research papers
Application of singular value decomposition analysis to timedependent powder diffraction data of an insitu photodimerization reaction
^{a}Xray Crystallography Laboratory, Solid State Department, Physics Division, National Research Center, El Buhouth (ElTahrir) Street, Dokki, Giza 12622, Egypt, ^{b}Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, KEK, Tsukuba 3050801, Japan, ^{c}Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguroku, Japan, ^{d}CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Japan, ^{e}Department of Materials Structure Science, School of High Energy Accelerator Science, KEK, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Sokendai, Tsukuba 3050801, Japan, and ^{f}PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Japan
^{*}Correspondence email: mabied@xrdlabnrceg.org
Singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis has important applications for timedependent crystallographic data, extracting significant information. Herein, a successful application of SVD analysis of timeresolved powder diffraction data over the course of an insitu photodimerization reaction of anthracene derivatives is introduced. SVD revealed significant results in the case of 9methylanthracene and 1chloroanthracene. The results support the formation of the 9methylanthracene stable dimer phase and suggest the existence of an excimer state.
Keywords: singular value decomposition; anthracene derivatives; photodimerization; timedependent; Xray powder diffraction.
1. Introduction
The rapid development of timeresolved Xray experiments has raised challenges regarding data analysis and the extraction of significant information. Singular value decomposition (SVD) analysis introduces an excellent solution, where large data sets containing a number of values can be reduced to fewer data sets containing significant values while conserving the correlation of variables of the original data. SVD is able to decompose timeresolved data into timeindependent and timedependent components. Also, it can help to extract meaningful signals from noisy data (Henry & Hofrichter, 1992; Rajagopal et al., 2004).
SVD analysis has had a variety of successful applications in crystallography; for instance, with timeresolved smallangle Xray scattering (Okamoto & Sakurai, 2003) and timeresolved macromolecular crystallographic data (Zhao & Schmidt, 2009; Rajagopal et al., 2004). In addition, it has been successful in many other areas such as spectroscopy (Berlich et al., 2005; Henry & Hofrichter, 1992; Henry, 1997), gene expression data (Alter et al., 2000; Wall et al., 2003), scientific computing and signal processing (Lahabar & Narayanan, 2009). Among these applications, SVD has proved efficient in treating timedependent crystallographic and spectroscopic data. It can reveal important information by extracting small changes from the data that could not be detected directly (Oka et al., 2000; Rajagopal et al., 2004; Zhao & Schmidt, 2009; Henry & Hofrichter, 1992).
The present study sheds some light on the advantages of applying SVD analysis to timeresolved crystallographic data in the case of powder diffraction. The target here is to treat the data of insitu photodimerization timedependent powder diffraction measurements of the anthracene derivatives 1chloroanthracene (1chA) and 9methylanthracene (9MA).
Upon illumination with light of wavelength >300 nm, anthracene derivatives undergo important photodimerization to form a stable dimer phase, which can be dissociated into its initial monomers either thermally or by illumination under light of wavelength <300 nm (BouasLaurent et al., 2001; Schmidt, 1971). Based on their photodimerization properties, many applications have been developed, such as the fabrication of photoswitchable devices (Zhao et al., 2008), control of biological reactions (Molard et al., 2006) and with optical storage memory devices (Dvornikov & Rentzepis, 1996).
Reported possible processes during monomer–dimer transformations due to the photoreaction are as follows: monomers absorb the light (2M + hν → M*) and then relax to instantly excited monomers (M^{ex}, excimer). The excimer could either disintegrate into stable monomers (M^{ex} → 2M + hν) or form a stable dimer (M^{ex} → D). However, forming the excimer is faster than forming a stable dimer (Takegoshi et al., 1998; Ferguson & Mau, 1974). Moreover, Aladekomo (1973) reported that 9MA is one of the unique materials which enables the study of excimer and stable dimer.
