research papers
link between the isostructurality, and (stereo)isomerism of organic crystals
aInstitute of Structural Chemistry, Chemical Research Center, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 17, Budapest 114, H-1525, Hungary
*Correspondence e-mail: akalman@chemres.hu
An ongoing analysis of the supramolecular self-assembly of disubstituted et al. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 539–550]. Two further patterns have been revealed in the close packing of analogous alicyclic β-amino acids [Fábián et al. (2005). Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 773–782]. Since each pattern is represented by at least one the chemical similarity and crystallographic forms of these crystals have facilitated the recognition that these patterns differ by one or two rotation(s) of the common motifs (e.g. dimers, tetramers, helices etc.), or the whole pattern may rotate through 180° in an oblique Such non-crystallographic – with the exception of – virtual rotations as a whole may be denoted by the expression morphotropism. According to Kitaigorodskii [(1961), Organic Chemical Crystallography, pp. 222–231. New York: Consultants Bureau], is an attempt to keep the packing coefficient above 0.6 whenever there are alternative possibilities for the structures of closely related molecules. It has been found that crystals of are also frequently related by such virtual rotations. Similarly, non-crystallographic rotations effect bridges between homostructural crystals [Kálmán et al. (1993b). Acta Cryst. B49, 1039–1049] and occasionally hallmark the of organic compounds [Kálmán et al. (2003) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 34–35]. In polymorphs, however, such rotations really transform one molecule into another in order to achieve a better packing mediated by solvents, temperature etc.
has led to the discovery of seven packing patterns built up from hydrogen-bonded homo- and heterochiral chains of racemic molecules, associated in either antiparallel or parallel arrays [KálmánKeywords: morphotropism; isostructurality; polymorphism.
1. Introduction
In his seminal book Organic Chemical Crystallography,1 Kitaigorodskii (1961) dealt with, among other topics, the isomorphism of organic molecules. His examples were mainly halo compounds with molecular similarities, which he considered to be sufficient to give rise to From this conclusion, he jumped directly to the suggestion that `it is therefore of some interest to determine the intermolecular spacing in non-isomorphous crystals of compounds with similar molecules. We explain the morphotropic step as due to the impossibility of maintaining a sufficiently high packing coefficient for isomorphous substitution'. He referred to tetra-p-ethoxyphenyltin {[Sn(C2H5OC6H4)4]}, which, unlike the tetragonal crystals of the closely related [Sn(C6H5)4], [Sn(CH3C6H4)4] and [Sn(CH3OC6H4)4], is monoclinic. He stated that the observed rearrangement maintains the packing density at ca 0.67. Otherwise, it would have dropped below 0.6. The essence of remained unexplored, however.
More than 30 years later, we wrote a paper2 on the isostructuralism of organic molecules in terms of Kitaigorodskii's early perception (Kálmán et al., 1993a). Among the examples was on a packing rearrangement which was observed twice in a series of organometallic compounds related by isostructurality. While Me3Si–SiPh3 (Párkányi & Henge, 1982) and its analogs Me3Si–GePh3 (Párkányi et al., 1986) and Me3Ge–SiPh3 (Pannell et al., 1990) form trigonal crystals (common ), the isomeric Me3Ge–SnPh3 and Me3Sn–GePh3 are pseudohexagonal with the orthorhombic Pna21 (Pannell et al., 1992). In the former case, the Me3E–E′Ph3 dumbbells related by a center of symmetry are antiparallel, whereas in the orthorhombic pair of structures they are stacked in a parallel array. Continuing these investigations, we found that the crystals of Me3Ge–GePh3 (Párkányi et al., 1994), Me3Sn–SnPh3 (Párkányi et al., 1996) and some others, such as Me3Pb–SnPh3 and Me3Pb–PbPh3 (Preut & Huber, 1976), are again trigonal with the . A 180° rotation of the R3Ge–Sn dumbbells, perpendicular to the respective E–E′ bond, was attributed (Kálmán & Párkányi, 1997) to the 0.19 Å difference in the covalent radii of Ge and Sn with respect to those of 0.11 and 0.06 Å observed between the Ge–Si and Pb–Sn pairs, respectively. In accordance with Kitaigorodskii's perception, we claimed that `in these pseudohexagonal unit cells, the bumps of the molecules stacked with similar orientation along the polar c-axis fit perfectly into the hollows of the adjacent columns generated by glide planes, thereby forming new efficient close packing'.
Although the → Pna21 rearrangement is a 180° rotation of every second dumbbell in the we did not feel (Kálmán & Párkányi, 1997) these examples to be sufficient for to be regarded as a rotation of motif(s) in general, as suggested by the mirror translation of the Greek words `morphos' (shape) and `trópos' (turn) or `tropé' (turning). Neither the symmetrical spirosulfurane (Kálmán et al., 1973) nor the analogous spiroselenourane (Dahlén, 1974), with parallel (space group Fdd2) and antiparallel (space group C2/c) molecules sitting on twofold axes, compelled us to recognize the importance of non-crystallographic rotations in crystal chemistry. Now, 50 years after Kitaigorodskii's publication, the present paper aims to explore the essence of Several forms of between polymorphs and stereoisomeric pairs are presented, recognized in a survey of the crystal structures of 2-hydroxycycloalkanecarboxylic acids, analogous alicyclic β-amino acids and their β-lactam derivatives determined in our laboratory. These molecules, together with a few examples of found by chance in the literature, are listed in Table 1 and depicted in Fig. 1.
|
First, we recognized that the racemic crystals of these compounds are built up from hydrogen-bonded homo- or heterochiral chains in either antiparallel or parallel arrays (Kálmán et al., 2001, 2002a). They form seven packing patterns, which can be transformed into each other directly or indirectly (Kálmán et al., 2002b). Several pairs of crystals with different degrees of isostructurality were discerned (Kálmán et al., 2001, 2002a,b). Novel forms of and isostructurality were then observed, which could be attributed to non-crystallographic rotations between common motifs (Kálmán et al., 2003, 2004). Finally, a study of the isostructurality of four cis-alicyclic β-amino acids, tested against ring deformation (the cyclohexane ring was replaced by the cyclohexene ring) and (Fábián et al., 2005), revealed two different forms of close packing, differing in the non-crystallographic rotations of a common motif. Bearing in mind the antiparallel versus parallel fits of the Me3E–E′Ph3 dumbbells (Kálmán & Párkányi, 1997) mentioned above, the novel examples must be regarded as morphotropes. This led belatedly (by 50 years) to the elucidation of the exhibited by isomers, isostructures and polymorphs.
2. The forms of morphotropism
2.1. Rotation of dimers
Four of the seven patterns built up from either heterochiral or homochiral chains of racemic molecules in an antiparallel array are characterized by dimers (Kálmán et al., 2002a), described by the graph-set notation R22(12) (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995). They are distinguished by their acceptor groups (either OC or OH) which can be interconverted by a simultaneous 180° rotation of the COOH and OH moieties. Separately, these dimer motifs may exist in lateral associations held together by R44(12) tetramers, while their linear association is the same, since either type generates the other dimer. This linear array, demonstrated by trans-2-hydroxycyclooctanecarboxylic acid (Ib),3 is therefore unique (Kálmán et al., 2002b). It is the basic pattern (1) from which (Fig. 2) the others can be deduced by non-crystallographic rotations of the OC or OH dimers.
To visualize such rotations the symbolic (topological) presentation of the packing patterns that we have introduced (Kálmán et al., 2002a,b) is convenient. To simplify the homologous 1,2-disubstituted alicyclic (cyclopentane → cyclooctane) monomers (Fig. 3a), the saturated rings are omitted, while the functional groups are depicted by graphical symbols. A straight line represents an OH group, a circle a CO group and a triangle (in carboxamides) an NH2 group (Fig. 3b). To distinguish between the C1-R and C1-S enantiomers the symbols are converted into black or white triangles (Fig. 3c). The hydrogen bonding in the heterochiral OC and OH dimers is denoted by dotted lines (Fig. 3d). In the topological descriptions, the OC and OH dimers simply rotate around their center of symmetry through either 90 or 180°. We apply these symbols in the analysis of pattern 1 depicted in Fig. 4(a), which shows the two parallel molecular ribbons in which the OC and OH dimers alternate. These dimers are taken to rotate through 90 or 180° as follows:
|
|
Although the symbolic descriptions of the crystal structures do have advantages and predictive power, they conceal the relevant three-dimensional information, e.g. the planar and folded conformations of the dimers cannot be seen. In addition, it must be remembered that dimers rotate through 90° around their main axes,5 while their 180° rotation takes place perpendicularly to their main axes (see Fig. 2a versus b). Nevertheless, these symbols enable us to describe the observed between the crystal structures which are `non-isomorphous'.
Kitaigorodskii (1961) guessed that the best way to find is the study of surrounded by `non-isomorphous' relatives. This guess is substantiated by the homologs (IIIb), (IVa) and (Va) (space group C2/c), which are isostructural (Kálmán et al., 2002a), while the fourth member of the series, cis-2-hydroxycyclooctanecarboxylic acid (Ia), forms crystals in the P21/c (Kálmán et al., 2002b). The sub-patterns 3a and 4a are related by a dimer rotation through 90°. It is noteworthy that the sub-pattern 4a and the basic pattern 1 are related directly by a rotation of the OC dimers (Fig. 3d) through 180° (Figs. 4a and d). In other words, the structures of (Ia) and (Ib), differing only in the of the C2 atom, can be virtually converted into another by a non-crystallographic rotation. Thus, they may be regarded as morphotropes.
2.2. Rotation of helices
In order to increase the packing coefficient the homochiral dimers in patterns 4a and 4b polymerize into helices, which can be seen if they are shown in two dimensions (Fig. 5). The antiparallel helices with opposite are held together by the retained (either OC or OH) dimer motifs. In (1R*,2R*,4S*)-4-tert-butyl-2-hydroxycyclopentanecarboxamide (VIb) (Kálmán et al., 2001), the helices are held together by OH dimers (Fig. 5b). In contrast, in the tert-butyl free trans-2-hydroxycyclopentanecarboxamide (VIIb), a 180° rotation of either of the enantiomorphic (back and white) helices forms a polar crystal with the Pca21. In this pattern (6), the parallel helices are held together by glide planes enclosing heterochiral rings (Fig. 5c) described by the graph-set notation R43(18). Of course, the non-crystallographic rotation between the structures (Figs. 5b and c) of the related (VIb) and (VIIb) molecules is only virtual. However, these virtual rotations shed light upon the packing similarities of closely related compounds.
In an alternative step, the antiparallel helices in pattern 4 may also reassemble in a lateral stacking mode (pattern 5) by a 90° rotation around the twofold screw axes (Fig. 4e), as demonstrated by cis-2-hydroxycyclopentanecarboxamide (VIIa) (Kálmán et al., 2001). In pattern 5, the helices are held together by R44(12) tetramers of Ci symmetry. Accordingly, the (VIIa) with monoclinic crystals (space group P21/c) and (VIIb) with orthorhombic crystals (space group Pca21) are morphotropes again. These are related by two consecutive virtual rotations.
2.3. Rotations of tetramers
The polar layers (pattern 6b) in parallel stacking, observed in (VIIb), may also be rearranged into an antiparallel array. A 180° rotation of every second layer of the tetrameric R43(18) rings gives rise to antiparallel stacking (Kálmán et al., 2004). The non-isomorphous (Table 3) two dimensional isostructurality of the parallel (space group Pca21) and the antiparallel (space group Pbca) stackings of (VIIb) and the (VIIIb) (trans-2-hydroxycycloheptanecarboxamide) are depicted in Fig. 6 taken from Kálmán et al. (2004).
|
Pattern 7 is the parallel association of heterochiral chains (Kálmán et al., 2001, 2002a). The molecules, invariably linked by hydrogen bonds, form exclusively heterochiral tetramers described by the graph-set notation R44(18). These rings are antidromic (see Appendix A), which generates dipoles. However, the dipoles must cancel out over the whole crystal by antiparallel stacking of either molecular layers or crystal domains (Jeffrey & Saenger, 1991), as demonstrated by the polymorphs (Table 3) of trans-2-hydroxycycloheptanecarboxylic acid (Vb) (Kálmán et al., 2003). The possible stacking forms of pattern 7, together with the rearrangement 3 → 7 are described in Appendix B.
