view article
Figure 7
Images of different lysozyme crystals that became morphologically unstable, obtained at 298.0 (5) K. The relative humidity of (a), (b), (d) and (e) was 58 (5)%; the relative humidity of (c) was 41 (5)% and the relative humidity of (f) was 89 (5)%. The growth conditions of (a) and (e) correspond to No. 1 in Table 1[link]; the growth conditions of (f) correspond to No. 2 in Table 1[link]; the growth conditions of (b), (c) and (d) correspond to No. 4 in Table 1[link]. (d) and (e) were grown using the PDMS–PDMS microfluidic device, while the other crystals were grown using the PDMS–glass microfluidic device.

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 45| Part 1| February 2012| Pages 53-60
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811048047
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS