view article
Figure 10
Correlation plots of calculated (Icalc) versus numerically simulated (Iobs) diffraction intensities for Penrose tiling: (a) ideal (no phasons) and (b)–(d) with phasons. The slight smearing of points along the line in (a) is caused by the finite size of the sample only. The probability of phason occurrence is [\alpha = 5\%]. No correction factor was used in (b), and phasonic correction in the form of the multiplicative standard Debye–Waller factor and the additive term (sum of Bessel functions) was applied to (c) and (d), respectively. The correlation in (d) is almost perfect, with small deviations caused by the finite size of the sample [cf. (a)].

Journal logoJOURNAL OF
APPLIED
CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
ISSN: 1600-5767
Volume 49| Part 6| December 2016| Pages 2106-2115
https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671601637X
Follow J. Appl. Cryst.
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow J. Appl. Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS