![[Figure 4]](rg5004fig4mag.jpg)
|
|
Figure 4
The relative difference between calculated and analytical values of the absorption factor for ![[mu]](/logos/entities/mu_rmgif.gif) R = 2.5 at 2![[theta]](/logos/entities/thetas_rmgif.gif) = 0° as a function of the number of summation steps. ![[article HTML]](../../../../../graphics/viewarticleborder.gif)
|
![[Figure 4]](rg5004fig4.jpg)
© International Union of Crystallography 2012
|
|
|
Figure 4
The relative difference between calculated and analytical values of the absorption factor for R = 2.5 at 2 = 0° as a function of the number of summation steps.
|