view article
Figure 9
Comparison of four theoretical models, using the constant Q cut (width of 0.067 Å−1) for Q = 4.6 Å−1 from Fig. 8[link], with experimental data for aluminium at 10 K obtained on the MARI spectrometer, ISIS (grey line). (a) The original LJ 12–6 model, (b) the LJ 12–6 model fitted from MARI experimental data, (c) the original Mei–Davenport model and (d) the Mei–Davenport model fitted from MARI experimental data. The horizontal axes are energy transfer and vibrational frequency (meV and cm−1, respectively) and the vertical axis is S′coh(Q, ω).

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 46| Part 6| December 2013| Pages 1755-1770
https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889813023728
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS