view article

Figure 1
Layer spacing against Ca/Si ratio for C-S-H(I) preparations. Data from: Matsuyama & Young (2000BB62) (unfilled circles); Matsuyama & Young (1999BB61) (unfilled dotted-line circles); Cong & Kirkpatrick (1996BB15) [filled symbols for `SCFUM' and `CSHFS' preparations except `CSHSF2' (unfilled triangle) and CSHFS0 (unfilled square); half-filled (right) symbols for `SEWCS' preparations]; Garbev, Beuchle, Bornefeld, Black & Stemmermann, 2008BB27 (+), compositions from Black et al. (2008BB6); Renaudin, Russias, Leroux, Frizon & Cau-dit-Coumes (2009BB80) (crosses); Taylor (1953BB99) and Taylor & Howison (1956BB106) (small unfilled diamonds); Grudemo (1955BB42) (filled triangles). Preparations that contain crystalline Ca(OH)2 are indicated with squares except for the filled square at Ca/Si = 0.79, which includes 16% Q3 Si. Trend-line data are indicated using white crosses (top line) and black crosses (bottom). The large bold unfilled diamonds represent the model structures developed in this paper; from top to bottom: T∞, T11, T5, T3 and T2.

Journal logoSTRUCTURAL SCIENCE
CRYSTAL ENGINEERING
MATERIALS
ISSN: 2052-5206
Follow Acta Cryst. B
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds