitozoon cuniculi

aEmerald BioStructures, 7869 NE Day Road West, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110, USA,bAdvanced Light Source, USA, and cDepartment of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Washington, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: agardberg@embios.com

(Received 20 December 2010; accepted 6 June 2011; online 13 August 2011)

Fructose bisphosphate aldolose (FBPA) enzymes have been found in a broad range of eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms. FBPA catalyses the cleavage of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate into glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and dihydroxy­acetone phosphate. The SSGCID has reported several FBPA structures from pathogenic sources. Bioinformatic analysis of the genome of the eukaryotic microsporidian parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi revealed an FBPA homolog. The structures of this enzyme in the presence of the native substrate FBP and also with the partial substrate analog phosphate are reported. The purified enzyme crystallized in 90 mM Bis-Tris propane pH 6.5, 18% PEG 3350, 18 mM NaKHPO4, 10 mM urea for the phosphate-bound form and 100 mM Bis-Tris propane pH 6.5, 20% PEG 3350, 20 mM fructose 1,6-­bisphosphate for the FBP-bound form. In both cases protein was present at 25 mg ml−1 and the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method was used. For the FBP-bound form, a data set to 2.37 Å resolution was collected from a single crystal at 100 K. The crystal belonged to the orthorhombic space group C2221, with unit-cell parameters a = 121.46, b = 135.82, c = 61.54 Å. The structure was refined to a final free R factor of 20.8%. For the phosphate-bound form, a data set was collected to 2.00 Å resolution. The space group was also C2221 and the unit-cell parameters were a = 121.96, b = 137.61, c = 62.23 Å. The structure shares the typical barrel tertiary structure reported for previous FBPA structures and exhibits the same Schiff base in the active site. The quaternary structure is dimeric. This work provides a direct experimental result for the substrate-binding conformation of the product state of E. cuniculi FBPA.

1. Introduction

1.1. SSGCID

The Seattle Structural Genomics Center for Infectious Disease (SSGCID) is one of two consortia funded by NIAID to apply genome-scale approaches to the solution of protein structures from bio­defense organisms, as well as those causing emerging and re-emerging diseases. In its first three and a half years, the SSGCID has submitted >350 protein structures to the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and is on track to solve a further 100–125 per year going forward. For several organisms, this represents the majority of PDB submissions during this time, including 100% of the structures for Ehrlichia, Anaplasma and Burkholderia. SSGCID's target-selection strategy has focused on drug targets, essential enzymes, virulence factors and vaccine candidates from a number of bacterial (Bartonella, Brucella, Ehrlichia, Anaplasma, Rickettsia, Burkholderia, Borrelia and Mycobacterium) and eukaryotic (Babesia, Cryptosporidium, Toxoplasma, Giardia, Entamoeba, Coccidioides and Encephalitozoon) pathogens, as well as ssDNA and negative-strand ssRNA viruses. More than 3000 targets have been selected to date, with >700 proteins being purified for crystallization trials. Crystallization screening and analysis of X-ray diffraction data sets for structure solution was performed at Emerald BioStructures.

Aldolases (EC 4.1.2) are enzymes that cleave aldols and they have been the subject of crystallographic study since 1971 (Heidner et al., 1971[Heidner, E. G., Weber, B. H. & Eisenberg, D. (1971). Science, 171, 677-679.]), with a 4 Å resolution crystal structure being determined in 1984 (Carrell et al., 1984[Carrell, H. L., Rubin, B. H., Hurley, T. J. & Glusker, J. P. (1984). J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3230-3236.]). To date, more than 70 unique aldolase structures have been deposited in the PDB. The glycolytic enzyme fructose bisphosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.13) catalyzes the aldol cleavage of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate. It also catalyzes the reverse reaction. The hallmark of a class I aldolase is the presence of an active-site lysine residue which forms a Schiff base with the substrate. Encephalitozoon cuniculi is a microsporidian parasite that can infect a wide range of hosts, including rats and mice, and is one of 14 microsporidians known to be human pathogens. Here, we present two crystal structures of the class I fructose bisphosphate aldolase enzyme from E. cuniculi: one with the reactant bound at the active site and the other with the partial substrate mimic phosphate.

2. Materials and methods

All expression clones, purified proteins and protein structures produced by SSGCID are available to the scientific community.