A curious property of the polymorphs of (Vb) with their virtually identical unit cells is that their upper halves cannot be distinguished, while the lower halves differ by a 180° rotation around a non-crystallographic axis perpendicular to the layers (Kálmán et al., 2003). In other words, if we rotate one of the unit cells around the a axis, then the lower halves become identical while the upper halves differ by a rotation through 180.° Consequently, dimorphs (Vb)(p) and (Vb)(a) [where (p) and (a) denote the parallel and antiparallel stackings] are isostructural in two dimensions with an alternating layer orientation; their is the archetype of Explicitly, the polymorphs (Vb)(p) and (Vb)(a) differ simply in a 180° rotation of every second layer in the Such a phenomenon is rare, but not unique. While studying the isostructurality of polymorphs (Fábián & Kálmán, 2004), we found that two (α and β) of the three polymorphs of glycine exhibit a similar relationship. In polymorph (IXβ) (Table 3), the layers of H3N+CH2COO− held together by four N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, are stacked in the parallel mode, which gives rise to the P21 (Iitaka, 1960). In polymorph (IXα), with a doubled along the orthogonal b axis, every second layer becomes antiparallel by a rotation through 180°. Since the molecules are achiral, this structure is centrosymmetric, P21/n (Langan et al., 2002). These morphotropic polymorphs are also isostructural, with an alternating layer orientation in two dimensions.
2.4. Rotation of molecules in a heterochiral chain
The b) originates from the parallel stacking of the heterochiral chains of molecules (pattern 7) formed by antidromic rings (Appendix A). In contrast, the cis isomer (Va) crystallizes in the C2/c (sub-pattern 3b). However, as described in Appendix B, the sub-patterns 3a and 3b may be equally transformed into pattern 7 by a 180° rotation of the molecules in every second chain in unison. From this, it follows that the (Va) and (Vb) are also related via morphotropism.
of (V2.5. Rotation of molecules in different patterns
2.5.1. of planar molecules
etc.). However, planar molecules such as nitrofurantoin (X) may also crystallize in two anhydrous6 forms, α and β (Table 3), obtained either from hot acetic acid–water or from hot acetone solution (Pienaar et al., 1990b). In the monoclinic polymorph (Xβ), the molecules form infinite helices held together by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 7a). If the achiral molecules, similarly as in the rearrangement 3a → 7 (see Appendix B), rotate through 180° on either side of the twofold screw axis in unison, they form centrosymmetric R22(8) dimers with the molecules stacked on the other side of the disappearing helix in (Xα) (Fig. 7b). Overall, the between the nitrofurantoin polymorphs (Xα) and (Xβ), mediated by the solvents, is a real rotation of the molecules.
is often attributable to the conformational difference(s) assumed by a molecule under different circumstances (solvent, pressure, temperature2.5.2. via non-crystallographic rotation of a macroring
Two polymorphs of trans-13-azabicyclo[10.2.0]tetradecan-13-one (XI) present a unique example of isostructurality, differing only in the orientation of a given hydrogen bond with respect to the β-lactam bond (Fábián et al., 2004). This slight difference is attributable to the twofold rotation of the C12H22 ring of C2 symmetry, which is hardly noticeable in the Both polymorphs are monoclinic (space group P21/c) and their orthogonal axes accommodate the homochiral helices of azetidin-2-one moieties linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The b axis is considerably longer in (XIα) [7.629 (1) Å] than in (XIβ) [7.267 (1) Å], which is attributed to the different orientations of the O lone-pair electrons that accept the hydrogen bond. The hydrogen-bond arrangement may be either antiperiplanar (XIα) or synperiplanar (XIβ) with respect to the endocyclic amide bond of the planar β-lactam ring. The formation of (XIα) and (XIβ) from different solvents (methanol versus acetone) is facilitated by the almost perfect C2 symmetry of the 12-membered rings (Figs. 8a and b). A non-crystallographic rotation of the molecules through 180° around the molecular C2 axis tilted by ca 45° with respect to the twofold screw axis alters only the orientation of the O=C—N—H moiety. The polymorphs (XIα) and (XIβ) (Table 3), characterized by a high degree of isostructurality (unit-cell similarity index Π = 0.008, volumetric index Iv = 75%; Fábián & Kálmán, 1999), are again related by a non-crystallographic rotation of the β-lactam molecules.
2.5.3. Non-crystallographic rotations in oblique unit cells
2.6. Non-crystallographic rotations in alicyclic β-amino acids
We have seen that the isostructurality of cis-alicyclic β-amino acids [(XIIa), (XIIIa) and (XIVa)] is differentiated by a rotation of the (XVa) dimers through 180° around a non-crystallographic axis in their oblique unit cells (Fábián et al., 2005). We now show that these β-amino acids are also linked to their and unsaturated derivatives by other virtual rotations, as follows:
After successful syntheses and crystallizations, the study of the cyclohexane homolog (XIIIa) could be extended to its trans isomer (XIIIb) and their cyclohexene derivatives (XVIa) and (XVIb). Since they form each NH3+ moiety forms three hydrogen bonds of the OC type with carboxylic O atoms, one of which is bifurcated. Two infinite rows of the heterochiral R22(12) dimers of (XIIIa), depicted by the topological symbols in Fig. 9(a), are held together by two hydrogen bonds and crosslinked by the third hydrogen bond. In this two-dimensional network, two kinds of centrosymmetric tetramers, R44(12) and R42(8), furnish the lateral connections between the ribbons. A rotation of every second dimeric motif in pattern 8 through 180° generates homochiral dimers (Fig. 9b), which polymerize into antiparallel helices (Fig. 9c). In this stacking (pattern 9), the homochiral `triangles' are located around a twofold screw axis and linked together by two hydrogen bonds (dotted lines) with alternating orientations. The R22(12) dimers formed along the helices are free of symmetry. The enantiomeric helices are crosslinked again by the third hydrogen bond, preserving the alternating R44(12) and R42(8) tetramers from the pattern 8. The antiparallel helices held together by the tetramers of Ci symmetry form a layer perpendicular to the folded plane of 8. This novel pattern 9 is exemplified by three crystal structures, (XIIIb) and the cis–trans isomers of (XVI), described above.
A comparison of the structures [(XIIIa), (XIIIb)] and [(XVIa), (XVIb)] reveals an important relationship between them:
3. Conclusions
It has been demonstrated that several of the hydrogen-bonded crystal structures of disubstituted basic motifs (dimers, helices, ribbons and tetramers). They form a network which relates directly or indirectly to the packing patterns. This fact-gathering work was complemented by a small number of examples taken from the literature. Accordingly, involves the rotation of motifs which transforms one packing pattern into another and vice versa.
are related by non-crystallographic rotations of theirThe forms of
that have been observed were as follows:Although the present work still comprises predominantly fact-gathering, it ascertains that two or more crystals are morphotropes if their packing patterns differ only by one (or occasionally two) non-crystallographic rotation(s) of their common motifs. In other words, the packing patterns of chemically similar molecules with isometric shapes may be related by a few non-crystallographic rotations. In particular, cis and trans isomers, with a configurational difference, are able to form closely related packing patterns. Homostructural crystals may also show whenever the `second' layer rotates through 180°, or the whole pattern rotates through 180° in an oblique unit cell.
form crystals, the patterns of which differ only in a non-crystallographic rotation. It explains howThe most important discovery is the ) are enantiotropic, i.e. their reversible phase transitions are solvent-mediated.
of polymorphs. While two chemically similar (isomeric or homostructural) crystals are related by a virtual rotation of the common motif, such a non-crystallographic rotation between polymorphs really transforms one molecule into another. The four rather different morphotropic polymorphs described above (Table 3Finally, it is also noteworthy that the revealed forms of non-crystallographic rotations occur in the most frequent centrosymmetric space groups P21/c (12), (7), C2/c (3) and Pbca (1), followed by Pna21 (2) and Pca21 (1). Even their numbers (in parentheses) among the structures discussed above correspond roughly to the population (%) of these space groups archived in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; October 1997 issue; Allen, 2002): 35.4, 19.4, 7.2, 3.8, 1.54, 0.73%, as demonstrated by statistics reported earlier by Kálmán (1999). This observation once again underscores the fundamental connections between the most frequent space groups (Brock & Dunitz, 1994). This conclusion is substantiated by the variety (four) of close packing in the P21/c found between the investigated disubstituted Enantiomeric helices are crosslinked:
As far as the future is concerned, the author hopes that the differences in the crystal structures of similar molecules will be better understood from studies of non-crystallographic rotations, whenever they are recognized. Since such a study has not been made so far, a search for such rotations, hopefully in numerous crystals archived in the CSD, may be informative in crystal engineering.
APPENDIX A
Definition of the homo-, hetero- and antidromic rings formed by hydrogen bonds of the type O—H⋯O
The homodromic (A), antidromic (B) and heterodromic (C) rings for cyclodextrin hydrates defined in the book `Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures' (Jeffrey & Saenger, 1991, p. 38) may be seen in Fig. 11. These definitions for pentamers have been adapted for the tetramers observed in the structures discussed here.
APPENDIX B
Dipole via three forms of layer stacking
in antidromic ringsThe simplest stacking form is an overlap of the identical sub-patterns 7a and 7b (Figs. 12c and d), deduced from 3a and 3b (Figs. 12a and b) by a rotation of each molecule in their second row through 180°. They are held together by a twofold screw axis which leaves the ring dipoles parallel [polymorph (Vb)(p), Pna21]. Consequently, the antiparallel alignment of the domains cancels out the The second form [polymorph (Vb)(a)] is an overlap of the identical 7a and 7c (Figs. 12c and e) held together by a screw axis perpendicular to the dipole vector which leaves the ring dipoles antiparallel. To this form a non-standard Pn21a had to be ascribed (Kálmán et al., 2003). The third form – demonstrated by (IIc) (1R*,2S*,5R*)-5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxycyclopentanecarboxylic acid (Kálmán et al., 2001) – is an overlap of the identical sub-patterns 7b and 7c (Figs. 12d and e), held together by the twofold screw axes which are perpendicular to them.
Footnotes
1The original Russian issue was published by the Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in Moscow in 1955.
2This was a contribution to the A. I. Kitaigorodskii Memorial Issue on Molecular Crystal Chemistry (Hargittai & Kálmán, 1993).
3The cis and trans isomers are distinguished by bold a and b.
4To diminish the empty channels in the i.e. to increase the close-packing coefficient, the principal factor in Kitaigorodskii's realm.
5The main axis is defined by a vector between the remotest CH2 groups of the opposite cycloalkane rings.
6Nitrofurantoin also forms two monohydrates, described by Pienaar et al. (1990a).
Acknowledgements
The author thanks his colleagues for their invaluable help in the structure determinations (Mr Gyula Argay and Mr Csaba Kertész), evaluations (Dr László Párkányi) and presentations (Mrs Györgyi Tóth-Csákvári). Thanks are due to Professor Gábor Bernáth and Dr Zsuzsanna Cs. Gyarmati for the crystals. I wish to thank in particular my student Dr László Fábián, who helped me greatly in writing the papers cited above and with the ongoing evaluation of novel results in our efforts to solve the puzzle posed by Kitaigorodskii 50 years ago. Dr Zsigmond Ritoók (Professor of Greek and Latin at the University of Budapest) also deserves the author's thanks for the definition of the word `morphotropic' from the Greek roots. This work was supported by Hungarian Research Fund, grants OTKA T034985 and T049712.