In our previously reported photodimerization study of 9MA (Mabied et al., 2012), the timedependent powder diffraction data of 9MA monomer and dimer phases were analyzed quantitatively based on the averaged structure in each phase. The study overcomes the drawbacks of photoreactions in a single crystal by the application of powder diffraction reaching higher completion (63.8%) of the dimer fraction. The suggested phasetransition kinetics reveal that small parts of the reactant phase (nuclei of the dimer) appear randomly in the parent phase at the beginning of the reaction. This means that the dimer and its associated excimer state should exist. In addition, it could enhance the change of the averaged diffraction intensity in the monomer phase despite the dimer peaks not yet having appeared, as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. Therefore, the aim of this study is to find any traces of the excimer state by applying SVD analysis, which could not be observed directly using Rietveld refinement.
2. Experimental
1Chloroanthracene powder (95% pure) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich Company and 9methylanthracene (98% pure) was supplied by Wako Chemical Co., Japan. All the samples were ground using an agate mortar and pestle after recrystallization from acetone and hexane solvents. The samples were filled into borosilicate glass capillaries of diameter 0.4 mm (Hilgenberg, Germany).
The photodimerization experiment was carried out insitu at the Xray timeresolved beamline NW14A of the Photon Factory Advanced Ring (PFAR) facility, KEK, Japan. Details of the beamline are given elsewhere (Nozawa et al., 2007). The Xray beam was set to an energy of 18.0 keV (λ = 0.689 Å). The samples were mounted on a horizontal φaxis and rotated around this axis for better counting statistics. The sampletodetector distance was set as 150 mm and calibrated using the 111 diffraction ring from standard silicone powder. Powder diffraction rings were collected at ambient temperature, which was about 302 K at the sample position, using a Mar165 CCD detector. Visible light from a xenon lamp with a visible mirror module (MAX301; 385–740 nm, 300 W; Asahi Spectra) illuminated the sample undergoing photodimerization during data collection. IR spectra were measured on a Shimadzu IR Prestige21 FTIR spectrometer by dispersing samples in KBr pellets. UV–Vis absorption spectra were recorded using a Varian Cary 50 Conc spectrophotometer in a cyclohexane solution.
3. SVD and data treatment
3.1. SVD
Mathematically, singular value decomposition can be defined as follows. An mbyn real matrix A (m ≥ n) can be decomposed into three matrices U, S and V^{T} [A_{m,n} = USV^{T}, equation (1)]. U is an mbyn (m ≥ n) matrix having the property that U^{T}U = I_{n}, where I_{n} is the identity matrix; columns of U are called the left singular vectors of A. The matrix S is an nbyn diagonal matrix with nonzero elements in descending order (s_{1} ≥ s_{2} ≥…≥ s_{n} ≥ 0) and called the singular values of A, which also indicates the matrix rank. V^{T} is the transpose of an nbyn matrix V (V^{T}V = I_{n}), where I_{n} is the identity matrix; columns of V are called the right singular vectors of A. Further details can be found elsewhere (Henry & Hofrichter, 1992; Stoer & Bulirsch, 2002; Unonius & Paatero, 1990; Golub & Van Loan, 1996).
Physically, according to the literature (Henry & Hofrichter, 1992; Unonius & Paatero, 1990), the SVD method can factorize an experimental data mbyn matrix into several components matrices. The columns of the U matrix represent the measurements base spectrum of the original data and the S elements give its singular values, which indicate the importance of the U spectrum. The singular values are arranged in descending order according to their magnitudes. The V matrix gives the associated timedependent vectors of the U elements. In other words, based on the obtained singular values (s_{1},…, s_{n}) and the characteristics of the U spectrum, the importance of the U columns (u_{1},…, u_{n}) is decided, and hence the associated timedependent vectors of V (v_{1},…, v_{n}) can be fitted (Henry & Hofrichter, 1992; Unonius & Paatero, 1990). The SVD results can be interpreted successfully based on global fitting of the column vectors of the matrix V extraction of timeindependent correlations (Zhang et al., 2004; Van Wilderen et al., 2011; Henry & Hofrichter, 1992; Unonius & Paatero, 1990). Visualization of the singular values is the most important step for understanding the results of the U, S and V matrices and to decide the meaningful components. One of the graphical methods used is a onedimensional plot, where the height of any one singular value is indicative of its importance in explaining the data. The relative variances [] are often plotted, where the square of each singular value is proportional to the variance explained by each singular vector. These kinds of plots are called scree plots, as referred to by Cattell (Cattell, 1966; Wall et al., 2003).
3.2. Data treatment
The standard 2θ versus intensity powder diffraction patterns through the measurement time were obtained from the recorded powder diffraction rings using Fit2D (Hammersley et al., 1996). The geometrical correction was applied and the beam center shadows and contamination spots were masked (Hammersley et al., 1996). For more accuracy, the background was subtracted from the data using Powder3D software (Hinrichsen et al., 2006) before SVD analysis. WinPLOTR (Roisnel & RodriguezCarvajal, 2001) and Powder3D (Hinrichsen et al., 2006) were used to visualize the timeresolved data.^{1}
The corrected powder data were set into an mbyn matrix, where the columns are the diffraction intensity at the 2θ angle points (Fig. 3) [for further reading about data treatment, see Henry & Hofrichter (1992) and Oka et al. (2000)].
The SVD was computed according to the reported procedures, where the data matrix A can be described by an mbyn matrix P(2θ) and an nbyn matrix C(t) as A(s, t) = P(2θ)C(t) = USVT. Here, P(2θ) and C(t) represent the diffraction pattern of the independent components and their concentrations as a function of time t, respectively. As mentioned above, U contains the basis spectra of the diffraction pattern, S contains the associated eigenvalues, and V contains the timedependence of the basis spectra.
The statistical weights for the data set A have been considered. The weight matrix W is defined as W_{ij} = 1/σ_{ij} (i = j) and W_{ij} = 0 (i ≠ j), where the error of the data element A (2θ_{i},t_{j}) is described as σ_{ij}. Since the measurement time is identical for all data, the error would depend on 2θ. The value of σ_{ij} is given as the average of the square root of A_{ij} for all frames (j = 1 to n). Therefore, the final data set to be analyzed should be WA = USVT = WU′SVT, where U′ = B^{−1}U. Then, A = U′SV^{T}.
The matrix dimensions were (1233, 59) and (1095, 42) for 9MA and 1chA, respectively. According to (A = U′SV^{T}), the SVD was calculated and produced the three matrices U, S and V. The results (see §4) of the timedependent spectra of the V matrix were plotted. Fitting analysis of the V curves showed the best fit function for the double exponential function [equation (2)]. As the results do not correspond directly to independent states in the photoreaction, the diffraction profiles need to be reconstituted. Global fitting analysis can extract the timeindependent correlations and their associated rate constants. Therefore, it was applied to the 9MA data. The parameters of equation (2) have been obtained successfully and can be defined as follows: A_{0} is a timeindependent part, which should be unchanged during the photoreaction. A_{1} and A_{2} are the changing parts; their rate constants are k_{1} and k_{2}, respectively. The powder diffraction profile during the photoreaction can be considered as a summation of all these profiles A_{0}, A_{1} and A_{2}. All SVD calculations and fitting were performed using IGORPro (Wave Metrics, 2011),
4. Results and discussion
SVD analysis of the present data gives the three matrices U, S and V. Investigation of the results can be considered as an aggregate of three major steps (Fig. 3): the first is determining the important singular values from the S matrix using a visualization method (such as relative variance); the second is checking the associated base spectrum characteristics of the matrix U; and the third is examining the behaviour of the timedependent vectors of the matrix V using global fitting analysis.
Fig. 4 shows a comparison of the resultant singular values of the 9MA and 1chA data. It illustrates the singular values versus their data components of the obtained S matrix. The importance of every component is indicated by the relative variance plot (red bars). The significance was decided based on the visualized singular values and their distinctive U and V spectra.
For 1chA data, there is a distinguishable singular value component (s_{1} = 2.8 × 10^{6}) and relatively smaller s_{2} component, as shown in Fig. 4. The s_{1}related v_{1} spectrum shows almost timeindependency (Fig. 5) . The associated u_{1} spectrum characteristics are similar to the original diffraction pattern of the 1chA monomer phase (Fig. 6).
Fig. 7 shows that there is almost no change in the position of the peaks of the 1chA diffraction pattern during the illumination in contrast to 9MA (Fig. 1). This indicates that the photodimerization of 1chA barely proceeded. The consistency of IR and UV–Vis spectra under the photoirradiation condition (Fig. 8) ensured less activity of this reaction. However, v_{2} showed timedependency (Fig. 5): the best curve fitting matched the double exponential function [equation (2)], which gave fast behaviour only with almost the same (k_{1} = 3.148 ± 0.093 × 10^{−5} s^{−1} and k_{2} = 3.1 ± 0.093 × 10^{−5} s^{−1}) in contrast to the case of 9MA, as shown in Table 1. The existence of such timedependency character, even if the dimer phase does not appear, could suggest that it is coming from the excimer state, which can disintegrate into the stable monomers without forming the dimer phase of 1chA. This is in agreement with the reported possible paths of the photodimerization reaction as mentioned in the Introduction.

The visualization of the 9MA data singular values (Fig. 4) indicates that three components are significant. The first three singular values (s_{1} = 13021.54, s_{2} = 4620.65 and s_{3} = 3835) are larger than the other values and give the nonrandom U spectrum (Fig. 9), which could point out that the higher singular values come from noise. The accompanying u_{1}, u_{2} and u_{3} (Fig. 9) spectra and their time courses v_{1}, v_{2} and v_{3} (Fig. 10) can give information about this significance.
However, the first component (s_{1}) is the largest one. The distinct u_{1} spectrum was similar to the diffraction pattern of the 9MA dimer phase (Fig. 1) except for its negative sign (Fig. 9), which corresponds to the sign of v_{1} (Fig. 10). Oka et al. (2000) have reported similar cases. v_{1} showed little timedependency at the lower values, as noticeable in Fig. 10; the character of v_{1} arises from the existence of the stable dimer. The other two components u_{2} and u_{3} are also significant because of their distinct u_{2} and u_{3} spectra, which are distinguishable from noise.
The first V spectrum (v_{1}) was almost timeindependent during the measurement, while the second spectrum (v_{2}) was seen to decay and the third (v_{3}) to grow, as shown in Fig. 10. This means that, even if the amount of one component decreased, another component increased to compensate for the decrease in the diffraction intensity. This is consistent with similar cases (Okamoto & Sakurai, 2003).
The characteristics of the U spectrum support this assumption, where the u_{2} and u_{3} spectra look like a diffraction pattern composed of diffraction peaks of the 9MA monomer and dimer phases (Figs. 1 and 9) while neglecting the peak directions. The associated v_{2} and v_{3} spectra showed notable timedependency in contrast to the v_{1} spectrum (Fig. 10). The v_{2} and v_{3} spectra were fitted successfully with a double exponential function [equation (2)] using global fitting analysis (Fig. 10). The results of the global fitting analysis are given in Table 1. For simplicity, it can be imagined roughly that the Xray diffraction profile is a summation of all three profiles that do not correspond directly to the independent states in the photoreaction, where A_{0} is timeindependent; A_{1} and A_{2} are timedependent components. However, as all of them are describing the same reaction, part A_{0} also exhibits little timedependency especially at the early stages of the reaction.
As given in Table 1, A_{1} and A_{2} provide the rate constants k_{1} and k_{2}, showing the fast and slow parts A_{1} and A_{2}, respectively. The presence of such a fast timedependency character strongly indicates that it is coming from the excimer, which can be disintegrating into the stable dimer phase. This is in agreement with reports on the monomer–dimer transformations due to the photoreaction, where the excimer either decays to stable monomers or forms a dimer phase. Forming the excimer state was found to be faster than forming the stable dimer (Takegoshi et al., 1998; Ferguson & Mau, 1974), and it has been reported that the excimer phase is unstable at room temperature (Horiguchi et al., 1987).
The appearance of the slower component A_{2} is also compatible with the reported literature for the mechanism of photodimerization, where the photodimerization mechanism involves a slow process forming a stable dimer in addition to a faster one for the metastable state (excimer) (Birks & Aladekomo, 1963; Takegoshi et al., 1998; Ferguson & Mau, 1974).
A more detailed discussion about et al. (2012). The dimer peaks were distinguished and could be analyzed using after about 30 min from the beginning of the reaction (Fig. 1). However, the dimer and its associated excimer state should exist at the start of the reaction and could enhance the change of the average diffraction intensity in the monomer phase even though the dimer peaks have not yet appeared. In the present work, SVD has treated all of the timedependent data sets from the start of the reaction showing traces to the excimer state; such a way of data treatment may also cause the variation of the numerical magnitude of the rate constants between the reported growth rate (Mabied et al., 2012) and the present study (Table 1). Similar (4π+4π) photodimerization studies have reported rate constants with similar orders of the numerical results, k = 9.7 (14) × 10^{−8} s^{−1} and k = 2.1 (26) × 10^{−6} s^{−1} (Cao et al., 2010).
kinetics and the phase growth mechanism of 9MA has been given by MabiedThe UV–Vis and IR spectra supported the SVD analysis results of 9MA. The IR spectrum showed the appearance of the aliphatic C—H saturated bond for the dimer phase (Fig. 8a) below 3000 cm^{−1} (Singh & Sandorfy, 1969). The absorption peaks between 350 and 400 nm (Fig. 8b) disappeared in the UV–Vis spectrum of the illuminated 9MA, which was reported as an indication of the formation of the dimer phase (Tillman et al., 2007).
5. Conclusions
SVD analysis for timeresolved powder diffraction of photodimerization reactions was introduced in order to effectively extract meaningful parameters from a small amount of changes from the timedependent crystallographic data. 1chA and 9MA were successful examples of SVD application to the analysis of timedependent powder diffraction experiments.
The results of SVD analysis revealed significant information of 9MA and 1chA photodimerization, which strongly suggest the existence of the excimer state even if it is difficult to detect directly, and supported the formation of the 9MA stable dimer phase.
SVD analysis of timedependent powder diffraction experiments can be recommended as a powerful tool discovering the important features hidden in their data sets, which leads to more useful applications. Using visualization methods, in addition to considering the physical description of the model under study and global fitting, is a very helpful method for investigation of the results.
Supporting information
Raw Xray diffraction data of both 9MA and 1chA before processing, used for SVD analysis. DOI: https://doi.org//10.1107/S1600577514004366/co5048sup1.zip
Acknowledgements
The synchrotron Xray experiment at KEK was approved by the Photon Factory Program Advisory Committee (PFPAC No. 2004S2001). This work was partly supported by the Asia–Africa Science Platform Program by JSPS. We thank Dr Michael Cheah [Australian National Beamline Facility (ANBF), KEK, Japan] for his help with the spectroscopic measurements.
References
Aladekomo, J. (1973). J. Lumin. 6, 83–95. CrossRef CAS
Alter, O., Brown, P. O. & Botstein, D. (2000). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 10101–10106. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
Berlich, A., Liu, Y. C. & Morgner, H. (2005). Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74, 201–209. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Birks, J. B. & Aladekomo, J. B. (1963). Photochem. Photobiol. 2, 415–418. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
BouasLaurent, H., Desvergne, J.P., Castellan, A. & Lapouyade, R. (2001). Chem. Soc. Rev. 30, 248–263. CAS
Cao, D. K., Sreevidya, T. V., Botoshansky, M., Golden, G., Benedict, J. B. & Kaftory, M. (2010). J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 7377–7381. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed
Cattell, R. B. (1966). Multivar. Behav. Res. 1, 245–276. CrossRef Web of Science
Dvornikov, A. S. & Rentzepis, P. M. (1996). Res. Chem. Intermed. 22, 115–128. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Ferguson, J. & Mau, A.H. (1974). Mol. Phys. 27, 377–387. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Golub, G. & Van Loan, C. (1996). Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins Studies in the Mathematical Sciences. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hammersley, A. P., Svensson, S. O., Hanfland, M., Fitch, A. N. & Hausermann, D. (1996). High Press. Res. 14, 235–248. CrossRef Web of Science
Henry, E. R. (1997). Biophys. J. 72, 652–673. CrossRef CAS PubMed
Henry, E. & Hofrichter, J. (1992). Numerical Computer Methods, edited by M. L. J. Ludwig Brand, Vol. 210 of Methods in Enzymology, pp. 129–192. New York: Academic Press.