2.1. Protein purification and crystallization

2.1.1. Purification of E. cuniculi aldolase

Fructose bisphosphate aldolase (FBPA) from E. cuniculi (NCBI 6035; UniProt Q8SSM8; Pfam ID PF00274; EC 4.1.2.13) spanning the full-length protein from residues 1 to 338 was cloned into a pAVA0421 vector using ligation-independent cloning (LIC; Aslanidis & de Jong, 1990[Aslanidis, C. & de Jong, P. J. (1990). Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6069-6074.]). The protein was expressed in Escherichia coli using BL21(DE3)R3 Rosetta cells and autoinduction medium in a LEX bioreactor. The frozen cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 30 mM imidazole, 0.025% sodium azide, 0.5% CHAPS, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM TCEP, 250 ng ml−1 AEBSF and 0.05 µg ml−1 lysozyme). The resuspended cell pellet was disrupted on ice for 30 min with a Virtis sonicator (408912; set at 100 W power, with alternating cycles of 15 s pulse-on and 15 s pulse-off). The cell debris was incubated with 20 µl Benzonase nuclease (25 units ml−1) at room temperature for 45 min and clarified by centrifugation on a Sorvall SLA-1500 at 14 000 rev min−1 for 75 min at 277 K. The protein was purified from the clarified cell lysate by immobilized metal-affinity chromatography on a HisTrap FF 5 ml column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with binding buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, 30 mM imidazole, 0.025% sodium azide, 1 mM TCEP). The recombinant protein was eluted with 250 mM imidazole. The purification tag (MAHHHHHHMGTLEAQTQG­PGS) was not cleaved. This sample was further polished using a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) column (GE Healthcare). Pure fractions collected in SEC buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 0.025% sodium azide, 5% glycerol) in the major peak of the chromatogram (estimated molecular weight from SEC of 51 kDa) were pooled. The expected molecular weight of the protein was 40 kDa, which was verified by SDS–PAGE analysis. The protein was concentrated to 25 mg ml−1 using Amicon Ultra 10K centrifugal filters (Millipore). The concentrated sample was flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen and stored at 193 K prior to crystallization.

2.1.2. Crystallization of E. cuniculi aldolase with the partial substrate phosphate

E. cuniculi aldolase at 25 mg ml−1 (0.6 mM) in SEC buffer (see above) was initially crystallized in PACT screen (Newman et al., 2005[Newman, J., Egan, D., Walter, T. S., Meged, R., Berry, I., Ben Jelloul, M., Sussman, J. L., Stuart, D. I. & Perrakis, A. (2005). Acta Cryst. D61, 1426-1431.]) condition F10 and optimized with the ADDit Additive Screen (Emerald BioSystems). Aldolase stock solutions (0.4 µl) were mixed with reservoir (0.4 µl) and equilibrated against a 80 µl reservoir of precipitant (crystallant) using 96-well Compact Jr plates from Emerald BioSystems. The final crystallization conditions were 90 mM Bis-Tris propane pH 6.5, 18% PEG 3350, 18 mM NaKHPO4, 10 mM urea, with protein at 25 mg ml−1. Crystals were obtained by sitting-drop vapor diffusion at 290 K. Cryoprotection used a solution consisting of 80% well solution and 20% glycerol.

2.1.3. Crystallization of E. cuniculi aldolase with the native substrate fructose 1,6-bisphosphate

E. cuniculi aldolase was co­crystallized with fructose 1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) in a condition based on PACT screen condition F10 with the phosphate reagent omitted from and FBP added to the protein solution (consisting of aldolase in SEC buffer). The final crystallization conditions were 100 mM Bis-Tris propane pH 6.5, 20% PEG 3350, 10 mM FBP, with protein at 20 mg ml−1. Crystals were obtained by sitting-drop vapor diffusion at 290 K. A solution consisting of 80% reservoir solution and 20% glycerol was used for cryoprotection.

2.2. Data collection, processing, structure solution and refinement

All data were indexed, integrated and scaled with the XDS suite (Kabsch, 2010[Kabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125-132.]). Data-collection and processing statistics are presented in Table 1[link]. Refinement and validation parameters are presented in Table 2[link].

Table 1
Data-collection statistics

Values in parentheses are for the highest of 20 resolution shells.

  Phosphate-bound FBP-bound
Space group C2221 C2221
Unit-cell parameters (Å) a = 121.960, b = 137.610, c = 62.230 a = 121.460, b = 135.820, c = 61.540
Resolution range (Å) 35.34–2.0 (2.05–2.00) 28.03–2.37 (2.43–2.37)
Unique reflections 35720 21046
Multiplicity 6.2 (6.1) 4.4 (4.4)
Completeness (%) 99.8 (99.3) 99.7 (99.6)
Rmerge 0.056 (0.489) 0.081 (0.479)
Mean I/σ(I) 21.830 15.350
Rmerge = [\textstyle \sum_{h}\sum_{i}|I_{i}(h) - \langle I(h)\rangle|/][\textstyle \sum_{h}\sum_{i}I_{i}(h)]

Table 2
Refinement and validation statistics

  Phosphate-bound FBP-bound
Resolution range (Å) 35.34–2.00 28.07–2.37
Rcryst 0.162 0.165
Rfree 0.190 0.208
R.m.s.d. bonds (Å) 0.015 0.016
R.m.s.d. angles (°) 1.395 1.499
Protein atoms 2631 2617
Nonprotein atoms 198 114
Mean B factor (Å2) 29.4 24.9
Ligand B factor (Å2) 37.8 26.1
Residues in favored region (%) 97.9 98.51
Residues in allowed region (%) 1.04 1.49
MolProbity score [percentile] 1.13 [100th] 1.32 [100th]
PDB code 3mbd 3mbf
Rcryst = [\textstyle \sum_{hkl}\big ||F_{\rm obs}|-|F_{\rm calc}|\big |/][\textstyle \sum_{hkl}|F_{\rm obs}|]. Rfree was calculated using the 5% of the reflections that were omitted from the refinement.
2.2.1. E. cuniculi aldolase with the partial substrate phosphate

Data were collected on ALS beamline 5.0.1 as part of the Collaborative Crystallography Project. The wavelength was 0.9774 Å and the detector was an ADSC Quantum 210. The crystal-to-detector distance was 186 mm. 250 frames were collected with a width of 1° in φ at 100 K.

The structure was solved by molecular replacement with Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007[McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658-674.]) using a search model prepared from human aldolase (PDB entry 1qo5 ; Dalby et al., 2001[Dalby, A. R., Tolan, D. R. & Littlechild, J. A. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1526-1533.]) with the CCP4i (Winn et al., 2011[Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235-242.]) interface to CHAINSAW (Stein, 2008[Stein, N. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 641-643.]). The structure was rebuilt in Coot (Emsley & Cowtan, 2004[Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126-2132.]) and refined with REFMAC5 (Murshudov et al., 2011[Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355-367.]).

2.2.2. E. cuniculi aldolase with the native substrate fructose 1,6-­bisphosphate

Data were collected on SSRL beamline 7.1 at 100 K via a remote data-collection protocol. 220 frames, each of 0.5° in φ, were collected at a crystal-to-detector distance of 280 mm at an X-ray wavelength of 0.98 Å using an ADSC Q315 detector. The structure was solved by difference Fourier methods using the structure of E. cuniculi aldolase as determined for the phosphate-bound form, but with the phosphate ion and all water molecules removed from the input file.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Overall structure

Fructose bisphosphate aldolase from E. cuniculi (EcFBPA) adopts the TIM-barrel fold typical of aldolases. It has 37–42% sequence identity to aldolases from other eukaryotes, such as those from Drosophila, Plasmodium, Babesia and mammalian aldolases B and C. The final phosphate-bound model contained one copy of FBPA spanning residues 2–337, one phosphate ion, one chloride ion and 192 water molecules. For FBP-bound FBPA, the final model contained one copy of FBPA spanning residues 2–338, one linear FBP molecule and 95 water molecules.