References
Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Brock, C. P. & Dunitz, J. D. (1994). Chem. Mater. 6, 1118–1127. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Dahlén, B. (1974). Acta Cryst. B30, 647–651. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Desiraju, G. R. (2003). Nature, 423, 485. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Fábián, L. & Kálmán, A. (1999). Acta Cryst. B55, 1099–1108. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fábián, L. & Kálmán, A. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 547–588. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Fábián, L., Kálmán, A., Argay, Gy., Bernáth, G. & Gyarmati, Zs. Cs. (2004). Chem. Commun. pp. 2114–2115. Google Scholar
Fábián, L., Kálmán, A., Argay, Gy., Bernáth, G. & Gyarmati, Zs. Cs. (2005). Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 773–782. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hargittai, I. & Kálmán, A. (1993). Acta Chim. Hung. 130, 151–577. Google Scholar
Iitaka, Y. (1960). Acta Cryst. 13, 35–45. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Jeffrey, G. A. & Saenger, W. (1991). Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar
Kálmán, A. (1998). Bull. Czech Slovak Cryst. Ass. 5, 153–154 (Abstracts, ECM-18, Prague). Google Scholar
Kálmán, A. (1999). Magyar Tudomány, pp. 280–288 (in Hungarian). Google Scholar
Kálmán, A. & Argay, Gy. (1998). Acta Cryst. B54, 877–888. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Argay, Gy., Fábián, L., Bernáth, G. & Fülöp. F. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 539–550. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Fábián, L. & Argay, Gy. (2000). Chem. Commun. pp. 2255–2256. Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Fábián, L., Argay, Gy., Bernáth, G. & Gyarmati, Z. (2002a). Acta Cryst. B58, 494–501. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Fábián, L., Argay, Gy., Bernáth, G. & Gyarmati, Z. (2002b). Acta Cryst. B58, 855–863. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Fábián, L., Argay, Gy., Bernáth, G. & Gyarmati, Zs. (2003). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 34–35. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Fábián, L., Argay, Gy., Bernáth, G. & Gyarmati, Z. Cs. (2004). Acta Cryst. B60, 755–762. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kálmán, A. & Párkányi, L. (1997). Adv. Mol. Struct. Res. 3, 189–226. CAS Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Párkányi, L. & Argay, Gy. (1993a). Acta Chim. Hung. 130, 279–298. CAS Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Párkányi, L. & Argay, Gy. (1993b). Acta Cryst. B49, 1039–1049. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kálmán, A., Sasvári, K. & Kapovits, I. (1973). Acta Cryst. B29, 355–357. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Kitaigorodskii, A. I. (1961). Organic Chemical Crystallography, pp. 222–231. New York: Consultants Bureau. Google Scholar
Kojic Prodić, B., Nigović, B., Tomić, S. & Duax, W. L. (1992). Abstr. of the Annual Meeting of Am., 9–14 August 1992, Pittsburgh, p. 111. Google Scholar
Langan, P., Mason, S. A., Myles, D. & Schoenborn, B. P. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 728–733. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pannell, K. H., Kapoor, R. N., Raptis, R., Párkányi, L. & Fülöp, V. (1990). J. Organomet. Chem. 384, 41–47. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Pannell, K. H., Párkányi, L., Sharma, H. & Cervantes-Lee, F. (1992). Inorg. Chem. 31, 522–524. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Párkányi, L. & Henge, E. (1982). J. Organomet. Chem. 235, 273–276. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Párkányi, L., Hernandez, C. & Pannell, K. H. (1986). J. Organomet. Chem. 301, 145–151. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Párkányi, L., Kálmán, A., Pannell, K. H., Cervantes-Lee, F. & Kapoor, R. N. (1996). Inorg. Chem. 35, 6622–6624. CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Párkányi, L., Kálmán, A., Sharma, S., Nolen, D. M. & Pannell, K. H. (1994). Inorg. Chem. 33, 180–182. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Pienaar, E. W., Caira, M. R. & Lötter, A. P. (1990a). J. Cryst. Spectrosc. Res. 23, 739–744. CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Pienaar, E. W., Caira, M. R. & Lötter, A. P. (1990b). J. Cryst. Spectr. Res. 23, 785–790. CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Preut, H. & Huber, F. (1976). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 396, 92–96. CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
© International Union of Crystallography. Prior permission is not required to reproduce short quotations, tables and figures from this article, provided the original authors and source are cited. For more information, click here.