Figure 5
Measured rate response obtained from 180 ns bunched fill with both bunched spacing and shaping time as free parameters. Comparison with Fig. 2[link] indicates a substantial improvement in goodness of fit. The model of equation (7)[link] was preferred for shaping times 1, 3 and 4 while the model of equation (6)[link] was preferred for shaping times 2, 5, 6 and 7.  [article HTML]