Human and rabbit liver, muscle and brain aldolases adopt tetrameric quaternary structures, as do Drosophila, Plasmodium, Babesia bovis, Leishmania mexicana (PDB entries 1epx and 2qdg ; Chudzik et al., 2000[Chudzik, D. M., Michels, P. A., de Walque, S. & Hol, W. G. (2000). J. Mol. Biol. 300, 697-707.]; Lafrance-Vanasse & Sygusch, 2007[Lafrance-Vanasse, J. & Sygusch, J. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 9533-9540.]), Trypanosoma brucei (PDB entry 1f2j ; Chudzik et al., 2000[Chudzik, D. M., Michels, P. A., de Walque, S. & Hol, W. G. (2000). J. Mol. Biol. 300, 697-707.]) and Bartonella henselae aldolases (PDB entry 3mmt ; Gardberg et al., 2011[Gardberg, A., Abendroth, J., Bhandari, J., Sankaran, B. & Staker, B. (2011). Acta Cryst. F67, 1051-1054.]), although there is a D128V variant of rabbit muscle aldolase that forms a dimer (PDB entry 3bv4 ; Sherawat et al., 2008[Sherawat, M., Tolan, D. R. & Allen, K. N. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 543-550.]) and Giardia aldolase (PDB entry 3gak ; Galkin et al., 2009[Galkin, A., Li, Z., Li, L., Kulakova, L., Pal, L. R., Dunaway-Mariano, D. & Herzberg, O. (2009). Biochemistry, 48, 3186-3196.]) is dimeric. Evidence that the monomeric and dimeric forms of EcFBPA interconvert was found in the size-exclusion chromatogram, which contains a small peak for the dimer and a larger peak for the monomer. Dimers are found in both of the EcFBPA structures presented here; the computed buried surface area at the dimer interface is ∼3000 Å2 for both structures, while that for the tetramer interface of rabbit muscle FBPA A (PDB entry 1zai ; St-­Jean et al., 2005[St-Jean, M., Lafrance-Vanasse, J., Liotard, B. & Sygusch, J. (2005). J. Biol. Chem. 280, 27262-27270.]) is ∼13 500 Å2, with each dimer interface burying ∼4000 Å2 (Krissinel & Henrick, 2007[Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774-797.]). Figs. 1[link] and 2[link] show how the typical aldolase tetrameric quaternary structure has been disrupted here. The origin of the unusual dimeric quaternary structure of EcFBPA is not clear, but the shortened loop from Leu106 to Ile115 (Gly112–Thr112) suggests one possibility.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The typical tetrameric quaternary structure of FBPA is shown for rabbit muscle FBPA (PDB entry 1zai ) as (a) cartoon and (b) surface plots.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
In E. cuniculi FBPA, the quaternary structure is dimeric. (a) Cartoon and (b) surface plots are shown for the phosphate-bound structure.

The final model for each structure showed good geometry (Table 2[link]) as determined using the program MolProbity (Davis et al., 2007[Davis, I. W., Leaver-Fay, A., Chen, V. B., Block, J. N., Kapral, G. J., Wang, X., Murray, L. W., Arendall, W. B. III, Snoeyink, J., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2007). Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375-W383.]).

3.2. Reactant state

As part of glycolysis, FBPA catalyzes the cleavage of fructose 1,6-­bisphosphate (FBP) to give glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP). Using this protein sample, we solved a 2.37 Å resolution crystal structure of E. cuniculi FBPA bound to FBP (Tables 1[link] and 2[link]). This structure has clear electron density for FBP bound at the active site (Fig. 3[link]). There is a covalent bond between C atom C2 of the linear FBP molecule and the NZ atom of Lys221 of the protein. Furthermore, phosphate 1 of FBP makes hydrogen bonds to four amide N atoms as well as to the side chains of Arg295 and Ser263 (Fig. 4[link]). The hydroxy groups along the linear carbon backbone of FBP also make hydrogen bonds to the protein, as well as to nearby water molecules. Finally, phosphate group 2 makes hydrogen bonds to side chains and to nearby water molecules. Similarly, there is clear electron density for the phosphate group in the 2.00 Å phosphate-bound structure (Fig. 5[link]).

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Weighted 2FoFc electron-density map at 1.5σ for FBP and nearby residues in the active site of fructose bisphosphate aldolase from E. cuniculi. There is clear electron density for a Schiff base formed by Lys221 and the FBP molecule.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Binding environment for FBP bound at the active site of fructose bisphosphate aldolase from E. cuniculi.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Weighted 2FoFc electron-density map at 1.5σ for the phosphate ion and nearby residues in the active site of fructose bisphosphate aldolase from E. cuniculi.