Hinrichsen, B., Dinnebier, R. E. & Jansen, M. (2006). Z. Kristallogr. Suppl. 23, 231–236. CrossRef
Horiguchi, R., Iwasaki, N. & Maruyama, Y. (1987). J. Phys. Chem. 91, 5135–5139. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Lahabar, S. & Narayanan, P. (2009). Parallel Distributed Processing 2009, IEEE International Symposium on IPDPS 2009, pp. 1–10.
Mabied, A. F., Müller, M., Dinnebier, R. E., Nozawa, S., Hoshino, M., Tomita, A., Sato, T. & Adachi, S. (2012). Acta Cryst. B68, 424–430. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Molard, Y., Bassani, D. M., Desvergne, J.P., Moran, N. & Tucker, J. H. R. (2006). J. Org. Chem. 71, 8523–8531. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
Nozawa, S., Adachi, S., Takahashi, J., Tazaki, R., Guérin, L., Daimon, M., Tomita, A., Sato, T., Chollet, M., Collet, E., Cailleau, H., Yamamoto, S., Tsuchiya, K., Shioya, T., Sasaki, H., Mori, T., Ichiyanagi, K., Sawa, H., Kawata, H. & Koshihara, S. (2007). J. Synchrotron Rad. 14, 313–319. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Oka, T., Yagi, N., Fujisawa, T., Kamikubo, H., Tokunaga, F. & Kataoka, M. (2000). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 14278–14282. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS
Okamoto, S. & Sakurai, S. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 982–985. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Rajagopal, S., Schmidt, M., Anderson, S., Ihee, H. & Moffat, K. (2004). Acta Cryst. D60, 860–871. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Roisnel, T. & RodriguezCarvajal, J. (2001). Mater. Sci. Forum, 378–381, 118–123. CrossRef CAS
Schmidt, G. M. J. (1971). Pure Appl. Chem. 27, 647–678. CrossRef CAS
Singh, S. & Sandorfy, C. (1969). Can. J. Chem. 47, 257–263. CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Stoer, J. & Bulirsch, R. (2002). Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.
Takegoshi, K., Nakamura, S. & Terao, T. (1998). Solid State Nucl. Magn. Res. 11, 189–196. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Tillman, E. S., Miller, D. J. & Roof, A. C. (2007). Polym. Bull. 58, 881–891. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Unonius, L. & Paatero, P. (1990). Comput. Phys. Commun. 59, 225–243. CrossRef Web of Science
Van Wilderen, L. J. G. W., Lincoln, C. N. & van Thor, J. J. (2011). PLoS ONE, 6, e17373. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed
Wall, M., Rechtsteiner, A. & Rocha, L. (2003). A Practical Approach to Microarray Data Analysis, pp. 91–109. Kluwer: Norwell.
Wave Metrics (2011). IGOR Pro 6.22 User's Manual: Technical graphing and data analysis software for scientists and engineers.
Zhang, L., Quan, D., Wang, L., Yang, G. & Weng, Y. (2004). Sci. Chin. Ser. G: Phys. Mech. Astron. 47, 208–222.
Zhao, P., Fang, C. F., Xia, C. J. M. W. Y., Liu, D. S. & Xie, S. J. (2008). Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 013113. Web of Science CrossRef
Zhao, Y. & Schmidt, M. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 734–740. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals
This is an openaccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CCBY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.