Acta Cryst. (2010). A66, 441-445 [ doi:10.1107/S0108767310013814 ]
Abstract: This paper demonstrates how numerical parameters usually used to assess the quality of a crystal structure solution (R, wR and S) may be misleading when studying a model refined against poor-quality data. Weakly diffracting crystals of tetrabutylammonium tetrabutylborate, a low-density organic salt comprising isoelectronic cations and anions, were measured using Cu and Mo K radiation. Along with the correct structural model, six erroneous structural models were constructed and refined against the same data. For both data sets it was found that models based on an incorrect unit-cell choice give lower values of R and wR than the correct one, thus apparently being in better agreement with measured data. Closer inspection of the measured data shows that this is in fact not the case.
Keywords: isoelectronic species; incorrect structure refinement; structure quality evaluation.
![]() | ![]() ![]() Structure factor file (CIF format) |
![]() | ![]() ![]() Structure factor file (CIF format) |
To open or display or play some files, you may need to set your browser up to use the appropriate software. See the full list of file types for an explanation of the different file types and their related mime types and, where available links to sites from where the appropriate software may be obtained.
The download button will force most browsers to prompt for a file name to store the data on your hard disk.
Where possible, images are represented by thumbnails.
Copyright © International Union of Crystallography
IUCr Webmaster