SSGCID's interest in E. cuniculi FBPA is as a potential drug target, so it is illuminating to compare the active site of E. cuniculi FBPA with those of homologous mammalian enzymes. The orientation of the FBP molecule in the active site differs from that observed in the structure of human muscle aldolase (PDB entry 4ald ; Dalby et al., 1999[Dalby, A., Dauter, Z. & Littlechild, J. A. (1999). Protein Sci. 8, 291-297.]; r.m.s.d. of non-H atoms in the FBP ligand of 2.23 Å; r.m.s.d. for Cα atoms over the whole protein monomer of 0.830 Å). However, the complex observed in 4ald does not show full formation of the Schiff base, suggesting that 4ald is a `preliminary hydrogen-bonded Michaelis complex before the formation of the covalent complex' (Dalby et al., 1999[Dalby, A., Dauter, Z. & Littlechild, J. A. (1999). Protein Sci. 8, 291-297.]). It is more illuminating to note that the FBP conformation in E. cuniculi FBPA is essentially identical to that of rabbit muscle aldolase A (PDB entry 1zai ; r.m.s.d. of non-H atoms in the FBP ligand of 0.40 Å; r.m.s.d. for Cα atoms over the whole protein of 0.580 Å).

4. Conclusion

Crystal structures of fructose bisphosphate aldolase from E. cuniculi in complex with its reactant and with the partial substrate analog phosphate have been determined at 2.37 and 2.0 Å resolution, respectively. The structure of the reactant Schiff-base state is similar to those of some other aldolases in the reactant state (PDB entries 1zai , 3mmt and 2qdg ), especially rabbit muscle FBPA A (PDB entry 1zai ; Fig. 6[link]). The similarity to the active site of mammalian FBPA A suggests that the design of a specific inhibitor for E. cuniculi FBPA (that does not inhibit the homologous human enzyme) would be exceptionally challenging and would have to rely on exploiting very minor differences in the chemical environment in and near the active site.

[Figure 6]
Figure 6
The (a) overall and (b) active-site structures of the reactant Schiff-base state are similar to those of some other aldolases in the reactant state (PDB entries 1zai , 3mmt and 2qdg ), especially rabbit muscle FBPA A (PDB entry 1zai ), which is shown here.

Supporting information


Acknowledgements

The authors thank the SSGCID teams at SBRI, UW and Emerald BioStructures. This research was funded under Federal Contract No. HHSN272200700057C from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. The Berkeley Center for Structural Biology is supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

References

First citationAslanidis, C. & de Jong, P. J. (1990). Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6069–6074.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationCarrell, H. L., Rubin, B. H., Hurley, T. J. & Glusker, J. P. (1984). J. Biol. Chem. 259, 3230–3236.  CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationChudzik, D. M., Michels, P. A., de Walque, S. & Hol, W. G. (2000). J. Mol. Biol. 300, 697–707.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationDalby, A., Dauter, Z. & Littlechild, J. A. (1999). Protein Sci. 8, 291–297.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationDalby, A. R., Tolan, D. R. & Littlechild, J. A. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 1526–1533.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationDavis, I. W., Leaver-Fay, A., Chen, V. B., Block, J. N., Kapral, G. J., Wang, X., Murray, L. W., Arendall, W. B. III, Snoeyink, J., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. (2007). Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W375–W383.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationEmsley, P. & Cowtan, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 2126–2132.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGalkin, A., Li, Z., Li, L., Kulakova, L., Pal, L. R., Dunaway-Mariano, D. & Herzberg, O. (2009). Biochemistry, 48, 3186-3196.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationHeidner, E. G., Weber, B. H. & Eisenberg, D. (1971). Science, 171, 677–679.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGardberg, A., Abendroth, J., Bhandari, J., Sankaran, B. & Staker, B. (2011). Acta Cryst. F67, 1051–1054.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKabsch, W. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 125–132.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKrissinel, E. & Henrick, K. (2007). J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationLafrance-Vanasse, J. & Sygusch, J. (2007). Biochemistry, 46, 9533-9540.  PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMcCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMurshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNewman, J., Egan, D., Walter, T. S., Meged, R., Berry, I., Ben Jelloul, M., Sussman, J. L., Stuart, D. I. & Perrakis, A. (2005). Acta Cryst. D61, 1426–1431.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSherawat, M., Tolan, D. R. & Allen, K. N. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 543–550.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStein, N. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 641–643.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSt-Jean, M., Lafrance-Vanasse, J., Liotard, B. & Sygusch, J. (2005). J. Biol. Chem. 280, 27262–27270.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationWinn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2053-230X
Volume 67| Part 9| September 2011| Pages 1055-1059
Follow Acta Cryst. F
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds